pPV: a novel IRES-containing vector to facilitate plasmid immunization and antibody response characterization

IRES-incorporated lactococcal bicistronic vector for target gene expression in a eukaryotic system

Plasmid DNAs isolated from lactic acid bacteria (LAB) such as Lactococcus lactis (L. lactis) has been gaining more interests for its positive prospects in genetic engineering-related applications. In this study, the lactococcal plasmid, pNZ8048 was modified so as to be able to express multiple genes in the eukaryotic system. Therefore, a cassette containing an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) was cloned between VP2 gene of a very virulent infectious bursal disease (vvIBDV) UPM 04190 of Malaysian local isolates and the reporter gene, green fluorescent protein (GFP) into pNZ:CA, a newly constructed derivative of pNZ8048 harboring the cytomegalovirus promoter (Pcmv) and polyadenylation signal. The new bicistronic vector, denoted as pNZ:vig was subjected to in vitro transcription/translation system followed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis to rapidly verify its functionality. Immunoblotting profiles showed the presence of 49 and 29kDa bands that corresponds to the sizes of the VP2 and GFP proteins respectively. This preliminary result shows that the newly constructed lactococcal bicistronic vector can co-express multiple genes in a eukaryotic system via the IRES element thus suggesting its feasibility to be used for transfection of in vitro cell cultures and vaccine delivery.

DNA vaccines: a review

Therapeutic and prophylactic DNA vaccine clinical trials for a variety of pathogens and cancers are underway (Chattergoon et al., 1997; Taubes, 1997). The speed with which initiation of these trials occurred is no less than astounding; clinical trials for a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) gp160 DNA-based vaccine were underway within 36 months of the first description of "genetic immunization" (Tang et al., 1992) and within 24 months of publication of the first article describing intramuscular delivery of a DNA vaccine (Ulmer et al., 1993). Despite the relative fervor with which clinical trials have progressed, it can be safely stated that DNA-based vaccines will not be an immunological "silver bullet." In this regard, it was satisfying to see a publication entitled "DNA Vaccines--A Modern Gimmick or a Boon to Vaccinology?" (Manickan et al., 1997b). There is no doubt that this technology is well beyond the phenomenology phase of study. Research niches and models have been established and will allow the truly difficult questions of mechanism and application to target species to be studied. These two aspects of future studies are intricately interwoven and will ultimately determine the necessity for mechanistic understanding and the evolution of target species studies. The basic science of DNA vaccines has yet to be clearly defined and will ultimately determine the success or failure of this technology to find a place in the immunological arsenal against disease. In a commentary on a published study describing DNA vaccine-mediated protection against heterologous challenge with HIV-1 in chimpanzees, Ronald Kennedy (1997) states, "As someone who has been in the trenches of AIDS vaccine research for over a decade and who, together with collaborators, has attempted a number of different vaccine approaches that have not panned out, I have a relatively pessimistic view of new AIDS vaccine approaches." Kennedy then goes on to summarize a DNA-based multigene vaccine approach and the subsequent development of neutralizing titers and potent CTL activity in immunized chimpanzees (Boyer et al., 1997). Dr. Kennedy closes his commentary by stating. "The most exciting aspect of this report is the experimental challenge studies.... Viraemia was extremely transient and present at low levels during a single time point. These animals remained seronegative ... for one year after challenge" and "Overall, these observations engender some excitement". (Kennedy, 1997). Although this may seem a less than rousing cheer for DNA vaccine technology, it is a refreshingly hopeful outlook for a pathogen to which experience has taught humility. It has also been suggested that DNA vaccine technology may find its true worth as a novel alternative option for the development of vaccines against diseases that conventional vaccines have been unsuccessful in controlling (Manickan et al., 1997b). This is a difficult task for any vaccine, let alone a novel technology. DNA-based vaccine technology represents a powerful and novel entry into the field of immunological control of disease. The spinoff research has also been dramatic, and includes the rediscovery of potent bacterially derived immunomodulatory DNA sequences (Gilkeson et al., 1989), as well as availability of a methodology that allows extremely rapid assessment and dissection of both antigens and immunity. The benefits of potent Th1-type immune responses to DNA vaccines must not be overlooked, particularly in the light of suggestions that Western culture immunization practices may be responsible for the rapid increases in adult allergic and possibly autoimmune disorders (Rook and Stanford, 1998). The full utility of this technology has not yet been realized, and yet its broad potential is clearly evident. Future investigations of this technology must not be hindered by impatience, misunderstanding, and lack of funding or failure of an informed collective and collaborative effort.

Components of vectors for gene transfer and expression in mammalian cells

Progress in diverse scientific fields has been realized partly by the continued refinement of mammalian gene expression vectors. A growing understanding of biological processes now allows the design of vector components to meet specific objectives. Thus, gene expression in a tissue-selective or ubiquitous manner may be accomplished by selecting appropriate promoter/enhancer elements; stabilization of labile mRNAs may be effected through removal of 3' untranslated regions or fusion to heterologous stabilizing sequences; protein targeting to selected tissues or different organelles is carried out using specific signal sequences; fusion moieties effect the detection, enhanced yield, surface expression, prolongation of half-life, and facile purification of recombinant proteins; and careful tailoring of the codon content of heterologous genes enhances protein production from poorly translated transcripts. The use of viral as well as nonviral genetic elements in vectors allows the stable replication of episomal elements without the need for chromosomal integration. The development of baculovirus vectors for both transient and stable gene expression in mammalian cells has expanded the utility of such vectors for a broad range of cell types. Internal ribosome entry sites are now widely used in many applications that require coexpression of different genes. Progress in gene targeting techniques is likely to transform gene expression and amplification in mammalian cells into a considerably less labor-intensive operation. Future progress in the elucidation of eukaryotic protein degradation pathways holds promise for developing methods to minimize proteolysis of specific recombinant proteins in mammalian cells and tissues.

Internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs): reality and use

IRESs are known to recruit ribosomes directly, without a previous scanning of untranslated region of mRNA by the ribosomes. IRESs have been found in a number of viral and cellular mRNAs. Experimentally, IRESs are commonly used to direct the expression of the second cistrons of bicistronic mRNAs. The mechanism of action of IRESs is not fully understood and a certain number of laboratories were not successful in using them in a reliable manner. Three observations done in our laboratory suggested that IRESs might not work as functionally as it was generally believed. Stem loops added before IRESs inhibited mRNA translation. When added into bicistronic mRNAs, IRESs initiated translation of the second cistrons efficiently only when the intercistronic region contained about 80 nucleotides, and they did not work any more effectively with intercistronic regions containing at least 300-400 nucleotides. Conversely, IRESs inserted at any position into the coding region of a cistron interrupted its translation and initiated translation of the following cistron. The first two data are hardly compatible with the idea that IRESs are able to recruit ribosomes without using the classical scanning mechanism. IRESs are highly structured and cannot be scanned by the 40S ribosomal subunit. We suggest that IRESs are short-circuited and are essentially potent stimulators favoring translation in particular physiological situations.