A different approach to the treatment of the lateral malleolar fractures with syndesmosis injury: the ANK nail

Mini Fragment and Small Fragment Screws are Comparable in Acute Syndesmotic Injury

Ankle fractures are often accompanied by syndesmotic injuries, contributing to instability and potential long term complications. Syndesmotic injuries are traditionally fixed with either small fragment (3.5-mm diameter) or large fragment (4.5-mm diameter) syndesmotic screws. With regards to the recent emergence of less prominent implants for ankle fracture, this study was set out to compare the outcomes of mini fragment screws (2.7-mm or 2.8-mm diameter) and small fragment screws in syndesmotic fixation. Eighty-seven patients with traumatic syndesmotic injuries were retrospectively included for this study. Forty-four patients underwent mini fragment fixation and 43 patients underwent standard small fragment fixation. After-treatment was similar in both groups. Primary outcome consisted of the incidence of malreduction and secondary dislocation within three months. Secondary objectives were the incidence of the overall complication rate and implant removal rate. In total, malreduction was observed in three patients (3.4 %) and secondary dislocation in two patients (2.3 %), with no significant differences between the mini fragment and small fragment groups. Mini fragment fixation demonstrated a significantly lower overall complication rate (2.3 %) compared to the small fragment group (16.3 %)(p = .030). Implant removal rates were similar between the groups (27.3 % for mini fragment and 27.9 % for small fragment screws). This study suggests that both screw types are effective for fixation of acute syndesmotic injuries, with comparable malreduction and secondary dislocation rates. Prospective studies with longer follow-up, including functional outcome, are needed for comprehensive insights into optimal syndesmotic screw selection.

Intramedullary Fixation Versus Plate Fixation of Distal Fibular Fractures: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide an update of the recent literature comparing clinical outcomes of surgically treated fibular fractures using intramedullary nailing (IMN) with open reduction and internal plate fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

A literature search reporting clinical outcomes after IMN or ORIF of the distal fibula was conducted on PubMed. Inclusion criteria consisted of original studies; studies focusing on clinical outcomes after IMN or IMN and ORIF published before May 11, 2022; studies with at least 5 patients; and studies reporting union rates, complication rates, and patient-reported outcomes such as American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Olerud-Molander scores.

RESULTS

Of 2,394 studies identified, a total of 29 studies (4 LOE-I, 2 LOE-II, 6 LOE-III, 17 LOE-IV) were included consisting of 1,850 IMN patients and 514 plate patients. The pooled mean age of IMN patients was 58 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 54 to 62, I2 = 42%) versus 57 years (95% CI, 53 to 62, I2 = 49%) in ORIF. Union rates for IMN patients revealed a 99% union rate (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.00, I2 = 20%) versus 97% union rate for ORIF patients (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.99, I2 = 0%). Studies that compared IMN with ORIF revealed no difference in union rates (risk ratio [RR] = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.02, I2 = 0%). IMN patients showed a 15% complication rate (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.23, I2 = 89%), whereas plate patients had a complication rate of 30% (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.46, I2 = 63%). When comparing studies with both treatments, IMN patients had a significantly lower risk of complications (RR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.82, I2 = 50%). The IMN group trended toward a higher mean AOFAS and Olerud-Molander score than the plate group by 4.53 (95% CI, -14.58 to 23.65, I2 = 85%) and 3.54 (95% CI, -2.32 to 9.41, I2 = 76%) points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Current literature reveals near equivalence in union rates and a markedly lower risk of complications when comparing IMN with plate fixation. While IMN patients had higher AOFAS and Olerud-Molander scores, these differences were not statistically significant. Notably, subgroup analyses indicated that rates of symptomatic implant and removal of implant were comparable between IMN and ORIF, which may indicate that wound-related complications were reduced in the minimally invasive IMN technique. While the high cost of IMN implants remains a barrier to their widespread adoption, the long-term benefits of reducing complications, specifically associated with wound complications in high-risk populations, may greatly improve quality of care for patients with distal fibula fractures. Additional research and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted to fully assess the long-term benefits and economic feasibility of using IMN fixation for distal fibula fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Lateral malleolar fractures Weber Type A and B: does percutaneous intramedullary screw confer a solid alternative to the traditional neutralization plate?

Purpose

To compare the clinical results, complication rates, and radiographic outcome between both methods of fixation of lateral malleolar fractures: lateral neutralization plates and intramedullary fully threaded screws.

Patients and methods

This prospective case series study involved 73 patients with fractured lateral malleolus of type A, B according to Weber classification, to whom internal fixation was performed by either lateral plate and screws construct (Group A) or intramedullary screw (Group B). All patients were followed up for 12 months at least, with an average follow-up time of 12.7 months.

Results

There was no significant difference in the functional outcome score between both groups. The intramedullary screw group had a significantly shorter operative time and time to full union (P<0.001 and =0.006 respectively). There was a relatively higher accuracy of reduction with the plate fixation group, but it was statistically insignificant. There was a relatively fewer complication rate with the use of intramedullary screw fixation compared to plate fixation.

Conclusion

The use of intramedullary fixation is a good alternative for plate fixation in low fibular fractures (Weber A and B). Although plate fixation provides an optimal anatomic reconstruction of the fractures, intramedullary fixation may have a lower risk of complications.

Intramedullary fixation of fibula fractures: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Distal fibula fractures are common injuries that often require open reduction internal fixation. Intramedullary fixation of the fibula has been used historically, and interest has been renewed somewhat recently, although there is limited data assessing outcomes after intramedullary fibular fixation. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the literature as it relates to the clinical and functional outcome after fibular fracture fixation using an intramedullary device.

METHODS

A literature review on Medline/Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane and Google was performed. In total, 1994 abstracts were reviewed of which 30 articles in English, German and French were included, all of which evaluated the clinical and functional outcome after fibular nail osteosynthesis.

RESULTS

Within the 30 studies, a total of 1116/1380 patients were treated with a fibular nail between 1986 and 2018. In total 11 different devices were investigated. Six articles compared fibular nail versus plate osteosynthesis and in five cases a prospective study was performed. The complication rate varied somewhat widely based on the implants used. The mean union rate was 99.1% with a mean follow-up of 19.0 months. In comparison to plate fixation the nail was superior in terms of complication rate in most studies. No unified assessment of functional outcome was used, and so comparison between studies was difficult. However, good and excellent results were obtained in 73%-100% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Current data on intramedullary fixation of the fibula is limited and suffers significantly from inconsistency in outcome reporting. It remains to be seen whether the potential advantages of intramedullary implants can both maintain the good results of other implants and improve on some aspects of more commonly used implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, systematic review.

Fibular Nail Fixation: Topical Review

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary implants have been used historically in long bone fractures with success. In recent years, a variety of intramedullary implants for the treatment of fibular fractures have been investigated. These various implants have not been assessed together in a cohesive manner. In this review, we assess implants used for intramedullary fixation of fibular fractures with respect to implant design and clinical results.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature review for intramedullary implants in fibular fractures was performed. All publications that assessed intramedullary fibular implants were reviewed. In total, 11 different intramedullary nails were found. Clinical results obtained from these studies were reviewed.

RESULTS

The intramedullary implants used for fibular fracture fixation generally fell into one of 3 categories: an unlocked longitudinal strut, an implant roughly equivalent to a large screw, or a more traditionally locked intramedullary nail. Reported clinical results were generally good, although inconsistent outcome reporting greatly limited comparison between studies. Complication rates varied with the implants but were generally low.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary implants for fibular fracture stabilization have changed over the years to improve stability. Although clinical results are limited, data suggest that these implants are safe and can potentially approximate more traditional implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review.

The Use of Modern Intramedullary Nailing in Distal Fibula Fracture Fixation

Background. Lateral malleolus (LM) fixation is necessary for unstable ankle fractures. Traditional fixation relies on the use of plates through a lateral incision, wound healing can be an issue for such incisions. A novel intramedullary (IM) fixation device has been developed that can be placed through a minimal incision. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of this device. Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who received IM fixation for isolated fibula, bimalleolar (BM), and trimalleolar (TM) fractures. Pertinent demographic information, operative factors, complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Results. Sixteen patients were included in the study with an average age of 59 years (range 35-86 years). Six patients presented with isolated LM fractures, four patients had a BM fracture with a syndesmotic injury, 2 patients sustained a LM fracture with an associated syndesmotic injury, 2 patients had a BM fracture, and 2 patients had a TM fracture with a syndesmotic injury. There was a 100% healing rate of the lateral malleolus without any cases of malunion or shortening. There were no cases of sural nerve or peroneal tendon injuries, nor any wound complications found. Conclusion. These findings demonstrate the safe and efficacious use of a novel intramedullary fixation device for fibula fractures with lower wound complications compared with published outcomes found with lateral fibular plating. The features of this device allow for reliable fixation of the fibula, maintaining length and minimizing wound issues. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Lateral malleolus closed reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary fibular rod using minimal invasive approach for the treatment of ankle fractures

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures are extremely common and represent nearly one quarter of all lower-limb fractures. Techniques for fixation of displaced fractures of the lateral malleolus have remained essentially unchanged in recent decades. The current gold standard of treating unstable fractures is with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), using plates and screws construct. This study evaluates the use of fibula intramedullary nailing based on minimal invasive surgical approach.

METHODS

Thirty-nine cases treated with fibula intramedullary nailing between the years 2014-2016 were retrospectively studied. A fibular nail was utilized for the treatment of various ankle fractures either as the sole method of fixation or combined with another method. Patient charts were reviewed for fracture patterns, comorbidities, quality of reduction, complications and additional surgeries.

RESULTS

Out of 39 cases in the study cohort, 37 were closed fractures while 2 had an associated medial malleolus open injury. According to Weber classification of lateral malleolus fractures, 20 cases were type B, 18 cases type C, and one case of a pathologic fracture type B like fracture. Quality of reduction was based on previously published criteria. It was determined to be good in 32 cases, fair in 5 cases and poor in 2 cases that were revised intraoperatively to plate fixation. Overall no systemic complications occurred. Eight patients have undergone additional surgeries, namely hardware removals. In two cases, the nail was later revised to a different fixation method: one case to a plate, due to secondary displacement at 2 weeks, and one to an intramedullary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis secondary to hardware failure and Charcot neuroarthropathy.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary fibular nail offers a satisfactory and safe procedure to establish good reduction and fixation of lateral malleoli fractures. It may be considered as treatment of choice for patients with soft tissue problems due to its minimal invasive approach. The current study shows that while good fracture reduction can be achieved, without major complications, more than fifth of patients, required secondary procedures, mainly hardware removals.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Intramedullary Fixation Versus Plate Fixation of Distal Fibular Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

Intramedullary fixation (IMF) has been described as a minimally invasive alternative to open reduction and internal fixation for operative treatment of distal fibular fractures in case of compromised soft tissue or severe comorbidities. The objective was to compare postoperative complications and functional outcomes of intramedullary versus plate fixation (PF) in distal fibular fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched for both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. A total of 26 studies was included, reporting on 1710 patients with a mean age of 51.6 years. Meta-analysis was performed on 8 comparative studies, including subgroup and sensitivity analyses on all outcomes. IMF was associated with significantly fewer wound related complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.25; p < .01), implant removals (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.93; p = .03), and nonunions (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.62; p < .01). No differences were found regarding malunion (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.17 to 1.21; p = .11) and the Olerud Molander Ankle Score for long-term functional outcome (mean difference, 9.56; 95% CI, 1.24 to 20.37; p = .08). Results of this study apply to a select group of patients, in which the advantages of minimal soft tissue damage by IMF are preferable to optimal fracture reduction by PF. IMF of distal fibular fractures resulted in fewer wound-related complications, implant removals, and nonunions compared with PF. Especially in elderly patients, patients with chronic comorbidity, and patients with compromised soft tissue, IMF may be preferred over PF.

Medial malleolus fractures: A biomechanical comparison of tension band wiring fixation methods

BACKGROUND

This study compared the biomechanical properties of three different fixation methods of tension band wirings, used in the treatment of medial malleolus fractures. The first method used an innovative "handmade bent pin" for cerclage fixation. The second method used a U-shaped K-wire to attach the cerclage to the medial tibial cortex. These two novel fixation techniques were compared with the traditional tension band wiring technique which is fixated to the bone by a screw.

HYPOTHESIS

Novel fixation techniques of tension band wiring provide stable fixation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study 27 artificial bone models, which medial malleolus fractures were simulated on, were used. Using an electromechanical test device, the force required to pull out each implant was assessed and compared.

RESULTS

This study found that; while handmade bent pinning resulted averagely 840.25N (range: 647-1066±118.72) and U-shaped K-wire fixation was 381.71N (range: 176-651±150.2) pull out strength, traditional tension band wiring indicated 871.33N (range: 549-1008±137.74) pull out strength.

DISCUSSION

Handmade bent pinning method provide similar results with traditional tension band wiring. Therefore, in suitable cases, it may be an acceptable alternative to traditional tension band wiring techniques when treating malleolar fractures. Although the outcomes of U-shaped K-wire fixation indicated lower than other two groups, the outcomes were comparable with the literature. So while performing tension band wiring, both handmade fixation systems may be used in certain cases. For Orthopaedic surgeons, it is better to know and think about these alternative handmade pinning systems created from simple K-wires during the surgery if needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Biomechanical trial.

The implants used for intramedullary fixation of distal fibula fractures: A review of literature

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures are amongst the most common surgically treated musculoskeletal injuries. Intramedullary (IM) fixation of the lateral malleolus had been attempted as early as the 1990s. In recent years, dedicated implants have emerged. This review evaluates the design characteristics of the technology used to perform IM fixation of distal fibular fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of electronic databases was performed. Medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text terms were used to optimise search sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

We identified 10 different surgical technologies for IM fixation of lateral malleolar fractures reported across 12 articles, including both improvised and custom-designed Orthopaedic implants. Most implants were inserted through percutaneous surgical techniques.

CONCLUSION

Advances in technology have improved the feasibility of intramedullary fixation as a treatment option for lateral malleolus fractures. The implants we reviewed had very diverse morphological and mechanical properties. Intra-medullary fixation may outperform extra-medullary fixation of the lateral malleolus, particularly in patients at high risk of soft tissue complications. Robust scientific evidence is awaited.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV evidence.

The role of intramedullary fixation in ankle fractures - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures are one of the most commonly occurring fractures in the elderly population. The overall incidence has been reported to be up to 184 fractures per 100,000 persons per year, of which 20-30% occur in the elderly. Medical co-morbidities, osteoporosis, suboptimal skin quality and poor toleration of non-weight bearing status all contribute to difficulties in managing these injuries in this population. Intramedullary implants are advantageous as they utilise smaller incisions, minimise soft tissue disruption and may allow early weight bearing. This systematic review aims to analyse the use of both fibula nails and talo-tibial-calcaneal (TTC) implants in the management of fragility ankle fractures.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature using the online databases Medline and EMBASE on 26th December 2015. Only studies assessing ankle fractures that were treated with either an intramedullary fibula nail or TTC implant were included. Studies must have reported complications, patient mobility status or a functional outcome measure. Studies were excluded if the intramedullary device utilised was an adjunct to plate fixation or where a variety of surgical treatments were included in the study. The included studies were appraised with respect to a validated quality assessment scale.

RESULTS

Our search strategy produced 350 studies although only 17 studies met inclusion criteria; ten assessed a fibula nail and seven assessed a standard hindfoot nail, a TTC implant. 15 studies were case series, the overall quality of the studies was low and only one randomised controlled trial was reviewed. The mean Olerud and Molander Ankle Score for fibula nail studies ranged from 58 to 97 and the complication rate from 0 to 22%. Two comparative studies reported a statistically significant increase in complication rate with plate fixation but similar functional outcomes. Studies assessing TTC implants reported a mean Olerud and Molander Ankle Score of 50-62 and complication rate from 18 to 22.6%.

CONCLUSION

The studies reviewed suggest that fibula nails may be capable of producing similar functional outcomes with lower rates of complications to plate fixation. TTC implants produce lower functional outcomes but this may be acceptable in a subgroup of patients at high risk or with reduced pre-injury mobility. However, the low quality of evidence reviewed, the variation in patients included, implant used and outcome scores measured restricts the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Further comparative studies are required to explore the role of these implants further.

Acute syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures: A review

Ankle fractures are among the most common fracture types, and 10% of all ankle fractures lead to accessory syndesmotic injury. An injury that is challenging in every respect is syndesmotic instability. Since the range of diagnostic techniques and the therapeutic options is extensive, it still is a controversial subject, despite the abundance of literature. This review aimed to summarize the current knowledge on syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures and to formulate some recommendations for clinical practice. Chronic instability and the operative osseous treatment of ankle fractures are not part of this review.

Intramedullary nail fixation of non-traditional fractures: Clavicle, forearm, fibula

Locked intramedullary fixation is a well-established technique for managing long-bone fractures. While intramedullary nail fixation of diaphyseal fractures in the femur, tibia, and humerus is well established, the same is not true for other fractures. Surgical fixations of clavicle, forearm and ankle are traditionally treated with plate and screw fixation. In some cases, fixation with an intramedullary device is possible, and may be advantageous. However, there is however a concern regarding a lack of rotational stability and fracture shortening. While new generation of locked intramedullary devices for fractures of clavicle, forearm and fibula are recently available, the outcomes are not as reliable as fixation with plates and screws. Further research in this area is warranted with high quality comparative studies, to investigate the outcomes and indication of these fractures treated with intramedullary nail devices compared to intramedullary nail fixation.

Surgical Treatment of Lateral Malleolar Fractures Using the Compression Cerclage System

Background Lateral malleolar fractures (Weber type B or OTA 44-B) account for 60% of all ankle fractures. To achieve anatomic restoration, surgical stabilization provides better results than conservative treatment. Various fixation methods are available to treat these fractures; however, the best method is still unknown. Our objectives were to present a new, useful, and efficient surgical technique for stabilizing lateral malleolar fractures and to analyze the outcomes of patients treated with the compression cerclage system. Methods The surgical technique consists of a Kirschner wire that is passed percutaneously and perpendicular to the fracture line, and a cerclage wire that is passed in a semi-circular fashion over the ends of the Kirschner wire on the lateral side of the bone, leaving loops on each side to allow bilateral compression while twisting both wires. We retrospectively evaluated patients treated with this technique, with or without additional fractures. Follow-up of <24 months and bilateral ankle fractures were the exclusion criteria. Fractures were examined clinically and radiologically in comparison to the uninjured side and were rated according to the criteria reported by McLennon and Ungersma. Olerud and Molander ankle score was used to evaluate functional outcome. Results At the final follow-up, 15 out of 21 patients (9 women and 6 men; mean age, 48.2 years [range, 19-78 years]) were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 5.16 years (28-129 months). Five patients had an isolated lateral malleolar fracture; eight had lateral and medial malleolar fractures; and two had trimalleolar fractures. At the final follow-up, 11 patients were rated good functionally and four were fair, and all patients were rated good radiographically according to the criteria by McLennon and Ungersma. Mean Olerud and Molander ankle score was 93.3 (range, 80-100). Conclusions The compression cerclage system provides good functional and radiological outcomes in patients with lateral malleolus fractures. This method is useful, safe, and efficient with minimum hardware. It can be applied through limited soft-tissue stripping, which is especially important in patients with a high risk for wound complications.

Intramedullary fixation of distal fibular fractures: a systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes

Background

Ankle fractures are extremely common and represent nearly one quarter of all lower-limb fractures. In the majority of patients, fractures involve the distal fibula. The current standard in treating unstable fractures is through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screws. Due to concerns with potentially devastating wound complications, minimally invasive strategies such as intramedullary fixation have been introduced. This systematic review was performed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of intramedullary fixation of distal fibular fractures using either compression screws or nails.

Materials and methods

Numerous databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar) were searched, 17 studies consisting of 1,008 patients with distal fibular fractures treated with intramedullary fixation were found.

Results

Mean rate of union was 98.5 %, with functional outcome reported as being good or excellent in up to 91.3 % of patients. Regarding unlocked intramedullary nailing, the mean rate of union was 100 %, with up to 92 % of patients reporting good or excellent functional outcomes. Considering locked intramedullary nailing, the mean rate of union was 98 %, with the majority of patients reporting good or excellent functional outcomes. The mean complication rate across studies was 10.3 %, with issues such as implant-related problems requiring metalwork removal, fibular shortening and metalwork failure predominating.

Conclusion

Overall, intramedullary fixation of unstable distal fibular fractures can give excellent results that are comparable with modern plating techniques. However, as yet, there is unconvincing evidence that it is superior to standard techniques with regards to clinical and functional outcome.

Level of evidence

Level IV evidence.

A modified technique for fixation of chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis using a wire and button

Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury accounts for 1% to 11% of soft tissue injuries of the ankle. Some acute syndesmotic injuries will fail to heal effectively owing to inadequate treatment or misdiagnosis, eventually resulting in chronic instability, which can destroy the stability of the ankle joint. Various surgical techniques have been described for fixation of the syndesmosis. Among the existing methods, the suture button has the advantage of allowing for physiologic micromotion at the syndesmosis by maintaining the reduction and preventing the risk of screw breakage. However, the "relatively" long suture between buttons can gradually relax under continuous loading, resulting in fixation failure, which we have termed electric wire phenomenon. In the present report, we have described a modified technique for flexible fixation using the Endobutton CL ULTRA fixation device by tricortical fixation, instead of quadricortical fixation, to allow for robust and reliable fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The modified technique is devoid of the concern regarding the use of screw fixation and can reduce the risk of displacement or elongation and skin irritation associated with the suture button.

Internal fixation of the fibula in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized and comparative study: plating versus nailing

AIM

Open reduction and internal plate fixation of the fibula is the gold standard treatment for ankle fractures. The aim of this study was to perform a prospective randomized study to compare bone union, complications and functional results of two types of internal fixation of the fibula (plating and the Epifisa FH intramedullary nail).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were: closed fractures, isolated displaced fractures of the lateral malleolus, inter- and supra-tubercular bimalleolar fractures, and trimalleolar fractures. This study included 71 patients (mean age 53 ± 19): plate fixation group (n=35) and intramedullary nail fixation group (n=36). In seven cases, intramedullary nailing was technically impossible and was converted to plate fixation (the analysis of this sub-group was performed independently). Two patients died and two patients were lost to follow-up. The final comparative series included 32 cases of plate fixation and 28 cases of intramedullary nail fixation. Union, postoperative complications and Kitaoka and Olerud-Molander functional scores were analyzed after one year of follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the rate of union (P=0.5605) between the two types of fixation. There were significantly fewer complications (7% versus 56%) and better functional scores (96 versus 82 for the Kitaoka score; 97 versus 83 for the Olerud-Molander score) with intramedullary nailing than with plate fixation.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary nailing of the lateral malleolus in non-comminuted ankle fractures without syndesmotic injury is a reproducible technique with very few complications that provides better functional results than plate fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (randomized prospective study).

Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair

PURPOSE

Recently, a new suture-button fixation device has emerged for the treatment of acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries and its use is rapidly increasing. The current systematic review was undertaken to compare the biomechanical properties, functional outcome, need for implant removal, and the complication rate of syndesmotic disruptions treated with a suture-button device with the current 'gold standard', i.e. the syndesmotic screw.

METHOD

A literature search in the electronic databases of the Cochrane Library, EMbase, Pubmed Medline, and Google Scholar, between January 1st 2000 to December 1st 2011, was conducted to identify studies in which unstable ankle fractures with concomitant distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injury were treated with either a syndesmotic screw or a suture-button device.

RESULTS

A total of six biomechanical studies, seven clinical full-text studies and four abstracts on the TightRope system, and 27 studies on syndesmotic screw or bolt fixation were identified. The AOFAS of 133 patients treated with TightRope was 89.1 points, with an average study follow-up of 19 months. The AOFAS score in studies with 253 patients treated with syndesmotic screws (metallic and absorbable) or bolts was 86.3 points, with an average study follow-up of 42 months. Two studies reported an earlier return to work in the TightRope group. Implant removal was reported in 22 (10%) of 220 patients treated with a TightRope (range, 0-25%), in the screw or bolt group the average was 51.9% of 866 patients (range, 5.8-100%).

CONCLUSION

The TightRope system has a similar outcome compared with the syndesmotic screw or bolt fixation, but might lead to a quicker return to work. The rate of implant removal is lower than in the syndesmotic screw group. There is currently insufficient evidence on the long-term effects of the TightRope and more uniform outcome reporting is desirable. In addition, there is a need for studies on cost-effectiveness of the treatment of acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic disruption treated with a suture-button device.

Which ankle fractures require syndesmotic stabilization?

Syndesmotic ruptures associated with ankle fractures are most commonly caused by external rotation of the foot, eversion of the talus within the ankle mortise, and excessive dorsiflexion. The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis consists of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, and interosseous ligament, and it is essential for stability of the ankle mortise. Despite the numerous biomechanical and clinical studies pertaining to ankle fractures, there are no uniform recommendations regarding the use of the syndesmotic screw for specific injury patterns and fracture types. The objective of this review was to formulate recommendations for clinical practice related to the use of syndesmotic screw placement.

Radiographic healing of conservative versus operative management of supination-external rotation II fractures in a smoking and premature weight-bearing population

The treatment of supination-external rotation II fibular fractures continues to be an area of debate. In the event of minimal displacement at the fracture, both surgical management and casting have been supported. This study aims to compare the time interval of radiographic healing in both the surgically and conservatively managed patient. Additional factors such as premature weight bearing and smoking were also examined. Fifty-two charts were examined retrospectively. This included 26 patients in both the surgical and conservative populations. Radiographs were examined for the presence of healing. Anterior-posterior, mortise, and lateral-view x-rays were examined. The presence of cortical bridging and a resolution of fracture line primarily on lateral view at the posterior spike were used to evaluate healing. The mean time for cortical bridging to occur was 89.38 days in the conservative group and 48.69 days in the surgical group. Mean times for healing were significantly longer in both smokers and patients who prematurely bore weight when treated in both the surgical and conservative populations. In the treatment of isolated fibular fractures, surgical intervention appears to offer a faster time to radiographic healing. Smoking and premature weight bearing are shown to prolong the time to radiographic healing in both the surgically and conservatively treated patient populations.

Ankle fractures

Although ankle injuries are common, it is imperative for the treating physician to be able to identify the mechanism of injury and accurately restore the normal anatomy of the ankle joint. Attention must be given to restoring the normal alignment and length of the fibula because of its dominant role in controlling talar stability. The medial ankle must not be overlooked, with the role of the deltoid taken into consideration. With a thorough understanding of the anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and fixation techniques, repair of the damaged ankle joint can lead to rewarding outcomes for the patient and physician.