1
|
Chand M, Rasheed S, Heald R, Swift I, West N, Rao S, Tekkis P, Brown G. Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve disease-free survival in patients with rectal cancer positive for MRI-detected extramural venous invasion following chemoradiation. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:537-543. [PMID: 27673438 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2016] [Accepted: 08/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM MRI-detected extramural venous invasion (mrEMVI) is a poor prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can cause regression in the severity of EMVI and subsequently improve survival whereas mrEMVI persisting after CRT confers an increased risk of recurrence. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following CRT on survival in rectal cancer remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a survival advantage for AC given to patients with mrEMVI persisting after CRT. METHOD A prospective analysis was conducted of consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer between 2006 and 2013. All patients underwent CRT followed by surgery. AC was given to selected patients based on the presence of specific 'high-risk' features. Comparison was made between patients offered AC with observation alone. The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Of 631 patients, 227 (36.0%) demonstrated persistent mrEMVI following CRT. Patients were grouped on the basis of AC or observation and were matched for age, performance status and final histopathological staging. Three-year DFS in the AC group was 74.6% compared with 53.7% in the observation only group. AC had a survival benefit on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.458; 95% CI: 0.271-0.775, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION Patients with persistent mrEMVI following CRT who receive AC may have a decreased risk of recurrence and an improved 3-year DFS compared with patients not receiving AC, irrespective of age and performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Chand
- Department of Surgery, University College London Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - S Rasheed
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - R Heald
- Pelican Cancer Foundation, Basingstoke, UK
| | - I Swift
- Croydon University Hospital, London, UK
| | - N West
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Biology, Leeds University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - S Rao
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - P Tekkis
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - G Brown
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wen B, Zhang L, Wang C, Huang R, Peng H, Zhang T, Dong J, Xiao W, Zeng Z, Liu M, Gao Y. Prognostic significance of clinical and pathological stages on locally advanced rectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:124. [PMID: 26040453 PMCID: PMC4490617 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0425-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2014] [Accepted: 05/21/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate prognostic significance of clinical and pathological stages in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) and total mesorectal excision. Patients and methods 210 patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma (cT3-4 or cN+) treated with neo-CRT followed by total mesorectal excision. Treatment outcomes were compared according to clinical and pathological stage. Overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) among patients with different clinical stage and pathological stage after neo-CRT. Results The median follow-up time was 47 months (range, 14–98 months). Clinical T stage was associated with 5 year OS (p = 0.042) and 5 year DFS (p = 0.014) while clinical N stage was not associated with 5 year OS (p = 0.440), 5 year DFS (p = 0.711). Pathological T stage was associate with 5 year OS (p = 0.001) and 5 year DFS (p = 0.046); and N stage was associated with 5 year OS (p = 0.001), 5 year DFS (p = 0.002). The pathological stage was further classified into three groups: ypT0–2N0 in 91 patients (43.3 %), ypT3–4N0 in 69 patients (32.9 %) and ypT0–4N+ in 50 patients (23.8 %). While pathological stage (ypT0–2 vs ypT3–4N0 vs ypT0–4N+) was associated with 5 year OS (87.9 %, 75.5 %, 56.7 %, p = 0.000), 5 year DFS (74.5 %, 77.4 %, 50.5 %, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that ypN stage was an independent prognostic factor for patients 5 year DFS. Conclusions Pathological stage is strongly associated with treatment outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with neo-CRT followed by total mesorectal excision, which may be used as guidance for further individualized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bixiu Wen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Luning Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Chengtao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Rong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Haihua Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Tian Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Jun Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Weiwei Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Zhifan Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Mengzhong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Yuanhong Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| |
Collapse
|