Magnetic resonance imaging and MR angiography of endoluminally treated abdominal aortic aneurysms

Multi-modal pre-post treatment consistency learning for automatic segmentation and evaluation of the Circle of Willis

The Circle of Willis (CoW) is a crucial vascular structure in the brain, vital for diagnosing vascular diseases. During the acute phase of diseases, CT angiography (CTA) is commonly used to locate occlusions within the CoW quickly. After treatment, MR angiography (MRA) is preferred to visualize postoperative vascular structures, reducing radiation exposure. Clinically, the pre- and post-treatment (P&P-T) changes in the CoW are critical for assessing treatment efficacy. However, previous studies focused on single-modality segmentation, leading to cumulative errors when segmenting CoW in CTA and MRA modalities separately. Thus, it is challenging to differentiate whether changes in the CoW are due to segmentation errors or actual therapeutic effects when evaluating treatment efficacy. To address these challenges, we propose a comprehensive framework integrating the Cross-Modal Semantic Consistency Network (CMSC-Net) for segmentation and the Semantic Consistency Evaluation Network (SC-ENet) for treatment evaluation. Specifically, CMSC-Net includes two key components: the Modality Pair Alignment Module (MPAM), which generates spatially aligned modality pairs (CTA-MRA, MRA-CTA) to mitigate imaging discrepancies, and the Cross-Modal Attention Module (CMAM), which enhances CTA segmentation by leveraging high-resolution MRA features. Additionally, a novel loss function ensures semantic consistency across modalities, supporting stable network convergence. Meanwhile, SC-ENet automates treatment efficacy evaluation by extracting static vascular features and dynamically tracking morphological changes over time. Experimental results show that CTMSC-Net achieves consistent CoW segmentation across modalities, with SC-ENet delivering high-precision treatment evaluation.

The Association Between the D-dimer Level at 1 Year After EVAR and Sac Diameter Change in Patients With Persistent Type 2 Endoleak

PURPOSE

Recent studies suggested that continuous clotting renewal in thrombi plays a central role in sac enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). We reviewed patients with persistent type 2 endoleak (T2EL) to estimate the impact of D-dimer level on sac enlargement.

METHODS

A retrospective review of elective EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm performed between June 2007 and February 2020. Persistent T2EL was defined as T2EL confirmed at both the 6 and 12 month contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) follow-ups. "Isolated" T2EL was defined as T2EL without other types of endoleak within 12 months. Patients with >2 year follow-up, persistent isolated T2ELs, and D-dimer level data at 1 year (DD1Y) were included. Patients with any reintervention within 12 months were excluded. The association between DD1Y and aneurysm enlargement (AnE), defined as a ≥5 mm diameter increase, within 5 years was analyzed. Among 761 conventional EVAR, 515 patients had >2 years of follow-up. Thirty-three patients with any reintervention within 12 months and 127 patients without CECT at either 6 or 12 months were excluded. Among 131 patients with persistent isolated T2ELs, 74 patients with DD1Y data were enrolled. During a 37 month median follow-up [25-60, IQR], 24 AnEs were observed. In the AnE patients, the median DD1Y was significantly higher than that in the other patients (12.30 [6.88-21.90] vs 7.62 [4.41-13.00], P=0.024). ROC curve analysis indicated that the optimal cutoff point of DD1Y for AnE was 5.5 µg/mL (AUC=0.681). In univariate analysis, angulated neck, occlusion of the inferior mesenteric artery, and DD1Y≥5.5 µg/mL were significantly associated with AnE (P= 0.037, 0.038, and 0.010). Cox regression analysis revealed that DD1Y≥5.5 µg/mL was correlated with AnE (P=0.042, HR [95% CI] 4.520 [1.056-19.349]).

CONCLUSION

A 1 year higher D-dimer level can potentially predict AnE within 5 years in persistent T2EL patients. AnE was considered improbable when the D-dimer level was low enough.Clinical ImpactThe present study suggests that a 1-year higher D-dimer level could potentially predict aneurysm expansion within 5 years in patients with persistent type 2 endoleak (T2EL). On the other hand, aneurysm expansion was considered unlikely if the D-dimer level was low enough.As there are many patients with T2EL who require regular follow-up, any predictor of future aneurysm expansion could be of great help in conserving medical resources. In patients with a low likelihood of future expansion, we might consider delaying follow-up, similar to patients with sac shrinkage.

Utility of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Aneurysm Follow-Up and Detection of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Repair

Objective

To assess the noncontrast two-dimensional single-shot balanced turbo-field-echo magnetic resonance angiography (b-TFE MRA) features of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) status following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and evaluate to detect endoleaks (ELs).

Materials and Methods

We examined four aortic stent-grafts in a phantom study to assess the degree of metallic artifacts. We enrolled 46 EVAR-treated patients with AAA and/or common iliac artery aneurysm who underwent both computed tomography angiography (CTA) and b-TFE MRA after EVAR. Vascular measurements on CTA and b-TFE MRA were compared, and signal intensity ratios (SIRs) of the aneurysmal sac were correlated with the size changes in the AAA after EVAR (AAA prognoses). Furthermore, we examined six feasible b-TFE MRA features for the assessment of ELs.

Results

There were robust intermodality (r = 0.92–0.99) correlations and interobserver (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97–0.99) agreement. No significant differences were noted between SIRs and aneurysm prognoses. Moreover, “mottled high-intensity” and “creeping high-intensity with the low-band rim” were recognized as significant imaging findings suspicious for the presence of ELs (p < 0.001), whereas “no signal black spot” and “layered high-intensity area” were determined as significant for the absence of ELs (p < 0.03). Based on the two positive features, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the detection of ELs were 77.3%, 91.7%, and 84.8%, respectively. Furthermore, the k values (0.40–0.88) displayed moderate-to-almost perfect agreement.

Conclusion

Noncontrast MRA could be a promising imaging modality for ascertaining patient follow-up after EVAR.

SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance

The Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) last published its comprehensive expert panel report of clinical indications for CMR in 2004. This new Consensus Panel report brings those indications up to date for 2020 and includes the very substantial increase in scanning techniques, clinical applicability and adoption of CMR worldwide. We have used a nearly identical grading system for indications as in 2004 to ensure comparability with the previous report but have added the presence of randomized controlled trials as evidence for level 1 indications. In addition to the text, tables of the consensus indication levels are included for rapid assimilation and illustrative figures of some key techniques are provided.

Ultrasonography for endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

People with abdominal aortic aneurysm who receive endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) need lifetime surveillance to detect potential endoleaks. Endoleak is defined as persistent blood flow within the aneurysm sac following EVAR. Computed tomography (CT) angiography is considered the reference standard for endoleak surveillance. Colour duplex ultrasound (CDUS) and contrast-enhanced CDUS (CE-CDUS) are less invasive but considered less accurate than CT.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of colour duplex ultrasound (CDUS) and contrast-enhanced-colour duplex ultrasound (CE-CDUS) in terms of sensitivity and specificity for endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, ISI Conference Proceedings, Zetoc, and trial registries in June 2016 without language restrictions and without use of filters to maximize sensitivity.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any cross-sectional diagnostic study evaluating participants who received EVAR by both ultrasound (with or without contrast) and CT scan assessed at regular intervals.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two pairs of review authors independently extracted data and assessed quality of included studies using the QUADAS 1 tool. A third review author resolved discrepancies. The unit of analysis was number of participants for the primary analysis and number of scans performed for the secondary analysis. We carried out a meta-analysis to estimate sensitivity and specificity of CDUS or CE-CDUS using a bivariate model. We analysed each index test separately. As potential sources of heterogeneity, we explored year of publication, characteristics of included participants (age and gender), direction of the study (retrospective, prospective), country of origin, number of CDUS operators, and ultrasound manufacturer.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 42 primary studies with 4220 participants. Twenty studies provided accuracy data based on the number of individual participants (seven of which provided data with and without the use of contrast). Sixteen of these studies evaluated the accuracy of CDUS. These studies were generally of moderate to low quality: only three studies fulfilled all the QUADAS items; in six (40%) of the studies, the delay between the tests was unclear or longer than four weeks; in eight (50%), the blinding of either the index test or the reference standard was not clearly reported or was not performed; and in two studies (12%), the interpretation of the reference standard was not clearly reported. Eleven studies evaluated the accuracy of CE-CDUS. These studies were of better quality than the CDUS studies: five (45%) studies fulfilled all the QUADAS items; four (36%) did not report clearly the blinding interpretation of the reference standard; and two (18%) did not clearly report the delay between the two tests.Based on the bivariate model, the summary estimates for CDUS were 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.91) for sensitivity and 0.93 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.96) for specificity whereas for CE-CDUS the estimates were 0.94 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.98) for sensitivity and 0.95 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.98) for specificity. Regression analysis showed that CE-CDUS was superior to CDUS in terms of sensitivity (LR Chi² = 5.08, 1 degree of freedom (df); P = 0.0242 for model improvement).Seven studies provided estimates before and after administration of contrast. Sensitivity before contrast was 0.67 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.83) and after contrast was 0.97 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.99). The improvement in sensitivity with of contrast use was statistically significant (LR Chi² = 13.47, 1 df; P = 0.0002 for model improvement).Regression testing showed evidence of statistically significant effect bias related to year of publication and study quality within individual participants based CDUS studies. Sensitivity estimates were higher in the studies published before 2006 than the estimates obtained from studies published in 2006 or later (P < 0.001); and studies judged as low/unclear quality provided higher estimates in sensitivity. When regression testing was applied to the individual based CE-CDUS studies, none of the items, namely direction of the study design, quality, and age, were identified as a source of heterogeneity.Twenty-two studies provided accuracy data based on number of scans performed (of which four provided data with and without the use of contrast). Analysis of the studies that provided scan based data showed similar results. Summary estimates for CDUS (18 studies) showed 0.72 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.85) for sensitivity and 0.95 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96) for specificity whereas summary estimates for CE-CDUS (eight studies) were 0.91 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.98) for sensitivity and 0.89 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.96) for specificity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates that both ultrasound modalities (with or without contrast) showed high specificity. For ruling in endoleaks, CE-CDUS appears superior to CDUS. In an endoleak surveillance programme CE-CDUS can be introduced as a routine diagnostic modality followed by CT scan only when the ultrasound is positive to establish the type of endoleak and the subsequent therapeutic management.

Evaluation and Coil Embolization of the Aortic Side Branches for Prevention of Type II Endoleak after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Objectives: Aneurysm shrinkage after EVAR is the strong factor of favorable outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), and type II endoleaks is the risk factor of no aneurysm shrinkage or aneurysm enlargement in the long term. In this study, we evaluate the aortic side branches relate to early postoperative type II endoleak, and performed coil embolization for those vessels for prevention of type II endoleak.

Methods: Patency and diameter of aortic side branches including inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar artery (LA) were evaluated in 56 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who were scheduled for EVAR. Coil embolization with Interlock was performed in 24 patients during EVAR for all patent IMA and LA with maximal diameter more than 2.0 mm. Computed tomography was performed one week after EVAR for evaluation of endoleak.

Results: In patients with IMA more than 2.5 mm in diameter, the frequency of type II endoleak was approximately 90% regardless of the number of patent LA. In case with patent IMA less than 2.5 mm or with 2 or more patent LA larger than 2.0 mm, the frequency of type II endoleak was 46 to 67%. Coil embolization for IMA was successfully performed in 15/16 patients (94%). Coil embolization of LA was performed for patent LA larger than 2.0 mm and 29 out of 45 LA (64%) were successfully occluded. There was no perioperative complication associated with coil embolization. The frequency of type II endoleak was significantly lower in patients with coil embolization than those without coil embolization (4.2% vs 58.9%, p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Patent IMA and LA in diameter larger than 2.0 mm were associated with type II endoleak one week after EVAR, and coil embolization with Interlock during EVAR is safe and effective procedure to prevent type II endoleak. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2016; 25: 321–328.)

Abdominal aortic aneurysm follow-up by shear wave elasticity imaging after endovascular repair in a canine model

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if shear wave imaging (SWI) can detect endoleaks and characterize thrombus organization in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) after endovascular aneurysm repair.

METHODS

Stent grafts (SGs) were implanted in 18 dogs after surgical creation of type I endoleaks (four AAAs), type II endoleaks (13 AAAs) and no endoleaks (one AAA). Color flow Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) and SWI were performed before SG implantation (baseline), on days 7, 30 and 90 after SG implantation, and on the day of the sacrifice (day 180). Angiography, CT scans and macroscopic tissue sections obtained on day 180 were evaluated for the presence, size and type of endoleaks, and thrombi were characterized as fresh or organized. Endoleak areas in aneurysm sacs were identified on SWI by two readers and compared with their appearance on DUS, CT scans and macroscopic examination. Elasticity moduli were calculated in different regions (endoleaks, and fresh and organized thrombi).

RESULTS

All 17 endoleaks (100 %) were identified by reader 1, whereas 16 of 17 (94 %) were detected by reader 2. Elasticity moduli in endoleaks, and in areas of organized thrombi and fresh thrombi were 0.2 ± 0.4, 90.0 ± 48.2 and 13.6 ± 4.5 kPa, respectively (P < 0.001 between groups). SWI detected endoleaks while DUS (three endoleaks) and CT (one endoleak) did not.

CONCLUSIONS

SWI has the potential to detect endoleaks and evaluate thrombus organization based on the measurement of elasticity.

KEY POINTS

• SWI has the potential to detect endoleaks in post-EVAR follow-up. • SWI has the potential to characterize thrombus organization in post-EVAR follow-up. • SWI may be combined with DUS in post-EVAR surveillance of endoleak.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Multislice Computed Tomography of Thoracic Aortic Endografts

Purpose:

To compare the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to multislice computed tomography (CT) for evaluating stent-graft placement in the thoracic aorta.

Methods:

Susceptibility artifacts in 2 different stent-graft systems (Talent and Excluder) were evaluated in vitro in 2 angulations (straight and 33° curved) using 3 different MRI gradient echo sequences (True FISP, 2-dimensional FLASH, and 3-dimensional Turbo FLASH). The size of the stent-related artifact was measured, and the relative stent lumen was calculated. In vivo stent demarcation, stent patency, and additional findings were determined in 13 patients (3 Talent, 9 Excluder, and 1 combined) and compared to CT findings.

Results:

In vitro, both endograft systems proved to be MR compatible, with the relative stent lumen value ranging from 82% to 100% in the straight configuration; in a curved model, the relative stent lumen value ranged from 56% to 92% with the 3D Turbo FLASH sequence, which provided the smallest susceptibility artifacts. The Excluder endoprosthesis caused significant signal inhomogeneity within the stent in a curved configuration. In vivo, MRI and multislice CT showed similar results, with CT imaging slightly superior in stent demarcation and MRI better in demonstrating thrombus. CT beam hardening artifacts were pronounced in the Talent system, while the Excluder device caused significant signal inhomogeneity within the stent on magnetic resonance angiography.

Conclusions:

Multislice CT and contrast-enhanced MRI are fast, reliable means of providing all relevant information for surveillance of fully MR-compatible stent-grafts in the thoracic aorta.

Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Follow-up with Noninvasive Vascular Elastography in a Canine Model

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of noninvasive vascular elastography (NIVE) to help characterize endoleaks and thrombus organization in a canine model of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular aneurysm repair with stent-grafts, in comparison with computed tomography (CT) and pathologic examination findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All protocols were approved by the Animal Care Committee in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council of Animal Care. Stent-grafts were implanted in a group of 18 dogs with aneurysms created in the abdominal aorta. Type I endoleak was created in four aneurysms; type II endoleak, in 13 aneurysms; and no endoleak, in one aneurysm. Doppler ultrasonography and NIVE examinations were performed at baseline and at 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up. Angiography, CT, and macroscopic tissue examination were performed at sacrifice. Strain values were computed by using the Lagrangian speckle model estimator. Areas of endoleak, solid organized thrombus, and fresh thrombus were identified and segmented by comparing the results of CT and macroscopic tissue examination. Strain values were compared by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

All stent-grafts were successfully deployed, and endoleaks were clearly depicted in the last follow-up elastography examinations. Maximal axial strains over consecutive heart cycles in endoleak, organized thrombus, and fresh thrombus areas were 0.78% ± 0.22, 0.23% ± 0.02, 0.10% ± 0.04, respectively. Strain values were significantly different between endoleak and organized or fresh thrombus areas (P < .000) and between organized and fresh thrombus areas (P < .0002). No correlation was found between strain values and type of endoleak, sac pressure, endoleak size, and aneurysm size.

CONCLUSION

NIVE may be able to help characterize endoleak and thrombus organization, regardless of the size, pressure, and type of endoleak.

Radiological Evaluation of Abdominal Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an alternative to open surgical repair of aortic aneurysms offering lower perioperative mortality and morbidity. As experience increases, clinicians are undertaking complex repairs with hostile aortic anatomy using branched or fenestrated devices or extra components such as chimneys to ensure perfusion to visceral branch vessels whilst excluding the aneurysm. Defining the success of EVAR depends on both clinical and radiographic criteria, but ultimately depends on complete exclusion of the aneurysm from the circulation. Aortic stent grafts are monitored using a combination of imaging modalities including computed tomography angiography (CTA), ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, plain films, and nuclear medicine studies. This article describes when and how to evaluate aortic stent grafts using each of these modalities along with the characteristic features of several of the main stent grafts currently used in clinical practice. The commonly encountered complications from EVAR are also discussed and how they can be detected using each imaging modality. As the radiation burden from serial follow up CTA imaging is now becoming a concern, different follow-up imaging strategies are proposed depending on the complexity of the repair and based on the relative merits and disadvantages of each imaging modality.

Stent fabric fatigue of grafts supported by Z-stents versus ringed stents: An in vitro buckling test

Stent-grafts externally fitted with a Z-shaped stents were compared to devices fitted with ringed stents in an in vitro oscillating fatigue machine at 200 cycles per minute and a pressure of 360 mmHg for scheduled durations of up to 1 week. The devices fitted with Z-stents showed a considerably lower endurance limit to buckling compared to the controls. The contact between the apexes of adjacent Z-stents resulted in significant damage to the textile scaffolds and polyester fibers due to the sharp angle of the Z-stents. The ringed stents did not cause any fraying in the textile scaffolds.

MRI assessment of thoracic stent grafts after emergency implantation in multi trauma patients: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of MRI for static and dynamic assessment of the deployment of thoracic aortic stent grafts after emergency implantation in trauma patients.

METHODS

Twenty patients initially presenting with a rupture of the thoracic aorta were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The deployment of the implanted stent graft was assessed by CTA and MRI, comprising the assessment of the aortic arch with and without contrast agent, and the assessment of the motion of the stent graft over the cardiac cycle.

RESULTS

The stent graft geometry and motion over the cardiac cycle were assessable by MRI in all patients. Flow-mediated signal variations in areas of flow acceleration could be well visualised. No statistically significant differences in stent-graft diameters were observed between CT and MRI measurements.

CONCLUSION

MRI appears to be a valuable tool for the assessment of thoracic stent grafts. It shows similar performance in the accurate assessment of stent-graft dimensions to the current gold standard CTA. Its capability of providing additional functional information and the lack of ionising radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents may make MRI a valuable tool for monitoring patients after TEVAR.

Prospective, intraindividual comparison of MRI versus MDCT for endoleak detection after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

This study compares MRI and MDCT for endoleak detection after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). Forty-three patients with previous EVAR underwent both MRI (2D T1-FFE unenhanced and contrast-enhanced; 3D triphasic contrast-enhanced) and 16-slice MDCT (unenhanced and biphasic contrast-enhanced) within 1 week of each other for endoleak detection. MRI was performed by using a high-relaxivity contrast medium (gadobenate dimeglumine, MultiHance). Two blinded, independent observers evaluated MRI and MDCT separately. Consensus reading of MRI and MDCT studies was defined as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated and Cohen's k statistics were used to estimate agreement between readers. Twenty endoleaks were detected in 18 patients at consensus reading (12 type II and 8 indeterminate endoleaks). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for endoleak detection were 100%, 92%, and 96%, respectively, for reader 1 (95%, 81%, 87% for reader 2) for MRI and 55%, 100%, and 80% for reader 1 (60%, 100%, 82% for reader 2) for MDCT. Interobserver agreement was excellent for MDCT (k = 0.96) and good for MRI (k = 0.81). MRI with the use of a high-relaxivity contrast agent is significantly superior in the detection of endoleaks after EVAR compared with MDCT. MRI may therefore become the preferred technique for patient follow-up after EVAR.

Real-time vascular interventional magnetic resonance imaging

Endovascular stent-graft placement is emerging as a promising alternative to medical and surgical treatment of patients with diseases of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta. Precise placement of the stentgraft, which is currently performed under x-ray control, remains, however, challenging as there are several shortcomings to fluoroscopic guidance beyond that related to the harmful effect of radiation exposure and nephrotoxic contrast media. While transesophageal echocardiography and intravascular ultrasound have been used as adjunct imaging modalities during endovascular stent-graft procedures to overcome the limitations of angiography, these techniques have not mitigated the need for fluoroscopy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance of vascular interventional procedures offers several potential advantages over fluoroscopy-guided techniques, including image acquisition in any desired orientation, superior 3D soft-tissue contrast with simultaneous visualization of the interventional device, absence of ionizing radiation, and avoidance of nephrotoxic contrast media. Magnetic resonance imaging is often used for pre-operative diagnosis of aortic disease and can provide all relevant information for the planning of endovascular stent-graft procedures as well as for accurate and immediate post-interventional evaluation. However, visualization of interventional instruments by MRI has proven to be the chief obstacle. This article will review current approaches that have been developed for depicting vascular instruments by MRI and will also discuss the first experimental experiences with MRI-guided endovascular stent-graft placement in a swine model of aortic dissection.

Diagnostic Value of Color Duplex Ultrasonography in the Follow-up of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysma

PURPOSE

To systematically review the findings of diagnostic value of color duplex ultrasound (US) in the follow-up of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of PubMed and Medline databases for English-language literature was performed to find studies published between 1991 and 2005. Studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of color duplex US with that of computed tomographic (CT) angiography were included, and analysis was performed of the detection of endoleaks and measurement of aneurysm diameter.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (39 separate comparisons) met the criteria and were included for analysis. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of color duplex US compared with CT angiography (with 95% CIs) were 66% (52%-81%), 93% (89%-97%), 76% (65%-87%), 90% (86%-95%), and 91% (86%-97%), respectively, for unenhanced color duplex US; and 81% (52%-100%), 82% (68%-97%), 58% (26%-90%), 95% (87%-100%), and 98% (91%-100%), respectively, for enhanced color duplex US. The sensitivity in the detection of endoleak was significantly improved with contrast material-enhanced color duplex US compared with unenhanced color duplex US (P < .05); however, no significant difference was found regarding the specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy between unenhanced and enhanced color duplex US (P > .05). Color duplex US was insensitive in measurement of aneurysm diameter compared with CT angiography in most situations.

CONCLUSIONS

Color duplex US is not as accurate as CT angiography and cannot replace CT angiography in the follow-up of endovascular aortic repair of AAAs. However, the use of contrast material-enhanced color duplex US resulted in improvement of diagnostic accuracy in the detection of endoleak and warrants further study.

Dynamic CE-MRA for Endoleak Classification after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

AIM

To evaluate the value of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) for classification of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients, between 2 days and 54 months after EVAR, were evaluated with CTA, MRI and dynamic CE-MRA. The additional diagnostic value of the dynamic 3D CE-MRA was evaluated by determining the ability of the dynamic series in pinpointing the site of inflow of an endoleak.

RESULTS

An endoleak was detected in 23 patients. Seventeen of the 23 dynamic series were technically successful (no disturbing artifacts limiting the diagnostic value). Using MRI our findings were: 2 type I, 6 type II, 1 type III, no type IV endoleaks and in 14 cases classification could not be made. The classification results for MRI plus the dynamic CE-MRA were: 2 type I, 12 type II, 1 type III, no type IV endoleaks and in eight cases classification could not be made. In six cases the dynamic MRA allowed classification of the endoleak, which was not possible with the non-dynamic images alone (p=0.091, Fisher exact).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study shows that dynamic CE-MRA can have additional value in the classification of endoleaks. Dynamic CE-MRA might obviate the need for diagnostic digital subtraction angiography and aid planning for intervention.

Transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts: current status and future directions

Aortic stent-graft repair has been widely used in clinical practice for more than a decade, achieving satisfactory results compared to open surgical techniques. Transrenal fixation of stent-grafts is designed to obtain secure fixation of the proximal end of the stent-graft to avoid graft migration and to prevent type I endoleak. Unlike infrarenal deployment of stent-grafts, transrenal fixation takes advantage of the relative stability of the suprarenal aorta as a landing zone for the uncovered struts of the proximal stent. These transostial wires have sparked concern about the patency of the renal arteries, interference with renal blood flow, and effects on renal function. Although short to midterm results with suprarenal stent-grafts have not shown significant changes in renal function, long-term effects of this technique are still not fully understood. This review will explore the current status of transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts, potential risks of stent struts relative to the renal ostium, alternative methods to preserve blood flow to the renal arteries, and future directions or developments in stent-graft design to prevent myointimal proliferation around the stent struts.

Endovascular Repair of Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Pre- and Postprocedural Imaging

Endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms is a safe alternative to conventional open surgical repair. Clinical success, however, is highly dependent on patient selection. Diagnostic vascular imaging has an essential role for this selection process. Following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), patients require long-term surveillance and again vascular imaging serves an integral function. This article reviews EVAR selection criteria and post-EVAR assessment and then discusses the imaging modalities used to evaluate these patients, namely multi-detector-row computed tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance imaging/angiography, duplex ultrasonography, and catheter angiography.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography of 8 Aortic Stent-Graft Models

PURPOSE

To report the systematic comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for evaluating 8 different aortic stent-graft models.

METHODS

MR angiography (MRA) was performed using a 1.5-T whole body system within 2 days of a CT examination (4 detector row scanner) on 8 patients with one of these stent-graft models: AneuRx, Endofit, PowerLink, Excluder, LifePath, Talent, Vanguard, or Zenith. Using a 4-point scale (maximum score 112 points), 4 independent readers (1 vascular surgeon and 3 radiologists) rated the impact of stent-related artifacts on the diagnostic quality of each imaging method for 28 parameters: length, diameter, collateral aortic side branches, stent-graft prostheses, and contrast. Each examiner also scored his personal diagnostic confidence with each stent-graft model.

RESULTS

The scores for diagnostic confidence in the CT imaging were 4 points for each stent-graft, with the exception of the LifePath (3 points). The diagnostic confidence in the MR images was mainly poor, with a median score of only 1; however, 3 stent-grafts (AneuRx, Excluder, and Vanguard) received > or =3 points. The total scores for comparative assessment were significantly different (p<0.05) between CT imaging (111.5) and MR (58.5). CT studies of all stent-grafts received >101 points, while only 3 devices acquired >80 points (AneuRx, Excluder, and Vanguard). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the reliability of the 4 readers was higher using the CT method. The total assessment scores of the stent-graft systems were related only on the different imaging methods (p<0.0001) and not to the different readers (p=0.983).

CONCLUSIONS

CT and MRI are fast, reliable means of providing all relevant information for stent-graft surveillance. Of 8 different stent-graft models, only 3 could be adequately assessed by MRA. Therefore, the potential advantages of the MR technique (e.g., use of minimally nephrotoxic contrast media, lack of ionizing radiation) are available only to a small proportion of patients.

MRA is useful as a follow-up technique after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms with nitinol endoprostheses

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether MR angiography (MRA) is a useful tool for the follow-up of aortic aneurysms treated with nitinol endoluminal grafts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 28 patients treated with nitinol endovascular stents to repair an aortic aneurysm with CT angiography (CTA) and MRA. Eleven patients (group 1) underwent an MRA after a positive CTA for endoleak was observed. Afterwards, 17 patients (group 2) were scheduled for both follow-up examinations. The kind of endoleak that occurred and the maximum aortic diameter were compared. The sensitivity of CTA relative to MRA for detecting endoleaks in group 2 was calculated. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were measured in the aortoiliac lumen at the arterial phase in, above, and below the endoprostheses. Student's t-test was used to compare aneurysm dimensions and SNR measurements.

RESULTS

Three type III leaks were correctly assessed at both examinations; however, CTA was less sensitive (50%) than MRA in depicting type II or unclassified leaks. No differences in aneurismal size were observed between the two examinations or between arterial SNRs observed in or out of the devices.

CONCLUSION

MRA can provide all relevant information necessary for the follow-up of patients treated with nitinol endoprostheses, and performs better than CTA in detecting endoleaks.

What is the significance of endoleaks and endotension

Endovascular repair has been used over a decade as a treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and has become a widely accepted treatment method with a low rate of perioperative complications. Endoleak, perigraft blood flow outside endograft but within aneurysmsac, has been intensively studied during the last 10 years of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVR). The natural history of aneurysms with endoleak and the true clinical significance of various types of endoleaks remains unclear. Type I/III endoleak has been found to be associated with aneurysm rupture, while the risk of rupture of aneurysms with type II endoleak and endotension appears very small. In endotension, the aneurysm sac remains pressurized, even if there is no evidence of an endoleak. Currently,it is accepted that type I/III endoleaks should be corrected, preferably by endovascular means, due to the risk of rupture. If endovascular repair is not possible, then open conversion should be considered. The risk of conversion should be weighed against the risk of aneurysm rupture. Treatment of type II endoleaks and endotension is more controversial. In those with aneurysm enlargement,secondary interventions are often performed.

Postoperative radiology of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

This article addresses the imaging appearances following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). EVAR is gaining popularity and hence there is increasing likelihood that radiologists who are unfamiliar with the procedure will report imaging investigations on these patients. We describe the technique, failure modes, complications, and postoperative imaging features of this procedure.

Magnetic resonance imaging for planning aortic endograft procedures

Patients with aortic aneurysms and renal insufficiency are at an increased risk when conventional imaging modalities (contrast enhancing computed tomography and arteriography) are used for aortic endograft design. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a nonionizing, noninvasive alternative to standard measurement techniques. Reliable diameter and length measurements can be obtained with MRI at a computer workstation without the use of iodinated radiologic contrast agents. The authors describe their experience with the use of magnetic resonance angiography as the sole imaging modality for aortic endograft design. Although not without limitations, MRI can be an effective measurement tool, particularly in patients who are at high risk of complications related to conventional imaging.

Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography as a noninvasive method to characterize endoleaks: initial results compared with conventional angiography

PURPOSE

Several types of endoleaks have been described, each with different methods of treatment. Conventional arteriography is widely regarded as the gold standard for the classification of endoleaks. Recently, faster magnetic resonance gradients have allowed for rapid data acquisition and review of vascular studies as a real-time continuous angiogram (time resolved magnetic resonance angiography [TR-MRA]). This study was performed to compare the findings of TR-MRA with conventional angiography for the characterization of endoleaks.

METHODS

Between June 2002 and June 2003, 12 patients with documented endoleaks following endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms (10 abdominal and two thoracic) underwent TR-MRA to identify and characterize the endoleak. All patients had nitinol-based aortic stent grafts. MRA was performed on a 1.5-Tesla magnet (Sonata class; Siemens Medical Systems, Iselin, NJ). The TR-MRA studies were reviewed under continuous observation as a "cine MR angiogram." These MRA data sets were used to classify the endoleaks into types 1 through 3. The patients underwent conventional angiography following the MRA to confirm the findings and to plan treatment. The MRA findings were compared with the findings made at conventional arteriography.

RESULTS

TR-MRA identified seven patients with type 1 leaks, including four proximal and three distal. Four patients had type 2 leaks, including two arising from the inferior mesenteric artery and two from an iliolumbar artery. One patient had a type 3 leak. Conventional angiography confirmed the type of endoleak in all 12 patients.

CONCLUSION

These initial results demonstrate TR-MRA to be an effective noninvasive method for classifying endoleaks. This technique may allow for screening of patients with endoleaks to identify those requiring urgent repair.

Thoracic aortic stent graft: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CT angiography in the follow-up: initial results

The objective of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) and multislice computed tomographic angiography (MS CTA) in the follow-up of thoracic stent-graft placement. The CE MRA and MS CTA were performed following nitinol stent-graft treatment due to thoracic aneurysm ( n=4), intramural bleeding ( n=2) and type-B aortic dissection ( n=5). Corresponding evaluation of arterial-phase imaging characteristics focused on the stent-graft morphology and leakage assessment. Stent-graft and aneurysm extensions were comparable between both techniques. Complete exclusion (aneurysm, n=4; dissection, n=2) was assessed with high confidence with CE MRA and MS CTA. Incomplete exclusion (intramural bleeding, n=2; dissection, n=3) was assigned to lower confidence scores on CE MRA compared with MS CTA. On CE MRA the stent-graft lumen demonstrated an inhomogeneous signal, the stent struts could not be assessed. The CE MRA can be used as alternative non-invasive imaging for follow-up of nitinol stent grafts. Arterial-phase leak assessment can be less evident in CE MRA compared with MS CTA studies; therefore, the use of late-phase imaging seems to be necessary. The diagnostic gap of stent-graft fracture evaluation using MRA may be filled with plain radiographs.

MR imaging for the detection of endoleaks in recipients of abdominal aortic stent-grafts with low magnetic susceptibility

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to assess the efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection of endoleaks in recipients of abdominal aortic stent-grafts with low magnetic susceptibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective search was conducted in radiology department records for cases of patients with low-susceptibility stent-grafts who had been evaluated with MR imaging and either computed tomography (CT) or conventional angiography within a 1-month time frame. Any endoleaks previously confirmed and classified with the use of CT and/or conventional angiography were compared with findings from MR imaging.

RESULTS

Nine patients fit the selection criteria. Images of five of those patients depicted six different endoleaks. Two endoleaks had been confirmed with CT, another two had been confirmed with CT and angiography, and two had been confirmed with angiography alone. All endoleaks visualized at CT and/or angiography were accurately detected and classified also with MR imaging. In some cases, the endoleak was more clearly visualized with MR imaging than with CT. In four patients in whom no endoleaks were found at CT, MR imaging also indicated no endoleaks.

CONCLUSION

MR imaging is a suitable modality for identifying endoleaks in patients with low-susceptibility stent-grafts. Moreover, MR imaging may be more sensitive than CT for the detection of small endoleaks.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for aortic stent-graft surveillance

PURPOSE

To compare unenhanced and enhanced ultrasound imaging to computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for surveillance of aortic endografts.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (29 men; mean age 69 years, range 50-82) who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair agreed to participate in a follow-up program. Patients underwent CTA (26/30) or MRA (4/30), plain abdominal radiography, and unenhanced and enhanced ultrasound examinations at 3, 12, and 24 months to evaluate aneurysm diameter, endoleaks, and graft patency. The accuracy of ultrasound was compared with CTA or MRA as the reference standards.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients reached the 24-month assessment (mean follow-up 30 months, range 6-60). All endoleaks detected by CTA or MRA were confirmed by enhanced ultrasound; the aneurysm diameter in these patients remained unchanged or increased. In patients without endoleaks on any imaging method, the sac diameter remained unchanged or decreased. Endoleaks disclosed by enhanced ultrasound alone, all type II, numbered 16 at 3 months, 6 at 12 months, and 3 at 24 months. In this group, the aneurysm diameter remained unchanged or increased. Enhanced ultrasound yielded 100% sensitivity in detecting endoleaks, but compared with CTA and MRA, all endoleaks detected by enhanced ultrasound alone were false positives (mean specificity 65%). Nevertheless, because changes in the postoperative aneurysm diameter were similar in patients with endoleaks detectable on CTA/MRA and on enhanced ultrasound ("true positives") and in those with endoleaks detectable only on enhanced ultrasound ("false positives"), some endoleaks were possibly "true positive" results.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced ultrasound is a useful method in the long-term surveillance of endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs, possibly in association with CTA or MRA. Enhanced ultrasound also seems able to identify endoleaks missed by other imaging techniques, but this conclusion awaits further investigation.

Elective endovascular stent-graft repair of atherosclerotic thoracic aortic aneurysms: clinical results and midterm follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and midterm results after endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic thoracic aortic aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight consecutive patients who were 53-82 years old (mean age, 71.6 years) were treated with a commercially available endoprosthesis. Subclavian transposition or bypass surgery was performed before the procedure in eight patients. Size dynamics of the aneurysms were analyzed on the basis of diameter and thrombus volume measurements obtained on three-dimensional CT reconstructions before hospital discharge (n = 22) and at the 1-year (n = 22), 2-year (n = 12), and 3-year (n = 5) follow-ups.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%. There was no 30-day mortality. None of the patients had symptoms due to spinal cord ischemia. The survival rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 96.1%, 90.9%, and 80.2%, respectively. During the perioperative period, patients presented with leukocytosis (37%), fever (36%), elevated C-reactive protein value (92%), pleural effusion (50%), and periaortic atelectasis (41%). Three early type I endoleaks sealed spontaneously. Three early type II endoleaks persisted over time, and one late type II endoleak was detected. In patients with type II endoleaks, thrombus volume of the aneurysms was constant (n = 2) or increased (n = 2). In patients without endoleaks, mean thrombus volume decreased (-53.2 +/- 56.8 mL, -40%) significantly (p = 0.001) during the first year. There was no significant interval decrease between the 1- and 2-year follow-ups (mean, -2.4 mL, p = 0.92) and between the 2- and 3-year follow-ups (mean, -0.4 mL, p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic thoracic aortic aneurysms may result in a substantial reduction of the aneurysm sac in patients without endoleaks.

Risk factors of early and late complications in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVES

to identify pre-operative factors that could predict complications following from transluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

during a 5-year period, 96 consecutive patients underwent elective endovascular treatment of a AAA. In all patients, helical CT and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and plain abdominal roentgenogram were performed at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and yearly thereafter. Angiography was performed systematically 1 year after the stent-graft implantation, or earlier if helical CT or MRI diagnosed an increase in the maximal transverse diameter or a high flow endoleak.

RESULTS

early (<30 days) morbidity (12%) was significantly increased by pre-operative renal insufficiency (p < 0.01). Early mortality (2%) correlated with ASA score (p = 0.01). Median follow-up was 27 months (range 3-66). Mortality (12%) during follow-up was correlated to the pre-operative coronary status (p = 0.01). A type I endoleak was diagnosed in 18 patients (19%). Common iliac artery diameter was correlated with the presence of type I endoleak (p < 0.001). A type II endoleak was diagnosed in 47 (49%) patients. The diagnostic of type II endoleak was significantly increased (p = 0.001) in patients with pre-operative patent IMA associated with more than four patent lumbar arteries. The anatomic characteristics of the aneurysm were correlated to the additional endovascular procedures during stentgraft implantation (p = 0.01), and to the implantation of a complementary iliac limb extension during follow-up (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

the risk factors determined by this statistical analysis could help surgeons to select more accurately patients suitable for endovascular treatment.

Imaging of aortic stent-grafts and endoleaks

Although the technical success of stent-graft implantation is established and relatively safe, data on the long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular repair are just emerging. Because several late complications of aortic stent-graft placement have been observed, life-long follow-up remains essential. Imaging methods form an integral part of every stage of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The current imaging strategy should include initial plain films, CT angiography, and color-coded Duplex sonography. Plain films are an excellent means to detect migration, angulation, kinking, and structural changes of the stent mesh, including material fatigue, at follow-up. Helical CT angiography is considered a potentially revolutionary method for the noninvasive complete postprocedural assessment of aortic sten-grafting. Current data justify the use of biphasic C angiography as the postprocedural imaging technique of choice in most patients [118]. Ultrasound offers the advantages of low cost and lack of radiation exposure. High-quality ultrasound reliably excludes endoleaks in patients after stent-grafting of AAAs. There is a substantial variability, however, in measuring the diameter of aneurysm sacs; thus, confirmation using an alternative study is prudent in cases that demonstrate a significant change in size during follow-up. MR angiography serves as an attractive alternative to CT angiography in patients with impaired renal function or known allergic reaction to iodinated contrast media. With current techniques, the visualization of aortic stent-grafts (with the exception of stainless-steel-based devices) is sufficient with MR angiography. There is evidence that MR imaging is superior to CT angiography in detecting small type 2 endoleaks or for excluding retrograde perfusion in patients with suspected endotension. The role of diagnostic catheter angiography is limited to assessment of vascular pathways in equivocal cases or for suspected endotension. Currently, a consensus view about postprocedural management after aortic stent-graft implantation is lacking. The authors propose performing a baseline CT angiography at discharge and a biphasic CT angiography and Duplex ultrasound scan at three months. In patients with no evidence of an endoleak, CT angiography, plain film and Duplex sonography (abdomen) should be repeated every year after endovascular repair. If an endoleak is present at follow-up, immediate appropriate treatment should be initiated.

Vertebral body infarction indicating midthoracic spinal stroke

STUDY DESIGN

Case report.

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate the significance of vertebral body infarction as the only confirmatory sign of spinal cord ischemic stroke.

SETTING

Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Bochum, Germany.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 65-year-old man presented with clinical features suggesting spontaneous spinal cord infarction in the territory of the left sulcocommissural artery at the level of Th 8. Sequential magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) investigations failed to demonstrate infarction of the spinal cord but T2-weighted images revealed bone marrow hyperintensities of vertebra Th 9 and 10 in their left and dorsal parts consistent with vertebral body infarction.

CONCLUSION

In clinically presumed spontaneous spinal cord infarction and unremarkable signaling of the spinal cord during sequential MRI investigations vertebral body infarction may serve as the only confirmatory sign of spinal cord ischemic stroke.

Endovascular aneurysm repair: Magnetic resonance monitoring of histological organization processes in the excluded aneurysm

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to systematically analyze the histopathologic organization processes in excluded aneurysms after endovascular stenting and to develop a noninvasive monitoring method for these processes using MRI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 36 mongrel dogs, autologous aortic aneurysms were created. Endovascular treatment was performed using covered stents. Follow-up was after 1 week, 6 weeks, and 6 months. MRI was performed with T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequences and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences and was repeated after contrast bolus with gadolinium. Histopathologic findings were correlated to signal intensities (SIs) of MRI images. SIs of distinct areas were analyzed and related to the SI of the reference tissue (SI ratio). The histological organization process was gradated in the following 4 classes: class 0, detritus without organization; classes I and II, connective tissue proliferation with increasing fiber synthesis; and class III, dense fibrous connective tissue. The SI ratios of T2-weighted images were significantly reduced from 4.76 in detritus (0) to 1.70 in dense fibrous connective tissue (III) as a function of histopathologic classes. SI ratios of T1-weighted images were reduced from 1.84 (0) to 1.12 (III). Contrast bolus with gadolinium-DTPA showed no change of SI ratio in detritus (0.99) but an increase from 1.12 (I) to 1.70 (III) as organization increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The histological organization of excluded aneurysms can be monitored by MRI. Progressive organization is indicated by decreasing SIs in T2- and an increasing signal increase in T1-weighted images after gadolinium bolus.

Postoperative regression of retroperitoneal fibrosis in patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms: evaluation with spiral computed tomography

Partial or total regression of aortic and retroperitonel fibrosis after surgery has been reported in combination with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). In this report, we consider the most recent 21 patients with inflammatory AAA consecutively operated on at our institution. The group was composed of 19 men and 2 women, with a mean age of 66 years. In addition to preoperative CT angiographic study, abdominal ultrasound and aortoiliac angiography were also performed. There were no perioperative deaths. The perioperative morbidity rate was 9.5%. In 20 cases (95.2%), the aortic wall was subjected to histological examination with calculation of an inflammatory index. Each patient was reexamined with spiral CT angiography after surgery; postoperative results were assessed in terms of changes in maximal fibrotic-mantle thickness observed on follow-up spiral CT angiograms, expressed both in millimeters and percentage of change. Regression was analyzed for possible correlation with preoperative severity of fibrotic reaction, time of the postoperative exam, inflammatory index, and changes in the fibrotic process involving the adjacent structures. The results show that postoperative improvement was significantly more marked in cases characterized by higher preoperative inflammatory indices in the aneurysmal wall; the time course of regression was highly variable; but on the whole, improvement was more substantial during the early months after surgery, with significant slowing after the second or third year.

Noninvasive diagnosis of incomplete endovascular aneurysm repair: D-dimer assay to detect type I endoleaks and nonshrinking aneurysms

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that D-dimer (D-D), a cross-linked fibrin degradation product of an ongoing thrombotic event, could be a marker for incomplete aneurysm exclusion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

METHODS

In a multicenter study, 83 venous blood samples were collected from 74 AAA endograft patients and controls. Twenty subjects who were >6 months postimplantation and had evidence of an endoleak and/or an unmodified or increasing AAA sac diameter formed the test group. Controls were 10 nondiseased subjects >65 years old, 18 AAA surgical candidates, and 26 postoperative endograft patients with no endoleak and a shrinking aneurysm. Blood samples were analyzed for D-D through a latex turbidimetric immunoassay. The endograft patients were stratified into 5 clinical groups for analysis: no endoleak and decreasing sac diameter, no endoleak and increasing/unchanged sac diameter, type II endoleak and decreasing sac diameter, type II endoleak and increasing/unchanged sac diameter, and type I endoleak.

RESULTS

Individual D-D values were highly variable, but differences among clinical groups were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). D-D values did not vary significantly between patients with stable, untreated AAAs and age-matched controls (238 +/- 180 ng/mL versus 421 +/- 400 ng/mL, p > 0.05). Median D-D values increased at 4 days postoperatively (963 ng/mL versus 382 ng/mL, p > 0.05) and did not vary thereafter if there was no endoleak and the aneurysm sac decreased. D-D mean values were higher in patients with type I endoleak (1931 +/- 924 ng/mL, p < 0.005) and those with unchanged/increasing sac diameters (1272 +/- 728 ng/mL) than in cases with decreasing diameters (median 638 +/- 238 ng/mL) despite the presence of endoleak (p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated D-D may prove to be a useful marker for fixation problems after endovascular AAA repair and may help rule out type I endoleak, thus excluding patients from unnecessary invasive tests.

Embolization of type II endoleaks after aortic stent-graft implantation: technique and immediate results

PURPOSE

We report the procedural details and immediate results of treatment of type II endoleaks after aortic stent-graft implantation.

METHODS

In a consecutive series of patients who had either Vangard (n = 53) or Talent (n = 7) aortic stent-grafts implanted, type II endoleaks were confirmed by means of angiography in 18 patients, with a mean (+/- SD) age of 69 +/- 11 years; 16 patients had Vangard stent-grafts, and two patients had Talent stent-grafts. After superselective catheterization of the feeding vessel, with 3F microcatheters, and liberal injections of vasodilators, embolization was performed with either a mixture of biologic glue and Lipiodol (n = 16) or Microcoils (n = 2).

RESULTS

The procedure was performed through the femoral artery in 16 patients and through the brachial artery in the remaining two patients. Overall, superselective catheterization and embolization were successfully undertaken in 17 (94.4%) of 18 patients. In the remaining patient, superselective catheterization proved impossible. This patient was treated with an injection of microparticles completed by means of embolization of biologic glue more proximally in an iliolumbar branch. During follow-up (mean, 13.3 months) after embolization, the aneurysm sac shrank in 13 (72.2%) of 18 patients. A new type II endoleak was diagnosed on helical computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in two (11.1%) of 18 patients.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous embolization is a safe and effective technique for treatment of type II endoleaks. However, despite these initially promising results, large long-term follow-up studies will be required to confirm its efficiency.

Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of type II endoleaks during follow-up after endovascular treatment of intra-renal aortic aneurysms.

DESIGN

prospective study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

between March 1996 and November 1999, 31 patients with infra-renal aortic aneurysms who underwent stentgraft implantation were followed with helical CT and MRI, including magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), at 1 and 6 months after the procedure. Arteriography was performed between 6 and 12 months after intervention. The parameters studied included the change in the maximum anteroposterior and transverse diameters, the nature of the signal on T1 and T2 weighted sequences (homogeneous vs heterogeneous), the presence or absence of Gadolinium uptake on MRI or of contrast uptake on helical CT (early and late phases) in the sac of the aneurysm. On MRA, stentgraft patency and endoleak detection were studied.

RESULTS

arteriography demonstrated an endoleak in 19 patients (18 type II, and 1 type I endoleak). MRI at 6 months detected 18/19 endoleaks on T1 weighted sequences after injection of Gadoliniumj; there were 2 false positives. MRA sequences confirmed stentgraft patency in all patients, but did not diagnose type II endoleaks. Helical CT (late phase) at 6 months detected 10/19 endoleaks; there was 1 false positive. The sensitivity of MRI after injection of Gadolinium and of helical CT for the detection of type II endoleaks were 94% and 50% (p=0.003) respectively. The mean maximal anteroposterior and transverse diameters were similar on MRI and on helical CT at 1 month and at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

MRI after injection of Gadolinium is more sensitive than helical CT in the detection of type II endoleaks after stentgraft implantation. Its more widespread use may permit earlier intervention in such patients.

Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysm before and after endoluminal stent-graft repair

Imaging is an essential component of endoluminal aneurysm repair. Detailed imaging with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and angiography, alone or in combination, is required for the initial assessment and planning. Careful, lifelong follow-up is essential since complications of endoluminal repair may take months or years to appear. Follow-up imaging requires a combination of plain film radiography, colour Doppler ultrasound and helical computed tomography. Magnetic resonance imaging may be valuable for the follow-up of non ferro-magnetic endografts and intra-arterial angiography will be required for specific cases.