Malignant and corticosteroid-dependent idiopathic anaphylaxis: successful responses to ketotifen

Approach to Idiopathic Anaphylaxis in Adolescents

Anaphylaxis is a potentially-life threatening condition. Adolescents are particularly vulnerable due to increased risk-taking behaviors, poor disease management, and minimized perception of risk. Although most anaphylaxis can be attributed to food, drug, or venom allergy via a detailed history and confirmatory studies, in nearly 1 in 5 cases, the cause may not be obvious. Clinical differentials including rare allergens, cofactors, mast-cell disorders, and mimic disorders can increase the likelihood of discovering of the cause of anaphylaxis.

Idiopathic anaphylaxis: Diagnosis and management

Introduction: Idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) is a diagnosis of exclusion and is based on the inability to identify a causal relationship between a trigger and an anaphylactic event, despite a detailed patient history and careful diagnostic assessment. The prevalence of IA among the subset of people who experienced anaphylaxis is challenging to estimate and varies widely, from 10 to 60%; most commonly noted is ∼20% in the adult anaphylactic population. Comorbid atopic conditions, such as food allergy, allergic rhinitis, and asthma, are present in up to 48% of patients with IA. Improved diagnostic technologies and an increased understanding of conditions that manifest with symptoms associated with anaphylaxis have improved the ability to determine a more accurate diagnosis for patients who may have been initially diagnosed with IA. Methods: Literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase. Results: Galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal) allergy, mast cell disorders, and hereditary a-tryptasemia are a few differential diagnoses that should be considered in patients with IA. Unlike food allergy, when anaphylaxis occurs within minutes to 2 hours after allergen consumption, α-gal allergy is a 3-6-hour delayed immunoglobulin E-mediated anaphylactic reaction to a carbohydrate epitope found in red meat (e.g., beef, lamb, pork). The more recently described hereditary α-tryptasemia is an inherited autosomal dominant genetic trait caused by increased germline copies of tryptase human gene alpha-beta 1 (TPSAB1), which encodes α tryptase and is associated with elevated baseline serum tryptase. Acute management of IA consists of carrying an epinephrine autoinjector to be administered immediately at the first signs of anaphylaxis. Long-term management for IA with antihistamines and other agents aims to potentially reduce the frequency and severity of the anaphylactic reactions, although the evidence is limited. Biologics are potentially steroid-sparing for patients with IA; however, more research on IA therapies is needed. Conclusion: The lack of diagnostic criteria, finite treatment options, and intricacies of making a differential diagnosis make IA challenging for patients and clinicians to manage.

Idiopathic anaphylaxis yardstick: Practical recommendations for clinical practice

Anaphylaxis is considered idiopathic when there is no known trigger. The signs and symptoms of idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) are identical to those of anaphylaxis because of a known cause and can include cutaneous, circulatory, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neurologic symptoms. Idiopathic anaphylaxis can be a frustrating disease for patients and health care providers. Episodes are unpredictable, and differential diagnosis is challenging. Current anaphylaxis guidelines have little specific guidance regarding differential diagnosis and long-term management of IA. Therefore, the objective of the Idiopathic Anaphylaxis Yardstick is to use published data and the authors' combined clinical experience to provide practical recommendations for the diagnosis and management of patients with IA.

Mast cell activation syndromes

Mast cell activation is common and possibly necessary for maintenance of survival. Disordered mast cell activation occurs when mast cells are pathologically overproduced or if their activation is out of proportion to the perceived threat to homeostasis. Mast cell activation syndrome refers to a group of disorders with diverse causes presenting with episodic multisystem symptoms as the result of mast cell mediator release. Despite introduction of diagnostic criteria and some advances in treatment in the last decade, many areas of mast cell activation syndrome are in need of research. This article reviews our current knowledge about the various types of mast cell activation disorders, their treatment, and areas of uncertainty in need of future investigation.

Type 1 Kounis syndrome in a patient with idiopathic anaphylaxis

Anaphylactic insults that cause cardiovascular signs and symptoms have been defined as Kounis syndrome, which has been associated with specific triggered anaphylactic reactions. Kounis syndrome has not been described in patients with no evidence of coronary artery disease (type I Kounis) in a scenario of idiopathic anaphylaxis. We reported a case of a 65-year-old white woman with no evidence of coronary artery disease who experienced two myocardial infarctions on separate occasions attributable to idiopathic anaphylaxis.

Mast Cells and Anaphylaxis

For half a century, it has been known that the mast cell is the cell responsible for the majority of anaphylactic events. Its mediators, taken as a whole, are capable of producing all of the clinical manifestations of these events. With the discovery of immunoglobulin E (IgE), it was originally felt that the vast majority of anaphylactic episodes were due to antigen coupling with two cell-bound IgE molecules. More recently it has been learned that many episodes are produced by direct activation of mast cells, not involving antigen binding to IgE, and that monomeric IgE under certain conditions can also cause degranulation. Of note--in regard to antigen independent degranulation--are recent reports that the human G-protein-coupled receptor, MRGPRX2, may be the receptor for many drugs and cationic proteins capable of producing direct mast cell degranulation and anaphylactic events.

Mastocytosis: update on pharmacotherapy and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Mastocytosis is a disorder characterized by abnormal mast cell (MC) accumulation in skin and internal organs such as bone marrow. The disease follows a benign course in most patients with cutaneous and indolent systemic mastocytosis (SM); however, advanced variants associated with decreased life expectancy also exist. Pharmacotherapy of mastocytosis is aimed at the control of symptoms caused by MC mediator release, treatment of comorbidities and cytoreductive therapies in advanced variants.

AREAS COVERED

This article will cover the general treatment principles of anti-MC mediator and cytoreductive therapies of mastocytosis. The literature discussed was retrieved with PubMed using the search terms 'treatment of mastocytosis,' 'mastocytosis antimediator therapy' and looking for important cross-references.

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacotherapy of mastocytosis should be individualized for each patient considering the category of disease, reduction of risk of anaphylaxis, constitutional symptoms and comorbidities including osteoporosis. Cytoreductive therapies are generally reserved for patients with aggressive mastocytosis (ASM), MC leukemia (MCL) and MC sarcoma (MCS); however, some patients with indolent disease and recurrent anaphylactic episodes not responsive to antimediator therapies may also be considered for cytoreduction on a case-by-case basis.

Posttraumatic elbow joint contractures: defining pathologic capsular mechanisms and potential future treatment paradigms

The Andrew J. Weiland Medal is presented by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand to a midcareer researcher who is dedicated to advancing patient care in the field of hand surgery. This essay, awarded the Weiland Medal in 2012, focuses on posttraumatic elbow joint contractures. Joint contractures are well known to hand surgeons because they limit function of our patients. There is a thorough understanding of the pathoanatomy underlying joint contractures. However, the mechanisms leading to the pathoanatomy are either unknown or partially understood, depending on the etiology of the particular clinical condition. This review describes our research over the past 14 years on posttraumatic elbow joint contractures. It defines pathologic cellular, matrix, and growth factor changes in the joint capsule, elaborates on the development of an animal model of posttraumatic joint contractures, presents an evaluation of a potential prevention strategy based on our research, and outlines future plans to bring this work to the clinical realm for the benefit of patients.

The mast cell stabilizer ketotifen fumarate lessens contracture severity and myofibroblast hyperplasia: a study of a rabbit model of posttraumatic joint contractures

BACKGROUND

The propensity of joints to become stiff after trauma is widely appreciated, and the joint capsule is commonly recognized as the major motion-limiting anatomical structure. Affected joint capsules become fibrotic, characterized by myofibroblast and collagen hyperplasia. Mast cell hyperplasia is common within fibrotic tissue, and mast cells are known to synthesize many profibrotic mediators. We hypothesized that mast cell inhibition after skeletal injury would lessen contracture severity and reduce myofibroblast hyperplasia within the joint capsule.

METHODS

Posttraumatic contractures of the knee were created with use of a combination of intra-articular injury and internal immobilization in skeletally mature New Zealand White rabbits. Four groups of animals were studied: a nonoperative control group, a group with the operatively created contracture and no pharmacological treatment (the operative contracture group), and two groups with the operatively created contracture that were treated with a mast cell stabilizer, ketotifen fumarate, at a dose of either 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg twice daily (the 0.5-mg/kg and 1.0-mg/kg ketotifen groups). After eight weeks of immobilization, flexion contractures were measured and the posterior aspect of the joint capsule was harvested for quantification of myofibroblast and mast cell numbers.

RESULTS

Flexion contractures developed in the operative contracture group (mean and standard deviation, 58 degrees +/- 14 degrees ), and the severity of the contractures was reduced in both the group treated with 0.5 mg/kg of ketotifen (42 degrees +/- 17 degrees ) and the group treated with 1.0 mg/kg of ketotifen (45 degrees +/- 10 degrees ) (p < 0.02). The joint capsule myofibroblast and mast cell numbers in the operative contracture group were significantly increased compared with the values in the control group (p < 0.001), and the myofibroblast and mast cell numbers in both ketotifen groups were significantly reduced compared with the values in the operative contracture group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a mast cell stabilizer, ketotifen, was effective in reducing the biomechanical and cellular manifestations of joint capsule fibrosis in a rabbit model of posttraumatic joint contracture. This finding suggests that an inflammatory pathway, mediated by mast cell activation, is involved in the induction of joint capsule fibrosis after traumatic injury.

Lymphocyte subsets and activation markers in patients with acute episodes of idiopathic anaphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA), a type of anaphylaxis in which no external allergen can be identified, is a corticosteroid-responsive disease, that suggests that it may have an immunologic pathogenesis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to compare patients with acute episodes of IA with normals, patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria, and patients with IA in remission relative to lymphocyte subsets and activation markers.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of 38 adults: 5 normals, 4 idiopathic urticaria, 11 IA patients in remission, 9 IA patients with acute attacks who had not yet received prednisone, and 9 IA patients who had received prednisone. The main outcome measures were lymphocyte subset and activation markers determined by two and three color flow cytometry (CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8, CD16, CD19, CD23, CD25, CD56, and HLA-DR).

RESULTS

Comparing patients with acute IA with those in remission, the only significant difference was that the acute IA patients had a significantly higher percentage of CD3+HLA-DR+ cells. Normals had a significantly lower percentage of CD3+ HLA-DR+ cells than all other groups. Patients with acute IA on prednisone as well as IA patients in remission had a significantly higher percentage of CD 19+ CD23+ cells than normals.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that there are more activated T cells in patients with acute episodes of IA than in patients in remission. Perhaps, these activated T cells have a role in the pathogenesis of IA.