Predicting the leakage performance of small bodyworn disposable incontinence pads using laboratory tests

The Temperature Dependence of Micro-Leakage between Restorative and Pulp Capping Materials by Cu Diffusion

We used the Cu ions for the leakage analysis between pulp capping and restorative materials. Theoretically, Cu has more advantages than Ag ions due to their smaller radii (r_Cu²⁺=73 pm and r_Ag²⁺=94 pm), lower mass density (d_Cu=8.96 g/cm³ and d_Ag=10.49 g/cm³) and higher radio opacity which can be more useful by X-ray or EDX detectors, cheaper price and more abundance in planet when compared with Ag element which is generally used in the leakage studies. The micro leakage between dental restorations and pulp capping materials has been determined by using Micro Computed Tomography, Scanning Electron Microscopy and EDX analysis. It is found that the leakage has temperature dependent mechanism which increases with the increasing temperature. As a result, using Cu solution for leakage studies in dentine is an effective and easy method which can be used in dental science.

Absorbent products for light urinary incontinence in women

BACKGROUND

Incontinence is a common and embarrassing problem which has a profound effect on social and psychological well-being. Many people wear absorbent products to contain urine leakage and protect their clothes. It can be difficult to define light urinary incontinence because urine volumes, flow and frequency rates may vary substantially whilst still being considered 'light'. Light incontinence may encompass occasional (monthly) leaks of very small amounts (e.g. 1 g to 2 g) up to frequent leaks (several times per day) of larger amounts (e.g. 20 g to 50 g). A practical definition is urine loss that can be contained within a small absorbent pad (typically 50 g to 500 g; ISO 1996).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of different types of absorbent product designs for women with light urinary incontinence.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (3 May 2006) and the reference lists of relevant articles were perused.

SELECTION CRITERIA

TYPES OF STUDIES: All randomised or quasi-randomised trials of absorbent products for women with light urinary incontinence.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

Women with light urinary incontinence. TYPES OF INTERVENTION: Absorbent products (disposable insert pads, menstrual pads, washable pants with integral pad, washable insert pads) suitable for light incontinence.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed the methodological quality of potentially eligible studies and independently extracted data from the included trial.

MAIN RESULTS

One study with 85 participants met the selection criteria. This trial studied all the absorbent product designs included in this review. Data were presented on all included outcomes. For preventing leakage, for preference and for overall acceptability disposable insert pads are better than disposable menstrual pads which are better than washable pants with integral pad which are better than washable insert pads. There is no strong evidence that either disposables or washables are better for skin health. The disposable insert is the most expensive design and there is no dominant design for cost-effectiveness. There is evidence that some women will prefer alternative designs which are all cheaper than disposable inserts.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although data were available from only one eligible trial the data were sufficiently robust to make recommendations for practice. Disposable insert pads are typically more effective than the other designs considered. However, because they are the most expensive, providing choice of designs (or combinations of designs for different circumstances) is likely to be cost-effective.

A critical investigation of ISO 11948-2 and ISO 11948-1 for predicting the leakage performance of small disposable incontinence pads for lightly incontinent women

ISO 11948-2--an international standard laboratory method developed to predict the leakage performance of small disposable pads for lightly incontinent women--was investigated. The repeatability and reproducibility (precision within and between laboratories, respectively) of two variants on the method were found to be poor. The coefficient of variation for each method variant in each laboratory (two laboratories ran each variant) was higher than 40% for about half the 12 products evaluated. Results differed by up to 94% between laboratories for a given product. The ability of the method to predict the leakage performance of pads was investigated by measuring correlations between the clinical evaluations of the 12 products, and technical evaluations using ISO 11948-2. Correlations were very weak (r < or= 0.487). Accordingly, it is recommended that 11948-2 is withdrawn. A second international standard method (ISO 11948-1)--developed for evaluating large pads, but sometimes used on small ones--was also investigated. Correlations between the clinical evaluations of the 12 products and technical evaluations using ISO 11948-1 were weak (r < or = 0.560). Accordingly, it is recommended that ISO 11948-1 is not used for evaluating small disposable bodyworn pads for women.

How well does ISO 11948-1 (the Rothwell method) for measuring the absorption capacity of incontinence pads in the laboratory correlate with clinical pad performance

The ability of ISO 11948-1 (the Rothwell method) to predict the leakage performance of disposable bodyworn pads for heavy urinary incontinence was investigated by measuring correlations between models based on clinical evaluations of 138 diapers and inserts (the two major design categories), and technical models based on their Rothwell absorption capacities and design features. Correlations were poorer than in the original 1993 study for the standard (r < or =0.87 compared with r < or =0.95), but still strong enough to help with purchasing choices. For a given Rothwell capacity, the leakage performance of diapers was far superior to inserts; for example, diapers containing 450 and 300 g of urine performed, as well as inserts containing 300 and 100 g, respectively. No evidence was found for any other design feature having a significant impact on leakage performance. The coefficient of variation for Rothwell capacity (a measure of product consistency) had significant impact on the leakage performance of diapers, but not inserts. The probability of diapers with the poorest consistency leaking exceeded that for the best by about 10 percentage points. Similarly, diapers were about 10 percentage points more likely to leak when used at night than during the day. Differences between day-time and night-time use of inserts were not studied.

Disposable bedpads for incontinence: predicting their clinical leakage properties using laboratory tests

A multi-centre project has been run to identify laboratory tests capable of predicting the leakage performance of disposable incontinence bedpads. Each of 95 subjects tested each of six products for a week in turn and reported whether or not they and/or their carers found the leakage performance of each product acceptable. In addition, carers noted the severity with which individual used bedpads had leaked so that, when they had been weighed, their leakage performance could be determined as a function of urine weight. These clinical data were compared with results from the 16 different laboratory tests used routinely for bedpad evaluation in three hospital laboratories. Each test was evaluated by seeing how well the data it yielded correlated with the clinical test data. No individual test was very successful at predicting the performance of bedpads when used as sole protection but a combination of an absorption capacity test and an absorption time test predicted the percentage of users/carers finding leakage performance acceptable, accurate to within +/- eight percentage points for all six test products. A different absorption capacity test proved most successful for bedpads used as back-up to body-worn products. It predicted the percentage of users/carers finding leakage performance acceptable, accurate to +/- five percentage points for all six products.