Birth of a healthy female after preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Charcot-Marie-Tooth type X

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Review of Methodologies and Report of Our Experience as a Regional Reference Laboratory

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become a crucial approach in helping carriers of inherited disorders to give birth to healthy offspring. In this study, we review PGD methodologies and explore the use of amplification refractory mutation system quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-qPCR) and/or linkage analysis for PGD in neurodegenerative diseases that are clinically relevant with typical features, such as late onset, and which are severely debilitating. A total of 13 oocyte retrieval cycles were conducted in 10 cases with various neurodegenerative diseases. Among the 59 embryos analyzed, 49.2% (29/59) were unaffected and 50.8% (30/59) were affected. Of the 12 embryo transfer cycles, three resulted in pregnancy, and all pregnancies were delivered. The implantation rate and livebirth rate were 23.1% (3/13) per oocyte retrieval cycle and 25.0% (3/12) per embryo transfer cycle. Allele dropout (ADO) was noted in two embryos that were classified as unaffected by ARMS-qPCR but were evidenced as affected after prenatal diagnosis, rendering the false negative rate as 6.3% (2/32). Four among the 13 cycles underwent PGD by ARMS-qPCR coupled with linkage analysis, and all were correctly diagnosed. We conclude that PGD by ARMS-qPCR and/or linkage analysis is a feasible strategy, whereas ADO is a concern when ARMS-qPCR is used as the sole technology in PGD, especially in autosomal dominant diseases.

Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of offering array-based comparative genomic hybridization testing for prenatal diagnosis as a first-line test, a prospective study was performed, comparing the results achieved from array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) with those obtained from conventional karyotype.

METHOD

Women undergoing amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling were offered aCGH analysis. A total of 1037 prenatal samples were processed in parallel using both aCGH and G-banding for standard karyotyping. Specimen types included amniotic fluid (89.0%), chorionic villus sampling (9.5%) and cultured amniocytes (1.5%).

RESULTS

Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 34 (3.3%) samples; in 9 out of 34 cases (26.5%) aCGH detected pathogenic copy number variations that would not have been found if only a standard karyotype had been performed. aCGH was also able to detect chromosomal mosaicism at as low as a 10% level. There was complete concordance between the conventional karyotyping and aCGH results, except for 2 cases that were only correctly diagnosed by aCGH.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that aCGH represents an improved diagnostic tool for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Although larger studies are needed, our results provide further evidence on the feasibility of introducing aCGH as a first-line diagnostic test in routine prenatal diagnosis practice.

Singling out genetic disorders and disease

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) involves testing of single cells biopsied from oocytes and/or embryos generated in vitro. As only embryos unaffected for a given genetic condition are transferred to the uterus, it avoids prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy. Follow-up data from PGD pregnancies, deliveries and children show an acceptable live birth rate and, so far, no detrimental effects of the procedure have been observed. Of course, the long-term health outcome is currently unknown. PGD was first performed in 1990 and remained an experimental procedure for a number of years. Now, two decades later, it is regarded as an established alternative to prenatal diagnosis: its use has expanded, the range of applications has broadened, and continuous technical progress in single-cell testing has led to high levels of efficiency and accuracy. The current gold standard methods (single-cell multiplex-PCR for monogenic diseases and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for chromosomal aberrations) are being replaced by single-cell whole genome amplification and array technology. These generalized methods substantially reduce the pre-PGD workload and allow more automated genome-wide analysis. The implementation of laboratory accreditation schemes brings the field at the same level of routine diagnostics. This article reviews the state of the art and considers indications, accuracy and current technical changes in the field of PGD.

The biology of infertility: research advances and clinical challenges

Reproduction is required for the survival of all mammalian species, and thousands of essential 'sex' genes are conserved through evolution. Basic research helps to define these genes and the mechanisms responsible for the development, function and regulation of the male and female reproductive systems. However, many infertile couples continue to be labeled with the diagnosis of idiopathic infertility or given descriptive diagnoses that do not provide a cause for their defect. For other individuals with a known etiology, effective cures are lacking, although their infertility is often bypassed with assisted reproductive technologies (ART), some accompanied by safety or ethical concerns. Certainly, progress in the field of reproduction has been realized in the twenty-first century with advances in the understanding of the regulation of fertility, with the production of over 400 mutant mouse models with a reproductive phenotype and with the promise of regenerative gonadal stem cells. Indeed, the past six years have witnessed a virtual explosion in the identification of gene mutations or polymorphisms that cause or are linked to human infertility. Translation of these findings to the clinic remains slow, however, as do new methods to diagnose and treat infertile couples. Additionally, new approaches to contraception remain elusive. Nevertheless, the basic and clinical advances in the understanding of the molecular controls of reproduction are impressive and will ultimately improve patient care.

Strategies and clinical outcome of 250 cycles of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for single gene disorders

BACKGROUND

We report on our experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene disorders (SGDs), from 1999 to 2004, describing strategies and overall clinical outcome of 250 cycles in 174 couples for 23 different genetic conditions.

METHODS

PGD cycles included 15 for autosomal dominant, 148 for autosomal recessive and 19 for X-linked SGDs. In addition, 68 cycles of PGD for SGDs were performed in combination with HLA matching. The strategy in each case used an initial multiplex PCR, followed by minisequencing to identify the mutation(s) combined with multiplex PCR for closely linked informative markers to increase accuracy. Linkage analysis, using intragenic and/or extragenic polymorphic microsatellite markers, was performed in cases where the disease-causing mutation(s) was unknown or undetectable.

RESULTS

In 250 PGD cycles, a total of 1961 cleavage stage embryos were biopsied. PCR was successful in 3409 out of 3149 (92.4%) biopsied blastomeres and a diagnosis was possible in 1849 (94.3%) embryos. Four hundred and twenty-seven embryos were transferred in 211 cycles, resulting in 71 pregnancies (33.6% per embryo transfer), including 15 biochemical pregnancies, six spontaneous miscarriages, two ectopic pregnancies, which were terminated, and nine pregnancies which are still ongoing. The remaining pregnancies were confirmed to be unaffected and went to term without complications, resulting in the birth of 35 healthy babies.

CONCLUSIONS

Minisequencing for mutation detection combined with multiplex fluorescence PCR for linkage analysis is an efficient, accurate and widely applicable strategy for PGD of SGDs. Our experience provides a further demonstration that PGD is an effective clinical tool and a useful option for many couples with a high risk of transmitting a genetic disease.

Birth of two healthy females after preimplantation genetic diagnosis for familial amyloid polyneuropathy

Familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP), Portuguese type, is a late onset, high penetrance, autosomal dominant Mendelian disorder caused by a V30M substitution in the transthyretin (TTR) protein. A genetic diagnosis was developed using fluorescent single cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on lymphocytes from patients and controls. Ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval were carried out using conventional protocols in a couple in whom the female was heterozygous for the mutation TTR V30M. Blastomere biopsy was performed on day 3 after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. PCR was then performed for a segment of the TTR gene encompassing the V30M mutation. The transfer of three embryos at day 4 resulted in a twin pregnancy, confirmed as healthy females by amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation; the birth took place at 37 weeks of gestation. With this report, FAP, TTR related, joins the lengthening list of genetic conditions for which preimplantation genetic diagnosis has been successfully carried out.