Evolving management of mild-to-moderate gallstone pancreatitis

Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;255:860-866. [PMID: 22470079 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182507646]

OBJECTIVES

To determine the risk of recurrent biliary events in the period after mild biliary pancreatitis but before interval cholecystectomy and to determine the safety of cholecystectomy during the index admission.

BACKGROUND

Although current guidelines recommend performing cholecystectomy early after mild biliary pancreatitis, consensus on the definition of early (ie, during index admission or within the first weeks after hospital discharge) is lacking.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies published from January 1992 to July 2010. Included were cohort studies of patients with mild biliary pancreatitis reporting on the timing of cholecystectomy, number of readmissions for recurrent biliary events before cholecystectomy, operative complications (eg, bile duct injury, bleeding), and mortality. Study quality and risks of bias were assessed.

RESULTS

After screening 2413 studies, 8 cohort studies and 1 randomized trial describing 998 patients were included. Cholecystectomy was performed during index admission in 483 patients (48%) without any reported readmissions. Interval cholecystectomy was performed in 515 patients (52%) after 40 days (median; interquartile range: 19-58 days). Before interval cholecystectomy, 95 patients (18%) were readmitted for recurrent biliary events (0% vs 18%, P < 0.0001). These included recurrent biliary pancreatitis (n = 43, 8%), acute cholecystitis (n = 17), and biliary colics (n = 35). Patients who had an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had fewer recurrent biliary events (10% vs 24%, P = 0.001), especially less recurrent biliary pancreatitis (1% vs 9%). There were no differences in operative complications, conversion rate (7%), and mortality (0%) between index and interval cholecystectomy. Because baseline characteristics were only reported in 26% of patients, study populations could not be compared.

CONCLUSIONS

Interval cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis is associated with a high risk of readmission for recurrent biliary events, especially recurrent biliary pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy during index admission for mild biliary pancreatitis appears safe, but selection bias could not be excluded.

The role of intraoperative cholangiogram in the management of patients recovering from acute biliary pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Use of the standard management for gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis calls for cholecystectomy with cholangiography performed during the same hospitalization after acute symptoms has decreased. No previous studies, however, have objectively addressed the usefulness of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) for the management of this condition. This study aimed to determine the incidence of common bile duct (CBD) stones after an acute episode of gallstone pancreatitis.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients who underwent a cholecystectomy and IOC after an episode of gallstone pancreatitis during the same admission between 1999 and 2004 at the University of Alberta and Royal Alexandra hospitals were examined to determine the incidence of CBD stones after resolution of gallstone pancreatitis.

RESULTS

After a chart review for a series of 86 patients, 63 met the inclusion criteria. All except for one patient had undergone successful IOC (98%). Among the patients who had no evidence of CBD obstruction on preoperative imaging or lab work, three were found to have a filling defect on IOC and stones on their postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (3/63, 5%). This is not significantly different from the 4.6% incidence of CBD stones among patients with cholelithiasis who had normal preoperative imaging and blood work.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of normal preoperative imaging and lab work, the incidence of CBD stones among patients recovering from acute mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis is not significantly higher than among patients with no history of pancreatitis. Therefore, an IOC for post-gallstone pancreatitis does not alter management.

Trends in the incidence and significance of presentations to the emergency department due to acute pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis is an important cause of abdominal pain that may be associated with significant morbidity for the patient and considerable workload for the hospital. Our impression has been that it is becoming increasingly common, perhaps in tandem with increased rates of other alcohol-related disease.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients attending our emergency department with acute pancreatitis by Hospital Inpatient Enquiry coding over a 9-year period were examined to determine its incidence, aetiology and significance (Imrie severity of pancreatitis scoring, length of hospital stay and interventional workload).

RESULTS

The incidence of acute pancreatitis (n=97, 40 male patients) increased approximately threefold over the study period (especially in the lattermost triennial period with 75 patients) in a fashion disproportionate to changes in our locality's population. Gallstone-related disease continues to be most prevalent although alcohol-related disease also became more common. Disease severity (length of hospital stay and Imrie score) was similar throughout with a mean length of hospital stay exceeding that of the majority of accident and emergency admissions. Seven acute complications of acute pancreatitis were noted while 34 chronic sequelae developed. Requirement for invasive intervention doubled (n=19 in first triennial period in the study vs 39 in the latter triennial period), although the relative need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography diminished with increased availability of magnetic resonance cholangiography imaging. Nine patients with gallstone-related acute pancreatitis suffered recurrent attacks while awaiting cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSION

Acute pancreatitis is an increasingly frequent cause of hospital admission while the clinical significance of each incident remains high. The presentation of acute pancreatitis to the emergency department as an early declaration of symptomatic cholelithiasis is especially worrisome as it suggests a failing of recognition and/or effective referral of premonitory biliary complaints.

Management of gallstone pancreatitis in Auckland: progress and compliance

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis include the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy,defining the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) and early cholecystectomy to prevent recurrent pancreatitis. The aim of the present study was to review the current management of gallstone pancreatitis in Auckland Hospital, compare findings with a similar study published a decade ago and to determine the extent to which the management is compliant with recently published consensus guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive patients admitted with acute pancreatitis during a 39-month study period was undertaken. Data were recorded regarding demographics, diagnosis, predicted and actual severity of gallstone pancreatitis (index and recurrent attacks), the role of ERCP and computed tomography scanning, the timing of cholecystectomy (open and laparoscopic), intraoperative cholangiography, duration of hospital stay, complications and mortality.

RESULTS

: There were 216 patients admitted with acute pancreatitis,106 of whom had proven gallstones. An ERCP was performed in 62(59%) patients with gallstone pancreatitis but not more commonly in patients with severe pancreatitis, and common bile duct stones were identified in 26% of these patients. Of the 70 (66%)patients who had a cholecystectomy, 56 (80%) had it within 3 weeks of admission. Although the proportion of patients with gallstone pancreatitis who had a cholecystectomy is similar to the earlier study, there has been a significant increase in the proportion of patients having a cholecystectomy during the index admission (chi2 = 3.83; P = 0.05). This has resulted in a reduction in recurrent pancreatitis (P < 0.001). Although the overall mortality from gallstone pancreatitis has not significantly decreased, it has for patients with predicted severe gallstone pancreatitis (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

: There has been reasonable compliance with published guidelines and some progress in the management of gallstone pancreatitis,particularly in relation to performing timely laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a reduction in the incidence of recurrent pancreatitis. Concerns remain regarding the overuse of diagnostic ERCP in patients with mild pancreatitis.

Effect of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy on outcome after gallstone pancreatitis

Acute gallstone pancreatitis has traditionally been managed by early cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). To evaluate the effect of IOC on patient outcome, we analyzed all patients operated on for acute gallstone pancreatitis at our institution over a 3-year period. A total of 200 patients (37 open, 163 laparoscopic) were evaluated. Nineteen of 34 patients who underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were found to have common bile duct (CBD) stones. The 59 patients who underwent cholecystectomy with IOC had significantly longer operative times compared to the 141 patients who underwent cholecystectomy alone (167 vs. 105 minutes for open [P = 0.008] and 89 vs. 68 minutes for laparoscopic [P < 0.0001] operations). Of the 59 patients who underwent IOC, only nine (15%) had abnormal cholangiograms, and CBD exploration in seven revealed stones in four patients, edematous ampullae in two, and no abnormality in one. Six of eight patients (5 IOC, 3 no IOC) who required immediate postoperative ERCP were noted to have CBD stones. Patients who underwent IOC had significantly longer postoperative hospital stays (3.8 vs. 2.0 days [P = 0.007]). The incidence of retained CBD stones following surgery was similar (5.1% IOC, 2.8% no IOC). Although 7 of 122 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy without IOC were readmitted, only one was found on ERCP to have a retained CBD stone. Age, sex, preoperative days, procedure type, and biliary-pancreatic complications after discharge did not differ significantly between patients with and without IOC. We conclude that IOC in patients operated on for acute gallstone pancreatitis results in a longer operative time and a prolonged postoperative course, but has no effect on the incidence of retained CBD stones.

Update on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including a clinical pathway

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a minimally invasive procedure in which the gallbladder is removed. Patients with symptomatic gallstones or biliary dyskinesis are eligible for this procedure. No specific contraindications exist except for poor surgical risk factors. The rate of conversion to an open technique is increased in patients with acute disease, pancreatitis, bleeding disorders, unusual anatomy, and prior upper abdominal surgery. Complications occur even with experienced laparoscopists, and the important technical aspects of surgery have been identified. The length of the hospital stay and postoperative recovery time is markedly shortened compared with that of standard cholecystectomy. This procedure offers sufficient advantages to patients that it has become the standard of practice in most cases.