Altered allergen binding capacities of Amb a 1-specific IgE and IgG4 from ragweed-sensitive patients receiving immunotherapy

[Allergen specific immunotherapy for rhinitis allergica : New applications]

BACKGROUND

Allergic diseases are among the most common diseases of humans. The immune response towards allergens is regulated by T-lymphozytes and characterized by an interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13 dominated Th2 cytokine profile.

RESULTS

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causative treatment option and able to change the course of disease, e. g. to prevent the development of asthma and new sensitizations. The intralymphatic delivery of allergenes named intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) has been evaluated in clinical trials and was demonstrated to be a highly potent application route with low effort and side effects while having equal efficacy if compared with current standard AIT forms. However, studies that verify important questions like optimal dose, new allergen forms, use of adjuvants etc. are still missing. Moreover, it has to be evaluated, whether different indications like rhinitis, or atopic dermatitis are suitable for ILIT and whether it is useful in children. Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) is a possible alternative application form. It is minimally invasive and basically consists of the affixation of allergen containing patches to the epidermis over 6 weeks. From the studies performed so far, the authors concluded, that epicutaneous immunotherapy is safe and efficacious in a dose-dependent manner after 6 patches only.

CONCLUSIONS

AIT is accepted to be the only causative treatment option for allergies. New application routes in ILIT and EPIT may become more important and allow for different delivery methods in the future, however further clinical studies are required and in preparation.

Intralymphatic immunotherapy

Gold Standard allergen-specific immunotherapy is associated with low efficacy because it requires either many subcutaneous injections of allergen or even more numerous sublingual allergen administrations to achieve amelioration of symptoms. Intralymphatic vaccination can maximize immunogenicity and hence efficacy. We and others have demonstrated that as few as three low dose intralymphatic allergen administrations are sufficient to effectively alleviate symptoms. Results of recent prospective and controlled trials suggest that this strategy may be an effective form of allergen immunotherapy.

Novel routes for allergen immunotherapy: safety, efficacy and mode of action

Allergen immunotherapy is the only curative treatment of IgE-mediated type I respiratory allergies. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is used as a reference therapy and has transformed allergic treatments; it improves symptoms (asthma and rhinitis) as well as the quality of life of patients. SCIT requires repetitive administration and carries the risk of severe systemic adverse effects, including anaphylaxis. Sublingual immunotherapy is now a valid noninvasive alternative to SCIT, as a safe and efficacious treatment for respiratory allergies. In this article, we compare various routes of allergen immunotherapy, including SCIT and sublingual immunotherapy, as well as more exploratory routes currently under investigation (i.e., intralymphatic, epicutaneous, intranasal and oral). We discuss their respective advantages, as well as their foreseen modes of action.

Epicutaneous/transcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy: rationale and clinical trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

IgE-mediated allergies, such as allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma, have become highly prevalent, today affecting up to 35% of the population in industrialized countries. Allergen immunotherapy (also called hyposensitization therapy, desensitization or allergen-specific immunotherapy), the administration of gradually increasing amounts of an allergen, either subcutaneously or via the sublingual or oral route is effective. However, only few allergy patients (<5%) choose immunotherapy, as treatment duration is over years and because allergen administrations are associated with local and in some cases even systemic allergic side effects due to allergen accidentally reaching the circulation. Therefore, ideally the allergen should be administered to a site that contains high numbers of potent antigen-presenting cells in order to enhance efficacy and shorten treatment duration, and ideally that site should also be nonvascularized in order to prevent both systemic distribution of the allergen and systemic allergic side effects. The epidermis, a nonvascularized multilayer epithelium that contains high numbers of potent antigen-presenting Langerhans cells, could therefore be an interesting administration route.

RECENT FINDINGS

We have recently reintroduced transcutaneous or epicutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy (EPIT) as treatment option for IgE-mediated allergies. This method was found efficacious and safe. Few applications of allergens using skin patches with a treatment duration of a few weeks were sufficient to achieve lasting relief.

SUMMARY

This review gives an overview on the history, the rationale, and the mechanisms of transcutaneous/epicutaneous immunotherapy.

Mechanisms of immunotherapy: a historical perspective

OBJECTIVE

To provide a historical review of mechanisms proposed during the last century to explain the efficacy of immunotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

We retrieved review articles and original research from MEDLINE, OVID, and PubMed that addressed our topic of interest.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were selected for their relevance to immunotherapy and mechanisms.

RESULTS

Early studies focused on the production of blocking antibodies induced by immunotherapy, with mechanistic explanations aimed at understanding a relationship between blocking antibodies and clinical response. This was followed by a period when the effects of immunotherapy on levels and function of effector cells in the allergic response were studied. Aiding in characterization of this response was the discovery of IgE and its role in allergic sensitization, which brought a renewed focus on the antibody-mediated effects of immunotherapy. In an attempt to create a unifying hypothesis to explain humoral and cellular mechanisms of immunotherapy, recent approaches have been focused on the role of the T cell and, specifically, regulatory T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the clinical practice of immunotherapy has been refined since its introduction 100 years ago, our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie this success has awaited discoveries in basic immunology.

Intralymphatic immunotherapy: from the rationale to human applications

Allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only treatment of IgE mediated allergies that is causative and has a long-term effect. Classically, SIT requires numerous subcutaneous injections of the allergen during 3-5 years. Over the last decade sublingual allergen applications have established as an alternative, but treatment duration could not be shortened. This review focuses on direct administration of vaccines in general and of allergens in particular into lymph nodes with the aim to enhance immunotherapy. Several studies have found that direct injection of antigens into lymph nodes enhanced immune responses. Recently we have focused on intralymphatic allergen administration in order to enhance SIT. Data in mouse models and in clinical trials showed that intralymphatic allergen administration strongly enhanced SIT, so that the number of allergen injections could be reduced to three, and the allergen dose could be reduced 10-100 fold. Intralymphatic injections proved easy, practically painless and safe. In mice and men, intralymphatic immunotherapy injecting allergens into a subcutaneous lymph node markedly enhances the protective immune response, so that both the dose and number of allergen injections can be reduced, making SIT safer and faster, which enhances patient convenience and compliance.

Intralymphatic immunotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

IgE-mediated allergy can be treated by subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy (SCIT). However, the percentage of allergic patients undergoing SCIT is low, mainly due to the long duration of the therapy and the risk of severe systemic allergic reactions associated with the allergen administration. Typically, SCIT requires dozens of subcutaneous allergen injections that stretch over 3-5 years. Over the last decade, sublingual immunotherapy has been established as an alternative to SCIT, but treatment duration and dosing frequencies could not be reduced. Recently, immunotherapy by direct administration of the allergen into lymph nodes [intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT)] has proven a promising alternative and this method is the focus of the present review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies on animals and on humans have shown that direct injection into lymph nodes enhanced immune responses to protein, peptide, and naked DNA vaccines. Moreover, ILIT strongly improved allergen immunotherapy, so that the number of allergen administrations as well as the allergen dose could be reduced. As ILIT was also well tolerated, practically painless, and easy to perform, patient compliance was improved as compared with SCIT.

SUMMARY

Direct ILIT into a subcutaneous lymph node markedly enhances protective immune responses, so that both the dose and the number of allergen injections can be reduced, making ILIT safer and faster than other forms of immunotherapy, and most importantly, this enhances patient convenience and compliance.

Epicutaneous allergen administration as a novel method of allergen-specific immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy is an effective treatment of IgE-mediated allergies, but it requires repeated allergen injections with a risk of systemic allergic reactions. Transcutaneous immunotherapy may improve patient compliance and safety.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of epicutaneous allergen immunotherapy.

METHODS

This monocentric, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted from March 2006 to December 2007 at the University Hospital Zurich. Thirty-seven adult patients with positive skin prick and nasal provocation tests to grass pollen were randomized to receive patches containing either allergen (n = 21) or placebo (n = 16). Treatment took place before and during the pollen season 2006, and follow-up visits took place before (n = 26) and after the pollen season 2007 (n = 30). The primary outcome measures were nasal provocation tests.

RESULTS

Allergen-treated patients showed significantly decreased scores in nasal provocation tests in the first (P < .001) and second year (P = .003) after treatment. In contrast, placebo-treated patients had decreased scores in the first treatment year, 2006 (P = .03), but the effect diminished in the second year (P = .53). Although improvement of nasal provocation test scores was not significantly better in the verum versus placebo group, the overall treatment success was rated significantly higher by the allergen-treated group than by the placebo group (2006, P = .02; 2007, P = .005). No severe adverse events were observed. Occurrence of eczema after allergen patch applications proved stimulation of specific T-cell responses, but was noted as an adverse effect of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Epicutaneous allergen immunotherapy is a promising strategy to treat allergies and merits further investigation.

Clinico-immunologic study on immunotherapy with mixed and single insect allergens

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy (IT) is practiced mainly with mixed and single allergen vaccines. But studies are rare with mixed allergen preparations.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to study mix and single insect allergen IT in patients of allergic rhinitis and asthma.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of mix and single allergen IT for 1 year in 99 patients of asthma or rhinitis or both. There were two groups, (1) active allergen IT (n = 61) with three subgroups single insect extract (cockroach, housefly, or mosquito) and mix allergen IT (two or three insect extracts) and (2) placebo (n = 38). Clinical (skin reactivity, airway reactivity, and symptom score) and immunological (IgE/IgG4 and IgG1/IgG4 ratio) parameters were assessed at baseline and after 1 year of IT.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients completed 1 year of IT. The active allergen IT group patients showed a significant improvement compared to baseline values (p < 0.05) and placebo group patients (p < 0.05) with regard to symptom scores, FEV1 values, and immunological parameters (IgG4). No significant difference was found between mixed and single IT group patients for changes in clinical and immunological parameters. Positive correlation was observed between increase in IgG4 and clinical improvement. The changes in above parameters in placebo group were nonsignificant after 1 year of treatment.

CONCLUSION

IT with two to three mix extract from the same allergen group is effective for insect hypersensitivity.

Sublingual immunotherapy of allergic diseases

The only disease-modifying treatment that is available for allergic patients is allergen-specific immunotherapy. Two competing application forms are used: subcutaneous immunotherapy, which has been used for > 90 years, and a relatively new immunotherapy where the allergen is applied sublingually. Numerous studies have shown efficacy for subcutaneous immunotherapy and have identified possible mechanisms that are responsible for the observed reduction in allergic responses. In contrast, the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy has not been documented to the same degree and the responsible immunological mechanisms have not yet been clearly defined. This review focuses on the published clinical and experimental data on sublingual immunotherapy and points at possible mechanisms of how sublingual immunotherapy may differ from subcutaneous immunotherapy in its mode of action, and also discusses the potential advantages and pit falls of both therapies.

Novel ways for immune intervention in immunotherapy: mucosal allergy vaccines

Allergen-specific immunotherapy is currently the only curative treatment for allergy. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) has been successfully used to treat patients who are allergic to insect venom, house dust mites, or tree or grass pollens. In the context of potentially severe, albeit infrequent, side effects associated with SCIT, mucosal routes of administration are being investigated to conduct allergenic desensitization. This article reviews recent developments in the field of nasal, oral, and sublingual immunotherapy as they relate to safety, clinical efficacy, and immune mechanisms of action. Implications for the design and development of improved allergy vaccines that could be used through such nonparenteral routes are discussed. Specifically, allergen presentation platforms and adjuvants facilitating the targeting of immune cells at mucosal surfaces to promote tolerance induction are reviewed.

IgE-Facilitated Antigen Presentation: Role in Allergy and the Influence of Allergen Immunotherapy

IgE-facilitated allergen presentation (FAP) is an important pathogenic mechanism in allergic disease and represents a potential therapeutic target. Allergen immunotherapy is a highly effective therapy, particularly in patients with seasonal pollinosis who fail to respond to usual pharmacotherapy. Allergen immunotherapy induces "blocking" IgG antibodies that are detectable in serum and have been shown to inhibit IgE-FAP in vitro. This review summarizes the main components involved in IgE-FAP and the potential value of a validated functional assay of serum inhibitory antibodies for IgE-FAP for monitoring the clinical response to immunotherapy.

Immune mechanisms of allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy

Sublingual immunotherapy has been shown in some clinical studies to modulate allergen-specific antibody responses [with a decrease in the immunoglobulin E/immunoglobulin G4 (IgE/IgG4) ratio] and to reduce the recruitment and activation of proinflammatory cells in target mucosa. Whereas a central paradigm for successful immunotherapy has been to reorient the pattern of allergen-specific T-cell responses in atopic patients from a T helper (Th)2 to Th1 profile, there is currently a growing interest in eliciting regulatory T cells, capable of downregulating both Th1 and Th2 responses through the production of interleukin (IL)-10 and/or transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta. We discuss herein immune mechanisms involved during allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), in comparison with subcutaneous immunotherapy. During SLIT, the allergen is captured within the oral mucosa by Langerhans-like dendritic cells expressing high-affinity IgE receptors, producing IL-10 and TGF-beta, and upregulating indoleamine dioxygenase (IDO), suggesting that such cells are prone to induce tolerance. The oral mucosa contains limited number of proinflammatory cells, such as mast cells, thereby explaining the well-established safety profile of SLIT. In this context, second-generation vaccines based on recombinant allergens in a native conformation formulated with adjuvants are designed to target Langerhans-like cells in the sublingual mucosa, with the aim to induce allergen-specific regulatory T cells. Importantly, such recombinant vaccines should facilitate the identification of biological markers of SLIT efficacy in humans.

Vaccination for birch pollen allergy: comparison of the affinities of specific immunoglobulins E, G1 and G4 measured by surface plasmon resonance

BACKGROUND

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is associated with increased levels of allergen-specific IgG in serum. However, it is not clear to what extent qualitative changes in the allergen binding capacity of IgG may be induced as well.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influences of SIT on antibody affinity.

METHODS

The binding affinity of purified serum IgG1, IgG4 and IgE to the major allergen in birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen, Bet v 1, was analysed by surface plasmon resonance. The antibodies were obtained from 10 birch pollen-allergic patients receiving SIT and from 10 patients with no SIT.

RESULTS

The patients having received SIT have a significant higher titre of anti-Bet v 1 antibodies in their blood, but the affinity to Bet v 1 of allergen-specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG4 does not differ between the two groups. For IgG1 and IgG4, correlations between less allergic symptoms and affinity of the antibodies were observed both in the SIT group and to a smaller extent in the non-SIT group.

CONCLUSION

SIT has no effect on antibody affinity of allergen-specific IgE, IgG1 or IgG4. Allergic patients with high-affinity IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies report less symptoms than patients with low-affinity antibodies.

A Novel Approach to Specific Allergy Treatment: The Recombinant Fusion Protein of a Bacterial Cell Surface (S-Layer) Protein and the Major Birch Pollen Allergen Bet v 1 (rSbsC-Bet v 1) Combines Reduced Allergenicity with Immunomodulating Capacity

Counterregulating the disease-eliciting Th2-like immune response of allergen-specific Th lymphocytes by fostering an allergen-specific Th1-like response is a promising concept for future immunotherapy of type I allergy. The use of recombinant allergens combined with more functional adjuvants has been proposed. In this respect, we present a novel approach. The gene sequence encoding the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, was fused with the gene encoding the bacterial cell surface (S-layer) protein of Geobacillus stearothermophilus, resulting in the recombinant protein, rSbsC-Bet v 1. rSbsC-Bet v 1 contained all relevant Bet v 1-specific B and T cell epitopes, but was significantly less efficient to release histamine than rBet v 1. In cells of birch pollen-allergic individuals, rSbsC-Bet v 1 induced IFN-gamma along with IL-10, but no Th2-like response, as observed after stimulation with Bet v 1. Intracellular cytokine staining revealed that rSbsC-Bet v 1 promoted IFN-gamma-producing Th cells. Moreover, rSbsC-Bet v 1 induced IFN-gamma synthesis in Bet v 1-specific Th2 cell clones, and importantly, increased IL-10 production in these cells. In conclusion, genetic fusion of an allergen to S-layer proteins combined reduced allergenicity with immunomodulatory capacity. The strategy described in this work may be generally applied to design vaccines for specific immunotherapy of type I allergy with improved efficacy and safety.