Isotopic methods to detect food folates

Critical evaluation of folate data in European and international databases: recommendations for standardization in international nutritional studies

SCOPE

The objective was to perform an inventory and critical evaluation of folate data in selected European and international databases. The ultimate aim was to establish guidelines for compiling standardized folate databases for international nutritional studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An ad hoc questionnaire was prepared to critically compare and evaluate folate data completeness, quantification, terminologies, and documentation of 18 European and international databases, and national fortification regulations. Selected countries participated in the European Prospective Investigation into Nutrition and Cancer project and European Food Information Resource Network (EuroFIR). Folate completeness was generally high. "Total folate" was the most common terminology and microbiological assay was the most frequently reported quantification method. There is a lack of comparability within and between databases due to a lack of value documentation, the use of generic or non-appropriate terminologies, folate value conversions, and/or lack of identification of synthetic folic acid.

CONCLUSION

Full value documentation and the use of EuroFIR component identifiers and/or INFOODS tagnames for total folate ("FOL") and synthetic folic acid ("FOLAC"), with the additional use of individual folates, will increase comparability between databases. For now, the standardized microbiological assay for total folate and HPLC for synthetic folic acid are the recommended quantification methods.

Single oral doses of 13C forms of pteroylmonoglutamic acid and 5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid elicit differences in short-term kinetics of labelled and unlabelled folates in plasma: potential problems in interpretation of folate bioavailability studies

Single (13)C6-labelled doses of pteroylmonoglutamic acid (PteGlu; 634 nmol) or 5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid (431-569 nmol) were given to fasted adult volunteers, and the rise in total and (13)C-labelled plasma 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid metabolite monitored over 8 h by HPLC and liquid chromatography-MS. The dose-adjusted area under the curve (AUC) for total (labelled plus unlabelled) plasma 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid following a 5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid test dose was 155 % that obtained following a PteGlu test dose. Surprisingly, an average 60 and 40 % of the total plasma 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid response to [(13)C6]PteGlu and [(13)C6]5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid, respectively, was unlabelled; an observation never before reported. Short-term kinetics of plasma [(13)C6]5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid showed a slower initial rate of increase in plasma concentration and longer time to peak following an oral dose of [(13)C6]PteGlu compared with that for an oral dose of [(13)C6]5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid, while the [(13)C6]5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid AUC for [(13)C6]5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid was 221 % that for [(13)C6]PteGlu. These data indicate that PteGlu and 5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid, which are thought to be well absorbed (about 90 %) at physiological doses, exhibit dramatically different rates and patterns of plasma response. A limitation in the rate of reduction of PteGlu before methylation could result in slower mucosal transfer of [(13)C6]5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid derived from [(13)C6]PteGlu into the plasma. This, when coupled with an observed similar plasma clearance rate for [(13)C6]5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid metabolite derived from either folate test dose, would yield a comparatively smaller AUC. These findings suggest potential problems in interpretation of absorption studies using unlabelled or labelled folates where the rate of increase, the maximum increase, or the AUC, of plasma folate is employed for test foods (mainly reduced folates) v. a 'reference dose' of PteGlu.