1
|
Baxter MA, Rowe M, Zucker K, Peters AL, Rohan M, Marsh A, Gee AL, Quesne G, Heseltine J, Prichard R, Scott D, O'Neill C, Brunner C, Howells J, Conteh V, Aujayeb A, Yan X, Rodgers LJ, Martin S, Dearden H. UK national observational cohort study investigating Tolerance of Anti-cancer Systemic Therapy in the Elderly: the TOASTIE study. BMJ ONCOLOGY 2024; 3:e000459. [PMID: 39886166 PMCID: PMC11557722 DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2025]
Abstract
Objective The Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) score was developed to predict severe chemotherapy-induced toxicity risk in older adults; validation study results have varied. The Tolerance of Anti-cancer Systemic Therapy in the Elderly study sought to evaluate the CARG score prospectively in a chemotherapy-naïve UK population. Methods and analysis This multicentre, prospective, observational study recruited patients aged ≥65 years commencing first-line chemotherapy for any solid organ malignancy or setting. Baseline demographics and established frailty measures were recorded. Follow-up data including toxicity and hospital admissions were collected retrospectively. Baseline CARG score predictive ability was assessed. Results 339 patients were recruited from 19 centres; median age 73 years (range 65-92), 51.9% male and 54.9% gastrointestinal primary. At baseline, 85% of patients were of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-1, with median Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) 3 (range 0-8).314 (92.6%) patients had follow-up data; 69 (22.3%) patients experienced Common Terminology for Cancer Adverse Events grade ≥3 toxicity and 84 (27%) required hospital admission during treatment.Increasing CARG risk groups had increased grade ≥3 toxicity (low 19.6%, medium 22.2%, high 28.2%); however, this was non-significant with no evidence of robust predictive performance. Predictive performance of CFS and ECOG PS was superior to CARG. Importantly, patient and clinician perceptions of toxicity risk differed significantly. Conclusions In older UK patients with cancer commencing chemotherapy, baseline frailty was prevalent. CARG score did not robustly discriminate or predict high-grade toxicity risk. ECOG and CFS showed superior, although limited, ability to predict and discriminate. This study highlights the need for the development of tools that better predict toxicity in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Baxter
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee Division of Medical Sciences, Dundee, UK
- Tayside Cancer Centre, Tayside University Hospitals NHS Trust, Dundee, UK
| | - Michael Rowe
- Sunrise Oncology Centre, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | | | | | - Maria Rohan
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | | | - Abigail L Gee
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jonny Heseltine
- Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Foundation Trust, Bebington, UK
| | | | - Deborah Scott
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Clair Brunner
- Swansea Bay University Health Board, Port Talbot, UK
| | | | | | - Avinash Aujayeb
- Respiratory Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK
| | - Xiangfei Yan
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aggarwal A, Simcock R, Price P, Rachet B, Lyratzopoulos G, Walker K, Spencer K, Roques T, Sullivan R. NHS cancer services and systems-ten pressure points a UK cancer control plan needs to address. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e363-e373. [PMID: 38991599 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00345-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
In this Policy Review we discuss ten key pressure points in the NHS in the delivery of cancer care services that need to be urgently addressed by a comprehensive national cancer control plan. These pressure points cover areas such as increasing workforce capacity and its productivity, delivering effective cancer survivorship services, addressing variation in quality, fixing the reimbursement system for cancer care, and balancing of the cancer research agenda. These areas have been selected based on their relative importance to ensuring sustainable cancer services, persistence as key issues in the NHS, and their impact on delivering better and more equitable and affordable patient outcomes. Many of these pressure points are not acknowledged explicitly in any current discourse. The evidence we provide points to their impact on the ability to deliver world class cancer care, but also to their amenability to affordable solutions if given the relevant prioritisation and investment. The current narrative needs to move away from a technocentric approach to improving care, to one focused on understanding the complexity of cancer services and the wider health system to drive improvements in survival, quality of life, and experience for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Oncology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Richard Simcock
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Pat Price
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Bernard Rachet
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Kate Walker
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Katie Spencer
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds
| | - Tom Roques
- Department of Oncology, Norfolk and Norwich NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ignatiadis M, Poulakaki F, Spanic T, Brain E, Lacombe D, Sonke GS, Vincent-Salomon A, Van Duijnhoven F, Meattini I, Kaidar-Person O, Aftimos P, Lecouvet F, Cardoso F, Retèl VP, Cameron D. EBCC-14 manifesto: Addressing disparities in access to innovation for patients with metastatic breast cancer across Europe. Eur J Cancer 2024; 207:114156. [PMID: 38861756 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
The European Breast Cancer Council (EBCC) traditionally identifies controversies or major deficiencies in the management of patients with breast cancer and selects a multidisciplinary expert team to collaborate in setting crucial principles and recommendations to improve breast cancer care. The 2024 EBCC manifesto focuses on disparities in the care of patients with metastatic breast cancer. There are several reasons for existing disparities both between and within countries. Our recommendations aim to address the stigma of metastatic disease, which has led to significant disparities in access to innovative care regardless of the gross national income of a country. These recommendations are for different stakeholders to promote the care of patients with metastatic breast cancer across Europe and worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Ignatiadis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Fiorita Poulakaki
- Breast Surgery Department, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece; Europa Donna - The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy
| | - Tanja Spanic
- Europa Donna - The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy; Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Denis Lacombe
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theragnostic Medicine, Institut Curie Hospital Group, Paris, France
| | - Frederieke Van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology & Breast Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Philippe Aftimos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frederic Lecouvet
- Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II (IRA2), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam (ESHPM), Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Cameron
- Edinburgh University Cancer Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chi S, Wang C, Liu Z. Biomimetic Nanocomposites for Glioma Imaging and Therapy. Chemistry 2024; 30:e202304338. [PMID: 38538540 DOI: 10.1002/chem.202304338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2024]
Abstract
Glioma, the most common primary brain tumor, is highly invasive and grows rapidly. As such, the survival of glioma patients is relatively short, highlighting the vital importance of timely diagnosis and treatment of glioma. However, the blood brain barrier (BBB) and the non-targeting delivery systems of contrast agents and drugs greatly hinder the effective glioma imaging and therapy. Fortunately, in recent years, investigators have constructed various biomimetic delivery platforms utilizing the exceptional advantages of biomimetic nanocomposites, such as immune evasion, homologous targeting ability, and BBB penetrating ability, to achieve efficient and precise delivery of substances to glioma sites for improved diagnosis and treatment. In this concept, we present the application of these biomimetic nanocomposites in fluorescence imaging (FI), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and multi-modal imaging, as well as in chemotherapy, phototherapy, and combined therapy for glioma. Lastly, we provide our perspective on this research field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyu Chi
- College of Health Science and Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan, 430062, P. R. China
| | - Caixia Wang
- College of Health Science and Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan, 430062, P. R. China
| | - Zhihong Liu
- College of Health Science and Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan, 430062, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Han W, Ma J, Wang HN. International variation in chemotherapy use in cancers. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e231. [PMID: 38821092 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00213-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Han
- Department of General Surgery, Kunshan First People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Urology Surgery, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hao-Nan Wang
- Oncology Department, Wuxi Fifth People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barclay ME, McPhail S, Johnson SA, Swann R, Lyratzopoulos G. International variation in chemotherapy use in cancer - Authors' reply. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e232. [PMID: 38821093 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00275-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew E Barclay
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes, Department of Behavioural Science & Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Sean McPhail
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Ruth Swann
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, Leeds, UK; Cancer Intelligence, Cancer Research UK, London, UK
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes, Department of Behavioural Science & Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK; National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|