Calf, buttock, and pectoral implants

High Definition Liposculpture in Male Patients Using Reciprocating Power-Assisted Liposuction Technology: Techniques and Results in a Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

High-definition liposculpture (HDL) consists of techniques developed to emulate an athletic and attractive surface anatomy.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe our experience, including techniques and postoperative outcomes, when performing HDL with power-assisted liposuction (PAL) technology in male patients.

METHODS

In this prospective study PAL was used for fat extraction and to perform HDL. Intraoperative data were collected and the techniques used were recorded. Postoperatively, photographs were taken, and data were collected regarding the use of compression garments and pain medication, return to work and full activity, and satisfaction levels.

RESULTS

All patients were males, with an average age of 32.3 years and a body mass index of 26.45 kg/m2; the follow-up period averaged 7.6 months. Intraoperatively, all patients received HDL of the chest, abdomen, back, and upper arms, and fat transfer to the chest. The average operative time was 3.4 hours. None of patients had drains left intraoperatively. Postoperatively, all patients were completely off their pain medications by postoperative day 9. They received, on average, 3.7 sessions of lymphatic massage and wore compression garments for an average of 3 weeks. They returned to work 6.1 days after surgery and were back to full activity in 3.2 weeks. Minor complications were reported in 2 patients. Patient satisfaction was on average 9.8 (on a scale of 1-10) at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

HDL with PAL technology is a safe procedure that delivers reproducible natural-looking results with high patient satisfaction rates, low risk of complications, and a relatively short and tolerable recovery process.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Gluteal lift with subfascial implants

BACKGROUND

Gluteal enhancement surgery includes buttock implants, gluteal flaps, lipografting, and gluteal lifts. However, no information is available on the outcomes achievable using the gluteal lift combined with subfascial gluteal implants.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to analyze the outcomes of gluteal lift combined with subfascial gluteal implants performed during a 7-year period by a single surgeon at a single institution.

RESULTS

During the study period, 114 patients (228 implants) ages 27-68 years (mean 47 years) were found. The follow-up period was 1-7 years (mean 4.5 years). The findings showed seroma in 11.4 % of the patients, hematoma in 5.26 %, minor wound dehiscence in 19.29 %, major wound dehiscence in 1.75 %, minor infection in 1.75 %, implant exposure in 0 %, capsular contracture Becker 3 and 4 in 3.5 %, implant rupture in 0 %, implant malposition in 5.25 %, long-term numbness of the buttock in 0 %, palpability of the implant in 0 %, implant rippling in 0 %, implant rupture in 0 %, wide scars in 41.2 %, need for secondary surgery in 26.31 %, and dissatisfaction with the final volume in 10.52 %. A patient satisfaction rate of 9.6 in 10 was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that the gluteal lift combined with gluteal implants placed in the subfascial pocket provided good long-lasting results with an acceptable rate of complications, very high patient satisfaction, and easily concealed scars.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Male chest enhancement: pectoral implants

The authors present their experience with the pectoral muscle implant for male chest enhancement in 21 patients. The markings and technique are thoroughly described. The implants used were manufactured and custom made. The candidates for implants comprised three groups: group 1 (18 patients seeking chest enhancement), group 2 (1 patient with muscular atrophy), and group 3 (2 patients with muscular injuries). Because of the satisfying results obtained, including significant enhancement of the chest contour and no major complications, this technique is used for an increasing number of male cosmetic surgeries.