Is preoperative chemoradiation effective in treatment of oesophageal carcinoma?

Tumor immune microenvironment in therapy-naive esophageal adenocarcinoma could predict the nodal status

BACKGROUND

Currently, preoperative staging of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has modest reliability and accuracy for pT and pN stages prediction, which heavily affects overall survival. The interplay among immune checkpoints, oncogenes, and intratumoral and peritumoral immune infiltrating cells could be used to predict loco-regional metastatic disease in early EAC.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated immune markers expression and oncogenes status as well as intratumoral and peritumoral immune infiltrating cells populations in esophageal mucosa samples obtained from neoadjuvant therapy-naïve patients who had esophagectomy for EAC.

RESULTS

Vascular invasion and high infiltration of lamina propria mononuclear cells resulted associated with nodal metastasis. Low infiltration of activated CD8+ CD28+ T cells was observed in both intratumoral and peritumoral mucosa of patients with nodal metastasis. Low levels of CD69, MYD88, and TLR4 transcripts were detected in the intratumoral specimen of patients with lymph node involvement. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed good accuracy for detecting nodal metastasis for all the markers tested. Significant lower infiltration of CD8 T cells and M1 macrophages and a lower expression of CD8A, CD8B, and TBX21 were found also in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma TCGA panCancer Atlas in the normal tissue of patients with nodal metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that immune surveillance failure is the main driver of nodal metastasis onset. Moreover, nodal metastasis containment also involves the immune microenvironment of the peritumoral healthy tissue.

Immune surveillance activation after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma and complete response

After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma, up to 29% of patients have a pathological complete response (pCR). What to do afterward is still under debate. The aim of this prospective study was to define which local markers of immune response might act as predictors of pCR and of recurrence after pCR. The peritumoral healthy mucosa of the surgical specimen was sampled at esophagectomy and analyzed by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and Real-Time PCR. One hundred and twenty-three patients received neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma and were included in the study. Significantly higher rate of natural killer (NK) cells (CD57+), intraepithelial CD8 + T lymphocytes and degranulating T- and NK-cells (CD107+) were observed in the healthy mucosa of patients with pCR. Moreover, pCR was characterized by a lower immune-check points gene expression level. T-cell activation markers mRNA levels were significantly lower in patients with pCR and recurrent disease, showing an excellent accuracy in the prediction of the postoperative recurrence. Costimulatory molecules mRNA relative levels tended to be lower in patients with pCR and recurrent disease, showing a good accuracy in the prediction of postoperative recurrence in patients with pCR. The immune profile identified in this study might further be tested in large prospective trials as marker of pCR after neoadjuvant therapy and as predictor of recurrence after pCR.

PD-L1 expression, CD8+ and CD4+ lymphocyte rate are predictive of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) can effectively downstage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in patients with locally advanced disease and prolonged survival have been observed in patients with a pathological complete response (ypCR).

AIMS AND METHODS

This exploratory study aimed to identify immunological predictors of pCR after neoadjuvant CTRT within SCC microenvironment. The tumor regression after neoadjuvant therapy was measured according to the Mandard score system. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with SCC of the thoracic esophagus who received neoadjuvant CTRT were included in this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were neoadjuvant CTRT and the availability of representative histological samples taken at diagnosis. We investigated immunohistochemical expression of CD4, Tbet, FoxP3, CD8, CD80, PD-L1, and PD-1, in the pretreatment biopsies and correlated the immunohistochemical profiles to patients' outcomes.

RESULTS

After neoadjuvant CTRT, 23 patients had pCR, while 65 ones had partial response, stable disease or progression. PD-L1 expression and CD8+ and CD4+ lymphocyte rate were significantly higher in patients who had ypCR compared to those who had not (10 (0-55) vs 0 (0-0), P = 0.004, 73 (36-147) vs 21 (7-47), P = 0.0006 and 39 (23-74) vs 5 (0-13), P < 0.0001 respectively). The accuracy of expression of PD-L1+, CD8+, and CD4+ lymphocyte rate in identifying responders was AUC = 0.76 (P = 0.001), AUC = 0.81 (P = 0.0001) and AUC = 0.75 (P = 0.0001), respectively. Within the ypCR group, all patients with high infiltration of CD4+ T cell recurred/relapsed while only the 38.9% of those with low CD4+ T cell infiltration did the same (P = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression and CD8+ and CD4+ lymphocyte rate were predictive of ypCR after neoadjuvant CTRT for SCC of the thoracic esophagus with adequate accuracy. Furthermore, recurrence/relapse was associated with high level of CD4+ T cell infiltration. However, the small sample size prevented to draw definitive conclusions; further studies are necessary to evaluate the prognostic role of these markers.

Evaluation of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients receiving chemoradiotherapy for stage III and IV esophageal cancer

High Glasgow Prognostic scores (GPSs) have been associated with poor outcomes in various tumors, but the values of GPS and modified GPS (mGPS) in patients with advanced esophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has not yet been reported. We have evaluated these with respect to predicting responsiveness to CRT and long-term survival. Between January 2002 and December 2011, tumor responses in 142 esophageal cancer patients (131 men and 11 women) with stage III (A, B and C) and IV receiving CRT were assessed. We assessed the value of the GPS as a predictor of a response to definitive CRT and also as a prognostic indicator in patients with esophageal cancer receiving CRT. We found that independent predictors of CRT responsiveness were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, GPS and cTNM stage. Independent prognostic factors were ECOG performance status and GPS for progression-free survival and ECOG performance status, GPS and cTNM stage IV for disease-specific survival. GPS may be a novel predictor of CRT responsiveness and a prognostic indicator for progression-free and disease-specific survival in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. However, a multicenter study as same regime with large number of patients will be needed to confirm these outcomes.

Early surgery for failure after chemoradiation in operable thoracic oesophageal cancer. Analysis of the non-randomised patients in FFCD 9102 phase III trial: Chemoradiation followed by surgery versus chemoradiation alone

BACKGROUND

Two randomised trials concerning thoracic oesophageal cancer concluded that for squamous cell carcinoma, chemoradiation alone leads to the same overall survival (OS) as chemoradiation followed by surgery. One of these trials, FFCD 9102, randomised only fit, compliant and operable responders to induction chemoradiation between continuation of chemoradiation and surgery. In the present analysis, the outcome in the patients not eligible for randomisation was calculated to determine if attempt of surgery should be recommended.

METHODS

Eligible patients had operable T3-N0/N1-M0 thoracic oesophageal cancer. After initial chemoradiation, patients with no clinical response, or with contraindication to follow any attributed treatment, were not randomised. OS was studied first in the whole population of not randomised patients, and then specifically in clinical non-responders. The impact of surgery on OS was studied in these two populations.

FINDINGS

Of the 451 registered patients in the trial, 192 were not randomised. Among them, 111 were clinical non-responders. Median OS was significantly shorter for non-randomised patients (11.5 months) than for randomised patients (18.9 months; p=0.0024). However, for the 112 non-randomised patients who underwent surgery, median OS was not different from that in randomised patients: 17.3 versus 18.9 months (p=0.58). Concerning clinical non-responders, median OS was longer for those who underwent surgery compared to non-operated patients: 17.0 versus 5.5 months (hazard ratio (HR)=0.39 [0.25-0.61]; p<0.0001), and again was not different from that in responding, randomised patients (p=0.40).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with locally advanced thoracic oesophageal cancer, overall survival did not differ between responders to induction chemoradiation and patients having surgery after clinical failure of chemoradiation. Surgery should therefore be considered in those patients who are still operable.

Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic oesophagus: is surgery always necessary?

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) before oesophagectomy is standard management for squamous cell carcinoma(SCC) of the thoracic oesophagus. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients who had clinical complete response(CR) with neoadjuvant CT-RT + oesophagectomy with the survival of patients who had clinical CR and were not operated on.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-seven consecutive patients with SCC of the thoracic oesophagus with CR with neoadjuvant CT-RT presenting at the Regional Center of Esophageal Diseases from 1992 to 2008 were included in this retrospective study on a prospectively collected database. Thirty-nine patients underwent oesophagectomy (CT-RT + oesophagectomy), while 38(CT-RT) were not operated on because they were considered unfit for surgery or refused the operation. Patients’ outcome and survival were compared.

RESULTS

In the CT-RT + oesophagectomy group, clinical CR was confirmed after histological examination of the surgical specimen in 27/39 (69.2 %) patients. Five-year overall survival rates were 50.0 % in the CT-RT + oesophagectomy group and 57.0 % in the CT-RT group (p=0.99); 5-year disease-free survival rates were 55.5%in the CT-RT + oesophagectomy group and 34.6%in the CTRT group (p=0.15). Even after adjusting for propensity score, age, ASA and clinical stage, the treatment regimen did not show a statistically significant effect on overall survival (adjusted p=0.65) nor on disease-free survival (adjusted p=0.15).

CONCLUSION

In our group of patients with clinical CR after neoadjuvant CT-RT for SCC of the thoracic oesophagus, waiting for recurrence and then using salvage surgery did not negatively impact their survival compared to patients treated with surgery. More accurate restaging protocols are warranted to improve decision making after CR with neoadjuvant CT-RT.

Chemoradiotherapy alone as the standard treatment of epidermoid esophageal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Surgery has traditionally been the treatment of choice for patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma. Recently, however, definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been suggested as a preferred treatment modality. In this study, CRT results with or without surgery are compared.

METHODS

A total of 986 patients of esophageal carcinoma were categorized into two groups depending on the treatment: surgery (675 patients) or CRT (311 patients). These two groups were compared based on age, sex, weight loss, tumor location and length, tumor shape, grade, stage, delay in receiving treatment, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients in the CRT arm were significantly older (p = 0.01), had a more significant adenocarcinoma histology (p = 0.015), upper esophageal carcinoma (p = 0.0001) and more advanced stages of the disease (p = 0.0001). The median EFS for the surgery group was 24.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 17-32] versus 22.5 months (95% CI, 16.7-28.2) for the CRT arm (p = 0.56). The mean OS was 59.25 months (95% CI, 53.8-64.7) for the surgery group compared to 58.77 months (95% CI, 50.9-66.6) for the CRT group (p = 0.78).

CONCLUSION

Definitive CRT is effective enough so as to consider omitting surgery and could be used as a standard treatment for patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Nodal metastasis from locally advanced esophageal cancer: how neoadjuvant therapy modifies their frequency and distribution

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) before esophagectomy seems to affect the number of nodal metastasis and to alter the distribution of those that remain. The aim of this study was to define how neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy changes nodal metastasis patterns in locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 402 consecutive patients with cancer of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction (181 adenocarcinoma [AC] and 221 squamous cell carcinoma [SCC]) (evaluated at clinical stage T1N1, T2N1, T3N0, or T3N1 and pathological stage M0) presenting in our Department between 1992 and 2007 and who underwent complete resection (R0) were included in this retrospective study on a prospectively collected database. All dissected lymph nodes were retrieved and microscopically analyzed. Nodal metastasis patterns in patients who underwent chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) neoadjuvant therapy were compared with those in patients who underwent surgery alone.

RESULTS

Almost 30% of the adenocarcinoma patients and approximately 40% of the SCC patients showed effective tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant therapy. There were fewer paracardial node metastases (P = .002) in the AC patients who underwent CT-RT neoadjuvant therapy. There were, likewise, significantly fewer paraesophageal, paracardial, and subcarinal node metastases in the SCC patients in whom the perigastric nodes became the second-most frequent site of metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Not only was frequency of lymph node metastases decreased after neoadjuvant therapy, but nodal localization and pattern were also significantly modified.

The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the number of lymph nodes metastasis (LNMs) and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (LNs) are better prognostic factors when compared with traditional staging systems in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The accuracy of the 6th UICC/TNM classification is suboptimal, especially when not taking into account neoadjuvant therapy and lymphadenectomy extent.

METHODS

For 536 patients who underwent curative en bloc esophagectomy, in whom 51.5% (n = 276) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, LNMs were classified according to the 6th UICC/TNM classification and systems based on the number (< or =4 and >4) or the ratio (< or =0.2 and >0.2) of LNMs. Survival of the respective stages, predictors of survival, and influence of both chemoradiation and number of examined LNs were studied.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 50 months, the 5-year survival rates were 47% for the entire population, significantly poorer for patients with >4 LNMs (8% vs. 53%, P < 0.001) or a ratio of LNMs >0.2 (22% vs. 54%, P < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding variables, a number of LNMs >4 and a ratio of LNMs >0.2 were the only predictors of poor prognosis. The prognostic role of both the number and the ratio of LNMs was maintained whether patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation or not. Moreover, LN ratio is shown to be more accurate for inadequately staged patients (<15 examined LNs), whereas the number of LNMs is pertinent for adequately staged patients (> or =15 examined LNs).

CONCLUSION

Staging systems for esophageal cancer that use the number (< or =4 or >4) and the ratio (< or =0.2 or >0.2) of LNMs have greater prognostic importance than the current staging systems because of the good stratification of the groups and their clinical utility, taking into account neoadjuvant therapy and lymphadenectomy extent.

Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities

Traditionally, surgery is considered the best treatment for oesophageal cancer in terms of locoregional control and long-term survival. However, survival 5 years after surgery alone is about 25%, and, therefore, a multidisciplinary approach that includes surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, alone or in combination, could prove necessary. The role of each of these treatments in the management of oesophageal cancer is under intensive research to define optimum therapeutic strategies. In this report we provide an update on treatment strategies for resectable oesophageal cancers on the basis of recent published work. Results of the latest randomised trials allow us to propose the following guidelines: surgery is the standard treatment, to be used alone for stages I and IIa, or possibly with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for stage IIb disease. For locally advanced cancers (stage III), neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is appropriate for adenocarcinomas. Chemoradiotherapy alone should only be considered in patients with squamous-cell carcinomas who show a morphological response to chemoradiotherapy, and produces a similar overall survival to chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, but with less post-treatment morbidity. Although the addition of surgery to chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy could result in improved local control and survival, surgery should be done in experienced hospitals where operative mortality and morbidity are low. Moreover, surgery should be kept in mind as salvage treatment in patients with no morphological response or persistent tumour after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma Nonresponder to Radiochemotherapy: Who Will Benefit From Surgery?

BACKGROUND

In patients who are nonresponders to primary radiochemotherapy (RCT), prognosis is poor, leading mostly to palliation. Salvage surgery may have a survival benefit otherwise complete. Our aim was to identify predictors of R0 resection in these patients.

METHODS

In 98 nonresponders with locally advanced infracarinal tumors, curative salvage surgery was attempted. Resection was R0 in 62.2% and incomplete in 37.8% of cases. Univariate and multivariate analyses included pre-RCT and post-RCT variables collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Overall survival was higher in the R0 resection group (18.4 vs 8.6 months, P < .001). Independent predictors of R0 resection were tumor height <or= 5 cm on barium swallow (P = .045) and aortic contact <or= 90 degrees on computed tomography (P = .039) evaluated after RCT. Three groups of patients were constructed: 1, tumor height <or= 5 cm with aortic contact <or= 90 degrees (n = 43); 2, tumor height between 6 and 10 cm with aortic contact <or= 90 degrees (n = 32); and 3, aortic contact > 90 degrees , irrespective of tumor height (n = 23). Rates of R0 resection were 81%, 53%, and 39%, respectively (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Salvage esophagectomy should be systematically attempted in nonresponders with tumor height <or= 5 cm on barium swallow and aortic contact <or= 90 degrees on computed tomography and discussed case by case for other patients.

Are squamous and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus the same disease?

Esophageal cancer can be divided in squamous-cell cancer (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (Barrett cancer: AEG I) by histopathology. However, most studies do not differentiate between these two tumor entities. SCC is associated with a lower socioeconomic level with nicotine and alcohol abuse resulting in comorbidities like liver cirrhosis and reduced pulmonary function; in contrast, AEG I is associated with a high socioeconomic level and cardiovascular risk factors. The median age of patients with SCC is 10 years younger than with AEG I. The localization of AEG I is in 94% below the tracheal bifurcation, whereas SCC has contact to the tracheal bronchial tree in 75%. Furthermore, SCC shows an earlier lymphatic spread and a worse prognosis compared to AEG I. The different localization and different comorbidities require different therapeutic strategies. The preoperative induction therapy consists of combined chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced SCC and of chemotherapy for AEG I in our department. Due to the favorable position of AEG I a classic Ivor-Lewis procedure ending with an intrathoracic anastomosis is possible, in contrast, SCC frequently requires a subtotal esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis (in a two step strategy). Therefore, at the moment there is no doubt that SCC and AEG I are two different diseases with different pathogenesis, epidemiology, tumor biology and prognosis requiring different therapeutic strategies. We suggest that the two different tumor entities should be analyzed and reported separately to provide comparable results in the future.

Prise en charge thérapeutique du cancer de l'œsophage

The prognosis for esophageal cancer remains grim despite recent progress in diagnosis and treatment. Surgery is the standard treatment for stages I and II (only). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or combined radiation and chemotherapy may be considered for stages IIb and III. Palliative surgery is no longer considered useful. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation treatment does not improve survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival, and the benefits of its neoadjuvant use remain controversial in view of the discordant results. There is strong evidence that a neoadjuvant combination of radiation and chemotherapy improves resection and survival rates compared with surgery alone, but definitive proof is not currently available. Combined radiation and chemotherapy may be considered for locally advanced tumors in responding patients, with curative salvage surgery if the tumor persists. For patients whose tumor is inoperable, a combination of radiation and chemotherapy is the standard treatment.