MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING APPLICATIONS IN UTERINE CERVICAL CANCER

Cervical Cancer Staging in Saudi Arabia Clinicoradiological Correlation

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the finding of pelvic MRI with clinical staging using cystoscopy and sigmoidoscopy for cervical cancer patients.

Method

We reviewed all patients with cervical cancer between January 2001 and December 2015. We correlate the clinical examination, cystoscopy, and sigmoidoscopy with MRI findings.

Result

A total of 152 patients were enrolled. 114 (74.9%) were with locally advanced cervix cancer. The true positives for MRI in the detection of parametrium were in 94 patients, with sensitivity, specificity, positive, PPV, and NPV of 72%, 82%, 96%, and 33%, respectively. The false negative of the MRI to detect the bladder invasion was 2. Nineteen patients reported having bladder invasion on MRI not confirmed by cystoscopy. None of the patients who had a negative rectal invasion by MRI were found to have rectal involvement by sigmoidoscopy with a specificity of 91%.

Conclusion

The combined MRI and clinical staging for parametrial evaluation should still be carried out for the staging of cervical cancer. However, in the absence of the bladder and the rectal invasion in the MRI, it will be safe to avoid the need for a cystoscopy and/or sigmoidoscopy for complete staging in the majority of patients with cervical cancer.

Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer

Improvements in the treatment of cervical carcinoma have made it possible to offer optimal and personalised treatment. Cervical cancer staging is based on clinical examination and histological findings. Many diagnostic methods are used in clinical practice. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the optimal method for staging cervical carcinoma because of its high accuracy in assessing local extension of disease and distant metastases. Ultrasound has gained increased attention in recent years; it is faster, cheaper, and more widely available than other imaging techniques, and is highly accurate in detecting tumour presence and evaluating local extension of disease. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound are often used together with computed tomography or positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography to assess the whole body, a more accurate detection of pathological lymph nodes and metabolic information of the disease.

MR staging of clinical stage I and IIa cervical carcinoma: a reappraisal of efficacy and pitfalls

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and pitfalls of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in preoperative staging of cervical cancer. MR imaging was performed to determine the tumor staging for 31 patients with cervical carcinoma emphasizing tumor size, parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion and lymph node metastases. Tumor size was 3.23+/-1.75 cm (mean+/-standard deviation) at MR imaging compared with 2.79+/-1.76 cm at surgical-pathologic evaluation. The discrepancy between the tumor size determined by MR imaging and the measured surgical specimens was consistent in tumors larger than 1 cm. In assessing parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion and lymph node metastases, MR imaging had an accuracy of 96.7 and 87%. In determining stage of disease and differentiating operable (< or =stage IIA) from advanced disease (> or =stage IIB), MR imaging had an accuracy of 83.8 and 96.7%. Pitfalls leading to staging errors included difficulties in differentiating cancer foci from surrounding tissue edema and excluding vaginal invasion in the presence of large cervical cancer. In conclusion, MR imaging is accurate in the evaluation of parametrial invasion and useful in the differentiation of operable from advanced disease. The ability of MR imaging to exclude vaginal invasion in the presence of large cervical cancer and differentiate cancer foci from surrounding tissue edema is not as reliable.