Adequate SIRT activity dose is as important as adequate chemotherapy dose

Theragnostics in primary and secondary liver tumors: the need for a personalized approach

Primary and secondary hepatic tumors have a dramatic impact in oncology. Despite many advances in diagnosis and therapy, the management of hepatic malignancies is still challenging, ranging from various loco-regional approaches to system therapies. In this scenario, theragnostic approaches, based on the administration of a radiopharmaceuticals' pair, the first labeled with a radionuclide suitable for the diagnostic phase and the second one bound to radionuclide emitting particles for therapy, is gaining more and more importance. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with microspheres labeled with ⁹⁰Y or ¹⁶⁶Ho is widely used as a loco-regional treatment for primary and secondary hepatic tumors. While ¹⁶⁶Ho presents both gamma and beta emission and can be therefore considered a real "theragnostic" agent, for ⁹⁰Y-microspheres theragnostic approach is realized at the diagnostic phase through the utilization of macroaggregates of human albumin, labeled with ^99mTc as "biosimilar" agent respect to microspheres. The aim of the present review was to cover theragnostic applications of ⁹⁰Y/¹⁶⁶Ho-labeled microspheres in clinical practice. Furthermore, we report the preliminary data concerning the potential role of some emerging theragnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma, such as glypican-3 (GPC3) and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA).

Assessment of radiation sensitivity of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a series of patients submitted to radioembolization with yttrium-90 resin microspheres

Radioembolization is a valuable therapeutic option in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The essential implementation of the absorbed dose calculation methods should take into account also the specific tumor radiosensitivity, expressed by the α parameter. Purpose of this study was to retrospectively calculate it in a series of patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma submitted to radioembolization. Twenty-one therapeutic procedures in 15 patients were analysed. Tumor absorbed doses were calculated processing the post-therapeutic ⁹⁰Y-PET/CT images and the pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT scans. Tumor absorbed dose and pre- and post-treatment tumor volumes were used to calculate α and α_3D parameters (dividing targeted liver in n voxels of the same volume with specific voxel absorbed dose). A tumor volume reduction was observed after treatment. The median of tumor average absorbed dose was 93 Gy (95% CI 81–119) and its correlation with the residual tumor mass was statistically significant. The median of α and α_3D parameters was 0.005 Gy⁻¹ (95% CI 0.004–0.008) and 0.007 Gy⁻¹ (95% CI 0.005–0.015), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed tumor volume and tumor absorbed dose as significant predictors of the time to tumor progression. The knowledge of radiobiological parameters gives the possibility to decide the administered activity in order to improve the outcome of the treatment.

Review of Intra-Arterial Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer liver metastasis occurs in more than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer and is thought to be the most common cause of death from this cancer. The mainstay of treatment for inoperable liver metastasis has been combination systemic chemotherapy with or without the addition of biological targeted therapy with a goal for disease downstaging, for potential curative resection, or more frequently, for disease control. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies including hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are alternative treatment strategies that have shown promising results, most commonly in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. In recent years, their role in the first-line setting in conjunction with concurrent systemic chemotherapy has also been explored. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future.

Abstract

The liver is frequently the most common site of metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer, occurring in more than 50% of patients. While surgical resection remains the only potential curative option, it is only eligible in 15–20% of patients at presentation. In the past two decades, major advances in modern chemotherapy and personalized biological agents have improved overall survival in patients with unresectable liver metastasis. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies such as hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are treatment strategies which are increasingly being considered to improve local tumor response and to reduce systemic side effects. Currently, these therapies are mostly used in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. However, their use in the first-line setting in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy as well as to a lesser degree, in a neoadjuvant setting, for downstaging to resection have also been investigated. Furthermore, some clinicians have considered these therapies as a temporizing tool for local disease control in patients undergoing a chemotherapy ‘holiday’ or acting as a bridge in patients between different lines of systemic treatment. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future.

Combined quality and dose-volume histograms for assessing the predictive value of 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT simulation for personalizing radioembolization treatment in liver metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

The relationship between the mean absorbed dose delivered to the tumour and the outcome in liver metastases from colorectal cancer patients treated with radioembolization has already been presented in several studies. The optimization of the personalized therapeutic activity to be administered is still an open challenge. In this context, how well the ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT predicts the absorbed dose delivered by radioembolization is essential. This work aimed to analyse the differences between predictive ^99mTc-MAA-SPECT/CT and post-treatment ⁹⁰Y-microsphere PET/CT dosimetry at different levels. Dose heterogeneity was compared voxel-to-voxel using the quality-volume histograms, subsequently used to demonstrate how it could be used to identify potential clinical parameters that are responsible for quantitative discrepancies between predictive and post-treatment dosimetry.

Results

We analysed 130 lesions delineated in twenty-six patients. Dose-volume histograms were computed from predictive and post-treatment dosimetry for all volumes: individual lesion, whole tumoural liver (TL) and non-tumoural liver (NTL). For all dose-volume histograms, the following indices were extracted: D₉₀, D₇₀, D₅₀, D_mean and D₂₀. The results showed mostly no statistical differences between predictive and post-treatment dosimetries across all volumes and for all indices. Notably, the analysis showed no difference in terms of D_mean, confirming the results from previous studies. Quality factors representing the spread of the quality-volume histogram (QVH) curve around 0 (ideal QF = 0) were determined for lesions, TL and NTL. QVHs were classified into good (QF < 0.18), acceptable (0.18 ≤ QF < 0.3) and poor (QF ≥ 0.3) correspondence. For lesions and TL, dose- and quality-volume histograms are mostly concordant: 69% of lesions had a QF within good/acceptable categories (40% good) and 65% of TL had a QF within good/acceptable categories (23% good). For NTL, the results showed mixed results with 48% QF within the poor concordance category. Finally, it was demonstrated how QVH analysis could be used to define the parameters that predict the significant differences between predictive and post-treatment dose distributions.

Conclusion

It was shown that the use of the QVH is feasible in assessing the predictive value of ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT dosimetry and in estimating the absorbed dose delivered to liver metastases from colorectal cancer via ⁹⁰Y-microspheres. QVH analyses could be used in combination with DVH to enhance the predictive value of ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT dosimetry and to assist personalized activity prescription.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-020-00345-4.

Mode of progression after radioembolization in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases

Background

Radioembolization is an established treatment modality in colorectal cancer patients with liver-dominant disease in a salvage setting. Selection of patients who will benefit most is of vital importance. The aim of this study was to assess response (and mode of progression) at 3 months after radioembolization and the impact of baseline characteristics.

Methods

Three months after radioembolization with either yttrium-90 resin/glass or holmium-166, anatomic response, according to RECIST 1.1, was evaluated in 90 patients. Correlations between baseline characteristics and efficacy were evaluated. For more detailed analysis of progressive disease as a dismal clinical entity, distinction was made between intra- and extrahepatic progression, and between progression of existing metastases and new metastases.

Results

Forty-two patients (47%) had extrahepatic disease (up to five ≥ 1 cm lung nodules, and ≤ 2 cm lymph nodes) at baseline. No patients showed complete response, 5 (5.5%) patients had partial response, 16 (17.8%) had stable disease, and 69 (76.7%) had progressive disease. Most progressive patients (67/69; 97%) had new metastases (intra-hepatic N = 11, extrahepatic N = 32; or both N = 24). Significantly fewer patients had progressive disease in the group of patients presenting without extrahepatic metastases at baseline (63% versus 93%; p = 0.0016). Median overall survival in patients with extrahepatic disease was 6.5 months, versus 10 months in patients without extrahepatic disease at baseline (hazard ratio 1.79, 95%CI 1.24–2.57).

Conclusions

Response at 3-month follow-up and survival were heavily influenced by new metastases. Patients with extrahepatic disease at baseline had a worse outcome compared to patients without.

Evaluation of the Safety and Feasibility of Same-Day Holmium-166 -Radioembolization Simulation and Treatment of Hepatic Metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of same-day treatment, including the simulation procedure for assessment of intrahepatic and extrahepatic distribution of the microspheres, with holmium-166 (¹⁶⁶Ho)-radioembolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of patients included in the 4 prospective studies (HEPAR I, HEPAR II, HEPAR PLuS, and SIM) on ¹⁶⁶Ho-radioembolization. The technical success rate of the same-day treatment protocol, defined as the number of patients who completed the same-day treatment, was measured. Total in-room time, duration of the scout procedure, time to imaging, and duration of the treatment procedure were recorded. Reasons for discontinuation or adjustment of treatment were identified. Adverse events that occurred during the treatment day were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred five of 120 scheduled patients completed the same-day treatment with ¹⁶⁶Ho-radioembolization (success rate, 88%). After the simulation procedure, treatment was cancelled in 15 patients because of extrahepatic deposition (n = 8), suboptimal tumor targeting (n = 1), unanticipated vascular anatomy (n = 5), and dissection (n = 1). In another 14 patients, the treatment plan was adjusted. The median total procedure time (ie, simulation, imaging, and treatment) was 6:39 hours:minutes (range, 3:58-9:17 hours:minutes). Back pain was a major same-day treatment-related complaint (n = 28).

CONCLUSION

¹⁶⁶Ho-radioembolization as a same-day treatment procedure is feasible in most selected patients, although treatment was adjusted in 12% of patients and cancelled in 12% of patients. This approach might be beneficial for a select patient population, such as patients needing a radiation segmentectomy.

Inter-observer variability of 90Y PET/CT dosimetry in hepatocellular carcinoma after glass microspheres transarterial radioembolization

INTRODUCTION

Strong correlation has been demonstrated between tumor dose and response and between healthy liver dose and side effects. Individualized dosimetry is increasingly recommended in the current clinical routine. However, hepatic and tumor segmentations could be complex in some cases. The aim of this study is to assess the reproducibility of the tumoral and non-tumoral liver dosimetry in selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent SIRT with glass microspheres were retrospectively included in the study. Tumor (TV) and total liver volumes (TLV), and mean absorbed doses in tumoral liver (TD) and non-tumoral liver (THLD) were determined on the ⁹⁰Y PET/CT studies using Simplicit90YTM software, by three independent observers. Dosimetry datasets were obtained by a medical physicist helped by a nuclear medicine (NM) physician with 10 years of experience (A), by a NM physician with 4-year experience (B), and by a resident who first performed 10 dosimetry assessments as a training (C). Inter-observer agreement was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV), Bland-Altman plots, and reproducibility coefficient (RDC).

RESULTS

A strong agreement was observed between all three readers for estimating TLV (ICC 0.98) and THLD (ICC 0.97). Agreement was lower for TV delineation (ICC 0.94) and particularly for TD (ICC 0.73), especially for the highest values. Regarding TD, the CV (%) was 26.5, 26.9, and 20.2 between observers A and B, A and C, and B and C, respectively, and the RDC was 1.5. Regarding THLD, it was 8.5, 12.7, and 9.4, and the RDC was 1.3.

CONCLUSION

Using a standardized methodology, and regardless of the different experiences of the observers, the estimation of THLD is highly reproducible. Although the reproducibility of the assessment of tumor irradiation is overall quite high, large variations may be observed in a limited number of patients.

Simultaneous 166Ho/99mTc dual-isotope SPECT with Monte Carlo-based downscatter correction for automatic liver dosimetry in radioembolization

Background

Intrahepatic dosimetry is paramount to optimize radioembolization treatment accuracy using radioactive holmium-166 microspheres (¹⁶⁶Ho). This requires a practical protocol that combines quantitative imaging of microsphere distribution with automated and robust delineation of the volumes of interest. To this end, we propose a dual isotope single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) protocol based on ¹⁶⁶Ho therapeutic microspheres and technetium-99 m (^99mTc) stannous phytate, which accumulates in healthy liver tissue. This protocol may allow accurate and automatic estimation of tumor-absorbed dose and healthy liver-absorbed dose. The current study focuses on a Monte Carlo-based reconstruction framework that inherently corrects for scatter crosstalk between the ¹⁶⁶Ho and ^99mTc imaging. To demonstrate the feasibility of the method, it is evaluated with realistic phantom experiments and patient data.

Methods

The Utrecht Monte Carlo System (UMCS) was extended to include detailed modeling of crosstalk interactions between ^99mTc and ¹⁶⁶Ho. First, ^99mTc images were reconstructed including energy window-based corrections for ¹⁶⁶Ho downscatter. Next, ^99mTc downscatter in the 81-keV ¹⁶⁶Ho window was Monte Carlo simulated to allow quantitative reconstruction of the ¹⁶⁶Ho images. The accuracy of the ^99mTc-downscatter modeling was evaluated by comparing measurements with simulations. In addition, the ratio between ^99mTc and ¹⁶⁶Ho yielding the best ¹⁶⁶Ho dose estimates was established and the quantitative accuracy was reported.

Results

Given the same level of activity, ^99mTc contributes twice as many counts to the 81-keV window than ¹⁶⁶Ho, and four times as many counts to the 140-keV window, applying a ¹⁶⁶Ho/^99mTc ratio of 5:1 yielded a high accuracy in both ¹⁶⁶Ho and ^99mTc reconstruction. Phantom experiments revealed that the accuracy of quantitative ¹⁶⁶Ho activity recovery was reduced by 10% due to the presence of ^99mTc. Twenty iterations (8 subsets) of the SPECT/CT reconstructions were considered feasible for clinical practice. Applicability of the proposed protocol was shown in a proof-of-concept case.

Conclusion

A novel ¹⁶⁶Ho/^99mTc dual-isotope protocol for automatic dosimetry compensates accurately for downscatter and allows for the addition of ^99mTc without compromising ¹⁶⁶Ho SPECT image quality.

Additional holmium-166 radioembolisation after lutetium-177-dotatate in patients with neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases (HEPAR PLuS): a single-centre, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

In patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, the liver is the most commonly affected organ and a crucial factor for prognosis and survival. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy can prolong progression-free survival in these patients. Additional treatment of liver disease might further improve outcomes. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of additional holmium-166 (¹⁶⁶Ho) radioembolisation after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with metastatic liver neuroendocrine neoplasms.

METHODS

The Holmium Embolization Particles for Arterial Radiotherapy Plus ¹⁷⁷Lu-Dotatate in Salvage Neuroendocrine Tumour Patients (HEPAR PLuS) study was a single-centre, phase 2 study done at the University Medical Center Utrecht (Utrecht, Netherlands). Patients, aged at least 18 years, with histologically proven grade 1 or 2 neuroendocrine neoplasms of all origins, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and three or more measurable liver metastases according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria received ¹⁶⁶Ho-radioembolisation within 20 weeks after four cycles of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (lutetium-177-dotatate [¹⁷⁷Lu-dotatate]). The primary endpoint was objective liver tumour response in the treated liver volume, defined as complete response (disappearance of all lesions) or partial response (≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions, compared with baseline measurements), according to RECIST 1.1, analysed per protocol at 3 months. Safety was assessed in all patients who received treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02067988. Recruitment is completed and long-term follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

From Oct 15, 2014, to Sept 12, 2018, 34 patients were assessed for eligibility. 31 patients received treatment and 30 (97%) patients were available for primary endpoint assessment and completed 6 months of follow-up. Three (9%) patients were excluded at screening and one (3%) patient was treated and died before the primary endpoint and was replaced. According to the per-protocol analysis 13 (43%; 95% CI 26-63) of 30 patients achieved an objective response in the treated volume. The most frequently reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3-4 clinical and laboratory toxicities within 6 months included abdominal pain (three [10%] of 31 patients), increased γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (16 [54%]), and lymphocytopenia (seven [23%]). One (3%) fatal treatment-related serious adverse event occurred (radioembolisation-induced liver disease). Two (6%) patients had serious adverse events deemed to be unrelated to treatment (gastric ulcer and perforated cholecystitis).

INTERPRETATION

¹⁶⁶Ho-radioembolisation, as an adjunct to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm liver metastases, is safe and efficacious. Radioembolisation can be considered in patients with bulky liver disease, including after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. A future randomised, controlled study should investigate the added benefit of this treatment on progression-free survival.

FUNDING

None.

Comparative dosimetry between 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y PET/CT in primary and metastatic liver tumors

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to determine whether ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT-based dosimetry could predict the actual absorbed dose in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases, treated by glass or resin microspheres.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients who underwent selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) were retrospectively included in the study, for a total of 59 treatments. Nineteen HCC were treated by resin microspheres (HCC-SIR), 20 HCC with glass microspheres (HCC-Thera), and 20 liver metastases with resin microspheres (Metastases-SIR). The mean absorbed doses in tumoral liver (Dm) and non-tumoral liver (DmNTL) were determined on the ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and the ⁹⁰Y PET/CT, and compared with each other.

RESULTS

DmNTL was < 50 Gy in the 3 groups, with a strong correlation in all population, albeit slightly lower in Metastases-SIR than HCC-SIR and HCC-Thera (CCC 0.8, 0.94 and 0.96, respectively). In tumoral liver, Dm was higher in HCC than metastases (159 ± 117 Gy versus 63 ± 31 Gy). ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT proved to be a better indicator of Dm in HCC compared with metastases, with similar ^99mTc-MAA-⁹⁰Y concordance in resin and glass microspheres (CCC HCC-SIR 0.82, CCC HCC-Thera 0.82, and CCC Metastases-SIR 0.52).

CONCLUSION

^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT is a reasonably reliable tool for predicting the dose to the non-tumoral liver in both HCC and metastases, regardless of the type of microspheres. It is also fairly reliable for predicting the tumor dose in HCC, again regardless of the type of spheres, although individual variations are observed.

The physics of radioembolization

Radioembolization is an established treatment for chemoresistant and unresectable liver cancers. Currently, treatment planning is often based on semi-empirical methods, which yield acceptable toxicity profiles and have enabled the large-scale application in a palliative setting. However, recently, five large randomized controlled trials using resin microspheres failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in either progression-free survival or overall survival in both hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer. One reason for this might be that the activity prescription methods used in these studies are suboptimal for many patients.In this review, the current dosimetric methods and their caveats are evaluated. Furthermore, the current state-of-the-art of image-guided dosimetry and advanced radiobiological modeling is reviewed from a physics' perspective. The current literature is explored for the observation of robust dose-response relationships followed by an overview of recent advancements in quantitative image reconstruction in relation to image-guided dosimetry.This review is concluded with a discussion on areas where further research is necessary in order to arrive at a personalized treatment method that provides optimal tumor control and is clinically feasible.