A comparison of graft implantation techniques for hair transplantation

A Novel Method of Intraoperative Calculation in Follicular Unit Transplantation: 'The Sequential Strip and FUE Method'

Hair loss, in particular androgenetic alopecia, has troubled humans since the dawn of history. Treatment options for hair restoration have undergone massive transformation from punch grafting to follicular unit transplantation. Current surgical treatment options in hair restoration fall broadly under two categories, follicular unit transplantation most commonly known as strip method and follicular unit extraction (FUE). The strip method though widely used initially is not so common now due to its fair share of disadvantages ranging from linear donor scar, scar widening to strip overharvesting and wastage of grafts. Follicular unit excision (FUE) was introduced as an alternative method for extraction of grafts to combat the donor linear scar produced by strip method but the disadvantages of FUE include the number of grafts harvested in a single session, moth eaten appearance of donor area caused by over extraction of grafts and harvesting from outside the safe zone. Newer developments like extraction of axillary hair, body hair and pubic hair have been sought to overcome the limitations of number of grafts harvested in a single session of FUE. With more patients now affected by alopecia in their early 20s, there is an ever-increasing demand from the patients for the youthful hairline and hence the focus has shifted towards mega and giga sessions of hair transplantation which pose danger of over extraction of grafts leading to depletion of available donor sites. This article elaborates the combined sequential strip and FUE method along with an intraoperative calculation model to overcome the limitations of over extraction and wastage of grafts. (1) Combination of techniques Strip method with FUE. (2) An intraoperative calculation model that aids in limiting over extraction and wastage of grafts. (3) It is a real time model which can be applied in practice with ease.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Hair restoration approaches for early onset male androgenetic alopecia

Society places great emphasis on the presence of hair. Some degree of hair loss is accepted as a normal part of the aging process, in line with the observation that more than 50% of men will develop androgenetic alopecia by the age of 50 years. However, it is possible to understand the psychosocial isolation and distress felt by men with a strong familial predisposition to androgenetic alopecia, who tend to display hair loss in their late teens or twenties. There are currently two drugs which have been licensed for the treatment of male androgenetic alopecia: oral finasteride and topical minoxidil solution which are effective to some extent. Furthermore, upon discontinuing treatment, any gain that has been achieved is quickly lost. Added to which there is an entire market of unproven over the counter products: advertised in the electronic media, local hair salons, and various departmental stores. In this review, we highlight the important advances in the management of male androgenetic alopecia with emphasis on approaches that can lead to more successful and long-term hair restoration for young adults. In particular, we discuss the evidence supporting the use of the follicular unit grafting technique in conjunction with medical treatment before and after the procedure. Moreover, some other alterations of this most popular state of the art hair restoration technique have been mentioned briefly. As a result, patients and physicians seem equally satisfied from this procedure for its naturally looking results which are cosmetically more acceptable and esthetically pleasing for longer period of time.

Epidural needle for recipient site preparation in hair restoration surgery

BACKGROUND

The mini- and micro-grafting method is still one of the most current treatment methods for male pattern baldness and female androgenic alopecia. The preparation of the recipient area with 16G needle has been reported in the literature. However, during the insertion of grafts, the neighboring grafts tend to `pop out'. The study presents our experience in the hair implantation for recipient site preparation with 16G epidural needle.

METHODS

The 16G epidural needle was used during preparation of the recipient field in eight patients. Approximately 500 micrografts were grafted in each patient to reconstruct the anterior hairline.

RESULTS

During insertion of the micrografts, almost none of the previously inserted grafts tended to `pop out'. The anterior hairline of the patients was natural without obvious scarring. The mean follow-up period of these patients was 1.5 years. The amount of graft survival was found to be satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

According to the surgeon's clinical observations, application of this technique was found to be easier than standard needle techniques. It can be used by inexperienced surgeons. Use of epidural needle for recipient hole preparation works well in reducing the popping out, and the curved fashion of the holes reduced the angle of the hair follicle.

Er:YAG laser-assisted hair transplantation in cicatricial alopecia

BACKGROUND

Autologous hair transplantation and its combination with flap or reduction procedures is a common surgical approach to cover defects in cicatricial alopecias. Due to the poor recipient conditions present in scar tissue, it is crucial to minimize the trauma exerted on implantation holes in order to achieve good transplantation results.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the "cold"-ablative properties of the Er:YAG laser for the generation of recipient holes in cicatricial alopecia.

METHODS

Patients with cicatricial alopecia of diverse etiology were treated with Er:YAG laser-assisted hair transplantation. Mini- or micrografts were inserted into recipient holes ablated with a pulse energy of 900-1200 mJ and a spot size of 1.0-1.6 mm.

RESULTS

A fluence of 80-120 J/cm2 and 8-12 pulses gave an almost ideal combination of minimal thermal damage and tissue ablation down to the subcutis. With an apparent mini- and micrograft survival of 95% we achieved good cosmetic results after two to five transplant sessions in all patients.

CONCLUSION

The Er:YAG laser is a novel effective tool to ablate recipient holes for autologous hair transplantation in cicatricial alopecia.