Observer differentiation of mechanical defects versus natural dental caries cavitations on monitor-displayed images with imaging plate readout

Comparison of diagnostic methods for early interproximal caries detection with near-infrared light transillumination: an in vivo study

Background

Although numerous studies have used digital intraoral imaging, only a few studies have used photo-optical methods for the diagnosis of caries. Moreover, several limitations exist in terms of observers (experience and specialty) and the caries lesion itself. Hence, the aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic capability of near-infrared light transillumination (NILT) and PSP-Bitewing radiographs and to compare the interobserver and intraobserver differences in addition to observers’ experience level to detect early interproximal caries lesions in vivo.

Methods

A total of 52 untreated posterior teeth with and without varying degrees of early interproximal carious lesions were included. Bitewing radiographs using digital phosphor plates (PSP-Bitewing) and NILT were used to clarify the diagnosis. An oral and maxillofacial radiologist and a restorative dentistry consultant evaluated the images twice. A separate appointment for clinical validation and restoration was made. Kappa coefficients were calculated to assess both intraobserver and interobserver agreements for each evaluation method. Scores obtained from PSP-Bitewing and NILT were compared with the clinical validation via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

No significant differences were found between PSP-Bitewing radiography and NILT for detecting early interproximal carious lesions with high average Az results. Both intraobserver and interobserver agreement values were relatively higher for NILT evaluation. The Az values increased at second evaluations for both caries detection methods.

Conclusions

NILT examination has an appropriate sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for detecting early interproximal caries lesions and can be considered as a method of choice for detecting caries without the use of ionizing radiation.

In vitro induction of enamel subsurface demineralization for evaluation of diagnostic imaging methods

The aim of this study was to investigate a model of inducing enamel subsurface demineralization for evaluating diagnostic imaging methods. Fifty sound teeth had their crowns coated with acid-resistant varnish, leaving a 7 mm² circular window of exposed enamel in one of the proximal surfaces. The specimens were assigned to 5 groups (4 experimental and the control) and were kept immersed in a buffer solution at pH 4.8, 50% saturated in relation to enamel, for 60, 75, 90 and 120 days, or were not exposed to the solution. Digital radiographs were taken, prior to and after each immersion period, and interpreted by a radiologist. For validation, the enamel was submitted to microhardness profiling. In addition, the solutions were analyzed for phosphorus (P_i) and calcium (Ca) concentrations. Microhardness data were evaluated using two-way ANOVA (p<0.05) and Tukey's test. P_i and Ca concentrations were compared using one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). The performance of radiography was assessed by ROC analysis. The microhardness values for the control group ranged from 405 to 432 KHN. Of the 4 experimental groups, the 60-day group demonstrated the highest values (179-379 KHN) and the 120-day group, the lowest values (103-277 KHN). The lowest total concentrations of P_i and Ca (1.74 mM and 2.63 mM, respectively) were found in the solutions of the 60- day group, indicating the lowest rate of mineral loss, however, there was no significant difference among the other experimental groups. The performance for detecting images consistent with caries lesions was high (A_z = 0.89). Therefore, this in vitro model of inducing demineralization may be considered suitable for research intended to evaluate imaging methods for the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions.

Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films

The aim of this study was to determine diagnostic performance of a storage phosphor plate system Digora Optime (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) with two types of LCD monitor in the detection of artificial caries when compared to Ultraspeed (D), Ektaspeed Plus (E), and Insight (F) radiographic films. Seventy extracted human molars-with artificial caries-were radiographed under identical standardized conditions using (1) a storage phosphor plate system Digora (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland), (2) Insight, (3) Ektaspeed Plus, and (4) Ultraspeed (Carestream Health Inc, Rochester, NY). All digital images and radiographs were examined by three observers for the presence or absence of artificial caries using a five-point confidence scale. Digital images were evaluated both on a LCD computer monitor (Philips 170S, Holland) and medical monitor-3 megapixel monochrome display (Me355i2, Totoku, Tokyo)-with brightness and contrast enhancement. Observer responses were evaluated using ROC analysis and other measurements for diagnostic accuracy. Storage phosphor images with medical monitor demonstrated higher mean A (z) values (0.70 +/- 0.08) than digital images with computer monitor and conventional films. Storage phosphor images with medical monitor presented the highest score, 0.97, 0.90, 0.94, for each observer, respectively. Also, true positive observations (0.82) and positive likelihood ratios (2.71) were higher in enhanced storage phosphor images with medical monitor. Caries detection of mechanically created lesions by experienced radiologists is roughly comparable when examining D-speed film images and Digora images on both the computer and medical LCD monitors, and appears to be poorer on E- and F-speed film images.

Influence of the display monitor on observer performance in detection of dental caries

Background and aims

Digital imaging continues to gain acceptance in dentistry and video display used for this becomes important. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the display monitor on observer performance on caries detection.

Materials and methods

Artificial enamel lesions were created in 40 extracted teeth at random using 1/4 and 1/2 round burs. Teeth were mounted in dental stone blocks to simulate a hemi-dentition. Approximate exposures were recorded at 70 kVp using a Planmeca (Planmeca Co, Helsinki, Finland) digital imaging system. Three oral and maxillofacial radiologists rated each image on a five-point scale for the presence or absence of lesion. Radiographic images were viewed on the following monitors: (1) LG Flatron 700p (LG Electronics Co., South Korea); (2) Samsung Magicgreen (Samsung Electronics Corp., South Korea); (3) Hansol 710p (Hansol Electronics Corp., South Korea) and (4) Toshiba satellite laptop (Toshiba Computer Corp., Philippines). Examiners were allowed to magnify and adjust density and contrast of each image at will. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. Data was subjected to repeated measures analysis of variance and ordinal logistic regression to test for significance between variables and to determine odds ratios.

Results

Mean ROC curve areas ranged from 0.8728 for the LG monitor to 0.8395 for the Samsung. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed significant differences between observers (P<0.0001), lesion size (P<0.0001), examiner/monitor interaction (P<0.033) and examiner/block interaction (P<0.013). However, no significant difference was found between monitors.

Conclusion

This study suggests that observer performance is independent of the visual characteristics of the display monitor.

Linear and logarithmic subtraction for detecting enamel subsurface demineralization

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performance of linear and logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images, acquired with digital and digitized radiographs, in detecting approximal enamel subsurface demineralization.

METHODS

Fifty caries-free human third molars were immersed in a demineralizing solution for 60, 75, 90, and 120 days, in order to induce artificial enamel subsurface demineralization. The teeth were coated with nail varnish, leaving only a circular window of approximately 7 mm2 in one of the approximal surfaces, allowing contact with the solution. Standardized radiographs of the teeth were taken prior to and after the demineralization period with three digital systems, CygnusRay MPS, DenOptix and DIGORA, and InSight film. Conventional, digital and digitized radiographs were assessed by three experienced radiologists. Linear and logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images were acquired and then examined by a fourth independent radiologist. For the validation of the radiographic diagnosis, the enamel test areas were submitted to Knoop microhardness profiling. Radiographic interpretation data was evaluated using ROC analysis. The areas under the ROC curves (Az) were compared by the chi-squared test. The level of significance was set at P=0.05.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between linear and logarithmically contrast- enhanced subtraction images, acquired with the four studied modalities: CygnusRay MPSlinear (Az=0.95), CygnusRay MPSlog (Az=0.98), DenOptixlinear (Az=0.97), DenOptixlog (Az=0.99), DIGORAlinear (Az=0.98), DIGORAlog (Az=0.98), digitized radiographylinear (Az=0.99), digitized radiographylog (Az=0.99).

CONCLUSION

Linear and logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images, acquired with digital and digitized radiographs, were diagnostically comparable for assessing enamel subsurface demineralization.

A Comparativein VitroStudy to Diagnose Decayed Dental Tissue Using Different Methods

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare diagnoses of decayed dental tissue (occlusal) using five different methods in vitro.

BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies have showed occlusal surface caries are very difficult to diagnose at early stages. Early carious lesions detection through conventional diagnosis methods, including radiographic, visual and tactile exams, is questionable because they can end up with a risk of a false-positive or false-negative diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used 22 teeth in vitro, premolars and molars, which suggested carious lesions. Three calibrated examiners using pre-determined scores made the exams. The methods used were GI, visual inspection; GII, tactile inspection (explorer probe); GIII, conventional radiographic exam; GIV, digital radiographic exam (Digora for Windows 1.51 and 1.51N, SoredexOrion Co.); GV, low-intensity laser for diagnosis (DIAGNOdent, KaVo, Germany); and GVI, histological inspection. The examiners did not communicate among themselves during the exams.

RESULTS

There was significant statistical difference among the evaluated methods. Under the Friedman statistical test, GI, GIII, and GIV were different from GV at the 0.1% level. Comparing GII with GV, we observed statistical difference at the 1% level.

CONCLUSION

GV was highly statistically different from the others groups, even when compared with GVI, which means that dentists must use every method they can get to avoid a false-negative diagnosis.

Fundamentals of image acquisition and processing in the digital era

OBJECTIVES

To review the historic context for digital imaging in dentistry and to outline the fundamental issues related to digital imaging modalities.

CONTEXT

Digital dental X-ray images can be achieved by scanning analog film radiographs (secondary capture), with photostimulable phosphors, or using solid-state detectors (e.g. charge-coupled device and complementary metal oxide semiconductor). There are four characteristics that are basic to all digital image detectors; namely, size of active area, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast resolution and the spatial resolution. To perceive structure in a radiographic image, there needs to be sufficient difference between contrasting densities. This primarily depends on the differences in the attenuation of the X-ray beam by adjacent tissues. It is also depends on the signal received; therefore, contrast tends to increase with increased exposure. Given adequate signal and sufficient differences in radiodensity, contrast will be sufficient to differentiate between adjacent structures, irrespective of the recording modality and processing used. Where contrast is not sufficient, digital images can sometimes be post-processed to disclose details that would otherwise go undetected. For example, cephalogram isodensity mapping can improve soft tissue detail.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that it could be a further decade or two before three-dimensional digital imaging systems entirely replace two-dimensional analog films. Such systems need not only to produce prettier images, but also to provide a demonstrable evidence-based higher standard of care at a cost that is not economically prohibitive for the practitioner or society, and which allows efficient and effective workflow within the business of dental practice.