The science of complementary and alternative medicine: the plural of anecdote is not evidence

Can we find better bronchodilators to relieve asthma symptoms?

Bronchodilators are the first line therapy during acute asthmatic exacerbations to reverse airway obstruction primarily by relaxing airway smooth muscle. Only three categories of bronchodilators exist in clinical practice: β-adrenergic agonists, anticholinergics, and methylxanthines. Each of these categories have specific drugs dating back to the early 20th century, raising the question of whether or not we can find better bronchodilators. While caffeine, theophylline, atropine, and epinephrine were the first generations of therapeutics in each of these drug classes, there is no question that improvements have been made in the bronchodilators in each of these classes. In the following editorial, we will briefly describe new classes of potential bronchodilators including: novel PDE inhibitors, natural phytotherapeutics, bitter taste receptor ligands, and chloride channel modulators, which have the potential to be used alone or in combination with existing bronchodilators to reverse acute airway obstruction in the future.

Awareness of allergy patients about herbal remedies: a cross-sectional study of residents of Ankara, Turkey

OBJECTIVE

The use of herbs in patients with allergic diseases is a special problem and still controversial. The objective of this questionnaire-based study was to determine the rate of herbal use in allergy clinic outpatients as well as to explore patient knowledge.

METHODS

Patients with respiratory and/or skin disease, either atopic or non-atopic were assigned to a prospective questionnaire study conducted in allergy clinic outpatients.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ninety-five patients enrolled in the study. The mean age was 33.50+/-12.14 years. Participants generally had a high educational level (40.5% college and 39% university graduated). The rate of herbal use was 14.2%. All characteristics were similar within herbal user and non-user patients, except gender and age. The number of female patients who use herbal products was greater than for males (p=0.043). Herbal use was common in patients in their late thirties (p=0.024). Three main rationales for herbal use were revealed: (i) acting upon advice of someone (41.1%); (ii) the belief that "herbals are always more beneficial than chemicals" (37.5%); and (iii) the trust that "herbals are always safe" (21.4%). Most of the participants have "no idea" (41.5%) or are "not sure" (33.7%) about potential harmful effects of herbs to allergic people.

CONCLUSION

People will continue to use herbals for one reason or another. Allergists and clinical immunologists need to become more knowledgeable about herbal therapies so that they can inform patients about either the benefits or possible harmful effects of herbs.

Complementary therapy in allergic rhinitis

The term complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) refers to those therapeutic and diagnostic approaches different from conventional allopathic medicine. CAM may encompass homeopathy, acupuncture, phytotherapy, antioxidant therapy, and numerous holistic or behavioral techniques. Allergists and physicians of all disciplines are confronted with patients using CAM treatments, making it imperative that they become familiar with the scientific literature surrounding them. Given the high prevalence of allergic diseases and associated costs of CAM treatments, proof of CAM therapies is needed to establish appropriate guidelines for their use. Efficacy of CAM modalities should be established with randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, including adverse-effects monitoring. Of all the CAM therapies examined to treat allergic rhinitis, some herbal therapies and antioxidants demonstrate a trend toward some clinical efficacy. Researchers have yet to determine how to integrate these CAM modalities into the general treatment paradigm of allergic rhinitis.