Dabigatran in atrial fibrillation: balancing secondary stroke prevention against bleeding risk

Dabigatran and warfarin for secondary prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients: a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

This register-based observational study compares dabigatran to warfarin for secondary stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients among both "new starters" on dabigatran and "switchers" to dabigatran from warfarin.

METHODS

We identified, in nationwide Danish registries, 2398 patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, making a first-time purchase of dabigatran 110 mg twice a day (bid; D110) and 150 mg bid (D150). Patients were categorized as either vitamin K antagonist (VKA) naive or experienced. Warfarin controls were identified using a complete (for VKA-naive dabigatran patients) or matched sampling approach (for VKA-experienced dabigatran patients). Subjects were followed for an average of 12.6 months for stroke and transient ischemic attacks. Confounder-adjusted Cox regression models were used to compare event rates between treatments.

RESULTS

Among patients with a history of stroke/transient ischemic attack and prior VKA experience, switching to dabigatran was associated with an increased stroke/transient ischemic attack rate for both dabigatran doses compared with continuing on warfarin (D110 hazard ratio [HR] 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-2.78; D150 HR 2.34; 95% CI, 1.60-3.41). Among prior stroke/transient ischemic attack patients who were new starters on dabigatran or warfarin, the rate of stroke/transient ischemic attack for both doses of dabigatran was similar to or lower than warfarin (D110 HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.80; D150 HR 0.92l; 95% CI, 0.73-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

In this register-based study, VKA-experienced patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack who switched to dabigatran therapy had an increased rate of stroke compared with patients persisting with warfarin therapy.

Dabigatran in secondary stroke prevention: clinical experience with 106 patients

INTRODUCTION

Our aim was to analyze our clinical experience with dabigatran etexilate in secondary stroke prevention.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients starting dabigatran etexilate for secondary stroke prevention from March 2010 to December 2012. Efficacy and safety variables were registered.

RESULTS

106 patients were included, median follow-up of 12 months (range 1-31). Fifty-six females (52.8%), mean age 76.4 (range 50-95, SD 9.8), median CHADS2 4 (range 2-6), CHA2DS2-VASc 5 (range 2-9), and HAS-BLED 2 (range 1-5). Indication for dabigatran etexilate was ischemic stroke in 101 patients and acute cerebral hemorrhage (CH) due to warfarin in 5 (4.7%). Dabigatran etexilate 110 mg bid was prescribed in 71 cases (67%) and 150 mg bid was prescribed in the remaining. Seventeen patients (16%) suffered 20 complications during follow-up. Ischemic complications (10) were 6 transient ischemic attacks (TIA), 3 ischemic strokes, and 1 acute coronary syndrome. Hemorrhagic complications (10) were CH (1), gastrointestinal bleeding (6), mild hematuria (2), and mild metrorrhagia (1), leading to dabigatran etexilate discontinuation in 3 patients. Patients with previous CH remained uneventful. Three patients died (pneumonia, congestive heart failure, and acute cholecystitis) and 9 were lost during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Dabigatran etexilate was safe and effective in secondary stroke prevention in clinical practice, including a small number of patients with previous history of CH.

[Scope of the latest RE-LY substudies: clinical implications]

The approval of the use of dabiatran in stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrilation (NVAF) is based on the results of the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial, one of the largest studies to date in this entity. In this trial, dabigatran showed similar safety and efficacy to warfarin in primary and secondary prevention of stroke in patients with AF. At a dose of 150 mg twice daily, dabigatran was superior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and the 110 mg dose twice daily showed similar efficacy and greater safety, given the lower incidence of hemorrhage. These results were consistently found in the various subanalyses, with some slight differences of interest for clinical practice. The ideal candidates for dabiatran are patients with NVAF suitable for cardioversion, who require short periods of anticoagulation, patients in remote geographical areas with difficulty in achieving good anticoagulation control or good control with anti-vitamin K treatment due to IRN fluctuations, and patients with a low risk of hemorrhage and a CHADS score ≥ 3 and/or with prior stroke, whenever there are no contraindications. The choice of dabigatran dose should be evaluated according to the patient's individual characteristics (caution must be exercised when prescribing this drug in the elderly and in renal insufficiency) and embolic and/or hemorrhagic risk. Studies of the long-term safety of this drug, pharmacoeconomic analyses in Spain and post-commercialization pharmacovigilance data are required before the definitive uses of this drug can be established.

Cerebral microbleeds on magnetic resonance imaging and anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage risk

The increasing use of antithrombotic drugs in an aging population [including anticoagulants to prevent future ischemic stroke in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF)] has been associated with a dramatic increase in the incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in users of antithrombotic drugs. Several lines of evidence suggest that cerebral small vessel disease (particularly sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy) is a risk factor for this rare but devastating complication of these commonly used treatments. Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) have emerged as a key MRI marker of small vessel disease and a potentially powerful marker of future ICH risk, but adequately powered, high quality prospective studies of CMBs and ICH risk on anticoagulation are not available. Further data are urgently needed to determine how neuroimaging and other biomarkers may contribute to individualized risk prediction to make anticoagulation as safe and effective as possible. In this review we discuss the available evidence on cerebral small vessel disease and CMBs in the context of antithrombotic treatments, especially regarding their role as a predictor of future ICH risk after ischemic stroke, where risk-benefit judgments can be a major challenge for physicians. We will focus on patients with AF because these are frequently treated with anticoagulation. We briefly describe the rationale and design of a new prospective observational inception cohort study (Clinical Relevance of Microbleeds in Stroke; CROMIS-2) which investigates the value of MRI markers of small vessel disease (including CMBs) and genetic factors in assessing the risk of oral anticoagulation-associated ICH.

Significant Bleeding in Elderly Patient with Atrial Fibrillation Due to Probable Interaction between Dabigatran and Amiodarone

Objective:

To present the case of an elderly patient who developed significant bleeding while receiving a standard dose of dabigatran with concomitant amiodarone therapy.

Case Summary:

A 77-year-old man was admitted for upper gastrointestinal bleeding that presented as coffee ground emesis. A coronary artery bypass graft had been performed 4 weeks earlier, which was well tolerated, except that his postoperative course was complicated by atrial fibrillation, for which amiodarone was initiated; dabigatran was added subsequently. Upon his admission to the hospital, dabigatran was stopped. The patient's bleeding was stabilized and dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was restarted after amiodarone was discontinued. The laboratory was not equipped to measure thrombin clotting time or ecarin clotting time; therefore, the team relied on the measurement of international normalized ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time to guide therapy based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of therapeutic dabigatran concentrations. Based on laboratory values the following morning, the team maintained dabigatran 150 mg once daily. Subsequent INR and partial thromboplastin time values were within the desired range. He remained stable, without further evidence of bleeding even after anticoagulation with dabigatran was restarted for atrial fibrillation.

Discussion:

Dabigatran received FDA approval in October 2010 to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolization in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. It has a favorable monitoring profile compared to warfarin. The manufacturer acknowledges the potential for amiodarone to increase the effective concentration of dabigatran because of its inhibition of P-glycoprotein. An objective causality assessment using the Horn Drug Interaction Probability Scale revealed that the interaction was probable.

Conclusions:

A probable interaction suggests that providers should use caution with the coadministration of amiodarone with dabigatran; dose adjustment in the setting of concomitant administration in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation should be considered.

Hemostatic Therapy in Experimental Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With the Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran

Background and Purpose—

Dabigatran-etexilate (DE) recently has been approved for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. However, lack of effective antagonists represents a major concern in the event of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The aims of the present study were to establish a murine model of ICH associated with dabigatran, and to test the efficacy of different hemostatic factors in preventing hematoma growth.

Methods—

In C57BL/6 mice receiving DE (4.5 or 9.0 mg/kg), in vivo and in vitro coagulation assays and dabigatran plasma levels were measured repeatedly. Thirty minutes after inducing ICH by striatal collagenase injection, mice received an intravenous injection of saline, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC; 100 U/kg), murine fresh-frozen plasma (200 μL), or recombinant human factor VIIa (8.0 mg/kg). ICH volume was quantified on brain cryosections 24 hours later.

Results—

DE substantially prolonged tail vein bleeding time and ecarin clotting time for 4 hours corresponding to dabigatran plasma levels. Intracerebral hematoma expansion was observed mainly during the first 3 hours on serial T2* MRI. Anticoagulation with high doses of DE increased the hematoma volume significantly. PCC and, less consistently, fresh-frozen plasma prevented excess hematoma expansion caused by DE, whereas recombinant human factor VIIa was ineffective. Prevention of hematoma growth and reversal of tail vein bleeding time by PCC were dose-dependent.

Conclusions—

The study provides strong evidence that PCC and, less consistently, fresh-frozen plasma prevent excess intracerebral hematoma expansion in a murine ICH model associated with dabigatran. The efficacy and safety of this strategy must be further evaluated in clinical studies.

[Expectation to and problems of thrombin inhibitor]

Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor, does not require blood coagulation monitoring and limitation of vitamin K intake as well as very few drug interactions, and thus expected to be an oral anticoagulant alternative to warfarin. Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) was conducted to determine non-inferiority of dabigatran against warfarin as an international multicenter-cooperative randomized trial in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The results showed not only non-inferiority of dabigatran but also superiority of high-dose dabigatran in efficacy and of low-dose dabigatran in safety. In a sub-analysis of RE-LY in NVAF patients with history of stroke or TIA, who are at high risk of intracranial hemorrhage with anticoagulants, hemorrhagic stroke was much less frequent in patients on either dose of dabigatran than in those on warfarin. In a sub-analysis of RE-LY in Japanese patients with NVAF, the results showed a consistency of the efficacy and safety profiles of dabigatran with the results of the global RE-LY trial. Use of dabigatran should be contraindicated in NVAF patients with renal insufficiency because some cases with fatal bleeding have been reported in a post marketing survey.