1
|
Martinez-Nunez AE, Rozell CJ, Little S, Tan H, Schmidt SL, Grill WM, Pajic M, Turner DA, de Hemptinne C, Machado A, Schiff ND, Holt-Becker AS, Raike RS, Malekmohammadi M, Pathak YJ, Himes L, Greene D, Krinke L, Arlotti M, Rossi L, Robinson J, Bahners BH, Litvak V, Milosevic L, Ghatan S, Schaper FLWVJ, Fox MD, Gregg NM, Kubu C, Jordano JJ, Cascella NG, Nho Y, Halpern CH, Mayberg HS, Choi KS, Song H, Cha J, Alagapan S, Dosenbach NUF, Gordon EM, Ren J, Liu H, Kalia LV, Hescham SA, Kusyk DM, Ramirez-Zamora A, Foote KD, Okun MS, Wong JK. Proceedings of the 12th annual deep brain stimulation think tank: cutting edge technology meets novel applications. Front Hum Neurosci 2025; 19:1544994. [PMID: 40070487 PMCID: PMC11893992 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1544994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/14/2025] Open
Abstract
The Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank XII was held on August 21st to 23rd. This year we showcased groundbreaking advancements in neuromodulation technology, focusing heavily on the novel uses of existing technology as well as next-generation technology. Our keynote speaker shared the vision of using neuro artificial intelligence to predict depression using brain electrophysiology. Innovative applications are currently being explored in stroke, disorders of consciousness, and sleep, while established treatments for movement disorders like Parkinson's disease are being refined with adaptive stimulation. Neuromodulation is solidifying its role in treating psychiatric disorders such as depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder, particularly for patients with treatment-resistant symptoms. We estimate that 300,000 leads have been implanted to date for neurologic and neuropsychiatric indications. Magnetoencephalography has provided insights into the post-DBS physiological changes. The field is also critically examining the ethical implications of implants, considering the long-term impacts on clinicians, patients, and manufacturers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher J. Rozell
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Simon Little
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Huiling Tan
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen L. Schmidt
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Neurobiology and Neurosurgery, Duke University and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Warren M. Grill
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Neurobiology and Neurosurgery, Duke University and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Miroslav Pajic
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Neurobiology and Neurosurgery, Duke University and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Dennis A. Turner
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Neurobiology and Neurosurgery, Duke University and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Andre Machado
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Nicholas D. Schiff
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, New York, NY, United States
| | - Abbey S. Holt-Becker
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Robert S. Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research, and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Mahsa Malekmohammadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation, Valencia, CA, United States
| | | | - Lyndahl Himes
- Neuromodulation Division, Abbott, Plano, TX, United States
| | - David Greene
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Lothar Krinke
- Newronika SpA, Milan, Italy
- West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | | | | | - Jacob Robinson
- Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Bahne H. Bahners
- Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Boston, MA, United States
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Vladimir Litvak
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luka Milosevic
- Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Saadi Ghatan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maria Fareri Children's Hospital, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Frederic L. W. V. J. Schaper
- Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michael D. Fox
- Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Cynthia Kubu
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - James J. Jordano
- Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
- Department of Biochemistry, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
- Neuroethics Studies Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nicola G. Cascella
- Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - YoungHoon Nho
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Casey H. Halpern
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Radiology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ki Sueng Choi
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Radiology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Haneul Song
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jungho Cha
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sankaraleengam Alagapan
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Nico U. F. Dosenbach
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Evan M. Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | | | - Hesheng Liu
- Changping Laboratory, Beijing, China
- Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Lorraine V. Kalia
- Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah-Anna Hescham
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Dorian M. Kusyk
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D. Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K. Wong
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santyr B, Boutet A, Ajala A, Germann J, Qiu J, Fasano A, Lozano AM, Kucharczyk W. Emerging Techniques for the Personalization of Deep Brain Stimulation Programming. Can J Neurol Sci 2025:1-13. [PMID: 39963066 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2025.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2025]
Abstract
The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies on applying carefully titrated therapeutic stimulation at specific targets. Once implanted, the electrical stimulation parameters at each electrode contact can be modified. Iteratively adjusting the stimulation parameters enables testing for the optimal stimulation settings. Due to the large parameter space, the currently employed empirical testing of individual parameters based on acute clinical response is not sustainable. Within the constraints of short clinical visits, optimization is particularly challenging when clinical features lack immediate feedback, as seen in DBS for dystonia and depression and with the cognitive and axial side effects of DBS for Parkinson's disease. A personalized approach to stimulation parameter selection is desirable as the increasing complexity of modern DBS devices also expands the number of available parameters. This review describes three emerging imaging and electrophysiological methods of personalizing DBS programming. Normative connectome-base stimulation utilizes large datasets of normal or disease-matched connectivity imaging. The stimulation location for an individual patient can then be varied to engage regions associated with optimal connectivity. Electrophysiology-guided open- and closed-loop stimulation capitalizes on the electrophysiological recording capabilities of modern implanted devices to individualize stimulation parameters based on biomarkers of success or symptom onset. Finally, individual functional MRI (fMRI)-based approaches use fMRI during active stimulation to identify parameters resulting in characteristic patterns of functional engagement associated with long-term treatment response. Each method provides different but complementary information, and maximizing treatment efficacy likely requires a combined approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Santyr
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandre Boutet
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jürgen Germann
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alfonso Fasano
- Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Walter Kucharczyk
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peeters J, Van Bogaert T, Boogers A, Gransier R, Wouters J, De Vloo P, Vandenberghe W, Barbe MT, Visser-Vandewalle V, Nuttin B, Dembek TA, Mc Laughlin M. Electrophysiological sweet spot mapping in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease patients. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:794-801. [PMID: 38821395 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a well-established therapy to treat Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the STN-DBS sub-target remains debated. Recently, a white matter tract termed the hyperdirect pathway (HDP), directly connecting the motor cortex to STN, has gained interest as HDP stimulation is hypothesized to drive DBS therapeutic effects. Previously, we have investigated EEG-based evoked potentials (EPs) to better understand the neuroanatomical origins of the DBS clinical effect. We found a 3-ms peak (P3) relating to clinical benefit, and a 10-ms peak (P10) suggesting nigral side effects. Here, we aimed to investigate the neuroanatomical origins of DBS EPs using probabilistic mapping. METHODS EPs were recorded using EEG whilst low-frequency stimulation was delivered at all DBS-contacts individually. Next, EPs were mapped onto the patients' individual space and then transformed to MNI standard space. Using voxel-wise and fiber-wise probabilistic mapping, we determined hotspots/hottracts and coldspots/coldtracts for P3 and P10. Topography analysis was also performed to determine the spatial distribution of the DBS EPs. RESULTS In all 13 patients (18 hemispheres), voxel- and fiber-wise probabilistic mapping resulted in a P3-hotspot/hottract centered on the posterodorsomedial STN border indicative of HDP stimulation, while the P10-hotspot/hottract covered large parts of the substantia nigra. CONCLUSION This study investigated EP-based probabilistic mapping in PD patients during STN-DBS, revealing a P3-hotspot/hottract in line with HDP stimulation and P10-hotspot/hottract related to nigral stimulation. Results from this study provide key evidence for an electrophysiological measure of HDP and nigral stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Peeters
- Experimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tine Van Bogaert
- Experimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexandra Boogers
- Experimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Neurology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robin Gransier
- Experimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Wouters
- Experimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philippe De Vloo
- Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Neurosurgery, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wim Vandenberghe
- Department of Neurology, UZ Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory for Parkinson Research, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael T Barbe
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Stereotactic & Functional Neurosurgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bart Nuttin
- Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Neurosurgery, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | - Till A Dembek
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Myles Mc Laughlin
- Experimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Campbell BA, Favi Bocca L, Tiefenbach J, Hogue O, Nagel SJ, Rammo R, Escobar Sanabria D, Machado AG, Baker KB. Myogenic and cortical evoked potentials vary as a function of stimulus pulse geometry delivered in the subthalamic nucleus of Parkinson's disease patients. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1216916. [PMID: 37693765 PMCID: PMC10484227 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1216916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The therapeutic efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD) may be limited for some patients by the presence of stimulation-related side effects. Such effects are most often attributed to electrical current spread beyond the target region. Prior computational modeling studies have suggested that changing the degree of asymmetry of the individual phases of the biphasic, stimulus pulse may allow for more selective activation of neural elements in the target region. To the extent that different neural elements contribute to the therapeutic vs. side-effect inducing effects of DBS, such improved selectivity may provide a new parameter for optimizing DBS to increase the therapeutic window. Methods We investigated the effect of six different pulse geometries on cortical and myogenic evoked potentials in eight patients with PD whose leads were temporarily externalized following STN DBS implant surgery. DBS-cortical evoked potentials were quantified using peak to peak measurements and wavelets and myogenic potentials were quantified using RMS. Results We found that the slope of the recruitment curves differed significantly as a function of pulse geometry for both the cortical- and myogenic responses. Notably, this effect was observed most frequently when stimulation was delivered using a monopolar, as opposed to a bipolar, configuration. Discussion Manipulating pulse geometry results in differential physiological effects at both the cortical and neuromuscular level. Exploiting these differences may help to expand DBS' therapeutic window and support the potential for incorporating pulse geometry as an additional parameter for optimizing therapeutic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett A. Campbell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Leonardo Favi Bocca
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Jakov Tiefenbach
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Olivia Hogue
- Center for Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Sean J. Nagel
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Richard Rammo
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - David Escobar Sanabria
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Andre G. Machado
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Kenneth B. Baker
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Passera B, Harquel S, Chauvin A, Gérard P, Lai L, Moro E, Meoni S, Fraix V, David O, Raffin E. Multi-scale and cross-dimensional TMS mapping: A proof of principle in patients with Parkinson's disease and deep brain stimulation. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1004763. [PMID: 37214390 PMCID: PMC10192635 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1004763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping has become a critical tool for exploratory studies of the human corticomotor (M1) organization. Here, we propose to gather existing cutting-edge TMS-EMG and TMS-EEG approaches into a combined multi-dimensional TMS mapping that considers local and whole-brain excitability changes as well as state and time-specific changes in cortical activity. We applied this multi-dimensional TMS mapping approach to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the sub-thalamic nucleus (STN) ON and OFF. Our goal was to identifying one or several TMS mapping-derived markers that could provide unprecedent new insights onto the mechanisms of DBS in movement disorders. Methods Six PD patients (1 female, mean age: 62.5 yo [59-65]) implanted with DBS-STN for 1 year, underwent a robotized sulcus-shaped TMS motor mapping to measure changes in muscle-specific corticomotor representations and a movement initiation task to probe state-dependent modulations of corticospinal excitability in the ON (using clinically relevant DBS parameters) and OFF DBS states. Cortical excitability and evoked dynamics of three cortical areas involved in the neural control of voluntary movements (M1, pre-supplementary motor area - preSMA and inferior frontal gyrus - IFG) were then mapped using TMS-EEG coupling in the ON and OFF state. Lastly, we investigated the timing and nature of the STN-to-M1 inputs using a paired pulse DBS-TMS-EEG protocol. Results In our sample of patients, DBS appeared to induce fast within-area somatotopic re-arrangements of motor finger representations in M1, as revealed by mediolateral shifts of corticomuscle representations. STN-DBS improved reaction times while up-regulating corticospinal excitability, especially during endogenous motor preparation. Evoked dynamics revealed marked increases in inhibitory circuits in the IFG and M1 with DBS ON. Finally, inhibitory conditioning effects of STN single pulses on corticomotor activity were found at timings relevant for the activation of inhibitory GABAergic receptors (4 and 20 ms). Conclusion Taken together, these results suggest a predominant role of some markers in explaining beneficial DBS effects, such as a context-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability and the recruitment of distinct inhibitory circuits, involving long-range projections from higher level motor centers and local GABAergic neuronal populations. These combined measures might help to identify discriminative features of DBS mechanisms towards deep clinical phenotyping of DBS effects in Parkinson's Disease and in other pathological conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brice Passera
- CNRS UMR 5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et Neurocognition, LPNC, Grenoble, France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sylvain Harquel
- CNRS UMR 5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et Neurocognition, LPNC, Grenoble, France
- CNRS, INSERM, IRMaGe, Grenoble, France
- Defitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute and Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alan Chauvin
- CNRS UMR 5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et Neurocognition, LPNC, Grenoble, France
| | - Pauline Gérard
- CNRS UMR 5105, Laboratoire Psychologie et Neurocognition, LPNC, Grenoble, France
| | - Lisa Lai
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Elena Moro
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Sara Meoni
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Valerie Fraix
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Olivier David
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
- Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, U1106, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France
| | - Estelle Raffin
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
- Defitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute and Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bangel KA, Bais M, Eijsker N, Schuurman PR, van den Munckhof P, Figee M, Smit DJA, Denys D. Acute effects of deep brain stimulation on brain function in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 148:109-117. [PMID: 36774324 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) yet neural markers of optimized stimulation parameters are largely unknown. We aimed to describe (sub-)cortical electrophysiological responses to acute DBS at various voltages in OCD. METHODS We explored how DBS doses between 3-5 V delivered to the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule of five OCD patients affected electroencephalograms and intracranial local field potentials (LFPs). We focused on theta power/ phase-stability, given their previously established role in DBS for OCD. RESULTS Cortical theta power and theta phase-stability did not increase significantly with DBS voltage. DBS-induced theta power peaks were seen at the previously defined individualized therapeutic voltage. Although LFP power generally increased with DBS voltages, this occurred mostly in frequency peaks that overlapped with stimulation artifacts limiting its interpretability. Though highly idiosyncratic, three subjects showed significant acute DBS effects on electroencephalogram theta power and four subjects showed significant carry-over effects (pre-vs post DBS, unstimulated) on LFP and electroencephalogram theta power. CONCLUSIONS Our findings challenge the presence of a consistent dose-response relationship between stimulation voltage and brain activity. SIGNIFICANCE Theta power may be investigated further as a neurophysiological marker to aid personalized DBS voltage optimization in OCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin A Bangel
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Institute of Neuroscience, The Medical School, Newcastle University, NE2 4HH, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Melisse Bais
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nadine Eijsker
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Richard Schuurman
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pepijn van den Munckhof
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Figee
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Dirk J A Smit
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Damiaan Denys
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
DBS-evoked cortical responses index optimal contact orientations and motor outcomes in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2023; 9:37. [PMID: 36906723 PMCID: PMC10008535 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-023-00474-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Although subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a highly-effective treatment for alleviating motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), clinicians currently lack reliable neurophysiological correlates of clinical outcomes for optimizing DBS parameter settings, which may contribute to treatment inefficacies. One parameter that could aid DBS efficacy is the orientation of current administered, albeit the precise mechanisms underlying optimal contact orientations and associated clinical benefits are not well understood. Herein, 24 PD patients received monopolar stimulation of the left STN during magnetoencephalography and standardized movement protocols to interrogate the directional specificity of STN-DBS current administration on accelerometer metrics of fine hand movements. Our findings demonstrate that optimal contact orientations elicit larger DBS-evoked cortical responses in the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex, and importantly, are differentially predictive of smoother movement profiles in a contact-dependent manner. Moreover, we summarize traditional evaluations of clinical efficacy (e.g., therapeutic windows, side effects) for a comprehensive review of optimal/non-optimal STN-DBS contact settings. Together, these data suggest that DBS-evoked cortical responses and quantitative movement outcomes may provide clinical insight for characterizing the optimal DBS parameters necessary for alleviating motor symptoms in patients with PD in the future.
Collapse
|
8
|
Formaggio E, Tonellato M, Antonini A, Castiglia L, Gallo L, Manganotti P, Masiero S, Del Felice A. Oscillatory EEG-TMS Reactivity in Parkinson Disease. J Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 40:263-268. [PMID: 34280941 DOI: 10.1097/wnp.0000000000000881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A dysfunction of beta oscillatory activity is the neurophysiological hallmark of Parkinson disease (PD). How cortical activity reacts to external perturbations may provide insight into pathophysiological mechanisms. This study aims at identifying modifications in EEG rhythms after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in PD. We hypothesize that single-pulse TMS can modulate brain intrinsic oscillatory properties (e.g., beta excess). METHODS EEG data were coregistered during single-pulse TMS (100 stimuli over the primary motor cortex [M1, hotspot for Abductor Pollicis Brevis], random intertrial interval from 8 to 13 seconds). We used a time-frequency analysis based on wavelet method to characterize modification of oscillatory rhythms (delta [1-4 Hz], theta [4-7 Hz], alpha [8-12 Hz], and beta [13-30 Hz] in 15 participants with PD compared with 10 healthy controls. RESULTS An increase in beta power over the sensorimotor areas was recorded at rest in the PD group ( P < 0.05). Brain oscillations in PD transiently reset after TMS: beta power over M1 becomes comparable to that recorded in aged-matched healthy subjects in the 2 seconds following TMS. CONCLUSIONS Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dominant motor cortex transiently normalizes cortical oscillations. More user-friendly noninvasive brain stimulation needs to be trialed, based on this proof of concept, to provide practical, portable techniques to treat motor symptoms in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuela Formaggio
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Michele Tonellato
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Study Centre on Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; and
| | - Leonora Castiglia
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Laura Gallo
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Manganotti
- Neurology Section, Cattinara University Hospital, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Stefano Masiero
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; and
| | - Alessandra Del Felice
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; and
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
D’Onofrio V, Manzo N, Guerra A, Landi A, Baro V, Määttä S, Weis L, Porcaro C, Corbetta M, Antonini A, Ferreri F. Combining Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Deep Brain Stimulation: Current Knowledge, Relevance and Future Perspectives. Brain Sci 2023; 13:brainsci13020349. [PMID: 36831892 PMCID: PMC9954740 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13020349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as an invasive neuromodulation technique for the treatment of several neurological disorders, but the mechanisms underlying its effects remain partially elusive. In this context, the application of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in patients treated with DBS represents an intriguing approach to investigate the neurophysiology of cortico-basal networks. Experimental studies combining TMS and DBS that have been performed so far have mainly aimed to evaluate the effects of DBS on the cerebral cortex and thus to provide insights into DBS's mechanisms of action. The modulation of cortical excitability and plasticity by DBS is emerging as a potential contributor to its therapeutic effects. Moreover, pairing DBS and TMS stimuli could represent a method to induce cortical synaptic plasticity, the therapeutic potential of which is still unexplored. Furthermore, the advent of new DBS technologies and novel treatment targets will present new research opportunities and prospects to investigate brain networks. However, the application of the combined TMS-DBS approach is currently limited by safety concerns. In this review, we sought to present an overview of studies performed by combining TMS and DBS in neurological disorders, as well as available evidence and recommendations on the safety of their combination. Additionally, we outline perspectives for future research by highlighting knowledge gaps and possible novel applications of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicoletta Manzo
- IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Via Alberoni 70, 0126 Venice, Italy
| | - Andrea Guerra
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Landi
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Valentina Baro
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Sara Määttä
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Luca Weis
- Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Camillo Porcaro
- Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, 35129 Padova, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Institute of Cognitive Sciences, and Technologies (ISTC)-National Research Council (CNR), 00185 Rome, Italy
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Maurizio Corbetta
- Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, 35129 Padova, Italy
- Unit of Neurology, Unit of Clinical Neurophysiology, Study Center of Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, 35129 Padova, Italy
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Unit of Neurology, Unit of Clinical Neurophysiology, Study Center of Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
- Correspondence: (A.A.); (F.F.)
| | - Florinda Ferreri
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
- Unit of Neurology, Unit of Clinical Neurophysiology, Study Center of Neurodegeneration (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Correspondence: (A.A.); (F.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Campbell BA, Favi Bocca L, Escobar Sanabria D, Almeida J, Rammo R, Nagel SJ, Machado AG, Baker KB. The impact of pulse timing on cortical and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation evoked potentials. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:1009223. [PMID: 36204716 PMCID: PMC9532054 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1009223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of pulse timing is an important factor in our understanding of how to effectively modulate the basal ganglia thalamocortical (BGTC) circuit. Single pulse low-frequency DBS-evoked potentials generated through electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) provide insight into circuit activation, but how the long-latency components change as a function of pulse timing is not well-understood. We investigated how timing between stimulation pulses delivered in the STN region influence the neural activity in the STN and cortex. DBS leads implanted in the STN of five patients with Parkinson's disease were temporarily externalized, allowing for the delivery of paired pulses with inter-pulse intervals (IPIs) ranging from 0.2 to 10 ms. Neural activation was measured through local field potential (LFP) recordings from the DBS lead and scalp EEG. DBS-evoked potentials were computed using contacts positioned in dorsolateral STN as determined through co-registered post-operative imaging. We quantified the degree to which distinct IPIs influenced the amplitude of evoked responses across frequencies and time using the wavelet transform and power spectral density curves. The beta frequency content of the DBS evoked responses in the STN and scalp EEG increased as a function of pulse-interval timing. Pulse intervals <1.0 ms apart were associated with minimal to no change in the evoked response. IPIs from 1.5 to 3.0 ms yielded a significant increase in the evoked response, while those >4 ms produced modest, but non-significant growth. Beta frequency activity in the scalp EEG and STN LFP response was maximal when IPIs were between 1.5 and 4.0 ms. These results demonstrate that long-latency components of DBS-evoked responses are pre-dominantly in the beta frequency range and that pulse interval timing impacts the level of BGTC circuit activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett A. Campbell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Leonardo Favi Bocca
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - David Escobar Sanabria
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Julio Almeida
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Richard Rammo
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Sean J. Nagel
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Andre G. Machado
- Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Kenneth B. Baker
- Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
- *Correspondence: Kenneth B. Baker
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cortical network formation based on subthalamic beta bursts in Parkinson's disease. Neuroimage 2022; 263:119619. [PMID: 36087901 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that beta bursts in subthalamic nucleus (STN) play an important role in Parkinsonian pathophysiology. We studied the spatio-temporal relationship between STN beta bursts and cortical activity in 26 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Postoperatively, we simultaneously recorded STN local field potentials (LFP) from externalized DBS leads and cortical activity using whole-brain magnetoencephalography. Event-related magnetic fields (ERF) were averaged time-locked to STN beta bursts and subjected to source localization. Our results demonstrate that ERF exhibiting activity significantly different from baseline activity were localized within areas functionally related to associative, limbic, and motor systems as well as regions pertinent for visual and language processing. Our data suggest that STN beta bursts are involved in network formation between STN and cortex. This interaction is in line with the idea of parallel processing within the basal ganglia-cortex loop, specifically within the functional subsystems of the STN (i.e., associative, limbic, motor, and the related cortical areas). ERFs within visual and language-related cortical areas indicate involvement of beta bursts in STN-cortex networks beyond the associative, limbic, and motor loops. In sum, our results highlight the involvement of STN beta bursts in the formation of multiple STN - cortex loops in patients with PD.
Collapse
|
12
|
Dale J, Schmidt SL, Mitchell K, Turner DA, Grill WM. Evoked potentials generated by deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:1040-1047. [PMID: 35921959 PMCID: PMC9588756 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.07.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The goal of this review is to describe the general features, mechanisms, technical recording factors, and clinical applications of brain evoked potentials (EPs) generated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD). RESULTS Evoked potentials in response to DBS pulses occur on the timescale of milliseconds and are found both locally at the site of stimulation and remotely in the cortex. DBS evoked potentials arise from a complex integration of antidromic and orthodromic conduction pathway responses, and provide information valuable for understanding the mechanisms and circuits involved in symptom treatment. Furthermore, these signals may provide biomarkers for improving DBS outcomes and function. For example, evoked potentials may have utility as control signals for DBS programming or adaptive DBS. Despite their promise there are still critical gaps in our understanding of the mechanisms by which evoked potentials arise and how these signals may be measured and applied in the clinical setting. Technical challenges of recording a highly transient signal at sufficient resolution without the interference of stimulation artifact present a barrier to understanding better DBS-induced EPs. CONCLUSIONS We describe the current scientific landscape of evoked potentials to facilitate and stimulate further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jahrane Dale
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stephen L Schmidt
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kyle Mitchell
- Departments of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Dennis A Turner
- Departments of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Departments of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Warren M Grill
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Departments of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Departments of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Adam EM, Brown EN, Kopell N, McCarthy MM. Deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease can restore dynamics of striatal networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2120808119. [PMID: 35500112 PMCID: PMC9171607 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2120808119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is highly effective in alleviating movement disability in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, its therapeutic mechanism of action is unknown. The healthy striatum exhibits rich dynamics resulting from an interaction of beta, gamma, and theta oscillations. These rhythms are essential to selection and execution of motor programs, and their loss or exaggeration due to dopamine (DA) depletion in PD is a major source of behavioral deficits. Restoring the natural rhythms may then be instrumental in the therapeutic action of DBS. We develop a biophysical networked model of a BG pathway to study how abnormal beta oscillations can emerge throughout the BG in PD and how DBS can restore normal beta, gamma, and theta striatal rhythms. Our model incorporates STN projections to the striatum, long known but understudied, found to preferentially target fast-spiking interneurons (FSI). We find that DBS in STN can normalize striatal medium spiny neuron activity by recruiting FSI dynamics and restoring the inhibitory potency of FSIs observed in normal conditions. We also find that DBS allows the reexpression of gamma and theta rhythms, thought to be dependent on high DA levels and thus lost in PD, through cortical noise control. Our study highlights that DBS effects can go beyond regularizing BG output dynamics to restoring normal internal BG dynamics and the ability to regulate them. It also suggests how gamma and theta oscillations can be leveraged to supplement DBS treatment and enhance its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie M. Adam
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
| | - Emery N. Brown
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Nancy Kopell
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hyperdirect connectivity of opercular speech network to the subthalamic nucleus. Cell Rep 2022; 38:110477. [PMID: 35263607 PMCID: PMC8971827 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
How the basal ganglia participate in the uniquely human behavior of speech is poorly understood, despite their known role in modulating critical aspects of cognitive and motor behavior. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is well positioned to facilitate basal ganglia functions critical for speech. Using electrocorticography in patients undergoing awake deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, evidence is reported for a left opercular hyperdirect pathway in humans via stimulating the STN and examining antidromic-evoked activity in the left temporal, parietal, and frontal opercular cortex. These high-resolution cortical and subcortical mapping data provide evidence for hyperdirect connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus and the STN. In addition, evoked potential data are consistent with the presence of monosynaptic projections from areas of the opercular ections may be unique to humans, evolving alongside the ability for speech. Using electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and simultaneous cortical recordings in individuals undergoing deep brain stimulation, Jorge et al. provide electrophysiological evidence for a hyperdirect pathway to the basal ganglia from cortical areas that control sensory and motor-planning aspects of speech.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bahners BH, Waterstraat G, Kannenberg S, Curio G, Schnitzler A, Nikulin V, Florin E. Electrophysiological characterization of the hyperdirect pathway and its functional relevance for subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Exp Neurol 2022; 352:114031. [PMID: 35247373 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
The subthalamic nucleus (STN) receives input from various cortical areas via hyperdirect pathway (HDP) which bypasses the basal-ganglia loop. Recently, the HDP has gained increasing interest, because of its relevance for STN deep brain stimulation (DBS). To understand the HDP's role cortical responses evoked by STN-DBS have been investigated. These responses have short (<2 ms), medium (2-15 ms), and long (20-70 ms) latencies. Medium-latency responses are supposed to represent antidromic cortical activations via HDP. Together with long-latency responses the medium responses can potentially be used as biomarker of DBS efficacy as well as side effects. We here propose that the activation sequence of the cortical evoked responses can be conceptualized as high frequency oscillations (HFO) for signal analysis. HFO might therefore serve as marker for antidromic activation. Using existing knowledge on HFO recordings, this approach allows data analyses and physiological modeling to advance the pathophysiological understanding of cortical DBS-evoked high-frequency activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahne Hendrik Bahners
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Gunnar Waterstraat
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Neurophysics Group, Department of Neurology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Silja Kannenberg
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Gabriel Curio
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Neurophysics Group, Department of Neurology, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Vadim Nikulin
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Esther Florin
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee LHN, Huang CS, Chuang HH, Lai HJ, Yang CK, Yang YC, Kuo CC. An electrophysiological perspective on Parkinson's disease: symptomatic pathogenesis and therapeutic approaches. J Biomed Sci 2021; 28:85. [PMID: 34886870 PMCID: PMC8656091 DOI: 10.1186/s12929-021-00781-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD), or paralysis agitans, is a common neurodegenerative disease characterized by dopaminergic deprivation in the basal ganglia because of neuronal loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta. Clinically, PD apparently involves both hypokinetic (e.g. akinetic rigidity) and hyperkinetic (e.g. tremor/propulsion) symptoms. The symptomatic pathogenesis, however, has remained elusive. The recent success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy applied to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the globus pallidus pars internus indicates that there are essential electrophysiological abnormalities in PD. Consistently, dopamine-deprived STN shows excessive burst discharges. This proves to be a central pathophysiological element causally linked to the locomotor deficits in PD, as maneuvers (such as DBS of different polarities) decreasing and increasing STN burst discharges would decrease and increase the locomotor deficits, respectively. STN bursts are not so autonomous but show a "relay" feature, requiring glutamatergic synaptic inputs from the motor cortex (MC) to develop. In PD, there is an increase in overall MC activities and the corticosubthalamic input is enhanced and contributory to excessive burst discharges in STN. The increase in MC activities may be relevant to the enhanced beta power in local field potentials (LFP) as well as the deranged motor programming at the cortical level in PD. Moreover, MC could not only drive erroneous STN bursts, but also be driven by STN discharges at specific LFP frequencies (~ 4 to 6 Hz) to produce coherent tremulous muscle contractions. In essence, PD may be viewed as a disorder with deranged rhythms in the cortico-subcortical re-entrant loops, manifestly including STN, the major component of the oscillating core, and MC, the origin of the final common descending motor pathways. The configurations of the deranged rhythms may play a determinant role in the symptomatic pathogenesis of PD, and provide insight into the mechanism underlying normal motor control. Therapeutic brain stimulation for PD and relevant disorders should be adaptively exercised with in-depth pathophysiological considerations for each individual patient, and aim at a final normalization of cortical discharge patterns for the best ameliorating effect on the locomotor and even non-motor symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan-Hsin Nancy Lee
- Department of Physiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, 1 Jen-Ai Road, 1st Section, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.,Department of Neurology, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Syuan Huang
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Hao Chuang
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsing-Jung Lai
- Department of Physiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, 1 Jen-Ai Road, 1st Section, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.,Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,National Taiwan University Hospital, Jin-Shan Branch, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Kai Yang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-Hwa 1st Road, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Chin Yang
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. .,Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-Hwa 1st Road, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan. .,Neuroscience Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| | - Chung-Chin Kuo
- Department of Physiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, 1 Jen-Ai Road, 1st Section, Taipei, 100, Taiwan. .,Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sand D, Arkadir D, Abu Snineh M, Marmor O, Israel Z, Bergman H, Hassin-Baer S, Israeli-Korn S, Peremen Z, Geva AB, Eitan R. Deep Brain Stimulation Can Differentiate Subregions of the Human Subthalamic Nucleus Area by EEG Biomarkers. Front Syst Neurosci 2021; 15:747681. [PMID: 34744647 PMCID: PMC8565520 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.747681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Precise lead localization is crucial for an optimal clinical outcome of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Currently, anatomical measures, as well as invasive intraoperative electrophysiological recordings, are used to locate DBS electrodes. The objective of this study was to find an alternative electrophysiology tool for STN DBS lead localization. Methods: Sixty-one postoperative electrophysiology recording sessions were obtained from 17 DBS-treated patients with PD. An intraoperative physiological method automatically detected STN borders and subregions. Postoperative EEG cortical activity was measured, while STN low frequency stimulation (LFS) was applied to different areas inside and outside the STN. Machine learning models were used to differentiate stimulation locations, based on EEG analysis of engineered features. Results: A machine learning algorithm identified the top 25 evoked response potentials (ERPs), engineered features that can differentiate inside and outside STN stimulation locations as well as within STN stimulation locations. Evoked responses in the medial and ipsilateral fronto-central areas were found to be most significant for predicting the location of STN stimulation. Two-class linear support vector machine (SVM) predicted the inside (dorso-lateral region, DLR, and ventro-medial region, VMR) vs. outside [zona incerta, ZI, STN stimulation classification with an accuracy of 0.98 and 0.82 for ZI vs. VMR and ZI vs. DLR, respectively, and an accuracy of 0.77 for the within STN (DLR vs. VMR)]. Multiclass linear SVM predicted all areas with an accuracy of 0.82 for the outside and within STN stimulation locations (ZI vs. DLR vs. VMR). Conclusions: Electroencephalogram biomarkers can use low-frequency STN stimulation to localize STN DBS electrodes to ZI, DLR, and VMR STN subregions. These models can be used for both intraoperative electrode localization and postoperative stimulation programming sessions, and have a potential to improve STN DBS clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Sand
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.,Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Research, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.,Elminda Ltd., Herzliya, Israel
| | - David Arkadir
- Department of Neurology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Muneer Abu Snineh
- Department of Neurology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Odeya Marmor
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Zvi Israel
- Brain Division, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.,Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Hagai Bergman
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.,Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Research, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.,Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sharon Hassin-Baer
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders Institute, Sheba Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Simon Israeli-Korn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders Institute, Sheba Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Amir B Geva
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Renana Eitan
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.,Brain Division, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.,Neuropsychiatry Unit, Jerusalem Mental Health Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.,Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Oswal A, Cao C, Yeh CH, Neumann WJ, Gratwicke J, Akram H, Horn A, Li D, Zhan S, Zhang C, Wang Q, Zrinzo L, Foltynie T, Limousin P, Bogacz R, Sun B, Husain M, Brown P, Litvak V. Neural signatures of hyperdirect pathway activity in Parkinson's disease. Nat Commun 2021; 12:5185. [PMID: 34465771 PMCID: PMC8408177 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25366-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterised by the emergence of beta frequency oscillatory synchronisation across the cortico-basal-ganglia circuit. The relationship between the anatomy of this circuit and oscillatory synchronisation within it remains unclear. We address this by combining recordings from human subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal globus pallidus (GPi) with magnetoencephalography, tractography and computational modelling. Coherence between supplementary motor area and STN within the high (21-30 Hz) but not low (13-21 Hz) beta frequency range correlated with 'hyperdirect pathway' fibre densities between these structures. Furthermore, supplementary motor area activity drove STN activity selectively at high beta frequencies suggesting that high beta frequencies propagate from the cortex to the basal ganglia via the hyperdirect pathway. Computational modelling revealed that exaggerated high beta hyperdirect pathway activity can provoke the generation of widespread pathological synchrony at lower beta frequencies. These findings suggest a spectral signature and a pathophysiological role for the hyperdirect pathway in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwini Oswal
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- The Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Chunyan Cao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chien-Hung Yeh
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- School of Information and Electronics Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| | | | - James Gratwicke
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Harith Akram
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Charité University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dianyou Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shikun Zhan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Department of Neurology, Charité University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ludvic Zrinzo
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tom Foltynie
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Patricia Limousin
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rafal Bogacz
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bomin Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Masud Husain
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Brown
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Vladimir Litvak
- The Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Motor Cortex Stimulation Reversed Hypernociception, Increased Serotonin in Raphe Neurons, and Caused Inhibition of Spinal Astrocytes in a Parkinson's Disease Rat Model. Cells 2021; 10:cells10051158. [PMID: 34064617 PMCID: PMC8150310 DOI: 10.3390/cells10051158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Persistent pain is a prevalent symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD), which is related to the loss of monoamines and neuroinflammation. Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) inhibits persistent pain by activating the descending analgesic pathways; however, its effectiveness in the control of PD-induced pain remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of MCS together with serotonergic and spinal glial modulation in an experimental PD (ePD) rat model. Wistar rats with unilateral striatal 6-OHDA and MCS were assessed for behavioral immobility and nociceptive responses. The immunoreactivity of dopamine in the substantia nigra and serotonin in the nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) and the neuronal, astrocytic, and microglial activation in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord were evaluated. MCS, without interfering with dopamine loss, reversed ePD-induced immobility and hypernociception. This response was accompanied by an exacerbated increase in serotonin in the NRM and a decrease in neuronal and astrocytic hyperactivation in the spinal cord, without inhibiting ePD-induced microglial hypertrophy and hyperplasia. Taken together, MCS induces analgesia in the ePD model, while restores the descending serotonergic pathway with consequent inhibition of spinal neurons and astrocytes, showing the role of MCS in PD-induced pain control.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ozturk M, Viswanathan A, Sheth SA, Ince NF. Electroceutically induced subthalamic high-frequency oscillations and evoked compound activity may explain the mechanism of therapeutic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Commun Biol 2021; 4:393. [PMID: 33758361 PMCID: PMC7988171 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-01915-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite having remarkable utility in treating movement disorders, the lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms of high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a main challenge in choosing personalized stimulation parameters. Here we investigate the modulations in local field potentials induced by electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) at therapeutic and non-therapeutic frequencies in Parkinson's disease patients undergoing DBS surgery. We find that therapeutic high-frequency stimulation (130-180 Hz) induces high-frequency oscillations (~300 Hz, HFO) similar to those observed with pharmacological treatment. Along with HFOs, we also observed evoked compound activity (ECA) after each stimulation pulse. While ECA was observed in both therapeutic and non-therapeutic (20 Hz) stimulation, the HFOs were induced only with therapeutic frequencies, and the associated ECA were significantly more resonant. The relative degree of enhancement in the HFO power was related to the interaction of stimulation pulse with the phase of ECA. We propose that high-frequency STN-DBS tunes the neural oscillations to their healthy/treated state, similar to pharmacological treatment, and the stimulation frequency to maximize these oscillations can be inferred from the phase of ECA waveforms of individual subjects. The induced HFOs can, therefore, be utilized as a marker of successful re-calibration of the dysfunctional circuit generating PD symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Musa Ozturk
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ashwin Viswanathan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nuri F Ince
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Howell B, Isbaine F, Willie JT, Opri E, Gross RE, De Hemptinne C, Starr PA, McIntyre CC, Miocinovic S. Image-based biophysical modeling predicts cortical potentials evoked with subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Brain Stimul 2021; 14:549-563. [PMID: 33757931 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical treatment for Parkinson's disease and continues to advance technologically with an enormous parameter space. As such, in-silico DBS modeling systems have become common tools for research and development, but their underlying methods have yet to be standardized and validated. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the accuracy of patient-specific estimates of neural pathway activations in the subthalamic region against intracranial, cortical evoked potential (EP) recordings. METHODS Pathway activations were modeled in eleven patients using the latest advances in connectomic modeling of subthalamic DBS, focusing on the hyperdirect pathway (HDP) and corticospinal/bulbar tract (CSBT) for their relevance in human research studies. Correlations between pathway activations and respective EP amplitudes were quantified. RESULTS Good model performance required accurate lead localization and image fusions, as well as appropriate selection of fiber diameter in the biophysical model. While optimal model parameters varied across patients, good performance could be achieved using a global set of parameters that explained 60% and 73% of electrophysiologic activations of CSBT and HDP, respectively. Moreover, restricted models fit to only EP amplitudes of eight standard (monopolar and bipolar) electrode configurations were able to extrapolate variation in EP amplitudes across other directional electrode configurations and stimulation parameters, with no significant reduction in model performance across the cohort. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that connectomic models of DBS with sufficient anatomical and electrical details can predict recruitment dynamics of white matter. These results will help to define connectomic modeling standards for preoperative surgical targeting and postoperative patient programming applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Howell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, USA
| | | | - Jon T Willie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, USA
| | - Enrico Opri
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, USA
| | | | | | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Arbuthnott GW. An Introspective Approach: A Lifetime of Parkinson's Disease Research and Not Much to Show for it Yet? Cells 2021; 10:cells10030513. [PMID: 33670933 PMCID: PMC7997292 DOI: 10.3390/cells10030513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
I feel part of a massive effort to understand what is wrong with motor systems in the brain relating to Parkinson’s disease. Today, the symptoms of the disease can be modified slightly, but dopamine neurons still die; the disease progression continues inexorably. Maybe the next research phase will bring the power of modern genetics to bear on halting, or better, preventing cell death. The arrival of accessible human neuron assemblies in organoids perhaps will provide a better access to the processes underlying neuronal demise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon W Arbuthnott
- Brain Mechanisms for Behaviour Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate University, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Madrid J, Benninger DH. Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: Clinical evidence, latest concepts and future goals: A systematic review. J Neurosci Methods 2021; 347:108957. [PMID: 33017643 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is becoming a major public-health issue in an aging population. Available approaches to treat advanced PD still have limitations; new therapies are needed. The non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) may offer a complementary approach to treat advanced PD by personalized stimulation. Although NIBS is not as effective as the gold-standard levodopa, recent randomized controlled trials show promising outcomes in the treatment of PD symptoms. Nevertheless, only a few NIBS-stimulation paradigms have shown to improve PD's symptoms. Current clinical recommendations based on the level of evidence are reported in Table 1 through Table 3. Furthermore, novel technological advances hold promise and may soon enable the non-invasive stimulation of deeper brain structures for longer periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Madrid
- Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - David H Benninger
- Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Primary motor cortex in Parkinson's disease: Functional changes and opportunities for neurostimulation. Neurobiol Dis 2020; 147:105159. [PMID: 33152506 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Movement abnormalities of Parkinson's disease (PD) arise from disordered neural activity in multiple interconnected brain structures. The planning and execution of movement requires recruitment of a heterogeneous collection of pyramidal projection neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1). The neural representations of movement in M1 single-cell and field potential recordings are directly and indirectly influenced by the midbrain dopaminergic neurons that degenerate in PD. This review examines M1 functional alterations in PD as uncovered by electrophysiological recordings and neurostimulation studies in patients and experimental animal models. Dysfunction of the parkinsonian M1 depends on the severity and/or duration of dopamine-depletion and the species examined, and is expressed as alterations in movement-related firing dynamics; functional reorganisation of local circuits; and changes in field potential beta oscillations. Neurostimulation methods that modulate M1 activity directly (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation) or indirectly (subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation) improve motor function in PD patients, showing that targeted neuromodulation of M1 is a realistic therapy. We argue that the therapeutic profile of M1 neurostimulation is likely to be greatly enhanced with alternative technologies that permit cell-type specific control and incorporate feedback from electrophysiological biomarkers measured locally.
Collapse
|
25
|
Litvak V, Florin E, Tamás G, Groppa S, Muthuraman M. EEG and MEG primers for tracking DBS network effects. Neuroimage 2020; 224:117447. [PMID: 33059051 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment method for a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders. It involves implantation of stimulating electrodes in a precisely guided fashion into subcortical structures and, at a later stage, chronic stimulation of these structures with an implantable pulse generator. While the DBS surgery makes it possible to both record brain activity and stimulate parts of the brain that are difficult to reach with non-invasive techniques, electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) provide complementary information from other brain areas, which can be used to characterize brain networks targeted through DBS. This requires, however, the careful consideration of different types of artifacts in the data acquisition and the subsequent analyses. Here, we review both the technical issues associated with EEG/MEG recordings in DBS patients and the experimental findings to date. One major line of research is simultaneous recording of local field potentials (LFPs) from DBS targets and EEG/MEG. These studies revealed a set of cortico-subcortical coherent networks functioning at distinguishable physiological frequencies. Specific network responses were linked to clinical state, task or stimulation parameters. Another experimental approach is mapping of DBS-targeted networks in chronically implanted patients by recording EEG/MEG responses during stimulation. One can track responses evoked by single stimulation pulses or bursts as well as brain state shifts caused by DBS. These studies have the potential to provide biomarkers for network responses that can be adapted to guide stereotactic implantation or optimization of stimulation parameters. This is especially important for diseases where the clinical effect of DBS is delayed or develops slowly over time. The same biomarkers could also potentially be utilized for the online control of DBS network effects in the new generation of closed-loop stimulators that are currently entering clinical use. Through future studies, the use of network biomarkers may facilitate the integration of circuit physiology into clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Litvak
- The Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Esther Florin
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Gertrúd Tamás
- Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Movement disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Movement disorders and Neurostimulation, Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen W, de Hemptinne C, Miller AM, Leibbrand M, Little SJ, Lim DA, Larson PS, Starr PA. Prefrontal-Subthalamic Hyperdirect Pathway Modulates Movement Inhibition in Humans. Neuron 2020; 106:579-588.e3. [PMID: 32155442 PMCID: PMC7274135 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The ability to dynamically change motor outputs, such as stopping an initiated response, is an important aspect of human behavior. A hyperdirect pathway between the inferior frontal gyrus and subthalamic nucleus is hypothesized to mediate movement inhibition, but there is limited evidence for this in humans. We recorded high spatial and temporal resolution field potentials from both the inferior frontal gyrus and subthalamic nucleus in 21 subjects. Cortical potentials evoked by subthalamic stimulation revealed short latency events indicative of monosynaptic connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus and ventral subthalamic nucleus. During a stop signal task, stopping-related potentials in the cortex preceded stopping-related activity in the subthalamic nucleus, and synchronization between these task-evoked potentials predicted the stop signal reaction time. Thus, we show that a prefrontal-subthalamic hyperdirect pathway is present in humans and mediates rapid stopping. These findings may inform therapies to treat disorders featuring perturbed movement inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Witney Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Andrew M Miller
- School of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | | | - Simon J Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Daniel A Lim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA
| | - Paul S Larson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Latency of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation-evoked cortical activity as a potential biomarker for postoperative motor side effects. Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 131:1221-1229. [PMID: 32299006 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Here, we investigate whether cortical activation predicts motor side effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and whether these potential biomarkers have utility under general anesthesia. METHODS We recorded scalp potentials elicited by DBS during surgery (n = 11), both awake and under general anesthesia, and in an independent ambulatory cohort (n = 8). Across a range of stimulus configurations, we measured the amplitude and timing of short- and long-latency response components and linked them to motor side effects. RESULTS Regardless of anesthesia state, in both cohorts, DBS settings with capsular side effects elicited early responses with peak latencies clustering at <1 ms. This early response was preserved under anesthesia in all participants (11/11). In contrast, the long-latency components were suppressed completely in 6/11 participants. Finally, the latency of the earliest response could predict the presence of postoperative motor side effects both awake and under general anesthesia (84.8% and 75.8% accuracy, awake and under anesthesia, respectively). CONCLUSION DBS elicits short-latency cortical activation, both awake and under general anesthesia, which appears to reveal interactions between the stimulus and the corticospinal tract. SIGNIFICANCE Short-latency evoked cortical activity can potentially be used to aid both DBS lead placement and post-operative programming.
Collapse
|
28
|
Thevathasan W, Sinclair NC, Bulluss KJ, McDermott HJ. Tailoring Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease Using Evoked Resonant Neural Activity. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:71. [PMID: 32180711 PMCID: PMC7059818 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley Thevathasan
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne and Austin Hospitals, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicholas C. Sinclair
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kristian J. Bulluss
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's and Austin Hospitals, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hugh J. McDermott
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Krishna V, Young NA, Sammartino F. Imaging: Patient Selection, Targeting, and Outcome Biomarkers. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34906-6_36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
30
|
Zhang Y, Xu S, Xiao G, Song Y, Gao F, Wang M, Zhao H, Xing G, Cai X. High frequency stimulation of subthalamic nucleus synchronously modulates primary motor cortex and caudate putamen based on dopamine concentration and electrophysiology activities using microelectrode arrays in Parkinson’s disease rats. SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B: CHEMICAL 2019; 301:127126. [DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2025]
|
31
|
Biophysical reconstruction of the signal conduction underlying short-latency cortical evoked potentials generated by subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 131:542-547. [PMID: 31757636 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Direct activation of the hyperdirect (HD) pathway has been linked to therapeutic benefit from subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). We sought to quantify the axonal conduction biophysics of corticofugal axons directly stimulated by subthalamic DBS and reconcile those findings with short-latency cortical evoked potential (EP) results. METHODS We used a detailed computational model of human subthalamic DBS to quantify axonal activation and conduction. Signal propagation to cortex was evaluated for medium (5.7 µm), large (10.0 µm), and exceptionally large (15.0 µm) diameter corticofugal axons associated with either internal capsule (IC) fibers of passage or the HD pathway. We then compared the modeling results to human cortical EP measurements that have described an exceptionally fast component (EP0) occurring ~1 ms after the stimulus pulse, a fast component (EP1) at ~3 ms, and a slower component (EP2) at ~5 ms. RESULTS Subthalamic stimulation of the HD pathway with large and medium diameter axons propagated action potentials to cortex with timings that coincide with the EP1 and EP2 signals, respectively. Only direct activation of exceptionally large diameter fibers in the IC generated signals that could approach the EP0 timing. However, the action potential biophysics do not generally support the existence of a cortical EP less than 1.5 ms after DBS onset. CONCLUSIONS The EP1 and EP2 signals can be biophysically linked to antidromic activation of the HD pathway. SIGNIFICANCE Theoretical reconstruction of cortical EPs from subthalamic DBS demonstrate a convergence of anatomical, biophysical, and electrophysiological results.
Collapse
|
32
|
Sinclair NC, Fallon JB, Bulluss KJ, Thevathasan W, McDermott HJ. On the neural basis of deep brain stimulation evoked resonant activity. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2019. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab366e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
33
|
Chen KS, Chen R. Invasive and Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Effects and Future Perspectives. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019; 106:763-775. [DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kai‐Hsiang Stanley Chen
- Krembil Research Institute University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
- Department of Neurology National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin‐Chu Branch Hsin‐Chu Taiwan
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
- Division of Neurology Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease modulates high-frequency evoked and spontaneous neural activity. Neurobiol Dis 2019; 130:104522. [PMID: 31276793 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation is an established therapy for Parkinson's disease; however, its effectiveness is hindered by limited understanding of therapeutic mechanisms and the lack of a robust feedback signal for tailoring stimulation. We recently reported that subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation evokes a neural response resembling a decaying high-frequency (200-500 Hz) oscillation that typically has a duration of at least 10 ms and is localizable to the dorsal sub-region. As the morphology of this response suggests a propensity for the underlying neural circuitry to oscillate at a particular frequency, we have named it evoked resonant neural activity. Here, we determine whether this evoked activity is modulated by therapeutic stimulation - a critical attribute of a feedback signal. Furthermore, we investigated whether any related changes occurred in spontaneous local field potentials. Evoked and spontaneous neural activity was intraoperatively recorded from 19 subthalamic nuclei in patients with Parkinson's disease. Recordings were obtained before therapeutic stimulation and during 130 Hz stimulation at increasing amplitudes (0.67-3.38 mA), 'washout' of therapeutic effects, and non-therapeutic 20 Hz stimulation. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed using clinical bradykinesia and rigidity scores. The frequency and amplitude of evoked resonant neural activity varied with the level of 130 Hz stimulation (p < .001). This modulation coincided with improvement in bradykinesia and rigidity (p < .001), and correlated with spontaneous beta band suppression (p < .001). Evoked neural activity occupied a similar frequency band to spontaneous high-frequency oscillations (200-400 Hz), both of which decreased to around twice the 130 Hz stimulation rate. Non-therapeutic stimulation at 20 Hz evoked, but did not modulate, resonant activity. These results indicate that therapeutic deep brain stimulation alters the frequency of evoked and spontaneous oscillations recorded in the subthalamic nucleus that are likely generated by loops within the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical network. Evoked resonant neural activity therefore has potential as a tool for providing insight into brain network function and has key attributes of a dynamic feedback signal for optimizing therapy.
Collapse
|
35
|
Phase-Dependent Suppression of Beta Oscillations in Parkinson's Disease Patients. J Neurosci 2019; 39:1119-1134. [PMID: 30552179 PMCID: PMC6363933 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1913-18.2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Synchronized oscillations within and between brain areas facilitate normal processing, but are often amplified in disease. A prominent example is the abnormally sustained beta-frequency (∼20 Hz) oscillations recorded from the cortex and subthalamic nucleus of Parkinson's disease patients. Computational modeling suggests that the amplitude of such oscillations could be modulated by applying stimulation at a specific phase. Such a strategy would allow selective targeting of the oscillation, with relatively little effect on other activity parameters. Here, activity was recorded from 10 awake, parkinsonian patients (6 male, 4 female human subjects) undergoing functional neurosurgery. We demonstrate that stimulation arriving on a particular patient-specific phase of the beta oscillation over consecutive cycles could suppress the amplitude of this pathophysiological activity by up to 40%, while amplification effects were relatively weak. Suppressive effects were accompanied by a reduction in the rhythmic output of subthalamic nucleus (STN) neurons and synchronization with the mesial cortex. While stimulation could alter the spiking pattern of STN neurons, there was no net effect on firing rate, suggesting that reduced beta synchrony was a result of alterations to the relative timing of spiking activity, rather than an overall change in excitability. Together, these results identify a novel intrinsic property of cortico-basal ganglia synchrony that suggests the phase of ongoing neural oscillations could be a viable and effective control signal for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. This work has potential implications for other brain diseases with exaggerated neuronal synchronization and for probing the function of rhythmic activity in the healthy brain.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In Parkinson's disease (PD), movement impairment is correlated with exaggerated beta frequency oscillations in the cerebral cortex and subthalamic nucleus (STN). Using a novel method of stimulation in PD patients undergoing neurosurgery, we demonstrate that STN beta oscillations can be suppressed when consecutive electrical pulses arrive at a specific phase of the oscillation. This effect is likely because of interrupting the timing of neuronal activity rather than excitability, as stimulation altered the firing pattern of STN spiking without changing overall rate. These findings show the potential of oscillation phase as an input for "closed-loop" stimulation, which could provide a valuable neuromodulation strategy for the treatment of brain disorders and for elucidating the role of neuronal oscillations in the healthy brain.
Collapse
|
36
|
What Is the Best Electrophysiologic Marker of the Outcome of Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Parkinson Disease? World Neurosurg 2018; 120:e1217-e1224. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
37
|
Ni Z, Udupa K, Hallett M, Chen R. Effects of deep brain stimulation on the primary motor cortex: Insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation studies. Clin Neurophysiol 2018; 130:558-567. [PMID: 30527386 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2018] [Revised: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) implanted in different basal ganglia nuclei regulates the dysfunctional neuronal circuits and improves symptoms in movement disorders. However, the understanding of the neurophysiological mechanism of DBS is at an early stage. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used safely in movement disorder patients with DBS, and can shed light on how DBS works. DBS at a therapeutic setting normalizes the abnormal motor cortical excitability measured with motor evoked potentials (MEP) produced by primary motor cortical TMS. Abnormal intracortical circuits in the motor cortex tested with paired-pulse TMS paradigm also show normalization with DBS. These changes are accompanied with improvements in symptoms after chronic DBS. Single-pulse DBS produces cortical evoked potentials recorded by electroencephalography at specific latencies and modulates motor cortical excitability at certain time intervals measured with MEP. Combination of basal ganglia DBS with motor cortical TMS at stimulus intervals consistent with the latency of cortical evoked potentials delivered in a repetitive mode produces plastic changes in the primary motor cortex. TMS can be used to examine the effects of open and closed loop DBS. Patterned DBS and TMS delivered in a repetitive mode may be developed as a new therapeutic method for movement disorder patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Ni
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kaviraja Udupa
- Department of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Robert Chen
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Distinct cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus and of the subthalamic nucleus. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2018; 20:1246-1254. [PMID: 30420259 PMCID: PMC6308824 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Revised: 10/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective To investigate the spatial and temporal pattern of cortical responses evoked by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM). Methods We investigated 7 patients suffering from Essential tremor (ET) and 7 patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) following the implantation of DBS electrodes (VIM for ET patients, STN for PD patients). Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to record cortical responses evoked by electric stimuli that were applied via the DBS electrode in trains of 5 Hz. Dipole fitting was applied to reconstruct the origin of evoked responses. Results Both VIM and STN DBS led to short latency cortical responses at about 1 ms. The pattern of medium and long latency cortical responses following VIM DBS consisted of peaks at 13, 40, 77, and 116 ms. The associated equivalent dipoles were localized within the central sulcus, 3 patients showed an additional response in the cerebellum at 56 ms. STN DBS evoked cortical responses peaking at 4 ms, 11 ms, and 27 ms, respectively. While most dipoles were localized in the pre- or postcentral gyrus, the distribution was less homogenous compared to VIM stimulation and partially included prefrontal brain areas. Conclusion MEG enables localization of cortical responses evoked by DBS of the VIM and the STN, especially in the sensorimotor cortex. Short latency responses of 1 ms suggest cortical modulation which bypasses synaptic transmission, i.e. antidromic activation of corticofugal fiber pathways. Cortical responses evoked by VIM or STN DBS can be precisely described using MEG. Both STN and VIM DBS primarily evoke cortical responses within the sensorimotor region. Short latency responses of 1 ms both observed in VIM and STN DBS suggest antidromic activation of corticofugal fibers.
Collapse
|
39
|
Cortical Potentials Evoked by Subthalamic Stimulation Demonstrate a Short Latency Hyperdirect Pathway in Humans. J Neurosci 2018; 38:9129-9141. [PMID: 30201770 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1327-18.2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
A monosynaptic projection from the cortex to the subthalamic nucleus is thought to have an important role in basal ganglia function and in the mechanism of therapeutic subthalamic deep-brain stimulation, but in humans the evidence for its existence is limited. We sought physiological confirmation of the cortico-subthalamic hyperdirect pathway using invasive recording techniques in patients with Parkinson's disease (9 men, 1 woman). We measured sensorimotor cortical evoked potentials using a temporary subdural strip electrode in response to low-frequency deep-brain stimulation in patients undergoing awake subthalamic or pallidal lead implantations. Evoked potentials were grouped into very short latency (<2 ms), short latency (2-10 ms), and long latency (10-100 ms) from the onset of the stimulus pulse. Subthalamic and pallidal stimulation resulted in very short-latency evoked potentials at 1.5 ms in the primary motor cortex accompanied by EMG-evoked potentials consistent with corticospinal tract activation. Subthalamic, but not pallidal stimulation, resulted in three short-latency evoked potentials at 2.8, 5.8, and 7.7 ms in a widespread cortical distribution, consistent with antidromic activation of the hyperdirect pathway. Long-latency potentials were evoked by both targets, with subthalamic responses lagging pallidal responses by 10-20 ms, consistent with orthodromic activation of the thalamocortical pathway. The amplitude of the first short-latency evoked potential was predictive of the chronic therapeutic stimulation contact.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This is the first physiological demonstration of the corticosubthalamic hyperdirect pathway and its topography at high spatial resolution in humans. We studied cortical potentials evoked by deep-brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing awake lead implantation surgery. Subthalamic stimulation resulted in multiple short-latency responses consistent with activation of hyperdirect pathway, whereas no such response was present during pallidal stimulation. We contrast these findings with very short latency, direct corticospinal tract activations, and long-latency responses evoked through polysynaptic orthodromic projections. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating the hyperdirect pathway into models of human basal ganglia function.
Collapse
|
40
|
Anderson RW, Farokhniaee A, Gunalan K, Howell B, McIntyre CC. Action potential initiation, propagation, and cortical invasion in the hyperdirect pathway during subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Brain Stimul 2018; 11:1140-1150. [PMID: 29779963 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High frequency (∼130 Hz) deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic region is an established clinical therapy for the treatment of late stage Parkinson's disease (PD). Direct modulation of the hyperdirect pathway, defined as cortical layer V pyramidal neurons that send an axon collateral to the subthalamic nucleus (STN), has emerged as a possible component of the therapeutic mechanisms. However, numerous questions remain to be addressed on the basic biophysics of hyperdirect pathway stimulation. OBJECTIVE Quantify action potential (AP) initiation, propagation, and cortical invasion in hyperdirect neurons during subthalamic stimulation. METHODS We developed an anatomically and electrically detailed computational model of hyperdirect neuron stimulation with explicit representation of the stimulating electric field, axonal response, AP propagation, and synaptic transmission. RESULTS We found robust AP propagation throughout the complex axonal arbor of the hyperdirect neuron. Even at therapeutic DBS frequencies, stimulation induced APs could reach all of the intracortical axon terminals with ∼100% fidelity. The functional result of this high frequency axonal driving of the thousands of synaptic connections made by each directly stimulated hyperdirect neuron is a profound synaptic suppression that would effectively disconnect the neuron from the cortical circuitry. CONCLUSIONS The synaptic suppression hypothesis integrates the fundamental biophysics of electrical stimulation, axonal transmission, and synaptic physiology to explain a generic mechanism of DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross W Anderson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - AmirAli Farokhniaee
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Kabilar Gunalan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Bryan Howell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abbasi O, Hirschmann J, Storzer L, Özkurt TE, Elben S, Vesper J, Wojtecki L, Schmitz G, Schnitzler A, Butz M. Unilateral deep brain stimulation suppresses alpha and beta oscillations in sensorimotor cortices. Neuroimage 2018; 174:201-207. [PMID: 29551459 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy to treat motor symptoms in movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD). The mechanisms leading to the high therapeutic effectiveness of DBS are poorly understood so far, but modulation of oscillatory activity is likely to play an important role. Thus, investigating the effect of DBS on cortical oscillatory activity can help clarifying the neurophysiological mechanisms of DBS. Here, we aimed at scrutinizing changes of cortical oscillatory activity by DBS at different frequencies using magnetoencephalography (MEG). MEG data from 17 PD patients were acquired during DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) the day after electrode implantation and before implanting the pulse generator. We stimulated the STN unilaterally at two different stimulation frequencies, 130 Hz and 340 Hz using an external stimulator. Data from six patients had to be discarded due to strong artefacts and two other datasets were excluded since these patients were not able to finalize the paradigm. After DBS artefact removal, power spectral density (PSD) values of MEG were calculated for each individual patient and averaged over the group. DBS at both 130 Hz and 340 Hz led to a widespread suppression of cortical alpha/beta band activity (8-22 Hz) specifically over bilateral sensorimotor cortices. No significant differences were observed between the two stimulation frequencies. Our finding of a widespread suppression of cortical alpha/beta band activity is particularly interesting as PD is associated with pathologically increased levels of beta band activity in the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuit. Therefore, suppression of such oscillatory activity might be an essential effect of DBS for relieving motor symptoms in PD and can be achieved at different stimulation frequencies above 100 Hz.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Abbasi
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Medical Engineering, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
| | - Jan Hirschmann
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Lena Storzer
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tolga Esat Özkurt
- Department of Health Informatics, Graduate School of Informatics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Saskia Elben
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jan Vesper
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery and Stereotaxy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Lars Wojtecki
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Georg Schmitz
- Department of Medical Engineering, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Markus Butz
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Electroencephalographic read-outs of the modulation of cortical network activity by deep brain stimulation. Bioelectron Med 2018; 4:2. [PMID: 32232078 PMCID: PMC7098231 DOI: 10.1186/s42234-018-0003-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS), a reversible and adjustable treatment for neurological and psychiatric refractory disorders, consists in delivering electrical currents to neuronal populations located in subcortical structures. The targets of DBS are spatially restricted, but connect to many parts of the brain, including the cortex, which might explain the observed clinical benefits in terms of symptomatology. The DBS mechanisms of action at a large scale are however poorly understood, which has motivated several groups to recently conduct many research programs to monitor cortical responses to DBS. Here we review the knowledge gathered from the use of electroencephalography (EEG) in patients treated by DBS. We first focus on the methodology to record and process EEG signals concurrently to DBS. In the second part of the review, we address the clinical and scientific benefits brought by EEG/DBS studies so far.
Collapse
|
43
|
Shehab S, D'souza C, Ljubisavljevic M, Redgrave P. Activation of the subthalamic nucleus suppressed by high frequency stimulation: A c-Fos immunohistochemical study. Brain Res 2018; 1685:42-50. [PMID: 29421187 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Revised: 12/03/2017] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation applied at high frequency (HFS) to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is used to ameliorate the symptoms of Parkinson's disease. The mechanism by which this is achieved remains controversial. In particular, it is uncertain whether HFS has a suppressive or excitatory action locally within the STN. Brief exposure of rats to ether anesthesia evokes pathological burst firing and associated expression of the immediate early gene c-Fos in STN neurons. We used this ether model of STN activation to test the effect of a range of HFS parameters on c-Fos expression evoked by the anesthetic. The elevated baseline of c-Fos expression afforded the possibility of detecting further excitatory, or suppressive effects of STN HFS. Four HFS protocols were examined; 130, 200 and 260 Hz with 60 µs, and 130 Hz with 90 µs pulse width (HFS intensity:150-300 µA). All HFS protocols were applied for 20 min while the animals were exposed to ether. Ether-evoked expression of c-Fos immunoreactivity was suppressed by HFS at 200 and 260 Hz with a pulse width of 60 µs, and by 130 Hz when the pulse width was increased to 90 µs. HFS at 130 Hz with the 60 µs pulse width had no significant effect and HFS alone caused negligible c-Fos expression in the STN. These findings suggest that HFS of the STN causes significant suppression of evoked neuronal activity. It remains to be determined whether this locally suppressive property of HFS is associated with the efficacy of STN deep brain stimulation to relieve the symptoms of Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safa Shehab
- Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, PO BOX 17666, United Arab Emirates.
| | - Crystal D'souza
- Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, PO BOX 17666, United Arab Emirates
| | - Milos Ljubisavljevic
- Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, PO BOX 17666, United Arab Emirates
| | - Peter Redgrave
- Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, PO BOX 17666, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Elias GJB, Namasivayam AA, Lozano AM. Deep brain stimulation for stroke: Current uses and future directions. Brain Stimul 2017; 11:3-28. [PMID: 29089234 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of stroke often experience significant disability and impaired quality of life related to ongoing maladaptive responses and persistent neurologic deficits. Novel therapeutic options are urgently needed to augment current approaches. One way to promote recovery and ameliorate symptoms may be to electrically stimulate the surviving brain. Various forms of brain stimulation have been investigated for use in stroke, including deep brain stimulation (DBS). OBJECTIVE/METHODS We conducted a comprehensive literature review in order to 1) review the use of DBS to treat post-stroke maladaptive responses including pain, dystonia, dyskinesias, and tremor and 2) assess the use and potential utility of DBS for enhancing plasticity and recovery from post-stroke neurologic deficits. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS A large variety of brain structures have been targeted in post-stroke patients, including motor thalamus, sensory thalamus, basal ganglia nuclei, internal capsule, and periventricular/periaqueductal grey. Overall, the reviewed clinical literature suggests a role for DBS in the management of several post-stroke maladaptive responses. More limited evidence was identified regarding DBS for post-stroke motor deficits, although existing work tentatively suggests DBS-particularly DBS targeting the posterior limb of the internal capsule-may improve paresis in certain circumstances. Substantial future work is required both to establish optimal targets and parameters for treatment of maladapative responses and to further investigate the effectiveness of DBS for post-stroke paresis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin J B Elias
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Krembil Neuroscience Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Andrew A Namasivayam
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Krembil Neuroscience Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Krembil Neuroscience Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lu M, Wei X, Loparo KA. Investigating Synchronous Oscillation and Deep Brain Stimulation Treatment in A Model of Cortico-Basal Ganglia Network. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2017; 25:1950-1958. [PMID: 28541214 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2017.2707100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Altered firing properties and increased pathological oscillations in the basal ganglia have been proven to be hallmarks of Parkinson's disease (PD). Increasing evidence suggests that abnormal synchronous oscillations and suppression in the cortex may also play a critical role in the pathogenic process and treatment of PD. In this paper, a new closed-loop network including the cortex and basal ganglia using the Izhikevich models is proposed to investigate the synchrony and pathological oscillations in motor circuits and their modulation by deep brain stimulation (DBS). Results show that more coherent dynamics in the cortex may cause stronger effects on the synchrony and pathological oscillations of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). The pathological beta oscillations of the STN can both be efficiently suppressed with DBS applied directly to the STN or to cortical neurons, respectively, but the underlying mechanisms by which DBS suppresses the beta oscillations are different. This research helps to understand the dynamics of pathological oscillations in PD-related motor regions and supports the therapeutic potential of stimulation of cortical neurons.
Collapse
|
46
|
Li DH, Yang XF. Remote modulation of network excitability during deep brain stimulation for epilepsy. Seizure 2017; 47:42-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2016] [Revised: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
|
47
|
Arbuthnott GW, Garcia-Munoz M. Are the Symptoms of Parkinsonism Cortical in Origin? Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2016; 15:21-25. [PMID: 28694933 PMCID: PMC5484763 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2016.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2016] [Revised: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
We present three reasons to suspect that the major deleterious consequence of dopamine loss from the striatum is a cortical malfunction. We suggest that it is cortex, rather than striatum, that should be considered as the source of the debilitating symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) since:Cortical synapses onto striatal dendritic spines are lost in PD. All known treatments of the symptoms of PD disrupt beta oscillations. Oscillations that are also disrupted following antidromic activation of cortical neurons. The final output of basal ganglia directly modulates thalamic connections to layer I of frontal cortical areas, regions intimately associated with motor behaviour.
These three reasons combined with evidence that the current summary diagram of the basal ganglia involvement in PD is imprecise at best, suggest that a re-orientation of the treatment strategies towards cortical, rather than striatal malfunction, is overdue. Suggested experimental contributions support the proposal of a cortical participation in PD. DBS produces antidromic activation of motor cortex and desynchronizes beta oscillations. Loss of dopamine decreases dendritic spines in the striatal D2 projection neurons. Motor thalamus distributes terminals into frontal cortex layer I. Thalamocortical-layer I activity increases with locomotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon W Arbuthnott
- OIST Graduate University, Brain Mechanisms for Behaviour Unit, Okinawa, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cortical Plasticity Induction by Pairing Subthalamic Nucleus Deep-Brain Stimulation and Primary Motor Cortical Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease. J Neurosci 2016; 36:396-404. [PMID: 26758832 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2499-15.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Noninvasive brain stimulation studies have shown abnormal motor cortical plasticity in Parkinson's disease (PD). These studies used peripheral nerve stimulation paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to primary motor cortex (M1) at specific intervals to induce plasticity. Induction of cortical plasticity through stimulation of the basal ganglia (BG)-M1 connections has not been studied. In the present study, we used a novel technique of plasticity induction by repeated pairing of deep-brain stimulation (DBS) of the BG with M1 stimulation using TMS. We hypothesize that repeated pairing of subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS and M1-TMS at specific time intervals will lead to plasticity in the M1. Ten PD human patients with STN-DBS were studied in the on-medication state with DBS set to 3 Hz. The interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between STN-DBS and TMS that produced cortical facilitation were determined individually for each patient. Three plasticity induction conditions with repeated pairings (180 times) at specific ISIs (∼ 3 and ∼ 23 ms) that produced cortical facilitation and a control ISI of 167 ms were tested in random order. Repeated pairing of STN-DBS and M1-TMS at short (∼ 3 ms) and medium (∼ 23 ms) latencies increased M1 excitability that lasted for at least 45 min, whereas the control condition (fixed ISI of 167 ms) had no effect. There were no specific changes in motor thresholds, intracortical circuits, or recruitment curves. Our results indicate that paired-associative cortical plasticity can be induced by repeated STN and M1 stimulation at specific intervals. These results show that STN-DBS can modulate cortical plasticity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We introduced a new experimental paradigm to test the hypothesis that pairing subthalamic nucleus deep-brain stimulation (STN-DBS) with motor cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation (M1-TMS) at specific times can induce cortical plasticity in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We found that repeated pairing of STN-DBS with TMS at short (∼ 3 ms) and medium (∼ 23 ms) intervals increased cortical excitability that lasted for up to 45 min, whereas the control condition (fixed latency of 167 ms) had no effects on cortical excitability. This is the first demonstration of associative plasticity in the STN-M1 circuits in PD patients using this novel technique. The potential therapeutic effects of combining DBS and noninvasive cortical stimulation should be investigated further.
Collapse
|
49
|
Wichmann T, DeLong MR. Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders of Basal Ganglia Origin: Restoring Function or Functionality? Neurotherapeutics 2016; 13:264-83. [PMID: 26956115 PMCID: PMC4824026 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-016-0426-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is highly effective for both hypo- and hyperkinetic movement disorders of basal ganglia origin. The clinical use of DBS is, in part, empiric, based on the experience with prior surgical ablative therapies for these disorders, and, in part, driven by scientific discoveries made decades ago. In this review, we consider anatomical and functional concepts of the basal ganglia relevant to our understanding of DBS mechanisms, as well as our current understanding of the pathophysiology of two of the most commonly DBS-treated conditions, Parkinson's disease and dystonia. Finally, we discuss the proposed mechanism(s) of action of DBS in restoring function in patients with movement disorders. The signs and symptoms of the various disorders appear to result from signature disordered activity in the basal ganglia output, which disrupts the activity in thalamocortical and brainstem networks. The available evidence suggests that the effects of DBS are strongly dependent on targeting sensorimotor portions of specific nodes of the basal ganglia-thalamocortical motor circuit, that is, the subthalamic nucleus and the internal segment of the globus pallidus. There is little evidence to suggest that DBS in patients with movement disorders restores normal basal ganglia functions (e.g., their role in movement or reinforcement learning). Instead, it appears that high-frequency DBS replaces the abnormal basal ganglia output with a more tolerable pattern, which helps to restore the functionality of downstream networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Wichmann
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Mahlon R DeLong
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Oswal A, Beudel M, Zrinzo L, Limousin P, Hariz M, Foltynie T, Litvak V, Brown P. Deep brain stimulation modulates synchrony within spatially and spectrally distinct resting state networks in Parkinson's disease. Brain 2016; 139:1482-96. [PMID: 27017189 PMCID: PMC4845255 DOI: 10.1093/brain/aww048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic dopamine depletion in Parkinson's disease leads to progressive motor and cognitive impairment, which is associated with the emergence of characteristic patterns of synchronous oscillatory activity within cortico-basal-ganglia circuits. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease, but its influence on synchronous activity in cortico-basal-ganglia loops remains to be fully characterized. Here, we demonstrate that deep brain stimulation selectively suppresses certain spatially and spectrally segregated resting state subthalamic nucleus-cortical networks. To this end we used a validated and novel approach for performing simultaneous recordings of the subthalamic nucleus and cortex using magnetoencephalography (during concurrent subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation). Our results highlight that clinically effective subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation suppresses synchrony locally within the subthalamic nucleus in the low beta oscillatory range and furthermore that the degree of this suppression correlates with clinical motor improvement. Moreover, deep brain stimulation relatively selectively suppressed synchronization of activity between the subthalamic nucleus and mesial premotor regions, including the supplementary motor areas. These mesial premotor regions were predominantly coupled to the subthalamic nucleus in the high beta frequency range, but the degree of deep brain stimulation-associated suppression in their coupling to the subthalamic nucleus was not found to correlate with motor improvement. Beta band coupling between the subthalamic nucleus and lateral motor areas was not influenced by deep brain stimulation. Motor cortical coupling with subthalamic nucleus predominantly involved driving of the subthalamic nucleus, with those drives in the higher beta frequency band having much shorter net delays to subthalamic nucleus than those in the lower beta band. These observations raise the possibility that cortical connectivity with the subthalamic nucleus in the high and low beta bands may reflect coupling mediated predominantly by the hyperdirect and indirect pathways to subthalamic nucleus, respectively, and that subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation predominantly suppresses the former. Yet only the change in strength of local subthalamic nucleus oscillations correlates with the degree of improvement during deep brain stimulation, compatible with the current view that a strengthened hyperdirect pathway is a prerequisite for locally generated beta activity but that it is the severity of the latter that may determine or index motor impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwini Oswal
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, UK Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Martijn Beudel
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ludvic Zrinzo
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Patricia Limousin
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Marwan Hariz
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Tom Foltynie
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Vladimir Litvak
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Peter Brown
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|