García Domínguez JM, Martínez Ginés ML, Martín-Barriga ML, Guzmán-de-Villoria J, Muñoz Blanco JL, de Andrés Frutos C. [Recurrent acute rhombencephalomyelitis in an adult or neuromyelitis optica? Presentation of a case].
Neurologia 2011;
27:154-60. [PMID:
21652118 DOI:
10.1016/j.nrl.2011.04.006]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2010] [Revised: 04/08/2011] [Accepted: 04/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The lack of accepted homogeneous criteria for the definition of some demyelinating diseases makes diagnostic characterization difficult and limits data interpretation and therapeutic recommendations. Recurrent encephalomyelitis (ADE-R) along with borderline cases of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) are especially controversial.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the clinical and radiological evolution of an adult-onset ADE-R versus NMO case throughout 9 years of follow-up.
PATIENT AND METHODS
Our patient presented with severe symptoms of rhombencephalomyelitis and the cranial and spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed large lesions, with gadolinium enhancement in brainstem and spinal cord, correlating with the clinical picture. Infectious aetiology was excluded, IgG index was normal and NMO antibodies were negative. After treatment with intravenous corticosteroids and plasmapheresis, there was excellent recovery in the acute phase. During follow-up, seven relapses have occurred, mainly in the spinal cord, with good recovery and the same symptomatology, albeit with different severity. Immunosuppressive treatment was introduced since the beginning.
CONCLUSIONS
Our case shares common features of both ADE-R and NMO, illustrating that diagnostic characterization is not easy in spite of current criteria.
Collapse