1
|
Stassen RC, Schurink AW, van der Veldt AAM, Hollestein LM, Verhoef C, Grünhagen DJ. Critical evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in pT1b and pT2a melanoma patients: A nationwide population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2025; 220:115365. [PMID: 40175255 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2025] [Accepted: 03/10/2025] [Indexed: 04/04/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) aims to stage patients. According to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) staging manual, patients with pT1b or pT2a melanoma can be eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy, however, only if they have a sentinel node (SN) tumour burden > 1 mm. This study aims to determine the percentage of patients with pT1b or pT2a that will become eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy following SLNB. METHODS A nationwide, population-based study was conducted using data from the Dutch Pathology Databank. Patients diagnosed with pT1b and pT2a melanoma between 2002 and 2023 were included. The primary endpoint was the number of SNs with a tumour burden > 1 mm. RESULTS We identified 36,606 patients of who 16,042 underwent SLNB. SN positivity was 5 % for patients with pT1b melanoma, and 11 % for pT2a melanoma. A tumour burden > 1 mm was found in 1.5 % and 4.1 %, translating to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 69 for pT1b and 25 for pT2a. CONCLUSION This nationwide study demonstrated a low incidence of positive SNs and minimal likelihood of significant clinical outcomes following SLNB. Given the high NNT to be eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy, SLNB may no longer be justified for pT1b melanoma. For patients with pT2a melanoma, SLNB should be considered carefully, balancing limited clinical benefits against potential risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Stassen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Antonius W Schurink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Loes M Hollestein
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stassen RC, Maas CCHM, Leong SP, Kashani-Sabet M, White RL, Pockaj BA, Zager JS, Schneebaum S, Vetto JT, Avisar E, Harrison Howard J, O’Donoghue C, Kosiorek H, van Akkooi ACJ, Verhoef C, van Klaveren D, Grünhagen DJ, Olofsson Bagge R. External validation of a model to predict recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival for patients with melanoma after sentinel node biopsy. Br J Surg 2025; 112:znaf037. [PMID: 40243383 PMCID: PMC12004364 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2024] [Revised: 12/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2025] [Indexed: 04/18/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, a model to predict 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was published. The aim of this study was to validate that model in a large independent international cohort. METHODS The database of the Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group (SLNWG) was analysed for patients with malignant melanoma who underwent SLNB. Patients with clinical stage III melanoma, a history of other malignancies, or receiving concomitant systemic therapies during follow-up were excluded. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using discrimination and calibration metrics in the eligible cohort. Decision curve analysis was performed to assess the clinical value of the model. RESULTS The external validation cohort consisted of 6174 patients of the SLNWG from the USA, Europe, and Israel. A positive sentinel node was found in 788 patients (12.8%). The area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the external validation was 0.76 (95% c.i. 0.74 to 0.77) for RFS and 0.79 (95% c.i. 0.76 to 0.81) for MSS. The model was well calibrated, as the observed 5-year survival rates aligned closely with the predicted survival rates (calibration slope of 0.98 for RFS and calibration slope of 0.99 for MSS). The model provided a net benefit versus the 'treat all' and 'treat none' strategies at the predetermined probability threshold for recurrence of 45%. CONCLUSION The model demonstrated good performance in a large heterogeneous independent cohort, emphasizing its robustness. Decision curve analysis revealed a clear net benefit of the model over a treat all strategy, highlighting its potential for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Stassen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carolien C H M Maas
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stanley P Leong
- Department of Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center and Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
- Department of Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center and Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Richard L White
- Department of Surgery, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Schlomo Schneebaum
- Department of Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - John T Vetto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Eli Avisar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - J Harrison Howard
- Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
| | - Cristina O’Donoghue
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Heidi Kosiorek
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Connor C, Carr QL, Sweazy A, McMasters K, Hao H. Clinical Approaches for the Management of Skin Cancer: A Review of Current Progress in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis for Patients with Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:707. [PMID: 40002300 PMCID: PMC11853469 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2025] [Revised: 02/16/2025] [Accepted: 02/17/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Melanoma represents a significant public health challenge due to its increasing incidence and potential for metastasis. This review will explore the current clinical approaches to the management of melanoma, focusing on advancements in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Methods for early detection and accurate staging have been enhanced by new diagnostic strategies. Treatment modalities have expanded beyond traditional surgical excision to include targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Prognostic assessment has benefited from the development of novel biomarkers and genetic profiling. This review will highlight the progress made in the multidisciplinary management of melanoma, underscoring the importance of continuous research to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colton Connor
- School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; (C.C.); (Q.L.C.)
| | - Quinton L. Carr
- School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; (C.C.); (Q.L.C.)
| | - Alisa Sweazy
- The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., MD Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; (A.S.); (K.M.)
| | - Kelly McMasters
- The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., MD Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; (A.S.); (K.M.)
| | - Hongying Hao
- The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., MD Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; (A.S.); (K.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bao Q, Li Y, Chen Y, Zheng J, Zhao J, Hu T. Transcriptome-Based Network Analysis Related to Histone Deacetylase Genes and Identified EMP1 as a Potential Biomarker for Prognosis in Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2025; 23:102262. [PMID: 39603145 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 08/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/01/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abnormal expression and function of histone deacetylases (HDACs) are closely associated with the development of bladder cancer (BCa). Systematic elucidation of the role of HDACs in BCa is expected to improve BCa prognosis and treatment strategies. METHODS We explored the correlation and expression patterns of HDAC family genes in BCa. Consensus clustering was employed to categorize BCa into subtypes based on HDAC expression profiles. Differential analysis, pathway enrichment analysis, and drug responsiveness evaluation were conducted to characterize HDAC subtypes. Then, a prognostic model based on HDAC cluster related genes was constructed and validated across multiple cohorts. RESULTS We identified distinct HDAC expression patterns and correlations with immune cell infiltration and enrichment of pathways in cancer, highlighting their role in BCa. Consensus clustering revealed 2 HDAC gene subtypes. Gene cluster 1 showed worse survival, higher clinical stage, and lower immune cell infiltration compared to gene cluster 2. Additionally, pathway enrichment analysis revealed differences in tumor-promoting pathways between the clusters. Moreover, gene cluster 1 exhibited higher resistance to Rho kinase inhibitor drugs. Multi-omic analysis unveiled unique mutation and CNV profiles between the clusters, indicating distinct molecular features. Furthermore, a HDAC gene-related prognostic model demonstrated robust predictive accuracy and identified EMP1 as a key prognostic gene associated with poor survival and enriched metastatic pathways. CONCLUSION Our study provides comprehensive insights into the landscape of HDACs in BCa, elucidating their roles in tumor heterogeneity, immune modulation, drug responsiveness, and molecular features. EMP1 is a potential therapeutic target and prognostic marker for BCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiong Bao
- Department of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China; State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China; State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Department of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China; State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Ji Zheng
- Department of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China; State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Jiang Zhao
- Department of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China; State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
| | - Ting Hu
- Department of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China; State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pelosi E, Castelli G, Testa U. Braf-Mutant Melanomas: Biology and Therapy. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:7711-7737. [PMID: 39727691 PMCID: PMC11674697 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31120568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Revised: 11/21/2024] [Accepted: 11/27/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of melanoma, the most lethal form of skin cancer, has increased mainly due to ultraviolet exposure. The molecular characterization of melanomas has shown a high mutational burden led to the identification of some recurrent genetic alterations. BRAF gene is mutated in 40-50% of melanomas and its role in melanoma development is paramount. BRAF mutations confer constitutive activation of MAPK signalling. The large majority (about 90%) of BRAF mutations occur at amino acid 600; the majority are BRAFV600E mutations and less frequently BRAFv600K, V600D and V600M. The introduction of drugs that directly target BRAF-mutant protein (BRAF inhibitors) and of agents that stimulate immune response through targeting of immune check inhibitor consistently improved the survival of melanoma BRAFV600-mutant patients with unresectable/metastatic disease. In parallel, studies in melanoma stage II-III patients with resectable disease have shown that adjuvant therapy with ICIs and/or targeted therapy improves PFS and RFS, but not OS compared to placebo; however, neoadjuvant therapy plus adjuvant therapy improved therapeutic response compared to adjuvant therapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ugo Testa
- Department of Oncology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy; (E.P.); (G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zheng H, Zheng H, Wei L, Xue Z, Xu B, Hu M, Yu J, Xie R, Zhang L, Zheng Z, Xie J, Zheng C, Huang C, Lin J, Li P. Risk stratification models incorporating oxidative stress factors to predict survival and recurrence in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: A real-world multicenter study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108658. [PMID: 39244978 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oxidative stress significantly influences the development and progression of gastric cancer (GC). It remains unreported whether incorporating oxidative stress factors into nomograms can improve the predictive accuracy for survival and recurrence risk in GC patients. METHODS 3498 GC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between 2009 and 2017 were enrolled and randomly divided into training cohort (TC) and internal validation cohort (IVC). Cox regression analysis model was used to evaluate six preoperative oxidative stress indicators to formulate the Systemic oxidative stress Score (SOSS). Two nomograms based on SOSS was constructed by multivariate Cox regression and validated using 322 patients from another two hospitals. RESULTS A total of 3820 patients were included. The SOSS, composed of three preoperative indicators-fibrinogen, albumin, and cholesterol-was an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The two nomograms based on SOSS showed a significantly higher AUC than the pTNM stage (OS: 0.830 vs. 0.778, DFS: 0.824 vs. 0.775, all P < 0.001) and were validated in the IVC and EVC (all P < 0.001). The local recurrence rate, peritoneal recurrence rate, distant recurrence rate and multiple recurrence rate in high-risk group were significantly higher than those in low-risk group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The two novel nomograms based on SOSS which was a combination score of three preoperative blood indicators, demonstrated outstanding predictive abilities for both survival and recurrence in GC patients with different risk groups, which may potentially improve survival through perioperatively active intervention strategies and individualized postoperatively close surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honghong Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Hualong Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Linghua Wei
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Zhen Xue
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Binbin Xu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Minggao Hu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Department of General Surgery, The PLA Navy Anqing Hospital, Anqing, 246000, China
| | - Junhua Yu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Department of General Surgery, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, 324000, China
| | - Rongzhen Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, 321000, China
| | - Lingkang Zhang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Zhiwei Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Jianwei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Chaohui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - ChangMing Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China.
| | - Jianxian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China.
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Egger ME, McMasters KM. Finally! An Improved Prognostic Calculator for Cutaneous Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5475-5478. [PMID: 38971958 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15763-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Egger
- The Hiram C. Polk Jr, MD, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
| | - Kelly M McMasters
- The Hiram C. Polk Jr, MD, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tapoi DA, Gheorghișan-Gălățeanu AA, Gosman LM, Derewicz D, Costache M. The Prognostic Value of Proliferative Activity in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Pilot Study Evaluating the Mitotic Rate and Ki67 Index to Predict Patient Outcomes. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1318. [PMID: 38927524 PMCID: PMC11202243 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12061318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Proliferative activity in cutaneous melanomas can be appreciated both histopathologically by counting mitotic figures and immunohistochemically through the Ki67 index, but the prognostic value of each method is still a matter of debate. In this context, we performed a retrospective study on 33 patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanomas between 2013 and 2018 in order to evaluate progression-free survival and overall survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was performed by considering both clinical histopathological and immunohistochemical features. The mitotic rate was significantly independently associated with both outcomes, while the Ki67 index was not an independent prognostic factor. However, the Ki67 predictive accuracy could be improved by establishing both a cut-off value and a standardized protocol for evaluating its expression. Until these desiderata are met, the mitotic rate remains superior to the Ki67 index for predicting prognosis in cutaneous melanomas, as also has the advantage of being easily interpreted in a standard histopathological examination regardless of the pathologist's experience and with no further financial expenses. Importantly, this is one of very few articles that has shown perineural invasion to be an independent prognostic factor for both progression-free survival and overall survival in cutaneous melanomas. As a consequence, this parameter should become a mandatory feature in the histopathological evaluation of cutaneous melanomas as it can improve the identification of patients who are at high risk for disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Antonia Tapoi
- Department of Pathology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (D.A.T.); (M.C.)
- Department of Pathology, University Emergency Hospital, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Laura Maria Gosman
- Doctoral School, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Pathology, Saint Pantelimon Clinical Emergency Hospital, 021659 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Diana Derewicz
- Department of Pediatrics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Marie Sklodowska Curie Clinical Emergency Hospital, 041447 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mariana Costache
- Department of Pathology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (D.A.T.); (M.C.)
- Department of Pathology, University Emergency Hospital, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Olofsson Bagge R, Hieken TJ. A new era of risk prediction for patients with high-risk melanoma. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:415-416. [PMID: 38547888 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00101-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy and Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|