[Foetal sampling techniques]

[Transabdominal chorionic villus sampling using biopsy forceps or needle: pregnancy outcomes by technique used]

OBJECTIVES

To compare pregnancy outcomes after transabdominal chorionic villus sampling using biopsy forceps or needle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective bicentric study including all women who had a transabdominal chorionic villus sampling between 2005 and 2009 (172 using biopsy forceps and 160 using needle). The primary endpoint was the rate of fetal loss, after excluding medical abortion due to the result of the biopsy. The secondary endpoint was the rate of premature rupture of the membrane. All cases were reviewed to try to determine the responsibility of the biopsy.

RESULTS

The pregnancy outcomes were not different between the two groups: 4 (4.4%) fetal losses in the biopsy forceps group and 6 (7.4%) in the needle group (P=0.52). Only one case (1.2%) of fetal loss can be attributed to the biopsy, using a needle, and none (0%) following a forceps biospy (P=0.29). The rate of premature rupture of the membrane was comparable in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The pregnancy outcomes following chorionic villus sampling using a biopsy forceps or a needle seem comparable.

[Feasibility of chorionic villous sampling outside a prenatal diagnosis center]

OBJECTIVES

According to new recommendations, a high combined risk for Down syndrome in the first trimester of pregnancy must indicate the need for a prenatal diagnosis. This is possible thanks to chorionic villous sampling. The objective of our study was to show that chorionic villous sampling is achievable in everyday practice, even outside research centers for pre-natal diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

It was a descriptive, retrospective study. All the patients who underwent a chorionic villous sampling in our level II maternity center from November 2005 to September 2009 were included. Success and complications rates linked with the procedure were calculated.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen pregnancies were included. A definitive diagnosis was given in 98.25% of cases. A secondary amniocentesis was necessary in 1.75% of cases. A medical termination of the pregnancy was done in 18.42% of cases. Without accounting for underlying pathology, fetal loss rate was up to 5.75%. Only one case of unexpected fetal loss was noted (1.15% of the ongoing pregnancies).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the presence of trained professional allows for onsite performance chorionic villous sampling.