1
|
Watanabe S, Nonaka T, Maeda M, Yamada M, Sugii N, Hashimoto K, Takano S, Koyanagi T, Arakawa Y, Ishikawa E. Recent Status of Phase I Clinical Trials for Brain Tumors: A Regulatory Science Study of Exploratory Efficacy Endpoints. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2024; 58:655-662. [PMID: 38530629 PMCID: PMC11169007 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00644-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate exploratory efficacy data from Phase I trials are vital for subsequent phases. Owing to the uniqueness of brain tumors (BTs), use of different strategies to evaluate efficacy is warranted. We studied exploratory efficacy evaluation in Phase I trials involving BTs. METHODS Using Clarivate's Cortellis™, 42 Phase I trials of BT interventions conducted from 2020 to 2022 were analyzed for efficacy endpoints, which were set as primary endpoints (PEs) or secondary endpoints (SEs). Additionally, these metrics were compared in two subgroups: trials including only BTs (Group-A) and those including BTs among mixed solid tumors (Group-B). RESULTS Selected studies included a median of 1.5 PEs (range, 1-6) and 5 SEs (range, 0-19). Efficacy endpoints were included as PEs and SEs in 2 (5%) and 31 (78%) trials, respectively. Among the latter 31 trials that included 94 efficacy endpoints, 24, 22, 20, 9, and 8 reflected overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and disease control rate (DCR), respectively. ORR for BT was determined using various methods; however, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was used less frequently in Group-A than in Group-B (p = 0.0039). CONCLUSIONS Recent Phase I trials included efficacy endpoints as SEs, with ORR, PFS, or OS included in ~ 50% trials and DOR or DCR in ~ 25%. No established criteria exist for imaging evaluation of BTs. Phase I trials involving mixed solid tumor cohorts revealed challenges in designing methods to assess the exploratory efficacy of BTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Watanabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mito Kyodo General Hospital, Tsukuba University Hospital Mito Area Medical Education Center, 3-2-7 Miyamachi, Mito, 310-0015, Ibaraki, Japan.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
| | - Takahiro Nonaka
- Department of Health and Medical Innovation, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University School, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makoto Maeda
- Department of, Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanobu Yamada
- Tsukuba Clinical Research and Development Organization, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Narushi Sugii
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Koichi Hashimoto
- Tsukuba Clinical Research and Development Organization, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Shingo Takano
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
- Tsukuba Clinical Research and Development Organization, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Tomoyoshi Koyanagi
- Tsukuba Clinical Research and Development Organization, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Arakawa
- Tsukuba Clinical Research and Development Organization, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Eiichi Ishikawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pollack IF, Felker J, Frederico SC, Raphael I, Kohanbash G. Immunotherapy for pediatric low-grade gliomas. Childs Nerv Syst 2024:10.1007/s00381-024-06491-9. [PMID: 38884777 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06491-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) are the most common brain tumor types affecting children. Although gross-total resection remains the treatment of choice, many tumors are not amenable to complete removal, because they either involve midline structures, such as the optic chiasm or hypothalamus, and are not conducive to aggressive resection, or have diffuse biological features and blend with the surrounding brain. Historically, radiation therapy was used as the second-line option for disease control, but with the recognition that this often led to adverse long-term sequelae, particularly in young children, conventional chemotherapy assumed a greater role in initial therapy for unresectable tumors. A variety of agents demonstrated activity, but long-term disease control was suboptimal, with more than 50% of tumors exhibiting disease progression within 5 years. More recently, it has been recognized that a high percentage of these tumors in children exhibit constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway because of BRAF translocations or mutations, NFI mutations, or a host of other anomalies that converged on MAPK. This led to phase 1, 2, and 3 trials that explored the activity of blocking this signaling pathway, and the efficacy of this approach compared to conventional chemotherapy. Despite initial promise of these strategies, not all children tolerate this therapy, and many tumors resume growth once MAPK inhibition is stopped, raising concern that long-term and potentially life-long treatment will be required to maintain tumor control, even among responders. This observation has led to interest in other treatments, such as immunotherapy, that may delay or avoid the need for additional treatments. This chapter will summarize the place of immunotherapy in the current armamentarium for these tumors and discuss prior results and future options to improve disease control, with a focus on our prior efforts and experience in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian F Pollack
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
| | - James Felker
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Stephen C Frederico
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Itay Raphael
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Gary Kohanbash
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rosen J, Werner JM, Ceccon GS, Rosen EK, Wollring MM, Stetter I, Lohmann P, Mottaghy FM, Fink GR, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. MRI and 18F-FET PET for Multimodal Treatment Monitoring in Patients with Brain Metastases: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:838-844. [PMID: 38664020 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PET using the radiolabeled amino acid O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) has been shown to be of value for treatment monitoring in patients with brain metastases after multimodal therapy, especially in clinical situations with equivocal MRI findings. As medical procedures must be justified socioeconomically, we determined the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 18F-FET PET for treatment monitoring of multimodal therapy, including checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, radiotherapy, and combinations thereof in patients with brain metastases secondary to melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: We analyzed already-published clinical data and calculated the associated costs from the German statutory health insurance system perspective. Two clinical scenarios were considered: decision tree model 1 determined the effectiveness of 18F-FET PET alone for identifying treatment-related changes, that is, the probability of correctly identifying patients with treatment-related changes confirmed by neuropathology or clinicoradiographically using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria for immunotherapy. The resulting cost-effectiveness ratio showed the cost for each correctly identified patient with treatment-related changes in whom MRI findings remained inconclusive. Decision tree model 2 calculated the effectiveness of both 18F-FET PET and MRI, that is, the probability of correctly identifying nonresponders to treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated to determine cost-effectiveness, that is, the cost for each additionally identified nonresponder by 18F-FET PET who would have remained undetected by MRI. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results. Results: 18F-FET PET identified 94% of patients with treatment-related changes, resulting in €1,664.23 (€1.00 = $1.08 at time of writing) for each correctly identified patient. Nonresponders were correctly identified in 60% by MRI and in 80% by 18F-FET PET, resulting in €3,292.67 and €3,915.83 for each correctly identified nonresponder by MRI and 18F-FET PET, respectively. The cost to correctly identify 1 additional nonresponder by 18F-FET PET, who would have remained unidentified by MRI, was €5,785.30. Conclusion: Given the considerable annual cost of multimodal therapy, the integration of 18F-FET PET can potentially improve patient care while reducing costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jurij Rosen
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry S Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena K Rosen
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael M Wollring
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Isabelle Stetter
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; and
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haskell-Mendoza AP, Reason EH, Gonzalez AT, Jackson JD, Sankey EW, Srinivasan ES, Herndon JE, Fecci PE, Calabrese E. Automated segmentation of ablated lesions using deep convolutional neural networks: A basis for response assessment following laser interstitial thermal therapy. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1152-1162. [PMID: 38170451 PMCID: PMC11145442 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) of intracranial tumors or radiation necrosis enables tissue diagnosis, cytoreduction, and rapid return to systemic therapies. Ablated tissue remains in situ, resulting in characteristic post-LITT edema associated with transient clinical worsening and complicating post-LITT response assessment. METHODS All patients receiving LITT at a single center for tumors or radiation necrosis from 2015 to 2023 with ≥9 months of MRI follow-up were included. An nnU-Net segmentation model was trained to automatically segment contrast-enhancing lesion volume (CeLV) of LITT-treated lesions on T1-weighted images. Response assessment was performed using volumetric measurements. RESULTS Three hundred and eighty four unique MRI exams of 61 LITT-treated lesions and 6 control cases of medically managed radiation necrosis were analyzed. Automated segmentation was accurate in 367/384 (95.6%) images. CeLV increased to a median of 68.3% (IQR 35.1-109.2%) from baseline at 1-3 months from LITT (P = 0.0012) and returned to baseline thereafter. Overall survival (OS) for LITT-treated patients was 39.1 (9.2-93.4) months. Lesion expansion above 40% from volumetric nadir or baseline was considered volumetric progression. Twenty-one of 56 (37.5%) patients experienced progression for a volumetric progression-free survival of 21.4 (6.0-93.4) months. Patients with volumetric progression had worse OS (17.3 vs 62.1 months, P = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS Post-LITT CeLV expansion is quantifiable and resolves within 6 months of LITT. Development of response assessment criteria for LITT-treated lesions is feasible and should be considered for clinical trials. Automated lesion segmentation could speed the adoption of volumetric response criteria in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ellery H Reason
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Joshua D Jackson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eric W Sankey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Piedmont Athens Regional Medical Center, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Ethan S Srinivasan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - James E Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Evan Calabrese
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lin FY, Stuckert A, Tat C, White M, Ruggieri L, Zhang H, Mehta B, Lapteva N, Mei Z, Major A, Thakkar S, Shum T, Parikh K, Wu MF, Lindsay HB, Scherer L, Shekar M, Baxter P, Wang T, Grilley B, Moeller K, Hicks J, Roy A, Anastas J, Malbari F, Aldave G, Chintagumpala M, Blaney S, Parsons DW, Brenner MK, Heslop HE, Rooney CM, Omer B. Phase I Trial of GD2.CART Cells Augmented With Constitutive Interleukin-7 Receptor for Treatment of High-Grade Pediatric CNS Tumors. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2302019. [PMID: 38771986 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE T cells modified with chimeric antigen receptors (CARTs) have demonstrated efficacy for hematologic malignancies; however, benefit for patients with CNS tumors has been limited. To enhance T cell activity against GD2+ CNS malignancies, we modified GD2-directed CART cells (GD2.CARTs) with a constitutively active interleukin (IL)-7 receptor (C7R-GD2.CARTs). METHODS Patients age 1-21 years with H3K27-altered diffuse midline glioma (DMG) or other recurrent GD2-expressing CNS tumors were eligible for this phase I trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04099797). All subjects received standard-of-care adjuvant radiation therapy or chemotherapy before study enrollment. The first treatment cohort received GD2.CARTs alone (1 × 107 cells/m2), and subsequent cohorts received C7R-GD2.CARTs at two dose levels (1 × 107 cells/m2; 3 × 107 cells/m2). Standard lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine was included at all dose levels. RESULTS Eleven patients (age 4-18 years) received therapy without dose-limiting toxicity. The GD2.CART cohort did not experience toxicity, but had disease progression after brief improvement of residual neurologic deficits (≤3 weeks). The C7R-GD2.CART cohort developed grade 1 tumor inflammation-associated neurotoxicity in seven of eight (88%) cases, controllable with anakinra. Cytokine release syndrome was observed in six of eight (75%, grade 1 in all but one patient) and associated with increased circulating IL-6 and IP-10 (P < .05). Patients receiving C7R-GD2.CARTs experienced temporary improvement from baseline neurologic deficits (range, 2 to >12 months), and seven of eight (88%) remained eligible for additional treatment cycles (range 2-4 cycles). Partial responses by iRANO criteria were observed in two of seven (29%) patients with DMG treated by C7R-GD2.CARTs. CONCLUSION Intravenous GD2.CARTs with and without C7R were well tolerated. Patients treated with C7R-GD2.CARTs exhibited transient improvement of neurologic deficits and increased circulating cytokines/chemokines. Treatment with C7R-GD2.CARTs represents a novel approach warranting further investigation for children with these incurable CNS cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Y Lin
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Austin Stuckert
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Candise Tat
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Mark White
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Lucia Ruggieri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Huimin Zhang
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Birju Mehta
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Natalia Lapteva
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Zhuyong Mei
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Angela Major
- Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Sachin Thakkar
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas Shum
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kathan Parikh
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Meng-Fen Wu
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Holly B Lindsay
- Department of Pediatrics Heme-Onc and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Children's Hospital Colorado Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO
| | - Lauren Scherer
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Meghan Shekar
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Patricia Baxter
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Tao Wang
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Bambi Grilley
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Karen Moeller
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - John Hicks
- Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Angshumoy Roy
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Jamie Anastas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Fatema Malbari
- Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Guillermo Aldave
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Murali Chintagumpala
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Susan Blaney
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - D Williams Parsons
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Malcolm K Brenner
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Helen E Heslop
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Cliona M Rooney
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Bilal Omer
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Hare P, Cooney T, de Blank P, Gutmann DH, Kieran M, Milde T, Fangusaro J, Fisher M, Avula S, Packer R, Fukuoka K, Mankad K, Mueller S, Waanders AJ, Opocher E, Bouffet E, Raabe E, Werle NE, Azizi AA, Robison NJ, Hernáiz Driever P, Russo M, Schouten N, van Tilburg CM, Sehested A, Grill J, Bandopadhayay P, Kilday JP, Witt O, Ashley DM, Ertl-Wagner BB, Tabori U, Hargrave DR. Resistance, rebound, and recurrence regrowth patterns in pediatric low-grade glioma treated by MAPK inhibition: A modified Delphi approach to build international consensus-based definitions-International Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma Coalition. Neuro Oncol 2024:noae074. [PMID: 38743009 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) is the most common childhood brain tumor group. The natural history, when curative resection is not possible, is one of a chronic disease with periods of tumor stability and episodes of tumor progression. While there is a high overall survival rate, many patients experience significant and potentially lifelong morbidities. The majority of pLGGs have an underlying activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway due to mutational events, leading to the use of molecularly targeted therapies in clinical trials, with recent regulatory approval for the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibition for BRAFV600E mutated pLGG. Despite encouraging activity, tumor regrowth can occur during therapy due to drug resistance, off treatment as tumor recurrence, or as reported in some patients as a rapid rebound growth within 3 months of discontinuing targeted therapy. Definitions of these patterns of regrowth have not been well described in pLGG. For this reason, the International Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma Coalition, a global group of physicians and scientists, formed the Resistance, Rebound, and Recurrence (R3) working group to study resistance, rebound, and recurrence. A modified Delphi approach was undertaken to produce consensus-based definitions and recommendations for regrowth patterns in pLGG with specific reference to targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia O'Hare
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Tabitha Cooney
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter de Blank
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - David H Gutmann
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Mark Kieran
- Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Till Milde
- Clinical Pediatric Oncology, Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jason Fangusaro
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael Fisher
- Division of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shivaram Avula
- Department of Radiology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Roger Packer
- Brain Tumor Institute, Center for Neuroscience and Behavioral Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Kohei Fukuoka
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kshitij Mankad
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Radiology, London, UK
| | - Sabine Mueller
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Angela J Waanders
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Enrico Opocher
- Paediatric Haematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant Division, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Eric Bouffet
- The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Raabe
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Natacha Entz Werle
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg. UMR CNRS 7021, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Amedeo A Azizi
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine and Comprehensive Centre of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nathan J Robison
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Pablo Hernáiz Driever
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, German HIT-LOGGIC-Registry for LGG in children and adolescents, Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mark Russo
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA
| | - Netteke Schouten
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis M van Tilburg
- Clinical Pediatric Oncology, Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Astrid Sehested
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacques Grill
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Villejuif, France
| | - Pratiti Bandopadhayay
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John-Paul Kilday
- The Centre for Paediatric, Teenage and Young Adult Cancer, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, and Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Olaf Witt
- Clinical Pediatric Oncology, Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David M Ashley
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center. Pediatric Neuro-Oncology, Preuss Laboratory for Brain Tumor Research, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Uri Tabori
- The Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Darren R Hargrave
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Won SE, Suh CH, Kim S, Park HJ, Kim KW. Summary of Key Points of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0. Korean J Radiol 2024; 25:407-411. [PMID: 38627876 PMCID: PMC11058423 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Eun Won
- Asan Image Metrics, Clinical Trial Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chong Hyun Suh
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sinae Kim
- Asan Image Metrics, Clinical Trial Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Won Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Picca A, Touat M, Belin L, Gourmelon C, Harlay V, Cuzzubbo S, Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E, Bronnimann C, Di Stefano AL, Laurent I, Lerond J, Carpentier C, Bielle F, Ducray F, Dehais C. REVOLUMAB: A phase II trial of nivolumab in recurrent IDH mutant high-grade gliomas. Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:114034. [PMID: 38537315 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Novel effective treatments are needed for recurrent IDH mutant high-grade gliomas (IDHm HGGs). The aim of the multicentric, single-arm, phase II REVOLUMAB trial (NCT03925246) was to assess the efficacy and safety of the anti-PD1 Nivolumab in patients with recurrent IDHm HGGs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult patients with IDHm WHO grade 3-4 gliomas recurring after radiotherapy and ≥ 1 line of alkylating chemotherapy were treated with intravenous Nivolumab until end of treatment (12 months), progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was the 24-week progression-free survival rate (24w-PFS) according to RANO criteria. RESULTS From July 2019 to June 2020, 39 patients with recurrent IDHm HGGs (twenty-one grade 3, thirteen grade 4, five grade 2 with radiological evidence of anaplastic transformation; 39% 1p/19q codeleted) were enrolled. Median time since diagnosis was 5.7 years, and the median number of previous systemic treatments was two. The 24w-PFS was 28.2% (11/39, CI95% 15-44.9%). Median PFS and OS were 1.84 (CI95% 1.81-5.89) and 14.7 months (CI95% 9.18-NR), respectively. Four patients (10.3%) achieved partial response according to RANO criteria. There were no significant differences in clinical or histomolecular features between responders and non-responders. The safety profile of Nivolumab was consistent with prior studies. CONCLUSIONS We report the results of the first trial of immune checkpoint inhibitors in IDHm gliomas. Nivolumab failed to achieve its primary endpoint. However, treatment was well tolerated, and long-lasting responses were observed in a subset of patients, supporting further evaluation in combination with other agents (e.g. IDH inhibitors).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Picca
- Service de Neuro-oncologie, Institut de Neurologie, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Paris, France
| | - Mehdi Touat
- Service de Neuro-oncologie, Institut de Neurologie, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Paris, France
| | - Lisa Belin
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, CIC-1901, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Carole Gourmelon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Vincent Harlay
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, AP-HM, University Hospital Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Stefania Cuzzubbo
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université Paris Cité, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal
- Department of Radiotherapy, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, Cancer University Institute of Toulouse, Oncopole Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse III, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), Toulouse, France
| | - Charlotte Bronnimann
- Hôpital Saint-André Bordeaux, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Service d'Oncologie, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Anna Luisa Di Stefano
- Department of Neurology, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France; Division of Neurosurgery, Spedali Riuniti di Livorno-USL Toscana Nord-Ovest, 57124 Livorno, Italy
| | - Isaura Laurent
- Unité de Recherche Clinique PSL-CFX, CIC-1901, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Julie Lerond
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Paris, France
| | - Catherine Carpentier
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Paris, France
| | - Franck Bielle
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Paris, France; Department of Neuropathology, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - François Ducray
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, East Group Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Caroline Dehais
- Service de Neuro-oncologie, Institut de Neurologie, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hahnemann L, Krämer A, Fink C, Jungk C, Thomas M, Christopoulos P, Lischalk J, Meis J, Hörner-Rieber J, Eichkorn T, Deng M, Lang K, Paul A, Meixner E, Weykamp F, Debus J, König L. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial postoperative cavities after resection of brain metastases - Clinical outcome and prognostic factors. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100782. [PMID: 38694237 PMCID: PMC11061678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose After surgical resection of brain metastases (BM), radiotherapy (RT) is indicated. Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) reduces the risk of local progression and neurocognitive decline compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Aside from the optimal dose and fractionation, little is known about the combination of systemic therapy and postoperative fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), especially regarding tumour control and toxicity. Methods In this study, 105 patients receiving postoperative fSRT with 35 Gy in 7 fractions performed with Cyberknife were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and total intracranial brain control (TIBC) were analysed via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. Results Median follow-up was 20.8 months. One-year TIBC was 61.6% and one-year LC was 98.6%. Median OS was 28.7 (95%-CI: 16.9-40.5) months. In total, local progression (median time not reached) occurred in 2.0% and in 20.4% radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) of the cavity (after median of 14.3 months) were diagnosed. Absence of extracranial metastases was identified as an independent prognostic factor for superior OS (p = <0.001) in multivariate analyses, while a higher Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was predictive for longer OS in univariate analysis (p = 0.041). Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) developed in 13% of patients. Conclusion FSRT after surgical resection of BM is an effective and safe treatment approach with excellent local control and acceptable toxicity. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to establish standardized therapeutic guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Hahnemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A. Krämer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - C. Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C. Jungk
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Thomas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - P. Christopoulos
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - J.W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Health at Long Island, New York, NY, USA
| | - J. Meis
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J. Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T. Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K. Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A. Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E. Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F. Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J. Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L. König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Geens W, Vanlaer N, Nijland L, Van Laere S, Schwarze JK, Bruneau M, Neyns B, Rogiers A, Duerinck J. Health-related quality of life and neurocognitive functioning in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with intracerebral immune checkpoint inhibition. J Neurooncol 2024; 168:159-169. [PMID: 38502281 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04646-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE After glioblastoma (GB) recurrence, prognosis is very cumbersome. Therefore, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and neurocognitive functioning (NCF) have become important endpoints in clinical trials when evaluating novel treatments. We aimed to evaluate the HRQoL and NCF in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) treated with a combination of surgical intervention (reoperation or biopsy) and intracerebral immune checkpoint inhibition. METHODS Patients who participated in the trial (N = 23), at a single-center university hospital were included. Data were collected using 3 patient-reported outcome measures (EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BN20, and HADS) and computerized NCF testing. In the responder group, baseline values were compared to results at a 6-month follow-up. Additionally, exploratory analyses compared baseline HRQoL and NCF between responders and non-responders. RESULTS There were five responders and 18 non-responders. When comparing the mean and individual baseline with follow-up results for the responders, we observed overall a stable to slight clinically relevant improvement of HRQoL in multiple subsets of the questionnaires while maintaining a stable NCF. One patient deteriorated on anxiety and depression symptoms from baseline to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In patients that responded to intracerebral immunotherapy in our institutional trial, HRQoL and NCF remained stable over time, suggesting that no detrimental effect on cognitive function or quality of life may be expected with this treatment approach. Furthermore, there seems to be an overall tendency for responders to score better on HRQoL and NCF than non-responders at baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wietse Geens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium.
| | - Nathalie Vanlaer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Lynn Nijland
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Sven Van Laere
- Support for Quantitative and Qualitative Research (SQUARE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Julia Katharina Schwarze
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Michaël Bruneau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Anne Rogiers
- Department of Psychiatry, CHU Brugmann, A.Van Gehuchtenplein 4, Brussels, 1020, Belgium
| | - Johnny Duerinck
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cuccarini V, Savoldi F, Mardor Y, Last D, Pellegatta S, Mazzi F, Bruzzone MG, Anghileri E, Pollo B, Maddaloni L, Russo C, Bocchi E, Pinzi V, Eoli M, Aquino D. Response assessment of GBM during immunotherapy by delayed contrast treatment response assessment maps. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1374737. [PMID: 38651109 PMCID: PMC11033465 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1374737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Assessing the treatment response of glioblastoma multiforme during immunotherapy (IT) is an open issue. Treatment response assessment maps (TRAMs) might help distinguish true tumor progression (TTP) and pseudoprogression (PsP) in this setting. Methods We recruited 16 naïve glioblastoma patients enrolled in a phase II trial consisting of the Stupp protocol (a standardized treatment for glioblastoma involving combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide, followed by adjuvant temozolomide) plus IT with dendritic cells. Patients were followed up till progression or death; seven underwent a second surgery for suspected progression. Clinical, immunological, and MRI data were collected from all patients and histology in case of second surgery. Patients were classified as responders (progression-free survival, PFS > 12 months), and non-responders (PFS ≤ 12), HIGH-NK (natural killer cells, i.e., immunological responders), and LOW-NK (immunological non-responders) based on immune cell counts in peripheral blood. TRAMs differentiate contrast-enhancing lesions with different washout dynamics into hypothesized tumoral (conventionally blue-colored) vs. treatment-related (red-colored). Results Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, a threshold of -0.066 in VBlue/VCE (volume of the blue portion of tumoral area/volume of contrast enhancement) variation between values obtained in the MRI performed before PsP/TTP and at TTP/PSP allowed to discriminate TTP from PsP with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 100%. Among HIGH-NK patients, at month 6 there was a significant reduction compared to baseline and month 2 in median "blue" volumes. Discussion In conclusion, in our pilot study TRAMs support the discrimination between tumoral and treatment-related enhancing features in immunological responders vs. non-responders, the distinction between PsP and TTP, and might provide surrogate markers of immunological response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Cuccarini
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Savoldi
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Yael Mardor
- Advanced Technology Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - David Last
- Advanced Technology Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Serena Pellegatta
- Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Mazzi
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Bruzzone
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Anghileri
- Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Bianca Pollo
- Neuro-Pathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Luisa Maddaloni
- Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Russo
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e delle Tecnologie dell’Informazione (DIETI), Università Degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Elisa Bocchi
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Pinzi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Marica Eoli
- Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Aquino
- Neuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gikandi A, Chi SN, Yeo KK, O'Neill AF, Shulman DS, DuBois SG, Collins NB. Off-label prescribing of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy at a single pediatric cancer center. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7154. [PMID: 38629258 PMCID: PMC11022150 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved outcomes in a variety of adult cancers and are prescribed with increasing frequency across oncology. However, patterns of off-label use of ICI in pediatrics remain unclear. METHODS This is a single-institution, retrospective cohort study evaluating off-label ICI use in pediatric and young adult patients with cancer treated at our institution from 2014 to 2022. Response was based on clinician assessment derived from clinical records. Immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) were classified according to CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS We identified 50 unique patients treated with off-label ICI (28 with solid tumors, 20 with central nervous system (CNS) tumors, 2 with hematologic malignancies). At time of ICI initiation, only five patients (10%) had localized disease, and all but one patient was treated in the relapsed/refractory setting. All patients were treated with the FDA-approved weight-based dosing recommendations. Overall, there was disease control in 21 patients (42%), with best response including one complete response (melanoma), two partial responses (high-grade glioma, CNS nongerminomatous germ cell tumor), and 18 patients with stable disease. Forty-four patients (88%) eventually experienced disease progression. Among 22 patients (44%) experiencing iRAEs, 10 (20%) had a grade ≥3 irAE, 12 (24%) required corticosteroids, and 14 (28%) required ICI discontinuation. irAE occurrence was associated with significantly improved progression-free survival (HR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.68; p = 0.002) and overall survival (HR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS At our institution, ICI was most commonly prescribed in the relapsed/refractory setting to patients with metastatic disease. The treatment was generally well-tolerated in the pediatric population. The overall response rate was low, and the majority of patients eventually experienced disease progression. A few patients, however, had durable treatment responses. Further studies are needed to identify which pediatric patients are most likely to benefit from ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan N Chi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kee Kiat Yeo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Allison F O'Neill
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David S Shulman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Steven G DuBois
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Natalie B Collins
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Valerius AR, Webb MJ, Hammad N, Sener U, Malani R. Cerebrospinal Fluid Liquid Biopsies in the Evaluation of Adult Gliomas. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:377-390. [PMID: 38488990 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01517-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to discuss recent research regarding the biomolecules explored in liquid biopsies and their potential clinical uses for adult-type diffuse gliomas. RECENT FINDINGS Evaluation of tumor biomolecules via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an emerging technology in neuro-oncology. Studies to date have already identified various circulating tumor DNA, extracellular vesicle, micro-messenger RNA and protein biomarkers of interest. These biomarkers show potential to assist in multiple avenues of central nervous system (CNS) tumor evaluation, including tumor differentiation and diagnosis, treatment selection, response assessment, detection of tumor progression, and prognosis. In addition, CSF liquid biopsies have the potential to better characterize tumor heterogeneity compared to conventional tissue collection and CNS imaging. Current imaging modalities are not sufficient to establish a definitive glioma diagnosis and repeated tissue sampling via conventional biopsy is risky, therefore, there is a great need to improve non-invasive and minimally invasive sampling methods. CSF liquid biopsies represent a promising, minimally invasive adjunct to current approaches which can provide diagnostic and prognostic information as well as aid in response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mason J Webb
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nouran Hammad
- Jordan University of Science and Technology School of Medicine, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Ugur Sener
- Department of Neurology, Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rachna Malani
- University of UT - Huntsman Cancer Institute (Department of Neurosurgery), Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wei R, Li J, Lin W, Pang X, Yang H, Lai S, Wei X, Jiang X, Yuan Y, Yang R. Nanoparticle-mediated blockade of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling enhances glioblastoma immunotherapy: Monitoring early responses with MRI radiomics. Acta Biomater 2024; 177:414-430. [PMID: 38360292 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
The limited therapeutic efficacy of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy against glioblastoma is closely related to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment, where the latter is driven primarily by tumor-associated myeloid cells (TAMCs). Targeting the C-X-C motif chemokine ligand-12/C-X-C motif chemokine receptor-4 (CXCL12/CXCR4) signaling orchestrates the recruitment of TAMCs and has emerged as a promising approach for alleviating immunosuppression. Herein, we developed an iRGD ligand-modified polymeric nanoplatform for the co-delivery of CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 and the small-molecule immune checkpoint inhibitor BMS-1. The iRGD peptide facilitated superior BBB crossing and tumor-targeting abilities both in vitro and in vivo. In mice bearing orthotopic GL261-Luc tumor, co-administration of AMD3100 and BMS-1 significantly inhibited tumor proliferation without adverse effects. A reprogramming of immunosuppression upon CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling blockade was observed, characterized by the reduction of TAMCs and regulatory T cells, and an increased proportion of CD8+T lymphocytes. The elevation of interferon-γ secreted from activated immune cells upregulated PD-L1 expression in tumor cells, highlighting the synergistic effect of BMS-1 in counteracting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Finally, our research unveiled the ability of MRI radiomics to reveal early changes in the tumor immune microenvironment following immunotherapy, offering a powerful tool for monitoring treatment responses. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The insufficient BBB penetration and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment greatly diminish the efficacy of immunotherapy for glioblastoma (GBM). In this study, we prepared iRGD-modified polymeric nanoparticles, loaded with a CXCR4 antagonist (AMD3100) and a small-molecule checkpoint inhibitor of PD-L1 (BMS-1) to overcome physical barriers and reprogram the immunosuppressive microenvironment in orthotopic GBM models. In this nanoplatform, AMD3100 converted the "cold" immune microenvironment into a "hot" one, while BMS-1 synergistically counteracted PD-L1 inhibition, enhancing GBM immunotherapy. Our findings underscore the potential of dual-blockade of CXCL12/CXCR4 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways as a complementary approach to maximize therapeutic efficacy for GBM. Moreover, our study revealed that MRI radiomics provided a clinically translatable means to assess immunotherapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruili Wei
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, PR China
| | - Jiamin Li
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, PR China
| | - Wanxian Lin
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, PR China
| | - Xinrui Pang
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, PR China
| | - Huikang Yang
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, PR China
| | - Shengsheng Lai
- School of Medical Equipment, Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College, Guangzhou 510520, PR China
| | - Xinhua Wei
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, PR China
| | - Xinqing Jiang
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, PR China
| | - Youyong Yuan
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou International Campus, Guangzhou 511442, PR China.
| | - Ruimeng Yang
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hu LS, Smits M, Kaufmann TJ, Knutsson L, Rapalino O, Galldiks N, Sundgrene PC, Cha S. Advanced Imaging in the Diagnosis and Response Assessment of High-Grade Glioma: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024. [PMID: 38477525 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
This AJR Expert Panel Narrative explores the current status of advanced MRI and PET techniques for the post-therapeutic response assessment of high-grade adult-type gliomas, focusing on ongoing clinical controversies in current practice. Discussed techniques that complement conventional MRI and aid the differentiation of recurrent tumor from post-treatment effects include DWI and diffusion tensor imaging; perfusion MRI techniques including dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and arterial spin labeling; MR spectroscopy including assessment of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) concentration; glucose- and amino acid (AA)-based PET; and amide proton transfer imaging. Updated criteria for Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology are presented. Given the abundant supporting clinical evidence, the panel supports a recommendation that routine response assessment after HGG treatment should include perfusion MRI, particularly given the development of a consensus recommended DSC-MRI protocol. Although published studies support 2HG MRS and AA PET, these techniques' widespread adoption will likely require increased availability (for 2HG MRS) or increased insurance funding in the United States (for AA PET). The article concludes with a series of consensus opinions from the author panel, centered on the clinical integration of the advanced imaging techniques into posttreatment surveillance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Linda Knutsson
- F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Otto Rapalino
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Dept. of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pia C Sundgrene
- Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund/Radiology, Lund University, Lund Sweden
- Lund BioImaging Center, Lund University, Lud, Sweden
- Department of Medical Imaging and Function Skane University hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Soonmee Cha
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bhattacharya K, Rastogi S, Mahajan A. Post-treatment imaging of gliomas: challenging the existing dogmas. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:e376-e392. [PMID: 38123395 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Gliomas are the commonest malignant central nervous system tumours in adults and imaging is the cornerstone of diagnosis, treatment, and post-treatment follow-up of these patients. With the ever-evolving treatment strategies post-treatment imaging and interpretation in glioma remains challenging, more so with the advent of anti-angiogenic drugs and immunotherapy, which can significantly alter the appearance in this setting, thus making interpretation of routine imaging findings such as contrast enhancement, oedema, and mass effect difficult to interpret. This review details the various methods of management of glioma including the upcoming novel therapies and their impact on imaging findings, with a comprehensive description of the imaging findings in conventional and advanced imaging techniques. A systematic appraisal for the existing and emerging techniques of imaging in these settings and their clinical application including various response assessment guidelines and artificial intelligence based response assessment will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bhattacharya
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - S Rastogi
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - A Mahajan
- Department of imaging, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L7 8YA, UK; University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ortiz de Mendivil A, Martín-Medina P, García-Cañamaque L, Jiménez-Munarriz B, Ciérvide R, Diamantopoulos J. Challenges in radiological evaluation of brain metastases, beyond progression. RADIOLOGIA 2024; 66:166-180. [PMID: 38614532 DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
MRI is the cornerstone in the evaluation of brain metastases. The clinical challenges lie in discriminating metastases from mimickers such as infections or primary tumors and in evaluating the response to treatment. The latter sometimes leads to growth, which must be framed as pseudo-progression or radionecrosis, both inflammatory phenomena attributable to treatment, or be considered as recurrence. To meet these needs, imaging techniques are the subject of constant research. However, an exponential growth after radiotherapy must be interpreted with caution, even in the presence of results suspicious of tumor progression by advanced techniques, because it may be due to inflammatory changes. The aim of this paper is to familiarize the reader with inflammatory phenomena of brain metastases treated with radiotherapy and to describe two related radiological signs: "the inflammatory cloud" and "incomplete ring enhancement", in order to adopt a conservative management with close follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ortiz de Mendivil
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Sección de Neurorradiología, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
| | - P Martín-Medina
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Sección de Neurorradiología, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - B Jiménez-Munarriz
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Ciérvide
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Obrador E, Moreno-Murciano P, Oriol-Caballo M, López-Blanch R, Pineda B, Gutiérrez-Arroyo JL, Loras A, Gonzalez-Bonet LG, Martinez-Cadenas C, Estrela JM, Marqués-Torrejón MÁ. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2529. [PMID: 38473776 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GB) stands out as the most prevalent and lethal form of brain cancer. Although great efforts have been made by clinicians and researchers, no significant improvement in survival has been achieved since the Stupp protocol became the standard of care (SOC) in 2005. Despite multimodality treatments, recurrence is almost universal with survival rates under 2 years after diagnosis. Here, we discuss the recent progress in our understanding of GB pathophysiology, in particular, the importance of glioma stem cells (GSCs), the tumor microenvironment conditions, and epigenetic mechanisms involved in GB growth, aggressiveness and recurrence. The discussion on therapeutic strategies first covers the SOC treatment and targeted therapies that have been shown to interfere with different signaling pathways (pRB/CDK4/RB1/P16ink4, TP53/MDM2/P14arf, PI3k/Akt-PTEN, RAS/RAF/MEK, PARP) involved in GB tumorigenesis, pathophysiology, and treatment resistance acquisition. Below, we analyze several immunotherapeutic approaches (i.e., checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, CAR-modified NK or T cells, oncolytic virotherapy) that have been used in an attempt to enhance the immune response against GB, and thereby avoid recidivism or increase survival of GB patients. Finally, we present treatment attempts made using nanotherapies (nanometric structures having active anti-GB agents such as antibodies, chemotherapeutic/anti-angiogenic drugs or sensitizers, radionuclides, and molecules that target GB cellular receptors or open the blood-brain barrier) and non-ionizing energies (laser interstitial thermal therapy, high/low intensity focused ultrasounds, photodynamic/sonodynamic therapies and electroporation). The aim of this review is to discuss the advances and limitations of the current therapies and to present novel approaches that are under development or following clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Obrador
- Scientia BioTech S.L., 46002 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | | | - María Oriol-Caballo
- Scientia BioTech S.L., 46002 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Rafael López-Blanch
- Scientia BioTech S.L., 46002 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Begoña Pineda
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Alba Loras
- Department of Medicine, Jaume I University of Castellon, 12071 Castellon, Spain
| | - Luis G Gonzalez-Bonet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Castellon General University Hospital, 12004 Castellon, Spain
| | | | - José M Estrela
- Scientia BioTech S.L., 46002 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, 46100 Burjassot, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Das A, Fernandez NR, Levine A, Bianchi V, Stengs LK, Chung J, Negm L, Dimayacyac JR, Chang Y, Nobre L, Ercan AB, Sanchez-Ramirez S, Sudhaman S, Edwards M, Larouche V, Samuel D, Van Damme A, Gass D, Ziegler DS, Bielack SS, Koschmann C, Zelcer S, Yalon-Oren M, Campino GA, Sarosiek T, Nichols KE, Loret De Mola R, Bielamowicz K, Sabel M, Frojd CA, Wood MD, Glover JM, Lee YY, Vanan M, Adamski JK, Perreault S, Chamdine O, Hjort MA, Zapotocky M, Carceller F, Wright E, Fedorakova I, Lossos A, Tanaka R, Osborn M, Blumenthal DT, Aronson M, Bartels U, Huang A, Ramaswamy V, Malkin D, Shlien A, Villani A, Dirks PB, Pugh TJ, Getz G, Maruvka YE, Tsang DS, Ertl-Wagner B, Hawkins C, Bouffet E, Morgenstern DA, Tabori U. Combined Immunotherapy Improves Outcome for Replication-Repair-Deficient (RRD) High-Grade Glioma Failing Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy: A Report from the International RRD Consortium. Cancer Discov 2024; 14:258-273. [PMID: 37823831 PMCID: PMC10850948 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is effective for replication-repair-deficient, high-grade gliomas (RRD-HGG). The clinical/biological impact of immune-directed approaches after failing ICI monotherapy is unknown. We performed an international study on 75 patients treated with anti-PD-1; 20 are progression free (median follow-up, 3.7 years). After second progression/recurrence (n = 55), continuing ICI-based salvage prolonged survival to 11.6 months (n = 38; P < 0.001), particularly for those with extreme mutation burden (P = 0.03). Delayed, sustained responses were observed, associated with changes in mutational spectra and the immune microenvironment. Response to reirradiation was explained by an absence of deleterious postradiation indel signatures (ID8). CTLA4 expression increased over time, and subsequent CTLA4 inhibition resulted in response/stable disease in 75%. RAS-MAPK-pathway inhibition led to the reinvigoration of peripheral immune and radiologic responses. Local (flare) and systemic immune adverse events were frequent (biallelic mismatch-repair deficiency > Lynch syndrome). We provide a mechanistic rationale for the sustained benefit in RRD-HGG from immune-directed/synergistic salvage therapies. Future approaches need to be tailored to patient and tumor biology. SIGNIFICANCE Hypermutant RRD-HGG are susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors beyond initial progression, leading to improved survival when reirradiation and synergistic immune/targeted agents are added. This is driven by their unique biological and immune properties, which evolve over time. Future research should focus on combinatorial regimens that increase patient survival while limiting immune toxicity. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 201.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirban Das
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nicholas R. Fernandez
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Adrian Levine
- Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vanessa Bianchi
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lucie K. Stengs
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jiil Chung
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Logine Negm
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jose Rafael Dimayacyac
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Yuan Chang
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Liana Nobre
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ayse B. Ercan
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Santiago Sanchez-Ramirez
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sumedha Sudhaman
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Melissa Edwards
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Valerie Larouche
- Pediatric Haematology/Oncology Department, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - David Samuel
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Valley Children's Hospital, Madera, California
| | - An Van Damme
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Saint Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Gass
- Atrium Health/Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - David S. Ziegler
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stefan S. Bielack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Center for Childhood, Adolescent, and Women's Medicine, Stuttgart Cancer Center, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Carl Koschmann
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Shayna Zelcer
- Department of Pediatrics, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada
| | - Michal Yalon-Oren
- Department of Paediatric Haematology-Oncology, Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Gadi Abede Campino
- Department of Paediatric Haematology-Oncology, Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | - Kim E. Nichols
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Kevin Bielamowicz
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences/Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Magnus Sabel
- Department of Paediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg & Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Charlotta A. Frojd
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Matthew D. Wood
- Neuropathology, Oregon Health & Science University Department of Pathology, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jason M. Glover
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Randall Children's Hospital, Portland, Oregon
| | - Yi-Yen Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Magimairajan Vanan
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Jenny K. Adamski
- Neuro-oncology Division, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastien Perreault
- Neurosciences Department, Child Neurology Division, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada
| | - Omar Chamdine
- Pediatric Hematology Oncology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Magnus Aasved Hjort
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Michal Zapotocky
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Fernando Carceller
- Paediatric and Adolescent Neuro-Oncology and Drug Development, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erin Wright
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | - Ivana Fedorakova
- Clinic of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Children's Hospital, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
| | - Alexander Lossos
- Department of Oncology, Leslie and Michael Gaffin Centre for Neuro-Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ryuma Tanaka
- Division of Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Michael Osborn
- Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, Australia
| | - Deborah T. Blumenthal
- Neuro-Oncology Service, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Melyssa Aronson
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ute Bartels
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Annie Huang
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vijay Ramaswamy
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Malkin
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Adam Shlien
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anita Villani
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter B. Dirks
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Trevor J. Pugh
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gad Getz
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Derek S. Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Birgit Ertl-Wagner
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cynthia Hawkins
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric Bouffet
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Daniel A. Morgenstern
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Uri Tabori
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Youssef G, Wen PY. Updated Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) for Gliomas. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2024; 24:17-25. [PMID: 38170429 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-023-01329-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The response assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and its versions were developed by expert opinion consensus to standardize response evaluation in glioma clinical trials. New patient-based data informed the development of updated response assessment criteria, RANO 2.0. RECENT FINDINGS In a recent study of patients with glioblastoma, the post-radiation brain MRI was a superior baseline MRI compared to the pretreatment MRI, and confirmation scans were only beneficial within the first 12 weeks of completion of radiation in newly diagnosed disease. Nonenhancing disease evaluation did not improve the correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival in newly diagnosed and recurrent settings. RANO 2.0 recommends a single common response criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas, regardless of the treatment modality being evaluated. It also provides guidance on the evaluation of nonenhancing tumors and tumors with both enhancing and nonenhancing components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilbert Youssef
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wen PY, van den Bent M, Vogelbaum MA, Chang SM. RANO 2.0: The revised Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high- and low-grade glial tumors in adults designed for the future. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:2-4. [PMID: 37774741 PMCID: PMC10768981 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Y Wen
- Center For Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department Neuro-Oncology, ErasmusMC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Departments of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fadul CE, Thakur A, Kim J, Kassay-McAllister J, Schalk D, Lopes MB, Donahue J, Purow B, Dillon P, Le T, Schiff D, Liu Q, Lum LG. Phase I study targeting newly diagnosed grade 4 astrocytoma with bispecific antibody armed T cells (EGFR BATs) in combination with radiation and temozolomide. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:321-330. [PMID: 38263486 PMCID: PMC10834565 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04564-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and immunologic responses of treating grade 4 astrocytomas with multiple infusions of anti-CD3 x anti-EGFR bispecific antibody (EGFRBi) armed T cells (EGFR BATs) in combination with radiation and chemotherapy. METHODS This phase I study used a 3 + 3 dose escalation design to test the safety and feasibility of intravenously infused EGFR BATs in combination with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with newly diagnosed grade 4 astrocytomas (AG4). After finding the feasible dose, an expansion cohort with unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) tumors received weekly EGFR BATs without TMZ. RESULTS The highest feasible dose was 80 × 109 EGFR BATs without dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in seven patients. We could not escalate the dose because of the limited T-cell expansion. There were no DLTs in the additional cohort of three patients with unmethylated MGMT tumors who received eight weekly infusions of EGFR BATs without TMZ. EGFR BATs infusions induced increases in glioma specific anti-tumor cytotoxicity by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (p < 0.03) and NK cell activity (p < 0.002) ex vivo, and increased serum concentrations of IFN-γ (p < 0.03), IL-2 (p < 0.007), and GM-CSF (p < 0.009). CONCLUSION Targeting AG4 with EGFR BATs at the maximum feasible dose of 80 × 109, with or without TMZ was safe and induced significant anti-tumor-specific immune responses. These results support further clinical trials to examine the efficacy of this adoptive cell therapy in patients with MGMT-unmethylated GBM. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT03344250.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo E Fadul
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, P.O. Box 800394, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
| | - Archana Thakur
- Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Division Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jungeun Kim
- Office of Clinical Research, School of Medicine, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jessica Kassay-McAllister
- Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Division Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Dana Schalk
- Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Division Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - M Beatriz Lopes
- Department of Pathology, Divisions of Neuropathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Joseph Donahue
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Benjamin Purow
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, P.O. Box 800394, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Patrick Dillon
- Division Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Tri Le
- Division Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - David Schiff
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, P.O. Box 800394, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Qin Liu
- Biostatistics Unit, Molecular & Cellular Oncogenesis Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lawrence G Lum
- Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Division Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Albert NL, Galldiks N, Ellingson BM, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM, Cicone F, de Groot J, Koh ES, Law I, Le Rhun E, Mair MJ, Minniti G, Rudà R, Scott AM, Short SC, Smits M, Suchorska B, Tolboom N, Traub-Weidinger T, Tonn JC, Verger A, Weller M, Wen PY, Preusser M. PET-based response assessment criteria for diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0): a report of the RANO group. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e29-e41. [PMID: 38181810 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00525-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) response criteria have been established and were updated in 2023 for MRI-based response evaluation of diffuse gliomas in clinical trials. In addition, PET-based imaging with amino acid tracers is increasingly considered for disease monitoring in both clinical practice and clinical trials. So far, a standardised framework defining timepoints for baseline and follow-up investigations and response evaluation criteria for PET imaging of diffuse gliomas has not been established. Therefore, in this Policy Review, we propose a set of criteria for response assessment based on amino acid PET imaging in clinical trials enrolling participants with diffuse gliomas as defined in the 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. These proposed PET RANO criteria provide a conceptual framework that facilitates the structured implementation of PET imaging into clinical research and, ultimately, clinical routine. To this end, the PET RANO 1.0 criteria are intended to encourage specific investigations of amino acid PET imaging of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - John de Groot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maximilian J Mair
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin and City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Brain Tumour Centre, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Medical Delta, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy and IADI INSERM UMR 1254, Universitè de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center For Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gallegos CA, Lu Y, Clements JC, Song PN, Lynch SE, Mascioni A, Jia F, Hartman YE, Massicano AVF, Houson HA, Lapi SE, Warram JM, Markert JM, Sorace AG. [ 89Zr]-CD8 ImmunoPET imaging of glioblastoma multiforme response to combination oncolytic viral and checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy reveals CD8 infiltration differential changes in preclinical models. Theranostics 2024; 14:911-923. [PMID: 38250045 PMCID: PMC10797292 DOI: 10.7150/thno.89206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Novel immune-activating therapeutics for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) have shown potential for tumor regression and increased survival over standard therapies. However, immunotherapy efficacy remains inconsistent with response assessment being complicated by early treatment-induced apparent radiological tumor progression and slow downstream effects. This inability to determine early immunotherapeutic benefit results in a drastically decreased window for alternative, and potentially more effective, treatment options. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of combination immunotherapy on early CD8+ cell infiltration and its association with long term response in orthotopic syngeneic glioblastoma models. Methods: Luciferase positive GBM orthotopic mouse models (GSC005-luc) were imaged via [89Zr]-CD8 positron emission tomography (PET) one week following treatment with saline, anti-PD1, M002 oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV) or combination immunotherapy. Subsequently, brains were excised, imaged via [89Zr]-CD8 ImmunoPET and evaluated though autoradiography and histology for H&E and CD8 immunohistochemistry. Longitudinal immunotherapeutic effects were evaluated through [89Zr]-CD8 PET imaging one- and three-weeks following treatment, with changes in tumor volume monitored on a three-day basis via bioluminescence imaging (BLI). Response classification was then performed based on long-term BLI signal changes. Statistical analysis was performed between groups using one-way ANOVA and two-sided unpaired T-test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Correlations between imaging and biological validation were assessed via Pearson's correlation test. Results: [89Zr]-CD8 PET standardized uptake value (SUV) quantification was correlated with ex vivo SUV quantification (r = 0.61, p < 0.01), autoradiography (r = 0.46, p < 0.01), and IHC tumor CD8+ cell density (r = 0.55, p < 0.01). Classification of therapeutic responders, via bioluminescence signal, revealed a more homogeneous CD8+ immune cell distribution in responders (p < 0.05) one-week following immunotherapy. Conclusions: Assessment of early CD8+ cell infiltration and distribution in the tumor microenvironment provides potential imaging metrics for the characterization of oHSV and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy response in GBM. The combination therapies showed enhanced efficacy compared to single agent immunotherapies. Further development of immune-focused imaging methods can provide clinically relevant metrics associated with immune cell localization that can inform immunotherapeutic efficacy and subsequent treatment response in GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos A. Gallegos
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Yun Lu
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Graduate Biomedical Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jennifer C. Clements
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Patrick N. Song
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Graduate Biomedical Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Shannon E. Lynch
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Graduate Biomedical Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Fang Jia
- Imaginab, Inc, Inglewood, CA, USA
| | - Yolanda E. Hartman
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Hailey A. Houson
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Suzanne E. Lapi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jason M. Warram
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - James M. Markert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Anna G. Sorace
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zheng Y, Jiang H, Yang N, Shen S, Huang D, Jia L, Ling J, Xu L, Li M, Yu K, Ren X, Cui Y, Lan X, Lin S, Lin X. Glioma-derived ANXA1 suppresses the immune response to TLR3 ligands by promoting an anti-inflammatory tumor microenvironment. Cell Mol Immunol 2024; 21:47-59. [PMID: 38049523 PMCID: PMC10757715 DOI: 10.1038/s41423-023-01110-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and the presence of the blood‒brain barrier are the two major obstacles to eliciting an effective immune response in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG). Here, we tried to enhance the local innate immune response in relapsed HGG by intracranially injecting poly(I:C) to establish a robust antitumor immune response in this registered clinical trial (NCT03392545). During the follow-up, 12/27 (44.4%) patients who achieved tumor control concomitant with survival benefit were regarded as responders in our study. We found that the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire in the TME was reshaped after poly(I:C) treatment. Based on the RNA-seq analysis of tumor samples, the expression of annexin A1 (ANXA1) was significantly upregulated in the tumor cells of nonresponders, which was further validated at the protein level. In vitro and in vivo experiments showed that ANXA1 could induce the production of M2-like macrophages and microglia via its surface receptor formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) to establish a Treg cell-driven immunosuppressive TME and suppress the antitumor immune response facilitated by poly(I:C). The ANXA1/FPR1 signaling axis can inhibit the innate immune response of glioma patients by promoting an anti-inflammatory and Treg-driven TME. Moreover, ANXA1 could serve as a reliable predictor of response to poly(I:C), with a notable predictive accuracy rate of 92.3%. In light of these notable findings, this study unveils a new perspective of immunotherapy for gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zheng
- Institute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Haihui Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China. National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Tumor, Beijing, 100070, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Naixue Yang
- Institute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Shaoping Shen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China. National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Tumor, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Daosheng Huang
- Institute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Lemei Jia
- Institute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Jing Ling
- Institute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Longchen Xu
- Institute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Mingxiao Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China. National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Tumor, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Kefu Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China. National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Tumor, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Xiaohui Ren
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China. National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Tumor, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Yong Cui
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China. National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Tumor, Beijing, 100070, China
| | - Xun Lan
- Institute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
- Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Song Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China. National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Tumor, Beijing, 100070, China.
| | - Xin Lin
- Institute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
- Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, 100084, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ghimire P, Kinnersley B, Karami G, Arumugam P, Houlston R, Ashkan K, Modat M, Booth TC. Radiogenomic biomarkers for immunotherapy in glioblastoma: A systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae055. [PMID: 38680991 PMCID: PMC11046988 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Immunotherapy is an effective "precision medicine" treatment for several cancers. Imaging signatures of the underlying genome (radiogenomics) in glioblastoma patients may serve as preoperative biomarkers of the tumor-host immune apparatus. Validated biomarkers would have the potential to stratify patients during immunotherapy clinical trials, and if trials are beneficial, facilitate personalized neo-adjuvant treatment. The increased use of whole genome sequencing data, and the advances in bioinformatics and machine learning make such developments plausible. We performed a systematic review to determine the extent of development and validation of immune-related radiogenomic biomarkers for glioblastoma. Methods A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines using the PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases. Qualitative analysis was performed by incorporating the QUADAS 2 tool and CLAIM checklist. PROSPERO registered: CRD42022340968. Extracted data were insufficiently homogenous to perform a meta-analysis. Results Nine studies, all retrospective, were included. Biomarkers extracted from magnetic resonance imaging volumes of interest included apparent diffusion coefficient values, relative cerebral blood volume values, and image-derived features. These biomarkers correlated with genomic markers from tumor cells or immune cells or with patient survival. The majority of studies had a high risk of bias and applicability concerns regarding the index test performed. Conclusions Radiogenomic immune biomarkers have the potential to provide early treatment options to patients with glioblastoma. Targeted immunotherapy, stratified by these biomarkers, has the potential to allow individualized neo-adjuvant precision treatment options in clinical trials. However, there are no prospective studies validating these biomarkers, and interpretation is limited due to study bias with little evidence of generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prajwal Ghimire
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Ben Kinnersley
- Department of Oncology, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Richard Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Keyoumars Ashkan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marc Modat
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas C Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nikoobakht M, Shamshiripour P, Mostafavi Zadeh SM, Rahnama M, Hajiahmadi F, Ramezani A, Farzam Rad V, Nazari E, Moradi AR, Akbarpour M, Ahmadvand D. Efficacy of cell-based immunotherapies on patients with glioma: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072484. [PMID: 38154889 PMCID: PMC10759140 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glial brain tumours are highly mortal and are noted as major neurosurgical challenges due to frequent recurrence or progression. Despite standard-of-care treatment for gliomas, the prognosis of patients with higher-grade glial tumours is still poor, and hence empowering antitumour immunity against glioma is a potential future oncological prospect. This review is designed to improve our understanding of the efficacy of cell-based immunotherapies for glioma. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This systematic review will be performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of main electronic databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI Web of Science EMBASE and ProQuest will be done on original articles, followed by a manual review of review articles. Only records in English and only clinical trials will be encountered for full-text review. All the appropriate studies that encountered the inclusion criteria will be screened, selected and then will undergo data extraction step by two independent authors. For meta-analyses, data heterogeneity for each parameter will be first evaluated by Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. In case of possible heterogeneity, a random-effects meta-analysis will be performed and for homogenous data, fixed-effects models will be selected for reporting the results of the proportional meta-analysis. Bias risk will be assessed through Begg's and Egger's tests and will also be visualised by Funnel plots. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION As this study will be a systematic review without human participants' involvement, no ethical registration is required and meta-analysis will be presented at a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022373297.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Nikoobakht
- Department of Neurosurgery, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
- Firoozgar Clinical Resrarch Development Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parisa Shamshiripour
- Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
- Department of Pathology, Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Mostafa Mostafavi Zadeh
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Oncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehrana Rahnama
- Department of Biophysics, Iran University of Meidcal Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahime Hajiahmadi
- Cellular Molecular Pharmacology School, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Aghdas Ramezani
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Vahideh Farzam Rad
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
- Department of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences, (IASBS), University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
| | - Elaheh Nazari
- Department of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences, (IASBS), University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
| | - Ali-Reza Moradi
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
- Department of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences, (IASBS), University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
| | - Mahzad Akbarpour
- Advanced Cellular Therapeutics Facility, David and Etta Jonas Center for Cellular Therapy, Hematopoietic Cellular Therapy Program, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Davoud Ahmadvand
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sanvito F, Kaufmann TJ, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY, Ellingson BM. Standardized brain tumor imaging protocols for clinical trials: current recommendations and tips for integration. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2023; 3:1267615. [PMID: 38152383 PMCID: PMC10751345 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2023.1267615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Standardized MRI acquisition protocols are crucial for reducing the measurement and interpretation variability associated with response assessment in brain tumor clinical trials. The main challenge is that standardized protocols should ensure high image quality while maximizing the number of institutions meeting the acquisition requirements. In recent years, extensive effort has been made by consensus groups to propose different "ideal" and "minimum requirements" brain tumor imaging protocols (BTIPs) for gliomas, brain metastases (BM), and primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCSNL). In clinical practice, BTIPs for clinical trials can be easily integrated with additional MRI sequences that may be desired for clinical patient management at individual sites. In this review, we summarize the general concepts behind the choice and timing of sequences included in the current recommended BTIPs, we provide a comparative overview, and discuss tips and caveats to integrate additional clinical or research sequences while preserving the recommended BTIPs. Finally, we also reflect on potential future directions for brain tumor imaging in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Sanvito
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Timothy F. Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Patrick Y. Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Benjamin M. Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Das A, Tabori U, Sambira Nahum LC, Collins NB, Deyell R, Dvir R, Faure-Conter C, Hassall TE, Minturn JE, Edwards M, Brookes E, Bianchi V, Levine A, Stone SC, Sudhaman S, Sanchez Ramirez S, Ercan AB, Stengs L, Chung J, Negm L, Getz G, Maruvka YE, Ertl-Wagner B, Ohashi PS, Pugh T, Hawkins C, Bouffet E, Morgenstern DA. Efficacy of Nivolumab in Pediatric Cancers with High Mutation Burden and Mismatch Repair Deficiency. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4770-4783. [PMID: 37126021 PMCID: PMC10690097 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Checkpoint inhibitors have limited efficacy for children with unselected solid and brain tumors. We report the first prospective pediatric trial (NCT02992964) using nivolumab exclusively for refractory nonhematologic cancers harboring tumor mutation burden (TMB) ≥5 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty patients were screened, and 10 were ultimately included in the response cohort of whom nine had TMB >10 mut/Mb (three initially eligible based on MMRD) and one patient had TMB between 5 and 10 mut/Mb. RESULTS Delayed immune responses contributed to best overall response of 50%, improving on initial objective responses (20%) and leading to 2-year overall survival (OS) of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI), 27-93]. Four children, including three with refractory malignant gliomas are in complete remission at a median follow-up of 37 months (range, 32.4-60), culminating in 2-year OS of 43% (95% CI, 18.2-100). Biomarker analyses confirmed benefit in children with germline MMRD, microsatellite instability, higher activated and lower regulatory circulating T cells. Stochastic mutation accumulation driven by underlying germline MMRD impacted the tumor microenvironment, contributing to delayed responses. No benefit was observed in the single patient with an MMR-proficient tumor and TMB 7.4 mut/Mb. CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab resulted in durable responses and prolonged survival for the first time in a pediatric trial of refractory hypermutated cancers including malignant gliomas. Novel biomarkers identified here need to be translated rapidly to clinical care to identify children who can benefit from checkpoint inhibitors, including upfront management of cancer. See related commentary by Mardis, p. 4701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirban Das
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Uri Tabori
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Lauren C. Sambira Nahum
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Natalie B. Collins
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Rina Dvir
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - Jane E. Minturn
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa Edwards
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Elissa Brookes
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Vanessa Bianchi
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Adrian Levine
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Simone C. Stone
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Sumedha Sudhaman
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Santiago Sanchez Ramirez
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ayse B. Ercan
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Lucie Stengs
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Jill Chung
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Logine Negm
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Gad Getz
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Birgit Ertl-Wagner
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Pamela S. Ohashi
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Trevor Pugh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Cynthia Hawkins
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Eric Bouffet
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Daniel A. Morgenstern
- Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kumthekar P, Le Rhun E. Brain Metastases and Leptomeningeal Disease. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2023; 29:1727-1751. [PMID: 38085896 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Central nervous system (CNS) metastases include brain parenchymal, spinal cord, and leptomeningeal metastases. This article discusses the diagnostic and therapeutic advances of the last decade that have improved outcomes for patients with these CNS metastases. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS The diagnostic tools for CNS metastases, particularly leptomeningeal disease, have evolved over the past decade with respect to advancements in CSF analysis. Multiple medical therapies are now available for brain metastasis treatment that have shown CNS efficacy, including targeted therapies and antibody-drug conjugates. Molecular testing for CNS metastases has become more common and the repertoire of molecularly targeted therapies continues to expand. Advancements in radiation therapy, including improvements in stereotactic radiation techniques, whole-brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance, and proton beam radiation, have changed the radiation management of patients with CNS metastases. New intrathecal agents are currently being tested for the management of leptomeningeal metastases. ESSENTIAL POINTS CNS metastases are far more common than primary brain tumors and are increasing in prevalence in the setting of improved treatments and prolonged survival in patients with systemic cancers. There have been many changes in the diagnostics and treatment of CNS metastases, yielding subsequent improvements in patient outcomes with further advancements on the horizon.
Collapse
|
31
|
Wen PY, van den Bent M, Youssef G, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM, Weller M, Galanis E, Barboriak DP, de Groot J, Gilbert MR, Huang R, Lassman AB, Mehta M, Molinaro AM, Preusser M, Rahman R, Shankar LK, Stupp R, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Wick W, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Vogelbaum MA, Chang SM. RANO 2.0: Update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for High- and Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:5187-5199. [PMID: 37774317 PMCID: PMC10860967 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time, some limitations of these criteria were identified, and challenges emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. METHODS Informed by data from studies evaluating the different criteria, updates to the RANO criteria are proposed (RANO 2.0). RESULTS We recommend a standard set of criteria for both high- and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the postradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), rather than the postsurgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for comparison with subsequent scans. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks after radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, are required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for the evaluation of treatment for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (two-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH wild-type glioblastoma, the nonenhancing disease will no longer be evaluated except when assessing response to antiangiogenic agents. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant nonenhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and nonenhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION The revised RANO 2.0 criteria refine response assessment in gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Y. Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gilbert Youssef
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Timothy F. Cloughesy
- UCLA Brain Tumor Program, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Benjamin M. Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - John de Groot
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mark R. Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Raymond Huang
- Division of Neuro-radiology, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew B. Lassman
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center and Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Annette M. Molinaro
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lalitha K. Shankar
- Clinical Trials Branch, Cancer Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Roger Stupp
- Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Neurological Surgery, Neurology and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurology Heidelberg University Hospital & Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David R. Macdonald
- Departments of Clinical Neurological Sciences and Oncology (Emeritus), Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A. Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael A. Vogelbaum
- Departments of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Susan M. Chang
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zhao B, Kilian M, Bunse T, Platten M, Bunse L. Tumor-reactive T helper cells in the context of vaccination against glioma. Cancer Cell 2023; 41:1829-1834. [PMID: 37863064 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
With the advances in immunogenomics, the majority of tumor-specific antigens were found to be recognized by T helper cells (THCs). This observation led to the development of long epitope vaccines in various cancers. Mechanistically, we are still gaining a deeper understanding of the mode of action of THCs as precision antitumor agonists. Here, we discuss the specific cellular mechanisms of THC functions in glioma immunology and contextualize current advances in anti-glioma vaccination exploiting THCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binghao Zhao
- CCU Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, core center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Kilian
- CCU Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, core center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Theresa Bunse
- CCU Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, core center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Platten
- CCU Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany; Helmholtz Institute of Translational Oncology Mainz (HI-TRON Mainz) - a Helmholtz Institute of the DKFZ, Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, core center, Heidelberg, Germany; Immune Monitoring Unit, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Bunse
- CCU Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neuroscience, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, core center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jucht A, Dumont S, Pooley C, Gonzalez Castro LN. Cancer vaccine strategies for the treatment of diffusely infiltrating gliomas. Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother 2023; 11:25151355231206163. [PMID: 37886714 PMCID: PMC10599115 DOI: 10.1177/25151355231206163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffusely infiltrating gliomas - including glioblastoma (GBM), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas, and histone 3 (H3) altered gliomas - are primary brain tumors with an invariably fatal outcome. Despite advances in the understanding of their biology, standard, targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies have proven ineffective in arresting their inexorable progression and associated morbidity and mortality. Recognizing the unique aspects of the immunogenicity of cancer cells, the last decade has seen the development and evaluation of vaccine-based therapies for the treatment of solid tumors, including gliomas. Here we review the current vaccine strategies for the treatment of GBM, IDH-mutant gliomas and diffuse midline glioma H3 K27M-altered. We discuss potential benefits and challenges of vaccine therapies in these specific patient populations.
Collapse
|
34
|
Roh YH, Park JE, Kang S, Yoon S, Kim SW, Kim HS. Prognostic value of MRI volumetric parameters in non-small cell lung cancer patients after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: comparison with response assessment criteria. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:102. [PMID: 37875970 PMCID: PMC10594817 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00624-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate response parameters are important for patients with brain metastasis (BM) undergoing clinical trials using immunotherapy, considering poorly defined enhancement and variable responses. This study investigated MRI-based surrogate endpoints for patients with BM receiving immunotherapy. METHODS Sixty-three non-small cell lung cancer patients with BM who received immune checkpoint inhibitors and underwent MRI were included. Tumor diameters were measured using a modification of the RECIST 1.1 (mRECIST), RANO-BM, and iRANO adjusted for BM (iRANO-BM). Tumor volumes were segmented on 3D contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Differences between the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) or total tumor volume at baseline and the corresponding measurement at time of the best overall response were calculated as "changes in SLDs" (for each set of criteria) and "change in volumetry," respectively. Overall response rate (ORR), progressive disease (PD) assignment, and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among the criteria. The prediction of overall survival (OS) was compared between diameter-based and volumetric change using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS The mRECIST showed higher ORR (30.1% vs. both 17.5%) and PD assignment (34.9% vs. 25.4% [RANO-BM] and 19% [iRANO-BM]). The iRANO-BM had a longer median PFS (13.7 months) than RANO-BM (9.53 months) and mRECIST (7.73 months, P = 0.003). The change in volumetry was a significant predictor of OS (HR = 5.87, 95% CI: 1.46-23.64, P = 0.013). None of the changes in SLDs, as determined by RANO-BM or iRANO-BM, were significant predictors of OS, except for the mRECIST, which exhibited a weak association with OS. CONCLUSION Quantitative volume measurement may be an accurate surrogate endpoint for OS in patients with BM undergoing immunotherapy, especially considering the challenges of multiplicity and the heterogeneity of sub-centimeter size responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Hwa Roh
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| | - Sora Kang
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Shinkyo Yoon
- Department of Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-We Kim
- Department of Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Van Gool SW, Van de Vliet P, Kampers LFC, Kosmal J, Sprenger T, Reich E, Schirrmacher V, Stuecker W. Methods behind oncolytic virus-based DC vaccines in cancer: Toward a multiphase combined treatment strategy for Glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Methods Cell Biol 2023; 183:51-113. [PMID: 38548421 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) remains an orphan cancer disease with poor outcome. Novel treatment strategies are needed. Immunotherapy has several modes of action. The addition of active specific immunotherapy with dendritic cell vaccines resulted in improved overall survival of patients. Integration of DC vaccination within the first-line combined treatment became a challenge, and immunogenic cell death immunotherapy during chemotherapy was introduced. We used a retrospective analysis using real world data to evaluate the complex combined treatment, which included individualized multimodal immunotherapy during and after standard of care, and which required adaptations during treatment, and found a further improvement of overall survival. We also discuss the use of real world data as evidence. Novel strategies to move the field of individualized multimodal immunotherapy forward for GBM patients are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Ella Reich
- Immun-onkologisches Zentrum Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hotchkiss KM, Batich KA, Mohan A, Rahman R, Piantadosi S, Khasraw M. Dendritic cell vaccine trials in gliomas: Untangling the lines. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:1752-1762. [PMID: 37289203 PMCID: PMC10547519 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a deadly brain tumor without any significantly successful treatments to date. Tumor antigen-targeted immunotherapy platforms including peptide and dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, have extended survival in hematologic malignancies. The relatively "cold" tumor immune microenvironment and heterogenous nature of glioblastoma have proven to be major limitations to translational application and efficacy of DC vaccines. Furthermore, many DC vaccine trials in glioblastoma are difficult to interpret due to a lack of contemporaneous controls, absence of any control comparison, or inconsistent patient populations. Here we review glioblastoma immunobiology aspects that are relevant to DC vaccines, review the clinical experience with DC vaccines targeting glioblastoma, discuss challenges in clinical trial design, and summarize conclusions and directions for future research for the development of effective DC vaccines for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly M Hotchkiss
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kristen A Batich
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Aditya Mohan
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Steven Piantadosi
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA(S.P.)
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Zakaria R, Jenkinson MD, Radon M, Das K, Poptani H, Rathi N, Rudland PS. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of brain metastasis associated with a less invasive growth pattern, higher T-cell infiltration and raised tumor ADC on diffusion weighted MRI. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2023; 72:3387-3393. [PMID: 37477652 PMCID: PMC10491542 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-023-03499-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors with an increasing incidence. They are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with solid organ cancer and a focus of recent clinical research and experimental interest. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are being increasingly used to treat solid organ cancers. METHODS To determine whether immune checkpoint inhibitors were biologically effective in the brain, we compared melanoma brain metastasis samples where treatment with ipilimumab had occurred preoperatively to those who had not received any immune modulating therapy and looked for histopathological (invasion, vascularity, metastasis inducing proteins, matrix metalloproteinases, immune cell infiltration, tissue architecture) and advanced MRI differences (diffusion weighted imaging). RESULTS Co-localized tissue samples from the same regions as MRI regions of interest showed significantly lower vascularity (density of CD34 + vessels) in the core and higher T-cell infiltration (CD3 + cells) in the leading edge for ipilimumab-treated brain metastasis samples than for untreated cases and this correlated with a higher tumor ADC signal at post-treatment/preoperative MRI brain. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of a melanoma brain metastasis with ipilimumab appears to cause measurable biological changes in the tumor that can be correlated with post-treatment diffusion weighted MRI imaging, suggesting both a mechanism of action and a possible surrogate marker of efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasheed Zakaria
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Nuffield Building, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK.
| | - Michael D Jenkinson
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mark Radon
- Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kumar Das
- Department of Neuroradiology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Harish Poptani
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Nuffield Building, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| | - Nitika Rathi
- Department of Neuropathology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Philip S Rudland
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Nuffield Building, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Le Rhun E, Weller M, van den Bent M, Brandsma D, Furtner J, Rudà R, Schadendorf D, Seoane J, Tonn JC, Wesseling P, Wick W, Minniti G, Peters S, Curigliano G, Preusser M. Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours: EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101624. [PMID: 37863528 PMCID: PMC10619142 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
•This Clinical Practice Guideline provides recommendations for managing leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumours. •The guideline covers clinical, imaging and cytological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •A treatment and management algorithm is provided. •The author panel encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M van den Bent
- Department of The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
| | - D Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Furtner
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MIAAI), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
| | - R Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - D Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen; University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - J Seoane
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J-C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc and Brain Tumour Center, Amsterdam; Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Alsajjan R, Mason WP. Bispecific T-Cell Engagers and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies in Glioblastoma: An Update. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8501-8549. [PMID: 37754534 PMCID: PMC10529026 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. The prognosis is extremely poor even with standard treatment of maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Recurrence is inevitable within months, and treatment options are very limited. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) and bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) are two emerging immunotherapies that can redirect T-cells for tumor-specific killing and have shown remarkable success in hematological malignancies and been under extensive study for application in glioblastoma. While there have been multiple clinical trials showing preliminary evidence of safety and efficacy for CART, bispecific TCEs are still in the early stages of clinical testing, with preclinical studies showing very promising results. However, there are multiple shared challenges that need to be addressed in the future, including the route of delivery, antigen escape, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and toxicity resulting from the limited choice of tumor-specific antigens. Efforts are underway to optimize the design of both these treatments and find the ideal combination therapy to overcome these challenges. In this review, we describe the work that has been performed as well as novel approaches in glioblastoma and in other solid tumors that may be applicable in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roa Alsajjan
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia
| | - Warren P. Mason
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ravi H, Hawkins SH, Stringfield O, Pereira M, Chen DT, Enderling H, Michael Yu HH, Arrington JA, Sahebjam S, Raghunand N. Rules-based Volumetric Segmentation of Multiparametric MRI for Response Assessment in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3318286. [PMID: 37790451 PMCID: PMC10543497 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3318286/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
We report domain knowledge-based rules for assigning voxels in brain multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to distinct tissuetypes based on their appearance on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of water (ADC) maps, T1-weighted unenhanced and contrast-enhanced, T2-weighted, and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery images. The development dataset comprised mpMRI of 18 participants with preoperative high-grade glioma (HGG), recurrent HGG (rHGG), and brain metastases. External validation was performed on mpMRI of 235 HGG participants in the BraTS 2020 training dataset. The treatment dataset comprised serial mpMRI of 32 participants (total 231 scan dates) in a clinical trial of immunoradiotherapy in rHGG (NCT02313272). Pixel intensity-based rules for segmenting contrast-enhancing tumor (CE), hemorrhage, Fluid, non-enhancing tumor (Edema1), and leukoaraiosis (Edema2) were identified on calibrated, co-registered mpMRI images in the development dataset. On validation, rule-based CE and High FLAIR (Edema1 + Edema2) volumes were significantly correlated with ground truth volumes of enhancing tumor (R = 0.85;p < 0.001) and peritumoral edema (R = 0.87;p < 0.001), respectively. In the treatment dataset, a model combining time-on-treatment and rule-based volumes of CE and intratumoral Fluid was 82.5% accurate for predicting progression within 30 days of the scan date. An explainable decision tree applied to brain mpMRI yields validated, consistent, intratumoral tissuetype volumes suitable for quantitative response assessment in clinical trials of rHGG.
Collapse
|
41
|
Suter Y, Notter M, Meier R, Loosli T, Schucht P, Wiest R, Reyes M, Knecht U. Evaluating automated longitudinal tumor measurements for glioblastoma response assessment. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2023; 3:1211859. [PMID: 37745204 PMCID: PMC10513769 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2023.1211859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Automated tumor segmentation tools for glioblastoma show promising performance. To apply these tools for automated response assessment, longitudinal segmentation, and tumor measurement, consistency is critical. This study aimed to determine whether BraTumIA and HD-GLIO are suited for this task. We evaluated two segmentation tools with respect to automated response assessment on the single-center retrospective LUMIERE dataset with 80 patients and a total of 502 post-operative time points. Volumetry and automated bi-dimensional measurements were compared with expert measurements following the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) guidelines. The longitudinal trend agreement between the expert and methods was evaluated, and the RANO progression thresholds were tested against the expert-derived time-to-progression (TTP). The TTP and overall survival (OS) correlation was used to check the progression thresholds. We evaluated the automated detection and influence of non-measurable lesions. The tumor volume trend agreement calculated between segmentation volumes and the expert bi-dimensional measurements was high (HD-GLIO: 81.1%, BraTumIA: 79.7%). BraTumIA achieved the closest match to the expert TTP using the recommended RANO progression threshold. HD-GLIO-derived tumor volumes reached the highest correlation between TTP and OS (0.55). Both tools failed at an accurate lesion count across time. Manual false-positive removal and restricting to a maximum number of measurable lesions had no beneficial effect. Expert supervision and manual corrections are still necessary when applying the tested automated segmentation tools for automated response assessment. The longitudinal consistency of current segmentation tools needs further improvement. Validation of volumetric and bi-dimensional progression thresholds with multi-center studies is required to move toward volumetry-based response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Suter
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michelle Notter
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Meier
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tina Loosli
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Roland Wiest
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mauricio Reyes
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Urspeter Knecht
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Radiology Department, Spital Emmental, Burgdorf, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Young JS, Al-Adli N, Scotford K, Cha S, Berger MS. Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma: what neurosurgeons need to know. J Neurosurg 2023; 139:748-759. [PMID: 36790010 PMCID: PMC10412732 DOI: 10.3171/2022.12.jns222173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Management of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is complex and involves implementing standard therapies including resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, as well as novel immunotherapies and targeted small-molecule inhibitors through clinical trials and precision medicine approaches. As treatments have advanced, the radiological and clinical assessment of patients with GBM has become even more challenging and nuanced. Advances in spatial resolution and both anatomical and physiological information that can be derived from MRI have greatly improved the noninvasive assessment of GBM before, during, and after therapy. Identification of pseudoprogression (PsP), defined as changes concerning for tumor progression that are, in fact, transient and related to treatment response, is critical for successful patient management. These temporary changes can produce new clinical symptoms due to mass effect and edema. Differentiating this entity from true tumor progression is a major decision point in the patient's management and prognosis. Providers may choose to start an alternative therapy, transition to a clinical trial, consider repeat resection, or continue with the current therapy in hopes of resolution. In this review, the authors describe the invasive and noninvasive techniques neurosurgeons need to be aware of to identify PsP and facilitate surgical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob S. Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Nadeem Al-Adli
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Katie Scotford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Soonmee Cha
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Mitchel S. Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Paz-Ares LG, Carbone DP. Response to the Letter to the Editor Titled "First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab With Chemotherapy for Metastatic NSCLC: The Updated Outcomes From CheckMate 9LA". J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:e102-e103. [PMID: 37599049 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Luis G Paz-Ares
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | - David P Carbone
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Phillips KA, Kamson DO, Schiff D. Disease Assessments in Patients with Glioblastoma. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1057-1069. [PMID: 37470973 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01440-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The neuro-oncology team faces a unique challenge when assessing treatment response in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the standard imaging modality for measuring therapeutic response in both clinical practice and clinical trials. However, even for the neuroradiologist, MRI interpretations are not straightforward because of tumor heterogeneity, as evidenced by varying degrees of enhancement, infiltrating tumor patterns, cellular densities, and vasogenic edema. The situation is even more perplexing following therapy since treatment-related changes can mimic viable tumor. Additionally, antiangiogenic therapies can dramatically decrease contrast enhancement giving the false impression of decreasing tumor burden. Over the past few decades, several approaches have emerged to augment and improve visual interpretation of glioblastoma response to therapeutics. Herein, we summarize the state of the art for evaluating the response of glioblastoma to standard therapies and investigational agents as well as challenges and future directions for assessing treatment response in neuro-oncology. RECENT FINDINGS Monitoring glioblastoma responses to standard therapy and novel agents has been fraught with many challenges and limitations over the past decade. Excitingly, new promising methods are emerging to help address these challenges. Recently, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group proposed an updated response criteria (RANO 2.0) for the evaluation of all grades of glial tumors regardless of IDH status or therapies being evaluated. In addition, advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as histogram analysis, parametric response maps, morphometric segmentation, radio pharmacodynamics approaches, and the integrating of amino acid radiotracers in the tumor evaluation algorithm may help resolve equivocal lesion interpretations without operative intervention. Moreover, the introduction of other techniques, such as liquid biopsy and artificial intelligence could complement conventional visual assessment of glioblastoma response to therapies. Neuro-oncology has evolved over the past decade and has achieved significant milestones, including the establishment of new standards of care, emerging therapeutic options, and novel clinical, translational, and basic research. More recently, the integration of histopathology with molecular features for tumor classification has marked an important paradigm shift in brain tumor diagnosis. In a similar manner, treatment response monitoring in neuro-oncology has made considerable progress. While most techniques are still in their inception, there is an emerging body of evidence for clinical application. Further research will be critically important for the development of impactful breakthroughs in this area of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kester A Phillips
- The Ben and Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment at Swedish Neuroscience Institute, 550 17Th Ave Suite 540, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA
| | - David O Kamson
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, 201 North Broadway, Skip Viragh Outpatient Cancer Building, 9Th Floor, Room 9177, Mailbox #3, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - David Schiff
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, 1300 Jefferson Park Avenue, West Complex, Room 6225, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zhao B, Ma W. First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab With Chemotherapy for Metastatic NSCLC: The Updated Outcomes From CheckMate 9LA. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:e101-e102. [PMID: 37599048 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Binghao Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Wenbin Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ly KI, Richardson LG, Liu M, Muzikansky A, Cardona J, Lou K, Beers AL, Chang K, Brown JM, Ma X, Reardon DA, Arrillaga-Romany IC, Forst DA, Jordan JT, Lee EQ, Dietrich J, Nayak L, Wen PY, Chukwueke U, Giobbie-Hurder A, Choi BD, Batchelor TT, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Curry WT, Gerstner ER. Bavituximab Decreases Immunosuppressive Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3017-3025. [PMID: 37327319 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the efficacy of bavituximab-a mAb with anti-angiogenic and immunomodulatory properties-in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma (GBM) who also received radiotherapy and temozolomide. Perfusion MRI and myeloid-related gene transcription and inflammatory infiltrates in pre-and post-treatment tumor specimens were studied to evaluate on-target effects (NCT03139916). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-three adults with IDH--wild-type GBM received 6 weeks of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by 6 cycles of temozolomide (C1-C6). Bavituximab was given weekly, starting week 1 of chemoradiotherapy, for at least 18 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients alive at 12 months (OS-12). The null hypothesis would be rejected if OS-12 was ≥72%. Relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and vascular permeability (Ktrans) were calculated from perfusion MRIs. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor tissue were analyzed pre-treatment and at disease progression using RNA transcriptomics and multispectral immunofluorescence for myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and macrophages. RESULTS The study met its primary endpoint with an OS-12 of 73% (95% confidence interval, 59%-90%). Decreased pre-C1 rCBF (HR, 4.63; P = 0.029) and increased pre-C1 Ktrans were associated with improved overall survival (HR, 0.09; P = 0.005). Pre-treatment overexpression of myeloid-related genes in tumor tissue was associated with longer survival. Post-treatment tumor specimens contained fewer immunosuppressive MDSCs (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Bavituximab has activity in newly diagnosed GBM and resulted in on-target depletion of intratumoral immunosuppressive MDSCs. Elevated pre-treatment expression of myeloid-related transcripts in GBM may predict response to bavituximab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ina Ly
- Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leland G Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mofei Liu
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alona Muzikansky
- Department of Biostatistics Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan Cardona
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kevin Lou
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew L Beers
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ken Chang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - James M Brown
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xiaoyue Ma
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Isabel C Arrillaga-Romany
- Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah A Forst
- Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Justin T Jordan
- Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lakshmi Nayak
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ugonma Chukwueke
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anita Giobbie-Hurder
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bryan D Choi
- Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William T Curry
- Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bronte G, Cosi DM, Magri C, Frassoldati A, Crinò L, Calabrò L. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in "Special" NSCLC Populations: A Viable Approach? Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:12622. [PMID: 37628803 PMCID: PMC10454231 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last decade, the therapeutic scenario for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a major paradigm shift. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a meaningful clinical and survival improvement in different settings of the disease. However, the real benefit of this therapeutic approach remains controversial in selected NSCLC subsets, such as those of the elderly with active brain metastases or oncogene-addicted mutations. This is mainly due to the exclusion or underrepresentation of these patient subpopulations in most pivotal phase III studies; this precludes the generalization of ICI efficacy in this context. Moreover, no predictive biomarkers of ICI response exist that can help with patient selection for this therapeutic approach. Here, we critically summarize the current state of ICI efficacy in the most common "special" NSCLC subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Bronte
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences (DISCLIMO), Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/A, 60121 Ancona, Italy
- Clinic of Laboratory and Precision Medicine, National Institute of Health and Sciences on Ageing (IRCCS INRCA), 60124 Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Magri
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy
| | | | - Lucio Crinò
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Luana Calabrò
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Crotty EE, Wilson AL, Davidson T, Tahiri S, Gust J, Griesinger AM, Venkataraman S, Park JR, Mueller S, Rood BR, Hwang EI, Wang LD, Vitanza NA. Cellular Therapy for Children with Central Nervous System Tumors: Mining and Mapping the Correlative Data. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:847-855. [PMID: 37160547 PMCID: PMC10326126 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01423-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Correlative studies should leverage clinical trial frameworks to conduct biospecimen analyses that provide insight into the bioactivity of the intervention and facilitate iteration toward future trials that further improve patient outcomes. In pediatric cellular immunotherapy trials, correlative studies enable deeper understanding of T cell mobilization, durability of immune activation, patterns of toxicity, and early detection of treatment response. Here, we review the correlative science in adoptive cell therapy (ACT) for childhood central nervous system (CNS) tumors, with a focus on existing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) and T cell receptor (TCR)-expressing T cell therapies. RECENT FINDINGS We highlight long-standing and more recently understood challenges for effective alignment of correlative data and offer practical considerations for current and future approaches to multi-omic analysis of serial tumor, serum, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biospecimens. We highlight the preliminary success in collecting serial cytokine and proteomics from patients with CNS tumors on ACT clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Crotty
- Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, M/S JMB-8, 1900 9thAvenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Tom Davidson
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Keck School of Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sophia Tahiri
- Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, M/S JMB-8, 1900 9thAvenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Juliane Gust
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrea M Griesinger
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sujatha Venkataraman
- Morgan Adams Foundation Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Julie R Park
- Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, M/S JMB-8, 1900 9thAvenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Children's Therapeutics, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sabine Mueller
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Brian R Rood
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Eugene I Hwang
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Leo D Wang
- Departments of Pediatrics and ImmunoOncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas A Vitanza
- Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, M/S JMB-8, 1900 9thAvenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Internò V, Massari F, Rudà R, Maiorano BA, Caffo O, Procopio G, Bracarda S, Atzori F, Passarelli A, Bersanelli M, Stellato M, Fornarini G, Galli L, Ortega C, Zanardi E, Incorvaia L, Facchini G, Giron Berrios JR, Ricotta R, Santoni M, Funaioli C, Trerotoli P, Porta C, Rizzo M. An Italian multicenter retrospective real-life analysis of patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma: the BMRCC study. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101598. [PMID: 37467658 PMCID: PMC10485397 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of patients with brain-spread renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an unmet clinical need, although more recent therapeutic strategies have significantly improved RCC patients' life expectancy. Our multicenter, retrospective, observational study investigated a real-world cohort of patients with brain metastases (BM) from RCC (BMRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 226 patients with histological diagnosis of RCC and radiological evidence of BM from 22 Italian institutions were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate models were performed to investigate the impact of clinicopathological features and multimodal treatments on both overall survival (OS) from the BM diagnosis and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). RESULTS The median OS from the BM diagnosis was 18.8 months (interquartile range: 6.2-43 months). Multivariate analysis confirmed the following as positive independent prognostic factors: a Karnofsky Performance Status >70% [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.92, P = 0.0026] and a single BM (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.86, P = 0. 0310); in contrast, the following were confirmed as worse prognosis factors: progressive extracranial disease (HR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.003-2.74, P = 0.00181) and only one line of systemic therapy after the BM occurrence (HR = 2.98, 95% CI 1.62-5.49, P = 0.029). Subgroup analyses showed no difference in iPFS according to the type of the first systemic treatment [immunotherapy (IT) or targeted therapy (TT)] carried out after the BM diagnosis (HR = 1.033, 95% CI 0.565-1.889, P = 0.16), and revealed that external radiation therapy (eRT) significantly prolonged iPFS when combined with IT (10.7 months, 95% CI 4.9-48 months, P = 0.0321) and not when combined with TT (9.01 months, 95% CI 2.7-21.2 months, P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest a potential additive effect in terms of iPFS for eRT combined with IT and encourage a more intensive multimodal therapeutic strategy in a multidisciplinary context to improve the survival of BMRCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Internò
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - F Massari
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience 'Rita Levi Montalcini', University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - B A Maiorano
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - O Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari di Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - G Procopio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - S Bracarda
- Medical and Translational Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - F Atzori
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - A Passarelli
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - M Bersanelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - M Stellato
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - G Fornarini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - L Galli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - C Ortega
- Oncology Unit-ASL Cuneo 2-'Michele e Pietro Ferrero' Hospital, Verduno, Cuneo, Italy
| | - E Zanardi
- Academic Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - L Incorvaia
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - G Facchini
- ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Oncology Operative Unit, 'S. Maria delle Grazie' Hospital-Pozzuoli, Napoli, Italy
| | - J R Giron Berrios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Belcolle Hospital of Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - R Ricotta
- Oncology Unit, IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy
| | - M Santoni
- Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - C Funaioli
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST 'Santi Paolo e Carlo', Milano, Italy
| | - P Trerotoli
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy
| | - C Porta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy; Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy
| | - M Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy; Division of Translational Oncology, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gallus M, Kwok D, Lakshmanachetty S, Yamamichi A, Okada H. Immunotherapy Approaches in Isocitrate-Dehydrogenase-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3726. [PMID: 37509387 PMCID: PMC10378701 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are slow-growing tumors in the central nervous system (CNS). Patients characteristically show the onset of seizures or neurological deficits due to the predominant LGG location in high-functional brain areas. As a molecular hallmark, LGGs display mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) enzymes, resulting in an altered cellular energy metabolism and the production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate. Despite the remarkable progress in improving the extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, LGG remains incurable, and secondary malignant transformation is often observed. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. In recent years, immunotherapeutic strategies have led to tremendous success in various cancer types, but the effect of immunotherapy against glioma has been limited due to several challenges, such as tumor heterogeneity and the immunologically "cold" tumor microenvironment. Nevertheless, recent preclinical and clinical findings from immunotherapy trials are encouraging and offer a glimmer of hope for treating IDH-mutant LGG patients. Here, we aim to review the lessons learned from trials involving vaccines, T-cell therapies, and IDH-mutant inhibitors and discuss future approaches to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapies in IDH-mutant LGG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Gallus
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Darwin Kwok
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | | | - Akane Yamamichi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Hideho Okada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA 94129, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|