Two-staged pancreatoduodenectomy with external drainage of pancreatic juice and omental graft technique

Application of omental interposition to reduce pancreatic fistula and related complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy: A propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The life-threatening complications following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and postoperative infection, are associated with leaks from the anastomosis of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although several methods have attempted to reduce the postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate after PD, few have been considered effective. The safety and short-term clinical benefits of omental interposition remain controversial.

AIM

To investigate the safety and feasibility of omental interposition to reduce the POPF rate and related complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

In total, 196 consecutive patients underwent PD performed by the same surgical team. The patients were divided into two groups: An omental interposition group (127, 64.8%) and a non-omental interposition group (69, 35.2%). Propensity score-matched (PSM) analyses were performed to compare the severe complication rates and mortality between the two groups.

RESULTS

Following PSM, the clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF, 10.1% vs 24.6%; P = 0.025) and delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (1.4% vs 11.6%; P = 0.016) rates were significantly lower in the omental interposition group. The omental interposition technique was associated with a shorter time to resume food intake (7 d vs 8 d; P = 0.048) and shorter hospitalization period (16 d vs 21 d; P = 0.031). Multivariate analyses showed that a high body mass index, nonapplication of omental interposition, and a main pancreatic duct diameter < 3 mm were independent risk factors for CR-POPF.

CONCLUSION

The application of omental interposition is an effective and safe approach to reduce the CR-POPF rate and related complications after PD.

Application analysis of omental flap isolation and modified pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (175 cases)

Background

To explore the application value of free omental wrapping and modified pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

The clinical data of 175 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively analysed. In total, 86 cases were divided into Group A (omental wrapping and modified pancreaticojejunostomy) and 89 cases were divided into Group B (control group). The incidences of postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications were compared between the two groups, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the potential risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula. Risk factors associated with postoperative overall survival were identified using Cox regression.

Results

The incidences of grade B/C pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, delayed bleeding, and reoperation in Group A were lower than those in Group B, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Group A had an earlier drainage tube extubation time, earlier return to normal diet time and shorter postoperative hospital stay than the control group (P < 0.05). The levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) inflammatory factors 1, 3 and 7 days after surgery also showed significant. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24, pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm, no isolation of the greater omental flap and modified pancreaticojejunostomy were independent risk factors for pancreatic fistula (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that age ≥ 65 years old, body mass index ≥ 24, pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm, no isolation of the greater omental flap isolation and modified pancreaticojejunostomy, and malignant postoperative pathology were independent risk factors associated with postoperative overall survival (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Wrapping and isolating the modified pancreaticojejunostomy with free greater omentum can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula and related complications, inhibit the development of inflammation, and favourably affect prognosis.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy With Delayed Division of the Pancreatic Parenchyma: A Novel Technique for Reducing Pancreatic Fistula

Objectives

To review our novel technique of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) with delayed division of the pancreatic parenchyma (DDPP) for reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

Background

The high operative morbidity and mortality rates after HPD remains a major issue. One of the most troublesome complications is POPF, which might possibly be caused by peripancreatic saponification due to long interval between pancreas resection and reconstruction, as most surgeons prefer a caudocranial approach, performing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) first and then hepatectomy (conventional HPD [C-HPD]).

Methods

A review of the patients undergoing C-HPD and HPD with DDPP was performed. Postoperative outcomes were compared. Multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk factors of POPF after HPD.

Results

One-hundred two patients comprised of 50 patients undergoing C-HPD and 52 patients undergoing HPD with DDPP. The interval between pancreas resection and reconstruction was significantly shorter in HPD with DDPP group than in C-HPD group (51 vs 263 minutes; P < 0.001). The incidence of POPF was significantly lower in HPD with DDPP group than in C-HPD group (32.7% vs 77.3%; P < 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing HPD with DDPP than in those undergoing C-HPD (32 vs 45 days). A multivariate analysis revealed that body mass index >24 kg/m2 and conventional (PD first) procedure were significant risk factors for POPF after HPD.

Conclusions

A novel technique of HPD with DDPP is a simple procedure and the optimal treatment choice to reduce the risk of developing POPF after this extensive surgery.

Wrapping the stump of the gastroduodenal artery using the ligamentum teres hepatis during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a center's preliminary experience

BACKGROUND

The present study aims to assess the preliminary outcomes of the effectiveness of wrapping the ligamentum teres hepatis (LTH) around the gastroduodenal artery stump for the prevention of erosion hemorrhage after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).

METHODS

We reviewed 247 patients who had undergone LPD between January 2016 and April 2019. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether LTH wrapped the stump of the gastroduodenal artery: group A (119 patients) who underwent the LTH wrapping procedure, and group B (128 patients) who did not undergo the procedure. The perioperative data from the two groups were reviewed to assess the effectiveness of the LTH procedure for the prevention of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) and other complications.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in the clinical characteristics between the two groups. The data from 247 patients were acceptable for analysis: 119 patients underwent wrapping, and 128 patients did not. The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (8.4% vs 3.9%), biliary fistula (2.5% vs 1.6%), intra-abdominal infection (10.1% vs 3.9%) and delayed gastric emptying (13.4% vs 16.4%) showed no significant difference between group A and group B. The 90-day mortality and 90-day reoperation rates (0.8% vs 0.8% and 5.0% vs 3.1%) were also similar between group A and group B. Furthermore, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage of Grade B and C occurred in 0 patients (0.0%) in the wrapping group, which was significantly less frequent than the occurrence in the nonwrapping group (7 patients; 5.5%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Wrapping the LTH around the gastroduodenal artery stump after LPD does not reduce the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula or delayed gastric emptying. However, this procedure has a trend of reducing the rate of PPH of Grade B and C after LPD and is simple to perform.

Feasibility of Hyaluronate Carboxymethylcellulose-Based Bioresorbable Membrane in Two-Staged Pancreatojejunostomy

BACKGROUND

Two-staged pancreatoduodenectomy with exteriorization of pancreatic juice is a safe procedure for high-risk patients. However, two-staged pancreatoduodenectomy requires complex re-laparotomy and adhesion removal. We analyzed whether using hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane (HCM) reduced the time required for the second operation and facilitated good fistula formation in two-staged pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Between April 2011 and December 2018, data were collected from 206 consecutive patients who underwent two-staged pancreatoduodenectomy. HCM has been used for all patients since 2015. Patients for whom HCM was used (HCM group; n = 61) were compared to historical controls (before 2015) without HCM (control group; n = 145) in terms of feasibility of the second operation (operation time, adhesion grade, and complications) and optimal granulation around the external tube at the second laparotomy.

RESULTS

The HCM group showed significantly shorter median operation time [105 min (30-228 min) vs. 151 min (30-331 min); p < 0.001] and smaller median blood loss [36 mL (8-118 mL) vs. 58 mL (12-355 mL); p < 0.001] for the second operation. Neither overall postoperative complication rate (p = 0.811) nor severe-grade complication rate (p = 0.857) differed significantly. Both groups showed good fistula formation, with no significant difference in rate of optimal fistula formation (HCM group, 95.1% vs. control, 95.9%; p = 0.867).

CONCLUSION

HCM placement significantly improved safety and duration for the second operation, while preserving good fistula formation.

Evaluation of preoperative risk factors for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage

Purpose

To investigate the risk factors for post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH).

Methods

The incidence, outcome, and risk factors for PPH were evaluated in 1169 patients who underwent pancreatectomy.

Results

The incidence and mortality rates of PPH were 3% and 11% in all pancreatectomies, 4% and 11% in pancreatoduodenectomy, 1% and 20% in distal pancreatectomy, and 3% and 0% in total pancreatectomy, respectively. Male sex [odds ratio (OR) 2.32], body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m² (OR 3.70), absence of diabetes mellitus (DM; HbA1c ≤ 6.2%; OR 3.62), and pancreatoduodenectomy (OR 3.06) were risk factors for PPH after all pancreatectomies. The PPH incidence was 0%, 1%, 2%, 6%, and 20% in patients with risk scores of 0 (n = 65), 1 (n = 325), 2 (n = 455), 3 (n = 299), and 4 (n = 25), respectively. The differences between risk-score groups 0–2 (2%) and 3–4 (7%) were significant (P < 0.05, OR 4.7). In patients who had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF; OR 31.7) and absence of DM (OR 3.45) were risk factors for PPH. There was no significant association between POPF and PPH after distal pancreatectomy (P = 0.28). The incidence of POPF post-pancreatoduodenectomy was 20%. BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² (OR 3.17), serum albumin < 3.5 g/dl (OR 1.77), absence of DM (OR 1.75), distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (OR 4.05), and carcinoma of the papilla of Vater (OR 5.19) were risk factors for POPF post-pancreatoduodenectomy.

Conclusion

Our study clarified the preoperative risk factors for PPH and recommends using a risk scoring system that includes “absence of DM” for predicting PPH.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00423-019-01830-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for Biliary Cancer: Strategies for Near-zero Operative Mortality and Acceptable Long-term Outcome

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) for patients with biliary cancer.

BACKGROUND

HPD is thought to be the only curative treatment for widespread bile duct cancer and for some advanced cases of gallbladder cancer; however, HPD has not yet been accepted as a standard operative procedure because of concerns over morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients undergoing HPD were retrospectively reviewed. The patient and tumor characteristics, preoperative treatments, operative results, and survival outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Preoperative biliary drainage and portal vein embolization were applied for all patients undergoing right-sided HPD or a left trisectionectomy. A major hepatectomy was performed in 42 patients, and a 2-stage pancreaticojejunostomy was selected in all the cases. The 90-day mortality was 0; however, 1 patient died because of a liver abscess 230 days after surgery. Postoperative significant complications (grade III or greater) and liver insufficiency were observed in 19 (37%) and 2 (3.8%) patients, respectively, and no abdominal bleeding events after the formation of a pancreatic fistula were encountered. The 5-year overall survival rate was 44.5%, and a significant difference was not observed between patients with bile duct cancer and those with gallbladder cancer. The operative procedure was switched to an HPD in 13 patients based on intraoperative findings, and the recurrence-free survival rate for these patients was poorer than that for patients who did not require a switch in operative procedure (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

HPD can be safely performed using the presently reported surgical strategies with acceptable short and long-term outcomes. A precise assessment of the extent of tumor spread might improve patient outcome.

Three hundred and sixty-eight consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with zero mortality

BACKGROUND

Only a limited number of reports have documented zero mortality in consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomy series. The aim of this study is to review and verify our management aiming to eliminate mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Three hundred and sixty-eight consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2002 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. During this period, in order to enhance the safety of pancreaticoduodenectomy, we have used a consistent strategy consisting of early ligation of the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery, mucosal sutureless pancreaticojejunostomy combined with external pancreatic duct stenting, conditional two-stage pancreaticojejunostomy, jejunal decompression using tube jejunostomy, application of an omental flap to cover the stump of the gastroduodenal artery, and careful postoperative drain management.

RESULTS

Major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) occurred in 20 patients (5%). Grade A/B/C pancreatic fistula was observed in 49/29/4 patients (13%/8%/1%), respectively. Reoperation and readmission was necessary in five and four patients (1% and 1%), respectively. There was no in-hospital or 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

To achieve zero mortality in pancreaticoduodenectomy, it is crucial to incorporate various strategies to minimize the degree of surgical invasiveness and the damage caused by pancreatic fistula with a meticulous approach to perioperative management.

Omental flaps reduces complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy are usually caused by a leaking pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. Omental flaps around various anastomoses were used to prevent the formation of fistula.

METHODS

We reviewed 147 patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy between March 2006 and March 2012. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the application of omental flaps around various anastomoses: group A (101 patients) who underwent omental wrapping procedure; group B (46 patients) who did not undergo the omental wrapping procedure. Perioperative data of the two groups were reviewed to assess the effectiveness of omental flap procedure in the prevention of pancreatic fistula and other complications.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in the clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. The incidences of pancreatic fistula (4.0% vs 17.4%), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (0 vs 6.5%), biliary fistula (1.0% vs 13.0%), and delayed gastric emptying (4.0% vs 17.4%) were significantly less frequent in group A. The overall morbidity (18.8% vs 47.8%) and hospital stay (8.3 vs 9.6 days) were also significantly lower in group A than in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Omental flaps around various anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy can reduce the incidences of pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage and delayed gastric emptying. This procedure is simple and effective to reduce the overall morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Wrapping in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Wrapping in pancreatic surgery involves the use of the omentum or falciform ligament (FL) to wrap the local retroperitoneal vessels, the pancreatojejunal anastomosis or the pancreatic section of distal pancreatectomy. However, there is no clear evidence that wrapping in fact provides benefits. We have performed a systematic review of the literature about this topic.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in the PubMed/MEDLINE database (1966-2012) for any language using various combinations of the following terms: wrapping, omental, omentum, pancreas, pancreatoduodenectomy and falciform ligament.

RESULTS

We selected 12 articles. Among five series that included a control group, only one obtained a statistically significant reduction in pancreatic fistula (PF) in the wrapping group and other series showed a lower percentage of post-operative haemorrhage in the wrapping group. In the seven series without control groups, a slight decrease in the rate of post-operative bleeding and PF was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the literature available at present, we cannot recommend the use of wrapping with omentum and/or FL in pancreatic surgery. Prospective randomized studies applying a systematic wrapping technique are needed in order to establish whether its use should be generalized.

Technical knacks and outcomes of extended extrahepatic bile duct resection in patients with mid bile duct cancer

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

Mid bile duct cancers often involve the proximal intrapancreatic bile duct, and resection of the extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) can result in a tumor-positive distal resection margin (RM). We attempted a customized surgical procedure to obtain a tumor-free distal RM during EHBD resection, so that R0 resection can be achieved without performing pancreaticoduodenectomy through extended EHBD resection.

METHODS

We previously reported the surgical procedures of extended EHBD resection, in which the intrapancreatic duct excavation resembles a ≥2 cm-long funnel. This unique procedure was performed in 11 cases of mid bile duct cancer occurring in elderly patients between the ages of 70 and 83 years.

RESULTS

The tumor involved the intrapancreatic duct in all cases. Deep pancreatic excavation per se required about 30-60 minutes. Cancer-free hepatic duct RM was obtained in 10 patients. Prolonged leakage of pancreatic juice occurred in 2 patients, but all were controlled with supportive care. Adjuvant therapies were primarily applied to RM-positive or lymph node-positive patients. Their 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 90.9% and 60.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that extended EHBD resection can be performed as a beneficial option to achieve R0 resection in cases in which pancreaticoduodenectomy should be avoided due to various causes including old age and expectation of a poor outcome.

Surgical management of infrahilar/suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma: an analysis of the surgical procedures, surgical margins, and survivals of 77 patients

BACKGROUND

Optical surgical management of infrahilar/suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma remains controversial.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 2006, 77 patients with infrahilar/suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma underwent curative surgical resections following our intention-to-treat strategy. The clinicopathological factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses with regard to the surgical procedures and surgical margins.

RESULTS

The surgical procedure included extrahepatic bile duct resection alone (EHBD; n = 17), major hepatectomy combined with extrahepatic bile duct resection (MHx; n = 26), pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD; n = 28), and MHx and concomitant PD (HPD; n = 6). Performance of MHx and/or PD in addition to EHBD increased surgical morbidity (p = 0.001). Among patients undergoing the four surgical procedures (EHBD, MHx, PD, and HPD), no significant difference was found in the incidence of positive overall surgical margins (53%, 65%, 46%, and 67%, p = 0.51) or long-term survivals (median survival time, 51, 27, 41, and 22 months, p = 0.60). A multivariate analysis revealed that perineural invasion (95% confidence interval, 1.1-12.3, p = 0.009), nodal metastasis (1.6-6.8, p = 0.001), and blood transfusion (1.1-3.9, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of a poor outcome. Perineural invasion was associated with positive radial margins (p = 0.045) and submucosal ductal infiltration (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Perineural invasion, rather than the type of surgical procedure, had a significant impact on surgical curability and survival of patients with infrahilar/suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma treated according to our intention-to-treat strategy.

Two-stage pancreatojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective analysis of short-term results

BACKGROUND

The morbidity associated with pancreatic fistula formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) still remains high. While theoretically 2-stage pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) is effective for preventing pancreatic juice enzymes from becoming activated by enteric contents, its clinical usefulness remains unknown. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the short-term results of two-stage PJ in PD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In PD cases with a narrow main pancreatic duct and/or soft texture of the pancreas, we performed 2-stage PJ; first an external tube pancreatostomy was performed, in which the tube was not passed through the jejunal loop, followed about 3 months later by second-stage reconstruction for PJ. Between 1998 and 2005, PDs with 1-stage and 2-stage PJ were performed in 53 and 99 patients, respectively, at our institution. Among the latter 99 patients, 13 (13%) also underwent concomitant right or extended right hemi-hepatectomy. In this study, the clinical records of these 152 patients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

After PD, a pancreatic fistula occurred in 58% of the patients undergoing 2-stage PJ; however, the fistula healed with conservative therapy in all but 2 patients who required surgical drainage for abdominal abscess. A second-stage pancreato-enteric reconstruction by PJ could be completed about 3 months after the PD in 89 of the 99 (90%) cases. Although the incidence of pancreatic fistula was 16% after the second-stage reconstruction for PJ, completion pancreatectomy was not needed in any of the cases. There were no deaths or other catastrophic events related to the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

While it is difficult to completely prevent pancreatic fistula formation after PD, a 2-stage PJ appears to be effective for minimizing pancreatic juice-related adverse events, especially in high-risk patients with a narrow pancreatic duct or undergoing highly invasive surgery, such as hepato-pancreticoduodenectomy.

Wrapping of skeletonized and divided vessels using the falciform ligament in distal pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

A pancreatic fistula is a major cause of morbidity in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP). A pancreatic fistula may expose skeletonized or divided vessels directly to pancreatic juice, creating a setting for vessel erosion and delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage (DIH). With the aim of protecting vessels near the pancreatic stump from potential pancreatic fistulas, we have adopted a surgical option by which these vessels are wrapped using a pedicled falciform ligament.

METHODS

After completing DP, the pedicled falciform ligament is spread out widely on major vessels exposed during resection near the pancreatic stump, and fixed to the surrounding retroperitoneal connective tissue. These procedures allow the complete separation of these vessels from the pancreatic stump. We reviewed the cases of 8 patients who underwent DP including these procedures.

RESULTS

The mobilization of the falciform ligament and the wrapping of the vessels were successfully performed without any complications. Although 2 patients (14.5%) developed pancreatic fistulas, DIH did not occur in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The wrapping of the skeletonized and divided vessels using a pedicled falciform ligament is simple and easy, and may be an effective prophylactic measure against DIH following DP.

Current surgical treatment for bile duct cancer

Since extrahepatic bile duct cancer is difficult to diagnose and to cure, a safe and radical surgical strategy is needed. In this review, the modes of infiltration and spread of extrahepatic bile duct cancer and surgical strategy are discussed. Extended hemihepatectomy, with or without pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), plus extrahepatic bile duct resection and regional lymphadenectomy has recently been recognized as the standard curative treatment for hilar bile duct cancer. On the other hand, PD is the choice of treatment for middle and distal bile duct cancer. Major hepatectomy concomitant with PD (hepatopancreatoduodenectomy) has been applied to selected patients with widespread tumors. Preoperative biliary drainage (BD) followed by portal vein embolization (PVE) enables major hepatectomy in patients with hilar bile duct cancer without mortality. BD should be performed considering the surgical procedure, especially, in patients with separated intrahepatic bile ducts caused by hilar bile duct cancer. Right or left trisectoriectomy are indicated according to the tumor spread and biliary anatomy. As a result, extended radical resection offers a chance for cure of hilar bile duct cancer with improved resectability, curability, and a 5-year survival rate of 40%. A 5-year survival rate has ranged from 24% to 39% after PD for middle and distal bile duct cancer.

Surgical management for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy

Although the mortality rate related to pancreatic surgery has been reduced recently, the postoperative morbidity is still high, because of various complications. Pancreatic fistula is one of the most common complications following distal pancreatectomy, and is generally hard to cure. Several surgical techniques and devices, such as the use of fibrin-glue sealing, stapler closure, an ultrasonic dissector, or an ultrasonically activated scalpel have been advocated to prevent pancreatic fistula. In the present review we provide an overview of several devices used for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy.

Omental flap in pancreaticoduodenectomy for protection of splanchnic vessels

Intraabdominal bleeding, the most life-threatening complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), most often is associated with failure of a pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis or with intraabdominal infection. We investigated whether placement of an omental flap around the splanchnic vessels in PD could reduce the occurrence of intraabdominal bleeding and other postoperative complications. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent PD at the authors' institution between January 2000 and October 2004 were enrolled in this prospective study. After dissection of the hepatoduodenal ligament, the major splanchnic arteries and the portal vein were covered by the omental flap. Preoperative condition, incidence of pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal bleeding, other complications, treatment mortality, and hospital stay were analyzed for interrelationships. The frequency of pancreatic fistula (20%) differed little from those in previous reports. However, intraabdominal bleeding was observed in only 1 (1.0%) patient, who was considered to have too thin a flap. No intraabdominal abscess was encountered. No mortality or complications occurred in relation to the omental flap. Thus, wrapping an omental flap around dissected splanchnic vessels in PD reduced postoperative intraabdominal bleeding and infection, but failed to prevent pancreatic fistulas.

Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate our strategy for hilar bile duct cancer and to elucidate prognostic factors and the surgeon's role in long-term survival.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Extended hemihepatectomy is recognized as a curative treatment of hilar bile duct cancer but is not always safe because of the risk of postoperative liver failure. A safe and beneficial strategy is required.

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive major hepatectomies for hilar bile duct cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Appropriate preoperative treatments, biliary drainage, and portal embolization were performed before major hepatectomies. The short- and long-term results of our strategy are presented and analyzed.

RESULTS

Biliary drainage and portal embolization were performed in 39 patients (67.2%) and 31 patients (53.4%), respectively. Major hepatectomies comprised 27 extended right and 22 extended left hemihepatectomies and 9 hepatoduodenopancreatectomies. Operative morbidity and mortality rates were 43% and 0%, respectively. There was no postoperative liver failure. The overall 5-year survival rate was 40%. Univariate analysis showed that residual tumor status, lymph node involvement, and perineural invasion were associated with patients' long-term survival. A surgical margin over 5 mm resulted in better long-term survival. The delay resulting from preoperative treatment was not detrimental to long-term survival. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement was the only prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our strategy, which includes preoperative biliary drainage and portal embolization, led to a reduction in the risks associated with major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer, and resulted in zero mortality. Surgeons should aim at complete clearance of the tumor with an adequate surgical margin to ensure optimal long-term survival.

Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate our strategy for hilar bile duct cancer and to elucidate prognostic factors and the surgeon's role in long-term survival.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Extended hemihepatectomy is recognized as a curative treatment of hilar bile duct cancer but is not always safe because of the risk of postoperative liver failure. A safe and beneficial strategy is required.

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive major hepatectomies for hilar bile duct cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Appropriate preoperative treatments, biliary drainage, and portal embolization were performed before major hepatectomies. The short- and long-term results of our strategy are presented and analyzed.

RESULTS

Biliary drainage and portal embolization were performed in 39 patients (67.2%) and 31 patients (53.4%), respectively. Major hepatectomies comprised 27 extended right and 22 extended left hemihepatectomies and 9 hepatoduodenopancreatectomies. Operative morbidity and mortality rates were 43% and 0%, respectively. There was no postoperative liver failure. The overall 5-year survival rate was 40%. Univariate analysis showed that residual tumor status, lymph node involvement, and perineural invasion were associated with patients' long-term survival. A surgical margin over 5 mm resulted in better long-term survival. The delay resulting from preoperative treatment was not detrimental to long-term survival. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement was the only prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our strategy, which includes preoperative biliary drainage and portal embolization, led to a reduction in the risks associated with major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer, and resulted in zero mortality. Surgeons should aim at complete clearance of the tumor with an adequate surgical margin to ensure optimal long-term survival.

Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate our strategy for hilar bile duct cancer and to elucidate prognostic factors and the surgeon's role in long-term survival.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Extended hemihepatectomy is recognized as a curative treatment of hilar bile duct cancer but is not always safe because of the risk of postoperative liver failure. A safe and beneficial strategy is required.

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive major hepatectomies for hilar bile duct cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Appropriate preoperative treatments, biliary drainage, and portal embolization were performed before major hepatectomies. The short- and long-term results of our strategy are presented and analyzed.

RESULTS

Biliary drainage and portal embolization were performed in 39 patients (67.2%) and 31 patients (53.4%), respectively. Major hepatectomies comprised 27 extended right and 22 extended left hemihepatectomies and 9 hepatoduodenopancreatectomies. Operative morbidity and mortality rates were 43% and 0%, respectively. There was no postoperative liver failure. The overall 5-year survival rate was 40%. Univariate analysis showed that residual tumor status, lymph node involvement, and perineural invasion were associated with patients' long-term survival. A surgical margin over 5 mm resulted in better long-term survival. The delay resulting from preoperative treatment was not detrimental to long-term survival. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement was the only prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our strategy, which includes preoperative biliary drainage and portal embolization, led to a reduction in the risks associated with major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer, and resulted in zero mortality. Surgeons should aim at complete clearance of the tumor with an adequate surgical margin to ensure optimal long-term survival.