Psychometric properties of the updated EORTC module for assessing quality of life in patients with lung cancer (QLQ-LC29): an international, observational field study

The Effect of Nursing-Based Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based, multidisciplinary protocol aimed at reducing surgical stress and expediting postoperative recovery. This meta-analysis will provide a comprehensive examination of the implications of ERAS care for the quality of life (QOL) of postoperative Lung cancer (LC) patients. The literature databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that implemented an ERAS program for adult patients with LC who underwent surgical treatment and reported QOL results. Thirty-one studies were included in the analysis. ERAS/FTS significantly improved the overall QOL of postoperative LC patients according to the Short Form-36 (SF-36) score (mean difference (MD): 8.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.17, 11.00; p < 0.001). For physical functioning, the ERAS/FTS significantly improved the SF-36 score (MD: 10.45; 95% CI: 7.41, 13.50; p < 0.001). In the role-physical dimension, the ERAS/FTS nurse strategy had a significant advantage in improving the role-physical score on the SF-36 scale (MD: 10.06; 95% CI: 7.00, 13.13; p < 0.001). The ERAS has a highly positive impact on QOL in postoperative LC patients, especially in the physical functioning and role-physical dimensions.

Validation of the cancer-specific utility measure EORTC QLU-C10D using evidence from four lung cancer trials covering six country value sets

The Quality of Life (QoL) Utility measure, QLU-C10D, is derived of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire, QLQ-C30. Based on the cancer-specific nature, the QLU-C10D is expected to be sensitive and responsive in lung cancer patients.This retrospective analysis used data from four international lung cancer multi-center trials (NCT00656136, NCT00949650, NCT01085136, NCT01523587). Clinical validity was assessed in comparison to a generic standard utility instrument, the EuroQoL Group´s EQ-5D-3L. Utilities of six country value sets (Australia, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, UK) were calculated at baseline and end of treatment for both measures. Country value set pairs of both measures (k) were compared in terms of Relative Efficiency (RE) and difference in Effect Sizes (dES) in 1) sensitivity to detect differences between performance status groups and 2) responsiveness to changes at each trial sample. Analysis of the four trials (N1 = 496, N2 = 290, N3 = 202, N4 = 770) with the six country value sets of each utility measure showed ad 1) Sensitivity indices favored the QLU-C10D (k = 18, p ≤ 0.019; RE > 1.10; dES > 0.03), and ad 2) Responsiveness indices of changes within clinically known groups (k = 78), largely favored QLU-C10D (k = 74, p ≤ .024; RE > 1.01; dES > 0.02), in comparison with the generic utility instrument. In summary, 96% of the comparative indices favored the QLU-C10D. In summary, this study confirms the clinical validity of the QLU-C10D in lung cancer patients. The QLU-C10D produced homogenous results across six country value sets and detected differences/changes in alignment with clinical expectations. In most comparisons the QLU-C10D was more sensitive or responsive compared to the EQ-5D-3L.

Clinically Significant Functional Impairments and Symptoms in COVID-19 Survivors: Empirical Research Quantitative

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 survivors may experience complex, distressing and persistent symptoms, referred to as long COVID, lasting months or years after diagnosis. More evidence is needed for effective long COVID screening and management.

AIM

To explore the clinical profile of long COVID and factors associated with its development.

DESIGN

A multicentre correlational study using a cross-sectional design.

METHODS

Adults diagnosed with COVID-19 6-9 months earlier were recruited via social media and referrals from three facilities. Participants provided demographic data and assessed their symptoms and functional status using validated questionnaires. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and binomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 102 participants, 13%-30% reported significant impairments in cognitive, emotional and physical functioning. Over 10% experienced symptoms such as diarrhoea, sleep problems, dyspnoea, nausea, fatigue and pain. These impairments and symptoms were associated with acute symptom severity, chronic disease, overweight status, regular exercise and living without partners.

CONCLUSION

This study adds to the literature by examining long-term functional status and symptoms in omicron survivors using comprehensive, validated tools. The findings highlight the prevalence and clinical significance of long COVID symptoms, aiding in the identification of functional impairments requiring medical and nursing interventions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE

Nurses should recognise these symptoms and educate survivors about potential challenges. Policies addressing long-term issues, including research, health services and education, are essential.

REPORTING METHOD

This study follows the STROBE guideline (Table S1).

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients self-reported symptoms for this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05303103).

Talking Cancer-Cancer Talking: A Linguistic and Thematic Analysis of Patient Narratives

To explore "the lived experience" of patients with cancer through narratives, in-depth interviews with 20 patients were conducted in the patients' homes-"at the kitchen table." Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed following the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) methodology. Thematic Analysis was used to explore themes in the narratives. Scores on relevant LIWC dimensions of the 20 patients were compared with norm data for respondents without cancer. Patients with cancer scored higher on "anger" and "sadness" (psychologic processes dimension); lower on "insight," "causes," and "tentatives" (cognitive processes dimension); and lower on "religion." Major themes identified from the Thematic Analysis were resilience, fatigue, social relationships, turning inward psychologically, shared decision-making, and psychological support. Narratives of patients with cancer are a source of rich data on how persons with cancer make sense of their illness, its medical management, and its psychological and social consequences. Qualitative methods of data analysis (LIWC; Thematic Analysis) are a highly valuable element in the methodology of exploring patient experience.

Symptom clusters and impact on quality of life in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To identify symptom clusters (SCs) in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and explore their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

Patients were invited to complete the Chinese version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory with the Lung Cancer Module and the Quality of Life Questionnaire-core 30. Network analysis was employed to identify SCs. The associations between SCs and each function of HRQoL were examined using the Pearson correlation matrix. Multiple linear regression was applied to analyze the influencing factors of each function of HRQoL.

RESULTS

A total of 623 lung cancer patients who were receiving chemotherapy were recruited. The global health status of lung cancer patients was 59.71 ± 21.09, and 89.73% of patients developed symptoms. Three SCs (Somato-psychological SC, Respiratory SC, and Gastrointestinal SC) were identified, and Somato-psychological SC and Gastrointestinal SC were identified as influencing factors for HRQoL in lung cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Most lung cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy experience a range of symptoms, which can be categorized into three SCs. The Somato-psychological SC and Gastrointestinal SC negatively impacted patients' HRQoL. Health care providers should prioritize monitoring these SCs to identify high-risk patients early and implement targeted preventive and intervention measures for each SC, aiming to alleviate symptom burden and enhance HRQoL.

Comparing the EORTC QLQ-LC13, EORTC QLQ-LC29, and the FACT-L for assessment of quality of life in patients with lung cancer - an updated systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Two commonly used quality of life (QoL) questionnaires in lung cancer patients are the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L). More recently, the EORTC QLQ-LC29 was developed. This systematic review compares the EORTC QLQ-LC29, EORTC QLQ-LC13 and FACT-L in terms of the content, validity and psychometric properties in assessing the QoL of lung cancer patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fourteen studies were included. The EORTC QLQ-LC29 is a 29-item scale that serves as an update of the EORTC QLQ-LC13 to include symptoms from surgery and new targeted therapies. It shows validity, high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity. The FACT-L continues to assess general quality of life and lung cancer-specific symptoms.

SUMMARY

The EORTC QLQ-LC29, EORTC QLQ-LC13, and FACT-L were reviewed to assess their validity in measuring QoL of lung cancer patients. All were found to be sufficiently validated, The choice of which to use should depend on the primary goals of the study.

Exploring the characteristics and antecedents of clinically significant long COVID: A longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

A significant number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors are experiencing long COVID, with symptoms lasting beyond three months. While diverse long COVID symptoms are established, there are gaps in understanding its long-term trends, intensity, and risk factors, requiring further investigation.

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the long COVID characteristics and associated factors by following COVID-19 survivors for one year post-infection and comparing them with healthy counterparts.

MAIN METHODS

In this longitudinal, correlational study, COVID-19 survivors diagnosed between November 2021 and February 2023 were monitored every three months for a year. Participants aged ≥18 years who had reported a positive COVID-19 test were recruited via social media and healthcare provider referrals.

KEY FINDINGS

Out of 182 survivors who initially agreed to participate, 176 completed the study. The mean age was 47.56 years (SD = 16.2), and 51.1 % were female. There was a clinically significant decline in cognitive function and health-related quality of life over time, with symptoms like shortness of breath, reduced physical fitness, and increased health concerns. Those with severe acute COVID-19 symptoms experienced greater cognitive and physical declines and more shortness of breath a year later. Lower financial status was linked to poorer health-related quality of life and increased health concerns.

SIGNIFICANCE

A year post-infection, COVID-19's impact on cognitive function and health-related quality of life remains significant, affecting individuals and communities. Survivors with severe initial symptoms and economic disadvantages need more attention. Future research should identify additional predictors of severe long COVID.

Electronic symptom monitoring after lung cancer surgery: establishing a core set of patient-reported outcomes for surgical oncology care in a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

Electronic symptom monitoring via patient-reported outcomes in surgical oncology is limited owing to lengthy instruments and non-specific items in common patient-reported outcome instruments. To establish electronic symptom monitoring through a clinically relevant and fit-for-purpose core set of patient-reported outcome in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One qualitative (Cohort 1) and two prospective studies (Cohorts 2 and 3) were conducted between 2018 and 2022. Patients undergoing lung cancer surgery were recruited. Items of symptoms and daily functioning were generated through extensive interviews in Cohort 1 and incorporated into a smartphone-based platform to establish the electronic Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Lung surgery (ePSA-Lung). This instrument was finalized and validated in Cohort 2. Patients in Cohort 3 were longitudinally monitored for the first-year post-surgery using the validated ePSA-Lung.

RESULTS

In total, 1037 patients scheduled for lung cancer surgery were recruited. The 11-item draft PSA-Lung was generated based on qualitative interview with 39 patients and input from a Delphi study involving 42 experts. A 9-item ePSA-Lung was finalized by assessing 223 patients in the validation cohort; the results supported the instrument's understandability, reliability, sensitivity, and surgical specificity. In Cohort 3 ( n =775), compliance ranged from 63.21 to 84.76% during the 1-year follow-up after discharge. Coughing, shortness of breath, and disturbed sleep were the most severe symptoms after discharge. Longitudinally, patients who underwent single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery had a lower symptom burden than those who underwent multi-port video-assisted thoracic surgery or thoracotomy (all symptoms, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ePSA-Lung is valid, concise, and clinically applicable as it supports electronic symptom monitoring in surgical oncology care. The need for long-term extensive care was identified for patients after discharge, even in early-stage cancer with potential curative treatment.

Patient-reported outcomes in lung cancer surgery: A narrative review

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, profoundly affecting patients' quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide essential insights from the patients' perspective, a crucial aspect often overlooked by traditional clinical outcomes. This review synthesizes research on the role of PROs in lung cancer surgery to enhance patient care and outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 2024, using terms such as "lung cancer," "Patient Reported Outcome," "lobectomy," "segmentectomy," and "lung surgery." The criteria included original studies on lung cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment and reported on PROs. After screening and removing duplicates, reviews, non-English articles, and irrelevant studies, 36 research articles were selected, supported by an additional 53 publications, totaling 89 references. The findings highlight the utility of PROs in assessing post-surgical outcomes, informing clinical decisions, and facilitating patient-centered care. However, challenges in standardization, patient burden, and integration into clinical workflows remain, underscoring the need for further research and methodological refinement. PROs are indispensable for understanding the quality-of-life post-surgery and enhancing communication and decision-making in clinical practice. Their integration into routine care is vital for a holistic approach to lung cancer treatment, promising significant improvements in patient outcomes and quality of care.

Patient-reported Physical Function Is Associated With Survival After Lung Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

We investigated the association between preoperative quality of life and long-term survival in patients undergoing surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted on 388 consecutive patients who completed the quality of life assessment through the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and lung cancer specific module (LC13), before anatomic lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (2014-2018). Survival distribution was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression and competing risk regression analyses were used to assess the independent association of preoperative patient-reported outcomes with overall and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Higher score in patient-reported physical functioning was significantly associated with longer overall survival. Factors significantly associated with poorer overall survival remained older age (P = .005), low body mass index (P = .007), male sex (P < .001), and nodal involvement (P = .007). Competing regression analysis found that worse baseline lung cancer-specific dyspnea (P = .03), low body mass index (P = .01), worse performance status (P = .03), and lymph node involvement (P = .01) were significantly associated with poorer cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher patient-reported physical function score was associated with longer overall survival after resection. Our study highlights the significance of routinely collecting quality of life data to aid preoperative decision making in non-small cell lung cancer.

Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes 1 year after thoracoscopic segmentectomy versus lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: a multicentre, prospective cohort study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Segmentectomy and lobectomy are the main surgical procedures for early-stage lung cancer. However, few studies have analysed patient-reported outcomes after segmentectomy versus lobectomy. This study aims to compare patient-reported outcomes-such as symptoms, daily functioning and quality of life-between thoracoscopic segmentectomy and lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer during the 1 year after surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Overall, 788 newly diagnosed patients with early-stage lung cancer (tumour size ≤2 cm), who are scheduled to undergo thoracoscopic segmentectomy or lobectomy, will be recruited in this multicentre, prospective cohort study. The patients will receive standardised care after surgery. The Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Lung Surgery-a validated lung cancer surgery-specific scale-will be used to assess the symptoms and functions at baseline, at discharge and monthly after discharge for 1 year. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Lung Cancer module 29 will be used to assess the patients' quality of life at the same time points. The primary outcome will be the shortness of breath scores during the first year after thoracoscopic segmentectomy and lobectomy and will be compared using mixed-effects models. The secondary outcomes will include other symptoms, indicators of daily functioning, quality of life scores and traditional clinical outcomes. These will be compared using mixed-effects models and the Student's t-test, non-parametric test or Χ² test. Propensity score matching will be used to ensure an even distribution of known confounders between the groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics Committee for Medical Research and New Medical Technology of Sichuan Cancer Hospital approved this study (approval number: SCCHEC-02-2022-002). All participants will be instructed to provide informed consent. The manuscript is based on protocol version 3.0. The study results will be presented at medical conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200060753.

Preliminary validation of a brief PROM assessing psychological distress in patients with malignant mesothelioma: The mesothelioma psychological distress tool-Patients

Objective

Psychological suffering in malignant mesothelioma (MM) differs from that in other cancers because of its occupational etiology, and we aimed to develop specific patient-reported outcome measures to assess it.

Methods

We used a multi-method prospective observational multicentric study (N = 149), and a preliminary questionnaire validation was performed through a Bayesian approach.

Results

Item analysis showed a good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.79 [95% CI = 0.74-0.93]. Twenty of the 41 initial items were selected as posterior 95% highest density interval factor loading standardized effect size fell outside of the region of practical equivalence. Bayesian exploratory factor analysis showed a two-factor structure: (1) Trauma-related reactions (TR, 13 items) and (2) Claim for justice (CJ, 7 items), confirmed by the Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis. Latent factors were poorly correlated (Posterior median: 0.13; 95% CI = -0.079 to 0.323). The 90% root mean square error of approximation posterior median was 0.04 [90% CI = 0.03-0.58]; the 90% chi-square posterior median was 242 [90% CI = 209-287].

Conclusion

Psychological suffering in MM patients implies negative cognitive, emotional, and somatic reactions related to the traumatic impact of the disease and the need to obtain justice through economic compensation. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that the Mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool-Patients could be a promising and reliable instrument to assess MM patients' psychological distress.

The correlation between pre-treatment symptoms, acute and late toxicity and patient-reported health-related quality of life in non-small cell lung cancer patients: Results of the REQUITE study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the association between clinician-scored toxicities and patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL), in early-stage (ES-) and locally-advanced (LA-) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving loco-regional radiotherapy, included in the international real-world REQUITE study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicians scored eleven radiotherapy-related toxicities (and baseline symptoms) with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. HRQoL was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core HRQoL questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30). Statistical analyses used the mixed-model method; statistical significance was set at p = 0.01. Analyses were performed for baseline and subsequent time points up to 2 years after radiotherapy and per treatment modality, radiotherapy technique and disease stage.

RESULTS

Data of 435 patients were analysed. Pre-treatment, overall symptoms, dyspnea, chest wall pain, dysphagia and cough impacted overall HRQoL and specific domains. At subsequent time points, cough and dysphagia were overtaken by pericarditis in affecting HRQoL. Toxicities during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy and 3-dimensional radiotherapy had the most impact on HRQoL. Conversely, toxicities in sequential chemo-radiotherapy and SBRT had limited impact on patients' HRQoL. Stage impacts the correlations: LA-NSCLC patients are more adversely affected by toxicity than ES-NSCLC patients, mimicking the results of radiotherapy technique and treatment modality.

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment symptoms and acute/late toxicities variously impact HRQoL of ES- and LA-NSCLC patients undergoing different treatment approaches and radiotherapy techniques. Throughout the disease, dyspnea seems crucial in this association, highlighting the additional effect of co-existing comorbidities. Our data call for optimized radiotherapy limiting toxicities that may affect patients' HRQoL.

Assessing the methodological quality of quality-of-life analyses in first-line non-small cell lung cancer trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Non-cytotoxic therapy has changed the treatment paradigm for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. With unique mechanisms of action, these agents have decidedly improved survival and have demonstrated an improved toxicity profile. However, the real-life experience of the patient, which is commonly assessed by health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurement, is not clearly established with this new generation of lung cancer treatments. The heterogeneity created by specific patient subgroups and different therapeutics calls for a tailored-approach to analyzing patient-reported outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the methodological quality of HRQoL analysis in Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) involving biologic agents to treat NSCLC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify NSCLC RCTs published between January 1st, 2000 and January 1st, 2020 reporting HRQoL measures. Only RCTs that both enrolled previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC and had HRQoL analysis were included.

RESULTS

4203 abstracts were screened, of which only 85 RCTs met inclusion and exclusion criteria for analysis. The most applied HRQoL assessment tools were the EORTC-QLQ-C30 (47, 55.3 %), and EORTC-QLQ-LC13 (35, 41.2 %). The median number of verified CONSORT-PRO Extension criteria in the included trials was 3, and only in 10 (11.8 %) trials were all criteria well-documented. Notably, only 21 (24.7 %) RCTs performed subgroup analyses to specifically evaluate HRQoL in different patient populations.

CONCLUSION

QoL reporting in clinical trials is inconsistent and the quality of QoL measures adopted in a majority of trials is suboptimal. Considering the fact that NSCLC is a biologically diverse disease and that the treatments differ based on patient and tumor-specifics, efforts should be pursued to tailor QoL measures for different subsets of this patient population in addition to mandating QoL reporting in clinical trials. We believe that this is necessary to understand the real-life experience of lung cancer patients in the era of personalized medicine.

Effect of acute aerobic exercise before immunotherapy and chemotherapy infusion in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: protocol for the ERICA feasibility trial

INTRODUCTION

Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) suffer from numerous symptoms linked to disease and treatment which may further impair the patient's overall condition. In addition to its benefits on quality of life and fatigue, physical exercise may improve treatment response, notably due to its known effects on the immune system. The ERICA study is designed to assess the feasibility of a supervised acute physical exercise therapy realised immediately prior immune-chemotherapy infusion in patients with mNSCLC. Secondary objectives will examine the effects of acute exercise combined with an unsupervised home-walking programme on clinical, physical, psychosocial and biological parameters.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

ERICA is a prospective, monocentric, randomised controlled, open-label feasibility study conducted at the Centre Léon Bérard Comprehensive Cancer Center (France). Thirty patients newly diagnosed with mNSCLC will be randomised (2:1 ratio) to the 'exercise' or the 'control' group. At baseline and during the last treatment cycle, participants in both groups will receive Physical Activity recommendations, and two nutritional assessments. In the exercise group, participants will receive a 3-month programme consisting of a supervised acute physical exercise session prior to immune-chemotherapy infusion, and an unsupervised home-based walking programme with an activity tracker. The acute exercise consists of 35 min interval training at submaximal intensity scheduled to terminate 15 min prior to infusion. Clinical, physical, biological and psychosocial parameters will be assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months after inclusion. Biological measures will include immune, inflammatory, metabolic, oxidative stress biomarkers and molecular profiling.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the French ethics committee (Comité de protection des personnes Ile de France II, N°ID-RCB 20.09.04.65226, 8 December 2020). The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT number:NCT04676009) and is at the pre-results stage. All participants will sign an informed consent form. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.

Health-related quality of life in patients with COVID-19; international development of a patient-reported outcome measure

BACKGROUND

We aimed to create a questionnaire to assess the health-related quality of life including functioning, symptoms, and general health status of adult patients with current or previous COVID-19. Here, we report on Phase I and II of the development.

METHODS

Internationally recognized methodology for questionnaire development was followed. In Phase I, a comprehensive literature review was performed to identify relevant COVID-19 issues. Decisions for inclusion, exclusion, and data extraction were completed independently in teams of two and then compared. The resulting issues were discussed with health care professionals (HCPs) and current and former COVID-19 patients. The input of HCPs and patients was carefully considered, and the list of issues updated. In Phase II, this updated list was operationalized into items/questions.

RESULTS

The literature review yielded 3342 publications, 339 of which were selected for full-text review, and 75 issues were identified. Discussions with 44 HCPs from seven countries and 52 patients from six countries showed that psychological symptoms, worries, and reduced functioning lasted the longest for patients, and there were considerable discrepancies between HCPs and patients concerning the importance of some of the symptoms. The final list included 73 issues, which were operationalized into an 80-item questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The resulting COVID-19 questionnaire covers health-related quality of life issues relevant to COVID-19 patients and is available in several languages. The next steps include testing of the applicability and patients' acceptability of the questionnaire (Phase IIIA) and preliminary psychometric testing (Phase IIIB).

Miguel A, David A, Patrick B, Pierre B, Erik B, Renée B, Patricia CC, Jenny CC, Ananya C, Gilles D, Sylvian D, Dunning Alison M, Elliott Rebecca M, Dawn E, Corinne FF, Marzia F, Sara GE, Carsten H, Higginson Daniel S, Kerns Sarah L, Kerstie J, Meritxell M, Maarten L, Mónica R, Tiziana R, Andreas R, Rosenstein Barry S, Ruysscher Dirk D, Ahmed S, Claudia S, Petra S, Paloma SF, Elena S, Hilary S, Holly S, Veerle S, Paul S, Begoña TL, Talbot Christopher J, Riccardo V, Ana V, Liv V, Veldwijk Marlon R, Tim W, Adam W, West Catharine M, Yolande L. Overview of health-related quality of life and toxicity of non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving curative-intent radiotherapy in a real-life setting (the REQUITE study)

OBJECTIVES

Radiotherapy-induced toxicity may negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This report investigates the impact of curative-intent radiotherapy on HRQoL and toxicity in early stage and locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy enrolled in the observational prospective REQUITE study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HRQoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire up to 2 years post radiotherapy. Eleven toxicities were scored by clinicians using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4. Toxicity scores were calculated by subtracting baseline values. Mixed model analyses were applied to determine statistical significance (p ≤ 0.01). Meaningful clinical important differences (MCID) were determined for changes in HRQoL. Analysis was performed on the overall data, different radiotherapy techniques, multimodality treatments and disease stages.

RESULTS

Data of 510 patients were analysed. There was no significant change in HRQoL or its domains, except for deterioration in cognitive functioning (p = 0.01). Radiotherapy technique had no significant impact on HRQoL. The addition of chemotherapy was significantly associated with HRQoL over time (p <.001). Overall toxicity did not significantly change over time. Acute toxicities of radiation-dermatitis (p =.003), dysphagia (p =.002) and esophagitis (p <.001) peaked at 3 months and decreased thereafter. Pneumonitis initially deteriorated but improved significantly after 12 months (p =.011). A proportion of patients experienced meaningful clinically important improvements and deteriorations in overall HRQoL and its domains. In some patients, pre-treatment symptoms improved gradually.

CONCLUSIONS

While overall HRQoL and toxicity did not change over time, some patients improved, whereas others experienced acute radiotherapy-induced toxicities and deteriorated HRQoL, especially physical and cognitive functioning. Patient characteristics, more so than radiotherapy technique and treatment modality, impact post-radiotherapy toxicity and HRQoL outcomes. This stresses the importance of considering the potential impact of radiotherapy on individuals' HRQoL, symptoms and toxicity in treatment decision-making.

Early Palliative Care in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Southwest China

PURPOSE

Effective interventions to improve prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are urgently needed. We assessed the effect of the early integration of interdisciplinary palliative care (based on WARM model) for patients with NSCLC on the quality of life (QoL), psychological state, cancer pain and nutritional status.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 120 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to the combined early palliative care (CEPC) group integrated with standard oncologic care or standard oncological care (SC) group. QoL and psychological state were assessed at baseline and at 24 weeks by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), respectively. Cancer nutritional and pain status were assessed with the use of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), respectively. The primary outcome was the change in the quality of life, psychological state and nutritional status at 24 weeks. Analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

120 patients were enrolled: 60 in CEPC group (38 completed) and 60 in the SC group (32 completed). CEPC group had a better QoL than SC group (P < .05). In addition, fewer patients in the CEPC group than in the SC group had depressive (P = .005) symptoms. Furthermore, patients in CEPC group had a better nutritional status than SC group (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, early palliative care led to significant improvements in quality of life, psychological state and nutritional status.

Incidence and risk factors of unplanned emergency department visits following thoracic surgery

Background

Unplanned visits for care following a surgical procedure can represent a lapse in quality of care. The purpose of this study was to define the proportion of patients undergoing thoracic surgery who return to the emergency department (ED) within 6 months after discharge and the reasons for the returns. In addition, the risk factors for ED visits after thoracic surgery were identified.

Methods

All adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery at the Leiden University Medical Center between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were reviewed. To identify potential risk factors for ED return visits, a multivariate regression analysis was performed. A subgroup analysis of patients who reported pain during the ED visit was performed to identify the risk factors for pain-related return to the ED.

Results

Of 277 patients who underwent thoracic surgery, 27.4% (n = 76) returned to the ED within 6 months after discharge. Among these patients, 41 (53.9%) presented with postoperative pain. Younger patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; P = .04), those who were operated on through a thoracotomy (OR, 2.92; P = .04), and those reporting a high pain score on the ward (OR, 1.98; P < .001) were at increased risk of returning to the ED.

Conclusions

The rate of patients returning to the ED after thoracic surgery was high. Pain was the most frequently reported reason for unplanned ED visits. The results of this study highlight the need to optimize the postoperative care and the follow-up of patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

Translation and adaptation of the EORTC QLQ-LC 29 for use in Chinese patients with lung cancer

Background

The latest European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 29 (QLQ-LC29) has been translated and validated in several languages but not yet in simplified Chinese. This study aimed to translate this questionnaire into simplified Chinese and adapt it for use in Chinese patients with lung cancer.

Methods

The translation and adaptation process followed the EORTC translation procedure, and consisted of eight steps, namely, translation preparation, forward translations, reconciled translation, back translations, a back translation report, proofreading, pilot testing, and finalisation. The pilot testing included 10 patients with lung cancer.

Results

We obtained the permission to perform the EORTC QLQ-LC29 translation work on November 17, 2020. Thereafter, it took 3 weeks to complete the forward translations, reconciled translation, and back translations. After several rounds of discussion with the EORTC Translation Unit, 19 items used the existing translations from the EORTC Item Library (a database of EORTC questionnaire items and their translations), and 10 items were translated from scratch. The 10 patients included in the pilot testing phase had a median age of 64 years (range 31–69 years); five were male, five had an educational level of high school or above, and six had undergone surgery. Eight items received comments from patients (six items by one patient alone and the other two items by three patients). No patients commented on the instructions or the format used for responses. After discussion with the EORTC Translation Unit, we modified the Chinese wording in item 50 to ensure that the meaning of “lifeless” was clear. No changes were made to the remaining items.

Conclusions

The simplified Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-LC29 is now available on the EORTC website. This translation may contribute to the application of the EORTC QLQ-LC29 scale in both research and clinical practice in the Chinese population with lung cancer. Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the translated EORTC QLQ-LC29 is warranted.

Psychosocial Burden and Quality of Life of Lung Cancer Patients: Results of the EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-LC29 Questionnaire and Hornheide Screening Instrument

Background

Overall survival is the ultimate criterion for the therapy of lung cancer, but psychosocial care, which helps the patient to cope with the disease, becomes a more and more important issue in the treatment of this life-threatening disease.

Methods

We report the satellite project within a prospective, international, cross-cultural, multicenter study to validate the EORTC QLQ-LC29, a new designed module to assess the quality of life of lung cancer patients. The participants filled in the EORTC QLQ-C30, the recently updated lung cancer module QLQ-LC29 and the Hornheide questionnaire (HSI).

Results

A total of 81 patients (32 female and 49 male, mean age 65.2 years, SD = 9.7) were enrolled in this study by completing the questionnaires. Fatigue (mean 55.4, SD = 26.3) and dyspnea (mean 46.3, SD = 36.2) were the most prominent symptoms. Thirty-nine patients (48.1%) according to the HSI needed psychosocial support. When using the EORTC questionnaires as screening instrument with 50 as cut-off in contrast only 29.5% of our patients needed psychosocial support. The need for psychosocial support according to the HSI correlated most with the EORTC scales “fatigue” (38.3% overlap between the two questionnaires), “existential fear” (38.3% overlap between the two questionnaires) and worse “global quality of life” (27.2% overlap between the two questionnaires).

Conclusion

If psychosocial distress is at the core, the HSI is a suitable instrument for quick screening. The EORTC measures help to specify impaired quality of life areas and also cover somatic symptoms that are specific for cancer patients. Once psychosocial distress has been ascertained, clinicians should be particularly aware of specific problems regarding “fatigue”, “existential fear” and diminished “global quality of life”.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov, reference number NCT02745691. Registered 20 April 2016.

European Society of Thoracic Surgeons electronic quality of life application after lung resection: field testing in a clinical setting

OBJECTIVES

Technology has the potential to assist healthcare professionals in improving patient-doctor communication during the surgical journey. Our aims were to assess the acceptability of a quality of life (QoL) application (App) in a cohort of cancer patients undergoing lung resections and to depict the early perioperative trajectory of QoL.

METHODS

This multicentre (Italy, UK, Spain, Canada and Switzerland) prospective longitudinal study with repeated measures used 12 lung surgery-related validated questions from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item Bank. Patients filled out the questionnaire preoperatively and 1, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after surgery using an App preinstalled in a tablet. A one-way repeated measures analysis of variance was run to determine if there were differences in QoL over time.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients consented to participate in the study (83 who had lobectomies, 17 who had segmentectomies and 3 who had pneumonectomies). Eighty-three operations were performed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Compliance rates were 88%, 90%, 88%, 82%, 71% and 56% at each time point, respectively. The results showed that the operation elicited statistically significant worsening in the following symptoms: shortness of breath (SOB) rest (P = 0.018), SOB walk (P < 0.001), SOB stairs (P = 0.015), worry (P = 0.003), wound sensitivity (P < 0.001), use of arm and shoulder (P < 0.001), pain in the chest (P < 0.001), decrease in physical capability (P < 0.001) and scar interference on daily activity (P < 0.001) during the first postoperative month. SOB worsened immediately after the operation and remained low at the different time points. Worry improved following surgery. Surgical access and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) are the factors that most strongly affected the evolution of the symptoms in the perioperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed good early compliance of patients operated on for lung cancer with the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons QoL App. We determined the evolution of surgery-related QoL in the immediate postoperative period. Monitoring these symptoms remotely may reduce hospital appointments and help to establish early patient-support programmes.

Translation and cultural adaptation of EORTC QLQ-LC 29 into Nepalese language for lung cancer patients in Nepal

Background

The quality of life (QoL) of patients with lung cancer (LC) may be affected by disease-related limitations such as patients’ functioning, the severity of symptoms, financial problems resulting along with the side effects of the treatment. The objective of this study was to translate LC-specific QoL questionnaire EORTC QLQ-LC29 into Nepalese language for Nepalese LC patients.

Methods

In the process of translation, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) translations guidelines were followed. The translated questionnaire was pilot-tested in a sample of 15 patients with LC. Descriptive statistics were calculated with SPSS version 21.0.

Results

All steps of the EORTC translation guideline were followed successfully. Fifteen lung cancer patients were included in the pilot study. Sixty percent were male and the mean age was 49.87 (range 21–76 years). For all items not related to thoracic surgery, patients used the entire range of the response options from 1 to 4 and no missing responses were observed. The highest mean (indicating a high symptom burden) was observed for the item number. 35 (shortness of breath; Mean = 3.33, SD = 1.11) and the lowest mean for an item number. 45 (dizzy; Mean = 1.73, SD = 0.96).

Conclusion

The Nepalese version of EORTC QLQ-LC29 is a result of a successfully conducted rigorous translation procedure, and is highly comprehensible as well as acceptable to Nepalese LC patients. Thus, the Nepalese version of EORTC QLQ-LC29 is ready to be used in international clinical studies as well as in Nepalese clinical practice.