Cutaneous norepinephrine application in complex regional pain syndrome

Neurogenic neuroinflammation in fibromyalgia and complex regional pain syndrome

Although fibromyalgia and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) have distinct clinical phenotypes, they do share many other features. Pain, allodynia and dysaesthesia occur in each condition and seem to exist on a similar spectrum. Fibromyalgia and CRPS can both be triggered by specific traumatic events, although fibromyalgia is most commonly associated with psychological trauma and CRPS is most often associated with physical trauma, which is frequently deemed routine or minor by the patient. Fibromyalgia and CRPS also seem to share many pathophysiological mechanisms, among which the most important are those involving central effects. Nonetheless, peripheral effects, such as neurogenic neuroinflammation, are also important contributors to the clinical features of each of these disorders. This Review highlights the differing degrees to which neurogenic neuroinflammation might contribute to the multifactorial pathogenesis of both fibromyalgia and CRPS, and discusses the evidence suggesting that this mechanism is an important link between the two disorders, and could offer novel therapeutic targets.

Norepinephrine-induced nociception and vasoconstrictor hypersensitivity in rats with chronic post-ischemia pain

Painful hypersensitivity to norepinephrine (NE) has been reported in various chronic pain conditions that exhibit sympathetically-maintained pain (SMP), particularly CRPS-I and II. We investigated the parallels between the nociceptive and vascular sensitivity to NE in rats with chronic post-ischemia pain (CPIP), an animal model of CRPS-I induced by hind paw ischemia-reperfusion injury. Intradermal injections of NE to the affected hind paw induced dose-dependent nociceptive behaviours in CPIP rats, but not sham animals. These behaviours were blocked by alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonists, or a nitric oxide (NO) donor. Using laser Doppler flowmetry, we detected vasoconstrictor hypersensitivity in the ipsilateral CPIP hind paw, as compared to responses in sham animals or the contralateral hind paw. The vasoconstrictor hypersensitivity was also attenuated by adrenergic antagonists. Intradermal injection of [Arg(8)] vasopressin (AVP) or the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) inhibitor, L-NIO, to the affected paw also induced nociceptive behaviours in CPIP rats, but not sham rats. These results suggest CPIP rats display abnormal nociceptive responses to adrenergic and non-adrenergic vasoconstrictive agents. Furthermore, the nociceptive responses to NE in CPIP rats are paralleled by enhanced vasoconstrictive responses to NE, and are relieved by alpha-adrenergic antagonists or a vasodilator. We conclude that persistent tissue ischemia and hypersensitivity to sympathetic vasoconstriction are important mechanisms for pain in CPIP rats, and that either reducing vasoconstriction or enhancing vasodilatation may be effective methods of relieving the pain of CRPS-I.

Noradrenergic pain modulation

Norepinephrine is involved in intrinsic control of pain. Main sources of norepinephrine are sympathetic nerves peripherally and noradrenergic brainstem nuclei A1-A7 centrally. Peripheral norepinephrine has little influence on pain in healthy tissues, whereas in injured tissues it has variable effects, including aggravation of pain. Its peripheral pronociceptive effect has been associated with injury-induced expression of novel noradrenergic receptors, sprouting of sympathetic nerve fibers, and pronociceptive changes in the ionic channel properties of primary afferent nociceptors, while an interaction with the immune system may contribute in part to peripheral antinociception induced by norepinephrine. In the spinal cord, norepinephrine released from descending pathways suppresses pain by inhibitory action on alpha-2A-adrenoceptors on central terminals of primary afferent nociceptors (presynaptic inhibition), by direct alpha-2-adrenergic action on pain-relay neurons (postsynaptic inhibition), and by alpha-1-adrenoceptor-mediated activation of inhibitory interneurons. Additionally, alpha-2C-adrenoceptors on axon terminals of excitatory interneurons of the spinal dorsal horn possibly contribute to spinal control of pain. At supraspinal levels, the pain modulatory effect by norepinephrine and noradrenergic receptors has varied depending on many factors such as the supraspinal site, the type of the adrenoceptor, the duration of the pain and pathophysiological condition. While in baseline conditions the noradrenergic system may have little effect, sustained pain induces noradrenergic feedback inhibition of pain. Noradrenergic systems may also contribute to top-down control of pain, such as induced by a change in the behavioral state. Following injury or inflammation, the central as well as peripheral noradrenergic system is subject to various plastic changes that influence its antinociceptive efficacy.

No adrenergic sensitization of afferent neurons in painful sensory polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to determine (1) if an adrenergic sensitivity of afferent neurons is present in patients with painful polyneuropathy as compared with non-painful polyneuropathy and (2) if there is a correlation between adrenergic sensitisation and the severity of afferent and sympathetic small fiber damage.

METHODS

10 patients with painful and non painful polyneuropathy and 10 healthy controls were included. The function of small afferent and efferent sympathetic neurons was evaluated. Adrenergic sensitivity of afferent neurons was assessed by cutaneous iontophoresis of norepinephrine. Spontaneous pain, mechanical hyperalgesia as well as warm and heat pain thresholds were measured.

RESULTS

Iontophoresis of norepinephrine did not induce or enhance spontaneous pain or mechanical allodynia, either in painless or painful polyneuropathies. There was no difference in norepinephrine-induced heat hyperalgesia between both neuropathy groups and healthy controls. The response of afferent neurons to norepinephrine was not correlated with the severity of damage to afferent small fibers or efferent sympathetic vasoconstrictor neurons.

CONCLUSION

The results do not support the assumption that in painful polyneuropathies afferent neurons acquire an adrenergic sensitivity after nerve injury and that adrenergic stimulation leads to an exacerbation of spontaneous pain and thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia.

Autonomic failure after stroke--is it indicative for pathophysiology of complex regional pain syndrome?

In order to find pieces of evidence for a central origin of autonomic failure in complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I), the pattern of autonomic symptoms in CRPS I patients was compared to patients a few days after stroke. Autonomic failure in the latter group is assumed to represent definite CNS origin. Seventeen stroke patients, 21 patients in the acute and late stage of CRPS I and a control group of 23 healthy subjects were investigated. Detailed neurological examination was performed, sweating was induced centrally (thermoregulatory sweating, TST) and peripherally by carbachol iontophoresis (QSART) and quantified by evaporation hygrometry. Skin temperature was assessed by infrared thermography. The incidence of motor-sensory dysfunction (without pain) and the incidence of edema was strikingly similar in stroke and CRPS patients. Furthermore, stroke patients had increased TST but not QSART responses on the contralesional limb (P < 0.05) and skin temperature was decreased (P < 0.001). The same pattern of autonomic failure was found in late CRPS (TST: P < 0.02, skin temperature: P < 0.01) whereas in acute CRPS additional, presumably peripheral mechanisms, contribute to sympathetic symptoms. In conclusion, our investigation suggests that many clinical symptoms and the main features of sympathetic dysfunction in CRPS could be explained by a CNS pathophysiology.