Utility of the lithoclast in the treatment of upper, middle and lower ureteric calculi

Evaluation of sexual function in patients submitted to ureteroscopic procedures

Objective:

We aimed to evaluate the possible effects of ureteroscopic procedures on the sexual function of both genders.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 102 sexually active cases (60 male, 42 female) undergoing ureteroscopic procedures were included in this study. Sexual function has been evaluated in detail by using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in male and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) forms in female cases both before and 1-month after the procedures. Pre-and postoperative data were evaluated in a comparative manner.

Results:

The pre-and postoperative mean IIEF scores were 57.86±2.26 and 54.57±2.48 (p=0.19) in males and the mean FSFI scores were 13.58±1.46 and 14.46±1.52 (p=0.41), respectively in females. Evaluation of these values showed that regarding the effects of this procedure on male cases although the total scores for sexual function were not influenced it was observed a significant reduction in the intercourse satisfaction sub-domain (IIEF-IS) in males (p<0.05). In female cases however, unlike the male cases no statistically significant alterations with respect to these scores were noted (p=0.418).

Conclusion:

Ureteroscopic interventions could have some adverse effects on the sexual function particularly in male cases. However, it is clear that further prospective studies in both genders with large population of cases are certainly needed in order to outline this unresolved but important subject.

Ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral stones--influence of operator's experience and skill on the procedure outcome

Aim

To observe the influence of operating urologist’s education and adopted skills on the outcome of ureterorenoscopy treatment of ureteral stones.

Methods

The study included 422 patients (234 men, 55.4%) who underwent ureterorenoscopy to treat ureteral stones at the Urology Department of Clinical Hospital Center Split, Croatia, between 2001 and 2009. All interventions were carried out with a semi-rigid Wolf ureteroscope and an electropneumatic generator used for lithotripsy. The operating specialists were divided into two groups. The first group included 4 urologists who had started learning and performing endoscopic procedures at the beginning of their specialization and the second group included 4 urologists who had started performing endoscopic procedures later in their careers, on average more than 5 years after specialization.

Results

Radiology tests confirmed that 87% (208/238) of stones were completely removed from the distal ureter, 54% (66/123) from the middle ureter, and 46% (28/61) from the proximal ureter. The first group of urologists completed significantly more procedures successfully, especially for the stones in the distal (95% vs 74%; P = 0.001) and middle ureter (66% vs 38%; P = 0.002), and their patients spent less time in the hospital postoperatively.

Conclusion

Urologists who started learning and performing endoscopic procedures at the beginning of their specialization are more successful in performing ureteroscopy. It is important that young specialists receive timely and systematic education and cooperate with more experienced colleagues.

Treatment Selection and Outcomes: Ureteral Calculi

The most important recent advances in the management of ureteral calculi have been the development of medical expulsive therapy to facilitate passage of ureteral stones, such that many calculi that would previously have required procedural treatment now exit the ureter with only pharmacologic treatment; and the improvements in ureteroscopic technology that have enabled retrograde ureteroscopy to become a first-line option for most ureteral stones. Shock wave lithotripsy still plays an important role for many ureteral calculi, particularly smaller ones, and the addition of percutaneous/antegrade ureteroscopy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy rounds out the treatment options for large or impacted stones. Selection of treatment based upon factors such as size, location, and others will optimize outcome for patients who have ureteral calculi.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones in pediatric age

Ureteroscopy procedures in pediatric age are becoming more and more common thanks to the availability of smaller caliber instruments, and of improved endoscopic techniques. The efficacy of this procedure in pediatric age is still discussed nowadays. This paper aims at reviewing all cases of ureteral lithiasis treated by ureteroscopy plus intracorporeal lithotripsy (ULT), as well as verifying efficacy and safety of this procedure in pediatric age.

Materials and Methods

From July 2002 to May 2006, 37 patients (26 female, 11 male; mean age 7.4 years; range 2–17) were treated by ULT for ureteral stones: 30 in distal, 4 in middle and 3 in proximal ureter. Median size of stones was 7mm (range 3–13mm). Dilation of the ureteral meatus was necessary in 2 patients only. Endoscopic procedure was similar to adult patients. Outcomes were statistically compared with current literature data.

Results

In 36 (97.3%) out of 37 patients ULT proved successful. All patients having stones in distal (30) and middle (4) ureter were stone-free at the end of treatment. Stone migration into the kidney pelvis occurred in 1 patient with proximal ureter stones (66.7% stone-free rate): an ESWL treatment was therefore performed. 1 case only (2.7%) developed a perioperative complication (stone migration). Hematuria and flank pain in 4 patients (10.8%) were the most common reported post-operative complications. A stone-free state was confirmed at 1 and 3 months for all 36 patients. There was no evidence of ureteral strictures and/or ureteral refluxes.

Conclusions

Smaller caliber ureteroscopes confirmed ULT as the first-choice treatment procedure in children affected by ureteral lithiasis, thanks to its efficacy and safety.