Discrepancy between stent deployment and balloon size used assessed by intravascular ultrasound

Balloon angioplasty optimization: should we measure balloon volume as well as pressure?

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence that measurement of balloon volume as a controlled variable in addition to balloon pressure has on the outcome of balloon angioplasty in an experimental model.

METHODS

One hundred and three segments of explanted normal porcine carotid arteries were obtained. Five were used as controls, and the remaining 98 were subjected to balloon angioplasty with simultaneous measurement of balloon volume and pressure. These arteries were randomized into two groups. In one group the endpoint of the angioplasty was determined by balloon pressure (pressure-limited group, PLG) and in the other group by balloon volume (volume-limited group, VLG). Pressure/volume curves for each procedure were constructed by continuous measurement of both parameters by a purpose-designed computer-controlled inflation device. The diameter of each arterial segment was measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and the ratio of the inflated balloon to arterial diameter calculated. Arterial appearances after angioplasty were recorded using IVUS.

RESULTS

The balloon volumes measured at the endpoint of angioplasty were significantly smaller in the PLG compared with the VLG (p < 0.001). Three types of pressure/volume curves were identified: A, B, and C. In the type A curves, IVUS identified fissures in 28% (17/60) and the examination was normal in 72% (43/60). In the type B curves, IVUS identified fissures in 44% (4/9), dissections in 22% (2/9), and the examination was normal in 33% (3/9). In the type C curves, IVUS identified fissures in 44% (4/9) and dissection in 56% (5/9) with no normal examinations. In undamaged arterial segments a very high correlation was achieved between balloon volume and the balloon/artery ratio (Pearson correlation = -0.979, R(2) = 0.957, p < 0.0001, n = 27).

CONCLUSION

The measurement of pressure and volume during angioplasty enabled the construction of pressure/volume curves that showed deviations from the curves obtained in air. The balloon volume results, and significant deviation of the curve shape from the control curve shape, predicted vessel damage, which was confirmed by the IVUS appearance of the vessel after angioplasty. When pressure was used as the endpoint of balloon inflation the balloons were significantly underdilated compared with the manufacturer's nominal sizes. These data indicate that monitoring of pressure and volume during angioplasty may provide an alternative method of predicting vessel damage.

Residual Stenosis Poststenting and Subsequent Decrease in the Proximal Reference Diameter Are Correlated:Excessive Axial Wall Stress Is a Plausible Explanation

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that edge restenosis in stented lesions might be due to an increase in axial wall stress in the adjacent proximal vessel segment by examining whether the proximal reference diameters of conventionally stented lesions are reduced at follow-up and whether this reduction depends on the degree of residual stenosis poststenting.

METHODS

The literature published in the past 5 years dealing with restenosis following implantation of standard stents was screened for the availability of (1) reference vessel diameters poststenting, (2) mean residual stenosis poststenting, and (3) mean reference vessel diameters at follow-up in the same patients or groups of patients. Data collected from 11 publications were pooled and used to compute the change in reference segment diameter over time. These differences were compared to the residual stenosis poststenting by nonlinear regression.

RESULTS

The reduction in the mean reference diameters over time and the mean residual stenosis poststenting appear to be strongly correlated (r2 = 0.838), which supports the idea that the evolution of a stenosis adjacent to a stent margin depends on the severity of the residual stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding indicates that edge restenosis might be due to excessive axial wall stress. It may also explain, at least partly, why edge restenosis is observed with catheter-based brachytherapy and radioactive or drug-eluting stents.

A morphological–mechanical explanation of edge restenosis in lesions treated with vascular brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Edge restenosis in stenotic lesions treated by implantation of a conventional stent followed (or preceded) by a catheter-based brachytherapy is often attributed to "geographic miss" (GM). We propose a complementary (or, possibly, alternative) explanation based on the concept that a clear postprocedural mismatch between the in-stent lumen and the normal (undilated) lumens of the proximal and/or distal vessel segments results in an excessive, damageable increase of axial wall stress in these segments.

METHODS

The possible poststenting situations at both margins of a stent are examined, and based on the presence or absence of an increase in axial wall stress, predictions are made about the lesion evolution. The concept is then also examined in the light of published observations.

RESULTS

None of the analyzed observations appeared to be incompatible with the proposed morphological-mechanical explanation.

CONCLUSION

From a mechanical point of view, optimal matching of the proximal and distal stent diameters to the corresponding normal diameters of the adjacent arterial segment is likely to reduce the rate of edge restenosis.

The value of intraoperative intravascular ultrasound for determining stent graft size (excluding abdominal aortic aneurysm) with a modular system

Since the introduction of endovascular stent grafts at our institution we have used intraoperative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to definitively determine stent graft size. In this study, expected stent graft size, based on preoperative helical CT scan measurements, was compared with the actual final size, based on intraoperative IVUS measurements. Between December 1996 and January 1998, 54 patients were treated with an AneuRxTM bifurcated stent graft. Preoperatively all patients underwent angiography and helical CT scanning. Expected stent graft size was determined according to these measurements. The final stent graft size was based on IVUS measurements acquired during the procedure. Differences in expected and final size were compared and follow-up endoleaks were also noted. Differences in diameter measurements between CT and IVUS were compared using the paired Student's t-test. Differences in expected and chosen stent graft length were compared using the McNemar's test for paired proportions of binomial outcomes. Our results showed that helical CT scanning overestimates diameter and underestimates length. This underestimation of length is explained by the tortuosity of the aorta and iliac arteries while using axial slices of the CT scan. The last-minute corrections based on the intraoperative IVUS measurements did not result in a high incidence of endoleaks at fixation zones. In our opinion, the possibility of making final corrections in the choice of diameter or length of the stent graft is the additional value of intraoperative IVUS.

Stent placement for treatment of renal artery stenosis guided by intravascular ultrasound

PURPOSE

To study the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during renal artery stent placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 22) with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis were studied with IVUS after predilation and after angiographically successful stent deployment (diameter stenosis < 10%). After predilation, IVUS was used to assess whether the balloon size selected angiographically was correct (discrepancy balloon-reference lumen diameter < 20%). After stent placement, IVUS images were assessed for (i) complete stent-vessel wall apposition; (ii) complete stent expansion (discrepancy stent-reference lumen diameter < 20%), and (iii) complete lesion covering by the stent. Modification based on IVUS included selection of a larger balloon, additional dilation, and placement of a second stent. Clinical outcome was based on blood pressure, amount of antihypertensive drugs, and glomerular filtration rate during follow-up of 3 months.

RESULTS

Stent placement and ultrasound imaging were completed successfully in 18 patients. After predilation, IVUS warranted the use of a larger balloon in five patients. After stent placement, incomplete stent apposition (n = 1), discrepancy between stent and reference lumen diameter (n = 3), and lesion distal to the stent (n = 2) seen on IVUS were treated with additional dilation in five patients and with a second stent in one patient. A larger balloon was used in three patients. Mean blood pressure and amount of antihypertensive drugs decreased (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In a number of patients, IVUS monitoring during renal artery stent placement resulted in additional lumen enlargement not considered necessary at angiography.