Endodontic cements induce alterations in the cell cycle of in vitro cultured osteoblasts

The solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers: an in vitro study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of AH Plus BC, TotalFill BC, AH Plus, and AH Plus Jet sealers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cytotoxicity analysis with direct and extraction tests at 3 different concentrations (1:1, 1:2, 1:4 v/v%) and time (24 h, 48 h, and 72 h) on Saos-2, PdLF, and THP-1 cell lines, chemical structure with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis, solubility, pH, and radiopacity values of AH Plus BC, TotalFill BC, AH Plus, and AH Plus Jet were evaluated. For statistical analyses of the groups, repeated measures, factorial, and one-way ANOVA tests were used. The statistical significance level was set at p < .05.

RESULTS

Resin-based sealers showed higher cytotoxicity values than the bioceramic-based sealers (p < 0.05). Time and concentrations were effective on the cell viabilities for cell lines. Higher peaks of calcium were detected bioceramic-based sealers and higher amount of zirconium was detected in AH Plus BC (p < 0.05). AH Plus BC showed similar radiopacity value with AH Plus, AH Plus Jet, whereas TotalFill BC showed the lowest radiopacity (p < 0.05). Bioceramic-based sealers had higher pH values in all experiment periods, and the difference between resin- and bioceramic-based sealer groups was significant (p < 0.05). However, the solubility values of the tested root canal sealers revealed no differences (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The newly produced AH Plus BC Sealer showed similar properties with TotalFill BC, and their biological properties were better than AH Plus and AH Plus Jet.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

AH Plus BC could be a possible alternative to other bioceramic- or resin-based sealers.

Development of endodontic sealers containing antimicrobial-loaded polymer particles with long-term antibacterial effects

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to prepare new dental resins with a long-lasting antimicrobial activity. Specifically, this study evaluates an approach for controlling infection in root canals using sealers containing polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate (polyHEMA/TMPT) particles loaded with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). In addition, the physical properties of sealers containing CPC-loaded polyHEMA/TMPT particles (CLP) are determined.

METHODS

PolyHEMA/TMPT particles with 10 (10%-CLP) and 25wt.% CPC (25%-CLP) with different particle sizes were fabricated and incorporated in HEMA-based sealers. CPC-release profiles were evaluated over 14 days of immersion in water, followed by 14 days of storage and 14 days of water immersion. The antibacterial activity of these sealers against Enterococcus faecalis in dentinal tubules was assessed using a root-canal-infection model. Their sealing abilities were evaluated by fluid filtration and physical properties were tested according to the ISO 6876 standard. The long-term antibacterial activity of the cured sealer containing 25%-CLP (∼21μm particle diameter) was re-assessed after 1 year of storage.

RESULTS

After 28 days of immersion, 25%-CLP exhibited a higher and sustained CPC release unlike 10%-CLP. Residual bacteria in root dentinal tubules were eradicated by obturation with 25%-CLP-containing sealers. The incorporation of 25%-CLP (∼21μm) had no adverse effects on the sealing ability and physical properties of the sealer and resulted in long-term antibacterial activity.

SIGNIFICANCE

The incorporation of CPC-loaded particles in HEMA resins yielded endodontic sealers with long-term bactericidal activity against E. faecalis in root canals. These sealers can potentially be used to prevent recurrent apical periodontitis.

A Novel Polyurethane Expandable Root Canal Sealer

INTRODUCTION

Endodontic sealers play a vital role in the obturation of root canal space. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of a recently developed polyurethane expandable sealer (PES), along with its cytotoxicity and dimensional changes.

METHODS

L929 fibroblasts and an cell viability assay (MTS assay) were used to determine the cytotoxicity of dental sealers (AH Plus [Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland], Sure-Seal Root [Sure Dent Corporation, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea], and the PES) at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. An advanced choroidal neovascularization model was used to assess the effect of these sealers on angiogenesis. Thirty-six extracted single-rooted human teeth were prepared and randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 12). Obturation was performed with gutta-percha and a sealer using lateral compaction as follows: group 1, AH Plus; group 2, Sure-Seal; and group 3, PES. The average depth of sealer penetration into dentinal tubules was measured with a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests (level of significance, P < .05).

RESULTS

The values of MTS, choroidal neovascularization, and the penetration depth of PES were significantly higher than in other experimental groups (P < .05). The lowest values were noted in specimens of AH Plus, whereas the highest were detected in the PES group.

CONCLUSIONS

PES showed promising results in terms of biocompatibility and dentinal tubule adaptation and penetration.

Assessment of cell viability in four novel endodontic sealers

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the viability of human periodontal ligament (PDL) cells on MTA-Fillapex, GuttaFlow 2, TotalFill Sealer, and BioRoot™ RCS in comparison to conventional epoxy resin-based (AH Plus) and zinc oxide-eugenol-based (Roth's 801) sealers.

Materials and Methods

Sealers were divided into two groups, and five coverslips for each material per group were prepared. In the first group, PDLs were added immediately after the preparation of sealers (Fresh Group), and in the second, PDLs were added after 24 h. PDLs were cultured for 72 h and afterward, counted using standard hematocytometry. A Mann-Whitney U-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for the statistical analysis. The level of significance was set at 5%. Furthermore, cell morphology was assessed by confocal microscopy.

Results

The number of viable cells for the 24 h-set groups was higher than the freshly mixed in all sealers except Roth's 801. In both groups, GuttaFlow 2 presented the highest number of viable cells. In a descending order of cells' survival, TotalFill, BioRoot, and MTA-Fillapex are following and the conventional sealers, AH Plus and Roth's 801, seem not to exhibit the biological properties of the others. Cells grown on GuttaFlow 2, TotalFill, and BioRoot were observed to be well-formed. In contrast, MTA-Fillapex exhibited untypical morphology. No cells were detected on the surfaces of AH Plus, as well as Roth's 801.

Conclusions

All novel sealers presented increased cell viability in comparison to conventional sealers. GuttaFlow 2 exhibited the highest cell viability.

Cytotoxic effects of four different root canal sealers on human osteoblasts

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an epoxy resin-based (AH-Plus), a zinc oxide eugenol containing (Pulp-Canal-Sealer) and two calcium silicate containing (MTA-Fillapex and BioRoot-RCS) sealers on primary human osteoblasts (hOB) in freshly mixed and set state. All sealers were mixed strictly according to the manufacturers´ instructions and identically samples were produced. In a pretest cytotoxic sealer concentrations were determined. Thus, for the main cell culture study, dilutions of sealer extract 1:1, 1:2, and 1:10 were used. To simulate a clinical scenario, extracts from freshly mixed sealer were added to the cells on day one. Extracts form set sealers were used for subsequent culturing for 24h, 7d, 14d, and 21d. Cell viability was analyzed by living-cell-count, MTT-assay, and living/dead-staining, cytotoxicity by LDH-assay, and changes by Richardson-staining. All data were statistically evaluated by one way ANOVA and a posthoc analysis with Bonferroni-Holm testing (p<0.05). AH-Plus was cytotoxic in a freshly mixed state, but not when the sealer was set. MTA-Fillapex and Pulp-Canal-Sealer were cytotoxic in a fresh as well as in a set state. BioRoot-RCS showed the lowest toxicity in both states; where as a regeneration of the cells could be observed over time (p<0.05). Contact of freshly mixed AH-Plus to osteoblasts should be avoided. Pulp Canal Sealer and MTA-Fillapex showed no biocompatibility in contact with osteoblasts at all. BioRoot-RCS had a positive influence on the cell metabolism (bioactivity) and is biocompatible.

Comparison of cytotoxicity of various concentrations origanum extract solution with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite

Objective:

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the cytotoxicity of 0.5–4.5 origanum extract solution (OES), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) with WST-1 test on human periodontal ligament (hPDL) fibroblasts.

Materials and Methods:

About 0.5–4.5% OES, 2% CHX and 5.25% NaOCl solutions cytotoxicity was evaluated with cell culture test using PDL fibroblasts. Viability of hPDL cells was evaluated with WST-1 (Cell Proliferation Reagent WST-1 Roche) test at 1, 24 and 72^nd h. hPDL cells were plated at 20 × 10³ cells per well in 96-well plates. Absorbance values were read in optical density 480 nm by ELISA plate reader spectrophotometer. The statistical differences between various groups were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Duncan's Multiple Range test using SAS software. Statistically, a significant difference was considered at P < 0.001.

Results:

According to the 1-h cytotoxicity results, 0.5% OES showed the least cytotoxic effect in test groups. There were not found any statistical significance between 1% OES and 2% CHX. About 5.25% NaOCl showed more cytotoxic effect than 1% OES and 2% CHX. In 24 and 72 h, different concentrations of OES, 5.25% NaOCl, 2% CHX solutions showed similar cytotoxic effect.

Conclusions:

Based on these results, 1% OES and 2% CHX showed similar results and less cytotoxic effect than 5.25% NaOCl. It could be considered as a favorable solution concentration when OES was used as root canal irrigation solution.

In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of FotoSan™ light-activated disinfection on human fibroblasts

Background

Root canal disinfection needs to be improved because actual techniques are not able to eliminate all microorganisms present in the root canal system. The aim of the present study was to investigate the in vitro cytotoxicity of FotoSan (CMS Dental APS, Copenhagen Denmark), 17% EDTA and 2% chlorhexidine.

Material/Methods

Fibroblasts of periodontal ligament from healthy patients were cultured. FotoSan (with and without light activation for 30 sec.), 17% EDTA and 2% chlorexidine were used for the cell viability tests. Untreated cells were used as control. The cellular vitality was evaluated by MTT test. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was measured using an oxidation-sensitive fluorescent probe. Results were statistically analyzed by ANOVA, followed by a multiple comparison of means by Student-Newman-Keuls, and the statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

MTT tests showed that cytotoxic effects of FotoSan (both photocured and uncured) were statistically lower (p<0.05) than that observed using 2% Chlorhexidine, while no significant differences were found in comparison with 17% EDTA. No alterations in ROS production were detectable in any of the tested materials.

Conclusions

Since the toxicity of the FotoSan photosensitizer, both light-activated and not light-activated, is similar to common endodontic irrigants, it can be clinically used with precautions of use similar to those usually recommended for the above-mentioned irrigating solutions.

In vitro Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity of Different Root Canal Filling Materials

OBJECTIVE

Aim of the present study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of Real Seal 1 compared to other commercially available endodontic filling materials: Real Seal (SybronEndo, Orange, CA, USA) and Thermafil (Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Periodontal ligament cells from healthy patients were cultured. The eluate of Real Seal 1(TM) (RS1), Real Seal (RS) and Thermafil (TF) samples was used for the cells viability tests, both diluted (50%) or undiluted (100%). Incubation of the specimens was performed in culture medium for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h at 37 °C under sterile conditions. The cellular mortality was evaluated by MTT test. Results were statistically analysed and the statistical significance was set at p< 0.05.

RESULTS

None of the studied materials showed toxic effects during the period of observation (0 -72 h) when compared to the control group. Only RS induced a very modest increase in cell mortality (about 3% at both concentrations used, during the first 24 hours), when increasing the incubation time, however, only the lower concentration continued to show modest toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the present study showed that all tested materials did not exhibit cytotoxic effects when compared to the control group.

Root canal sealers cause cytotoxicity and oxidative damage in hepatocytes

Elutable substances and degradation products from root canal sealers may gain access to periodontal tissue in many ways. The aim of this study was to investigate damage and oxidative stress caused by treatment with root canal sealers in primary cultured rat hepatocytes. Four root canal sealers were used: Canals, Sealapex, AH 26, and AH Plus. Toxicity was detected by assessing lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage, and oxidative stress was determined by analysis of glutathione (GSH) levels. One-way analysis of variance was performed on the data. As the concentrations of sealer were increased, LDH leakage increased (p < 0.01). Increased GSH depletion accompanied LDH leakage increase. GSH levels were reduced to zero at a concentration of 0.05% for Canals and 0.10% for AH 26. These results confirmed the hypothesis that root canal sealers can cause cytotoxicity in hepatocytes. The Canals and AH 26 sealers can also cause oxidative stress in hepatocytes.

Cytotoxicity of root canal filling materials to three different human cell lines

The aim of this study was to investigate the biological compatibility of five root canal sealers (Sealapex, Endion, Super-EBA, Ketac-Endo, and AH Plus) and regular and calcium hydroxide-based gutta-percha in three different human cell lines. Cultures without root canal sealers were used as controls. Cell growth, cell morphology, cell viability, protein content of the cells, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) release were used as parameters to determine the cytotoxicity of the materials. The protein content of the three cell lines--nasal fibroblasts, gingival fibroblasts, and epithelial tumor cells--was significantly reduced (p < or = 0.001) by all materials tested. Determinations of PGE2 release showed significant material specific differences. No significant increased PGE2 release values were found with Sealapex, Endion, and Super-EBA. On the contrary significantly increased PGE2 levels were measured with Ketac Endo, AH Plus, regular and calcium hydroxide-based gutta-percha points (p < or = 0.001).

Evaluation of the cytocompatibility of three endodontic materials

The goal of this in vitro study was to evaluate the relative cytocompatibility of three endodontic materials: calcium hydroxide, a calcium oxide-based compound, and a zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer. The evaluation was conducted 24, 72, and 168 h after contact with the compounds and involved three complementary techniques: a colorimetric cytotoxicity test, scanning electron microscopy, and flow cytometry. The results we obtained confirmed the initial cytotoxicity of the zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer and showed that the calcium oxide-based compound had the same relative cytocompatibility as calcium hydroxide.

Current trends in biocompatibility testing

Biocompatibility remains the central theme for biomaterials applications in medicine. It is generally accepted that this term means not only absence of a cytotoxic effect but also positive effects in the sense of biofunctionality, i.e. promotion of biological processes which further the intended aim of the application of a biomaterial. The national and international standards for testing regimes represent a lowest common denominator for such applications and do not necessarily ensure that optimal function will be achieved. The authors' thesis is that biocompatibility testing has scope for extensive development with respect to biofunctionality. The present paper reviews current trends in the in vitro aspects of biocompatibility testing. As well as a critical appraisal of the recent literature, future trends are also stressed, which the authors regard as essential for a meaningful integration of a modern biological approach into new developments in the material sciences. These include the application of modern techniques of cell and molecular biology, the concepts of tissue remodelling, hybrid organ development and encapsulated cell technology.

pH measurement of root canal sealers

The purpose of this study was to compare the surface pH level of three different type sealers after mixing at various time intervals in vitro. The cements were mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions. They were incubated to set in 100% humidity at 37 degrees C for 1 h, 24 h, 5 days, 8 days, 2 wk, 3 wk, 4 wk, 5 wk, and 7 wk. pH was calculated by a Twin pH meter. The pH levels of the three sealers were different at various time intervals (p < 0.0001). The resin-based cement had a acid pH level (pH < 7.0). The calcium hydroxide-based cement showed a higher alkalinity pH level (pH > 7.0). The zinc oxide-eugenol-based cement showed a similar pH level to the calcium hydroxide cement at the end of the measurement. We postulated that, in endodontic therapy when those healing is needed, the alkaline-based sealer is the choice.

Dental materials: 1995 literature review

This critical review of the published literature on dental materials for the year 1995 has been compiled by the Dental Materials Panel of the United Kingdom. It continues the series of annual reviews started in 1973 and published in the Journal of Dentistry. Emphasis has been placed upon publications which report upon the materials science or clinical performance of the materials. The review has been divided by accepted materials classifications (fissure sealants, glass polyalkenoate cements, resin composites, dentine bonding, dental amalgam, endodontic materials, casting alloys, investment materials, resin-bonded bridges and ceramo-metallic restorations, all ceramic restorations, denture base and soft lining materials, impression materials, dental implants, orthodontic materials and biomechanics). Three hundred and thirty articles published in 68 titles have been reviewed.

In vitro effects of bone cements on the cell cycle of osteoblast-like cells

The effects of orthopaedic cements on the proliferation and cell cycle of in vitro cultured MG63 osteoblast-like cells were examined. Five different cements were mixed and extracted at different time intervals (15 and 60 min, 6, 24 and 48 h). Cell proliferation inhibition (CPI) was evaluated after 72 h culture as the toxicity parameter. As for the toxicity degree, the extracts were considered to have 'high toxicity' (CPI > or = 50%), 'medium toxicity' (50% > CPI > 25%), 'low toxicity' (CPI < or = 25%) and 'no toxicity' (CPI = 0). Cell cycle phases of MG63 cells were evaluated at 24, 48 and 72 h by flow cytometry; the DNA content was assessed using the propidium iodide uptake and the percentage of cells in the S phase was determined using 5'-bromodeoxyuridine uptake. According to our results, the toxicity is inversely correlated with the time interval between polymerization and extract preparation, and is different according to the cement type. For some cements the effects are still observed 48 h after polymerization. The damaging effect is not linked to a specific phase of the cell cycle, nor does it hamper the restarting of cell proliferation at 72 h.