Molecular detection of human papillomavirus in women with minor-grade cervical cytology abnormalities

Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions

BACKGROUND

Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (LSIL) are minor lesions of the cervical epithelium, detectable by cytological examination of cells collected from the surface of the cervix of a woman.Usually, women with ASCUS and LSIL do not have cervical (pre-) cancer, however a substantial proportion of them do have underlying high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN, grade 2 or 3) and so are at increased risk for developing cervical cancer. Therefore, accurate triage of women with ASCUS or LSIL is required to identify those who need further management.This review evaluates two ways to triage women with ASCUS or LSIL: repeating the cytological test, and DNA testing for high-risk types of the human papillomavirus (hrHPV) - the main causal factor of cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVES

Main objective To compare the accuracy of hrHPV testing with the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay against that of repeat cytology for detection of underlying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) or grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) in women with ASCUS or LSIL. For the HC2 assay, a positive result was defined as proposed by the manufacturer. For repeat cytology, different cut-offs were used to define positivity: Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (ASCUS+), low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions or worse (LSIL+) or high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+).Secondary objective To assess the accuracy of the HC2 assay to detect CIN2+ or CIN3+ in women with ASCUS or LSIL in a larger group of reports of studies that applied hrHPV testing and the reference standard (coloscopy and biopsy), irrespective whether or not repeat cytology was done.

SEARCH METHODS

We made a comprehensive literature search that included the Cochrane Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (through PubMed), and EMBASE (last search 6 January 2011). Selected journals likely to contain relevant papers were handsearched from 1992 to 2010 (December). We also searched CERVIX, the bibliographic database of the Unit of Cancer Epidemiology at the Scientific Institute of Public Health (Brussels, Belgium) which contains more than 20,000 references on cervical cancer.More recent searches, up to December 2012, targeted reports on the accuracy of triage of ASCUS or LSIL with other HPV DNA assays, or HPV RNA assays and other molecular markers. These searches will be used for new Cochrane reviews as well as for updates of the current review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies eligible for inclusion in the review had to include: women presenting with a cervical cytology result of ASCUS or LSIL, who had undergone both HC2 testing and repeat cytology, or HC2 testing alone, and were subsequently subjected to reference standard verification with colposcopy and colposcopy-directed biopsies for histologic verification.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review authors independently extracted data from the selected studies, and obtained additional data from report authors.Two groups of meta-analyses were performed: group I concerned triage of women with ASCUS, group II concerned women with LSIL. The bivariate model (METADAS-macro in SAS) was used to assess the absolute accuracy of the triage tests in both groups as well as the differences in accuracy between the triage tests.

MAIN RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity of HC2 was significantly higher than that of repeat cytology at cut-off ASCUS+ to detect CIN2+ in both triage of ASCUS and LSIL (relative sensitivity of 1.27 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.39; P value < 0.0001) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.4; P value 0.007), respectively. In ASCUS triage, the pooled specificity of the triage methods did not differ significantly from each other (relative specificity: 0.99 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.03; P value 0.98)). However, the specificity of HC2 was substantially, and significantly, lower than that of repeat cytology in the triage of LSIL (relative specificity: 0.66 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.75) P value < 0.0001).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

HPV-triage with HC2 can be recommended to triage women with ASCUS because it has higher accuracy (significantly higher sensitivity, and similar specificity) than repeat cytology. When triaging women with LSIL, an HC2 test yields a significantly higher sensitivity, but a significantly lower specificity, compared to a repeat cytology. Therefore, practice recommendations for management of women with LSIL should be balanced, taking local circumstances into account.

The role of p-STAT3 (ser727) revealed by its association with Ki-67 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

OBJECTIVES

Constitutive activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) has been described in many types of cancers. However, the role of phospho-STAT3 (p-STAT3) at serine residue 727 is in large part undetermined. Our purposes of this study were to evaluate the expression patterns of p-STAT3 (ser727) in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and to explore its possible role in the progression of cervical cancer.

METHODS

Paraffin-embedded sections from 56 patients including 20 CIN 1, 10 CIN 2, and 26 CIN 3 were collected in this study. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed, and the expression patterns of p-STAT3 (ser727) were categorized by semiquantitative method and further correlated with the CIN histopathologic grade using the chi(2) test with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons and with the proliferation marker Ki-67 expression using Fisher's Exact Test.

RESULTS

The categorized high p-STAT3 (ser727) expression group in nuclei of dysplastic cells was significantly higher in CIN 3 (76.92%), in comparison with CIN 1/2 (13.33%, P < 0.001). Moreover, both the nuclear and cytoplasmic p-STAT3 (ser727) expressions were correlated with Ki-67 nuclear staining (P < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our result revealed that aberrant expression levels of p-STAT3 (ser727) were significantly correlated with CIN lesion grade and cell proliferation. Evaluation of p-STAT3 (ser727) expression may provide additional prognostic information for the clinical course of the disease and therefore to be developed as a prognostic indicator for cervical cancer.

Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and catalyzed signal amplification in situ hybridization methods for human papillomavirus detection in paraffin-embedded cervical preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions

BACKGROUND

Two molecular methods for HPV genotyping in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue were evaluated: in house polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR) with consensus and type-specific primers and a novel procedure of in situ hybridization-a catalyzed signal amplification system (CSA-ISH, Genpoint, DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). The number of HPV positive cases and detected viral types were compared in cervical biopsies and cone specimens according to histopathological diagnosis. Primer efficiency in detecting various types of HPV by PCR method was evaluated.

METHODS

DNA samples (101) were used as a template to amplify with three pairs of consensus (MY09/11, GP5+/6 +, CPI/IIG) and four type-specific HPV primers (HPV-6/11, 18, 16 and 33). The according histological tissue sections were analyzed with CSA-ISH method, using commercial HPV biotinylated probes HPV-6/11, 16/18 and 31/33/51.

RESULTS

The degree of concordance for PCR and CSA-ISH was 64.4%. In 63 of 101 samples (62.4%), HPV was detected by PCR, while only 35 (34.7%) were positive using CSA-ISH. CSA-ISH found lower percentages for all HPV types, except HPV-6/11. A lower percentage of positive results in all high-grade lesions was detected by CSA-ISH. Multiple infections were detected by PCR in only one sample and in three samples by CSA-ISH. Detection with My09/11 primers followed by Gp5+/6+ primers, in nested reaction, gave the highest number of positive results: 58 of 63 (92%). None of the samples diagnosed as condylomata planum or CIN I was positive for HPV-6/11 (low risk type), which was detected exclusively in condylomata acuminatum group.

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly higher number of positive samples was detected with PCR than with CSA-ISH method. CSA-ISH method should be improved, especially in detecting HPV in high-grade lesions. CSA-ISH may be more accurate in detection of multiple infections. GP5+/6+ in nested reaction after MY09/11 detected the highest number of positive results. Samples diagnosed as benign lesions positive on HPV-X must be monitored as possible candidates for progression. CIN I lesions, which were HPV negative, probably will not progress. This finding may be important in planning therapy and avoiding unnecessary treatment.

Clinical utility of molecular detection of human papillomavirus in cervical samples by hybrid capture technology

High-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the primary risk factor for developing cervical carcinoma. Hybrid capture II HPV Test (HCII) is a standardized test for molecular detection of HPV DNA in cervical swabs. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical utility of the HCII when used in combination with conventional cytology in a group of 171 women who were followed-up with both, cytology and molecular testing for 3 years. At the end of the study, only women positive for high-risk HPV at baseline had retained or worsened cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). In most women who were negative for high-risk HPV, CIN had resolved within 3 years. These results are in concordance with earlier studies reporting the highly negative predictive value of high-risk HPV testing. Both cytology and high-risk HPV testing provide significant clinical information on the current cervical status of a woman. They should be used in combination for primary screening of CIN, which will provide a more selective and cost-effective follow-up.