The place of radiotherapy for localized invasive bladder cancer

A meta-analysis of randomised trials suggests a survival benefit for combined radiotherapy and radical cystectomy compared with radical radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: are these data relevant to modern practice?

OBJECTIVE

Treatment options for muscle-invasive bladder cancer include radical cystectomy or radical radiotherapy, and the prevailing choice varies by country. The ideal treatment would be a bladder-preserving therapy without compromising survival. The objective of this review was to compare the overall survival after radical surgery (cystectomy) with radical radiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, EMBASE, Cancerlit, Healthstar and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness. Authors of unpublished data were contacted. Randomised trials comparing surgery (alone or with preoperative radiotherapy) with radiotherapy were eligible for assessment. Three reviewers assessed trial quality based on the Cochrane Guidelines. Data were extracted from the text of the article or extrapolated from the Kaplan-Meier plot. The Peto odds ratio was determined to compare the overall survival and disease-specific survival. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis and treatment actually received.

RESULTS

No randomised trials comparing surgery alone with radiotherapy alone were identified. Three randomised trials comparing preoperative radiotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (surgery) versus radical radiotherapy with salvage cystectomy (radical radiotherapy) were eligible for assessment. These trials represented a total of 439 patients, 221 randomised to surgery and 218 to radical radiotherapy. Three trials were combined for the overall survival results, and one was evaluable for the disease-specific survival analysis. The mean overall survival (intention-to-treat analysis) at 3 and 5 years were 45% and 36% for surgery, and 28% and 20% for radiotherapy, respectively. Peto odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) analysis consistently favoured surgery in terms of overall survival. The results were significantly in favour of surgery at 3 years (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.30-2.82) and at 5 years (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.22 -2.82). On a treatment-received basis, the results were significantly in favour of surgery at 3 years (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.17-2.90) and 5 years (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.39-3.38) for overall survival, and at 3 years (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.06-3.65) for disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of this review suggests that there is an overall survival benefit with combined preoperative radiotherapy plus radical surgery compared with radical radiotherapy plus salvage cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, it must be considered that only three trials were included for analysis, the patient numbers were small and that many patients did not receive the treatment they were randomised to. It must also be noted that many improvements in radiotherapy and surgery have taken place since the initiation of these trials; therefore, the data may not be readily extrapolated to modern practice. Ideally, a new trial comparing modern bladder-sparing therapy with the latest surgical approach to this disease is required.

Surgery versus radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Muscle invasive bladder cancer is a serious clinical problem and is fatal for the majority of patients. Alternative treatments for this condition are radical cystectomy or radical radiotherapy. The choice of treatment varies according to the resident country. The ideal treatment would be a bladder preserving therapy with total eradication of the tumour without compromising survival.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to compare the survival after radical surgery (cystectomy) versus radical radiotherapy in patients with muscle invasive cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (July 2000), Medline (July 2000), EMBASE (July 2000), Cancerlit (July 2000), Healthstar (July 2000) and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (July 2000). Attempts to contact authors of unpublished data were undertaken.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing surgery versus radiotherapy were eligible for assessment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers assessed trial quality based on the Cochrane Guidelines. Data was extracted from the text of the article or extrapolated from the Kaplan-Meier plot. The Peto odds ratio was determined to compare the overall-survival and disease-specific survival. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis and treatment actually received.

MAIN RESULTS

Three randomised trials comparing pre-operative radiotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (surgery) versus radical radiotherapy with salvage cystectomy (radical radiotherapy) were eligible for assessment. These trials represented a total of 439 patients, 221 randomised to surgery and 218 to radical radiotherapy. Peto odds ratio analysis consistently favoured surgery in terms of survival. It was significant at 3 (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.10,4.07) and 5 years (OR = 2.40, 95% CI 1.35, 4.29) for overall survival and at 3 years (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.06,3.65) for disease-specific survival for patients that actually received the protocol treatment. On an intention-to-treat analysis for disease-specific survival, the results were significantly in favour of surgery at 3 years (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.06,3.65) but not at 5 years.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The evidence from this review suggests that there is no overall statistically significant benefit to radiotherapy or surgery ( with pre-operative radiotherapy) in muscle invasive bladder cancer in terms of survival, but the trends consistently favour surgery.