Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetic profiles of intranasal and oral cetirizine in a repeated allergen challenge model of allergic rhinitis

Nasal IL-13 production identifies patients with late-phase allergic responses

BACKGROUND

There is limited knowledge on how local cytokine secretion patterns after nasal allergen challenge correlate with clinical symptoms especially with regard to the "late allergic response," which occurs in approximately 40% to 50% of patients with allergy.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to characterize the immunologic and clinical nasal responses to birch pollen allergen challenge with a special focus on the late allergic response.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, birch pollen-allergic participants were challenged with birch pollen extract (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) on 3 consecutive days. On days 1 and 3, nasal secretions were collected at selected time points over a 24-hour time course for the measurement of 33 inflammatory mediators. Clinical responses were determined through subjective symptom scores and objective nasal airflow measurements.

RESULTS

Provoked participants had significantly greater clinical responses and showed significant increases in tryptase and the soluble IL-33 receptor serum stimulation 2 (sST2) in nasal secretions within minutes compared with the placebo group. Eight of 20 provoked participants displayed high IL-13 levels 2 to 8 hours after allergen provocation. This group also showed significant changes in clinical parameters, with a secondary drop in nasal airflow measured by peak nasal inspiratory flow and increased symptoms of nasal obstruction, which significantly differed from IL-13 nonresponders after 6 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-13 response status correlates with clinical responses and type 2 cytokine responses in the late phase after allergen provocation.

Generic Workflow to Predict Medicine Concentrations in Human Milk Using Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modelling-A Contribution from the ConcePTION Project

Women commonly take medication during lactation. Currently, there is little information about the exposure-related safety of maternal medicines for breastfed infants. The aim was to explore the performance of a generic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict concentrations in human milk for ten physiochemically diverse medicines. First, PBPK models were developed for "non-lactating" adult individuals in PK-Sim/MoBi v9.1 (Open Systems Pharmacology). The PBPK models predicted the area-under-the-curve (AUC) and maximum concentrations (C_max) in plasma within a two-fold error. Next, the PBPK models were extended to include lactation physiology. Plasma and human milk concentrations were simulated for a three-months postpartum population, and the corresponding AUC-based milk-to-plasma (M/P) ratios and relative infant doses were calculated. The lactation PBPK models resulted in reasonable predictions for eight medicines, while an overprediction of human milk concentrations and M/P ratios (>2-fold) was observed for two medicines. From a safety perspective, none of the models resulted in underpredictions of observed human milk concentrations. The present effort resulted in a generic workflow to predict medicine concentrations in human milk. This generic PBPK model represents an important step towards an evidence-based safety assessment of maternal medication during lactation, applicable in an early drug development stage.

[Pathogenetic approach in the treatment of inflammatory diseases of the nose and paranasal sinuses]

In recent years, inflammatory diseases of the nose and paranasal sinuses have been on the rise. In addition to infectious diseases, in the modern world a large percentage of the population suffers from allergic diseases. The approach to therapy and the choice of a drug should take into account the pathogenesis of the inflammatory reaction in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. By exerting its effect, the drug should reduce hyperemia and swelling of the nasal mucosa, reduce the level of mucus secretion, improve the drainage of the paranasal sinuses, i.e. possess vasoconstrictive and anti-allergic properties. As such a drug, you can use the combined intranasal spray Frinozol, which basically contains cetirizine and phenylephrine. The use of Frinozol in the complex treatment of inflammation of the mucous membrane of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses contributes to the rapid and pronounced weakening of the symptoms of the disease, and is also the key to successful therapy.

Nasal administration of a probiotic assemblage in allergic rhinitis: a placebo-controlled crossover experimental study

BACKGROUND

Topical probiotics have been suggested as a treatment option for allergic rhinitis, as they may skew the immune response towards a beneficial type-1 non-allergic profile. So far observations in man have exclusively involved oral intake. The aim of this study was to examine if a topical/nasal administration of a probiotic assemblage (PA) affects quality of life, symptoms, and signs of allergic rhinitis in a nasal allergen challenge (NAC) model.

METHODS

In a placebo-controlled and crossover design, 24 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were subjected to topical/nasal administration with a PA of Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1, Lactobacillus paracasei 101/37, and Lactococcus lactis L1A for three weeks. The last week of each treatment period was combined with a NAC-series. Efficacy variables were "Mini-Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire" (Mini-RQLQ), "Total Nasal Symptom Score" (TNSS), "Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow" (PNIF), and "Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide" (FeNO). In addition, to assess whether or not the PA produced any pro-inflammatory effect per se, soluble analytes were monitored in nasal lavage fluids. Finally, bacterial cultures, sampled using swabs from the middle nasal meatus, were assessed for presence of the PA by MALDI-TOF analysis.

RESULTS

Administration of the PA did not produce any nasal symptoms (cf. placebo). An innate response was discerned within the PA-run (cf. baseline), but no change in nasal lavage fluid levels of cytokines/mediators were observed cf. placebo except for IL-17/IL-17A (a minor increase in the PA run). Administration of the PA did neither affect Mini-RQLQ, TNSS, PNIF, nor FeNO. No evidence of persistent colonization was observed.

CONCLUSION

Topical/nasal administration of a PA comprising Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1, Lactobacillus paracasei 101/37, Lactococcus lactis L1A, while likely evoking a minor innate immune response yet being safe, does not affect quality of life, symptoms, or signs of allergic rhinitis.

Repetitive nasal allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis: Priming and Th2-type inflammation but no evidence of remodelling

BACKGROUND

Local tissue eosinophilia and Th2 cytokines are characteristic features of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Airway remodelling is a feature of asthma whereas evidence for remodelling in allergic rhinitis (AR) is conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

By use of a novel human repetitive nasal allergen challenge (RAC) model, we evaluated the relationship between allergic inflammation and features of remodelling in AR.

METHODS

Twelve patients with moderate-severe AR underwent 5 alternate day challenges with diluent which after 4 weeks were followed by 5 alternate day challenges with grass pollen extract. Nasal symptoms, Th1/Th2 cytokines in nasal secretion and serum were evaluated. Nasal biopsies were taken 24 hours after the 1st and 5th challenges with diluent and with allergen. Sixteen healthy controls underwent a single challenge with diluent and with allergen. Using immunohistochemistry, epithelial and submucosal inflammatory cells and remodelling markers were evaluated by computed image analysis.

RESULTS

There was an increase in early and late-phase symptoms after every allergen challenge compared to diluent (both P < .05) with evidence of both clinical and immunological priming. Nasal tissue eosinophils and IL-5 in nasal secretion increased significantly after RAC compared to corresponding diluent challenges (P < .01, P = .01, respectively). There was a correlation between submucosal mast cells and the early-phase clinical response (r = 0.79, P = .007) and an association between epithelial eosinophils and IL-5 concentrations in nasal secretion (r = 0.69, P = .06) in allergic rhinitis. No differences were observed after RAC with regard to epithelial integrity, reticular basement membrane thickness, glandular area, expression of markers of activation of airway remodelling including α-SMA, HSP-47, extracellular matrix (MMP7, 9 and TIMP-1), angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis for AR compared with healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

Novel repetitive nasal allergen challenge in participants with severe persistent seasonal allergic rhinitis resulted in tissue eosinophilia and increases in IL-5 but no structural changes. Our data support no link between robust Th2-inflammation and development of airway remodelling in AR.

[Results of an open, randomized, actively controlled study of the efficacy and safety of the new drug Freinozole nasal spray (Phenylephrine + Cetyrizine) in patients with acute respiratory infection]

The aim of the study was proof of efficacy and safety of the drug Frinozol nasal spray in patients with acute respiratory infection (acute rhinitis). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized open-label study with active control included 134 ambulatory patients: men and women aged 18 to 65 years with acute upper respiratory tract infection (acute rhinitis) lasting no more than 48 hours before inclusion into the study. Patients were randomized in two groups: group 1 took Frinozol nasal spray 2 sprays per each nostril three times a day for 7 days, subjects randomized to the group 2 took Vibrocil at the same dose and treatment regimen. The primary efficacy endpoint in the study was assessment of the dynamics of symptoms such as nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, itching in the nose and hyposmia using 10 cm VAS in 1 day after the start of treatment compared to the baseline. Secondary endpoints included assessment of the dynamics of nasal symptoms after 7 days of treatment, changes in the values of the Congestion Quantifier 5, CQ-5 questionnaire and evaluation of the effectiveness by the investigator. Safety analysis was carried out throughout the study and included the assessment of adverse events, laboratory data, vital signs, ECG assessment. RESULTS: According to the results of the study and comparative analysis of the primary (assessment of the dynamics of nasal symptoms on a 10 cm visual analogue scale 1 day after the start of treatment) and secondary efficacy endpoints as well as a comprehensive safety analysis, it can be concluded that the study drug is not inferior to the reference drug. Thus, the new combination Frinozol nasal spray is an effective and safe treatment for patients with acute respiratory infections.

[Comparative study of the efficacy of combined nasal topical drug and topical decongestants in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the drug Frinozol (nasal spray phenylephrinein 0.25% + cetirizine 0.25%) comparison with Rinostop Extra (nasal spray oxymetazoline 0.05%) in relation to nasal symptoms of rhinosinusitis, evaluated on rating scales, when using these drugs intranasally for 7 days in patients with acute viral and post-viral rhinosinusitis of mild (VAS 0-3) and moderate (VAS 3-7).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The randomized open-label study included 60 ambulatory patients (men and women aged 18 to 60 years) with a verified diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) lasting no more than 120 hours. 1 group of patients took Frinozol (nasal spray phenylephrinein 0.25% + cetirizine 0.25%) for 2 sprays per each nostril 3 times a day for 7 days; 2 group - Rinostop Extra (nasal spray oxymetazoline 0.05%) at the same dose and the therapy regimen. We evaluated 3 visits (day 1, day 3, and day 7) with an ENT examination on each of them; questionnaires on the 1st and 3rd visits of nasal symptoms (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, hyposmia) on the visual analog scale (VAS) and Clinical Global Impression Scale-CGI. Active anterior rhinomanometry (AAR) was performed on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd visits using the PTS-14P-01 rhinomanometer Rinolan before and 20 minutes after the use of the drugs Frinozol and oxymetazoline 0.05%.

The Allergic Rhinitis - Clinical Investigator Collaborative (AR-CIC): nasal allergen challenge protocol optimization for studying AR pathophysiology and evaluating novel therapies

Background

The Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) model allows the study of Allergic Rhinitis (AR) pathophysiology and the proof of concept of novel therapies. The Allergic Rhinitis – Clinical Investigator Collaborative (AR-CIC) aims to optimize the protocol, ensuring reliability and repeatability of symptoms to better evaluate the therapies under investigation.

Methods

20 AR participants were challenged, with 4-fold increments of their respective allergens every 15 minutes, to determine the qualifying allergen concentration (QAC) at which the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) of ≥10/12 OR a Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) reduction of ≥50% from baseline was achieved. At the NAC visit, the QAC was used in a single challenge and TNSS and PNIF were recorded at baseline, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, and hourly up to 12 hours. 10 additional ragweed allergic participants were qualified at TNSS of ≥8/12 AND ≥50% PNIF reduction; the Cumulative Allergen Challenge (CAC) of all incremental doses was used during the NAC visit. 4 non-allergic participants were challenged with the highest allergen concentration.

Results

In the QAC study, a group qualified by only meeting PNIF criteria achieved lower TNSS than those achieving either TNSS criteria or PNIIF+TNSS (p<0.01). During the NAC visit, participants in both studies reached their peak symptoms at 15minutes followed by a gradual decline, significantly different from non-allergic participants. The “PNIF only” group experienced significantly lower TNSS than the other groups during NAC visit. QAC and CAC participants did not reach the same peak TNSS during NAC that was achieved at screening. QAC participants qualifying based on TNSS or TNSS+PNIF managed to maintain PNIF scores.

Conclusions

Participants experienced reliable symptoms of AR in both studies, using both TNSS and PNIF reduction as part of the qualifying criteria proved better for qualifying participants at screening. Phenotyping based on pattern of symptoms experienced is possible and allows the study of AR pathophysiology and can be applied in evaluation of efficacy of a novel medication. The AR-CIC aims to continue to improve the model and employ it in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.

Effect of mucosal TRPV1 inhibition in allergic rhinitis

Transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) has been implicated as a mediator of itch in allergic rhinitis. To address this possibility, we synthesized a TRPV1 blocker (SB-705498) for nasal administration in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. The pharmacological activity of SB-705498 was confirmed on human TRPV1-expressing HEK293 cells, using fluorometric calcium imaging, and in patients with allergic rhinitis subjected to nasal capsaicin challenges. The effect of SB-705498 was studied in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis subjected to daily allergen challenges for 7 days, using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized and cross-over design. SB-705498 was delivered by nasal lavage 2 min. before each allergen challenge. Primary end-point was total nasal symptom score on days 5-7. Nasal peak inspiratory flow (nPIF) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) content in nasal lavages were also monitored. Daily topical applications of SB-705498 at a concentration that inhibited capsaicin-induced nasal symptoms had no effect on total symptom score, nPIF and ECP levels in allergen-challenged patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. The individual symptoms, nasal itch or sneezes, were also not affected. These findings may indicate that TRPV1 is not a key mediator of the symptoms in allergic rhinitis. However, additional studies, using drug formulations with a prolonged duration of action, should be conducted before TRPV1 is ruled out as a drug target in allergic rhinitis.

Comparative responses to nasal allergen challenge in allergic rhinitic subjects with or without asthma

BACKGROUND

Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is useful to study the pathophysiology of rhinitis, and multiple challenges may more adequately approximate natural exposure.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of 4 consecutive daily NAC, on clinical and inflammatory parameters in rhinitics with or without asthma.

METHODS

Rhinitic subjects were recruited: 19 with mild asthma and 13 without asthma. Subjects underwent a control challenge (normal saline) followed by 4 consecutive daily NAC. Allergen challenge consisted of spraying the chosen allergen extract into each nostril until a positive nasal response occurred. Symptoms were recorded on a Likert scale, and oral peak expiratory and nasal peak inspiratory flows allowed assessment of a nasal blockage index (NBI), for a period of 7 hours. Induced sputum and nasal lavage were performed on control day and after 1 and 4 days of NAC.

RESULTS

Compared with the control day, there was a significant increase in symptom scores and NBI 10 minutes after each last daily NAC in both groups (p < 0.05). Symptom scores and NBI were similar for the 2 groups, except for nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea, which were more marked in subjects with asthma and rhinitis, respectively. Nasal lavage eosinophils were increased after 4 days of challenges in both groups, but there was no change in sputum eosinophils. No cumulative effect or any late response were observed in any of the groups over the challenge period.

CONCLUSION

Multiple NAC may be a useful tool to study the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis or its relationships with asthma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01286129.

Effects of a dual CCR3 and H1-antagonist on symptoms and eosinophilic inflammation in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

The CC-chemokine receptor-3 (CCR3) has emerged as a target molecule for pharmacological intervention in allergic inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether a dual CCR3 and H1-receptor antagonist (AZD3778) affects allergic inflammation and symptoms in allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were subjected to three seven days' allergen challenge series. Treatment with AZD3778 was given in a placebo and antihistamine-controlled design. Symptoms and nasal peak inspiratory flow (PIF) were monitored in the morning, ten minutes post challenge, and in the evening. Nasal lavages were carried out at the end of each challenge series and alpha2-macroglobulin, ECP, and tryptase were monitored as indices of allergic inflammation.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of AZD3778 were stable throughout the treatment series. AZD3778 and the antihistamine (loratadine) reduced rhinitis symptoms recorded ten minutes post challenge during this period. AZD3778, but not the anti-histamine, also improved nasal PIF ten minutes post challenge. Furthermore, scores for morning and evening nasal symptoms from the last five days of the allergen challenge series showed statistically significant reductions for AZD3778, but not for loratadine. ECP was reduced by AZD3778, but not by loratadine.

CONCLUSIONS

AZD3778 exerts anti-eosinophil and symptom-reducing effects in allergic rhinitis and part of this effect can likely be attributed to CCR3-antagonism. The present data are of interest with regard to the potential use of AZD3778 in allergic rhinitis and to the relative importance of eosinophil actions to the symptomatology of allergic rhinitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT No: 2005-002805-21.

Histamine in allergic rhinitis

Histamine plays a major role in allergic rhinitis. In susceptible individuals, allergen induces nasal mast cell degranulation and the release of histamine into the nasal mucosa. Histamine has been detected after controlled challenges with allergen and, when administered into the nasal cavity, elicits signs and symptoms similar to those elicited by allergen. All four histamine receptors have been demonstrated in the nasal mucosa. The role of the four histamine receptors in the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis are discussed.

Effects of Clara cell 10 (CC10) protein on symptoms and signs of allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

The Clara cell 10 (CC10) protein is produced by the airway epithelium. Reduced levels of CC10 are associated with allergic rhinitis and asthma. In experimental models, treatment with the CC10 protein may reduce features of airway inflammation.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether or not topical treatment with recombinant human CC10 (rhCC10) affects symptoms and signs of allergic rhinitis in a pollen season model.

METHODS

Out of the pollen season, patients with allergic rhinitis received treatment with rhCC10, 0.56 mg per nasal cavity, once daily for 7 days in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover design. During this period, individualized allergen challenges were given once daily. Symptoms and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were recorded daily in the morning, 10 minutes after challenge, and in the evening. Mean recordings of the last 3 days of the challenge series were used in the analysis. Nasal lavages were performed at the end of each challenge period, and eosinophil cationic protein, myeloperoxidase, and alpha2-macroglobulin levels were measured as indices of eosinophil and neutrophil activity and plasma exudation, respectively.

RESULTS

Recombinant human CC10 did not affect allergen-induced morning, postchallenge, or evening symptoms compared with placebo. Morning, postchallenge, and evening PNIF were not improved by rhCC10. No statistically significant differences were observed between rhCC10 and placebo for any of the lavage fluid indices.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated nasal administrations of rhCC10 protein, in the present dose, do not exert antiallergic effects in seasonal allergic rhinitis.