18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating malignant from benign origins of obstructive jaundice

Cholangiocarcinoma imaging: from diagnosis to response assessment

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a highly aggressive primary liver cancer arising from the bile duct epithelium, represents a substantial proportion of hepatobiliary malignancies, posing formidable challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Notably, the global incidence of intrahepatic CCA has seen a rise, necessitating a critical examination of diagnostic and management strategies, especially due to presence of close imaging mimics such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA). Hence, it is imperative to understand the role of various imaging modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), elucidating their strengths, and limitations in diagnostic precision and staging accuracy. Beyond conventional approaches, there is emerging significance of functional imaging tools including positron emission tomography (PET)-CT and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI, providing pivotal insights into diagnosis, therapeutic assessment, and prognostic evaluation. This comprehensive review explores the risk factors, classification, clinical features, and role of imaging in the holistic spectrum of diagnosis, staging, management, and restaging for CCA, hence serving as a valuable resource for radiologists evaluating CCA.

Hepato-Biliary Imaging in an Acute Setting: Is There a Role for Nuclear Medicine?

Nuclear medicine (NM) is not commonly considered as a first-line imaging modality in hepato-biliary (HB) emergencies. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the potential of NM for the imaging of HB emergencies. 99mTc-HIDA scintigraphy showed high diagnostic accuracy for acute cholecystitis, thus being particularly useful in patients at high-risk for surgery due to comorbidities and with no clear findings at US or CT. Although limitedly explored, White blood cell (WBC) scan might have a role in case of acute pancreatitis, especially for the imaging of pancreatic leukocyte infiltration and the prediction of pancreatic necrosis. Scientific literature on 18F-FDG-PET/CT in HB acute disease mainly consists of case reports or case series, describing incidental findings in oncological PET/CT scans. In patients with obstructive jaundice, PET/CT has been proposed to disclose and characterize occult tumoral etiology. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the various NM approaches in HB acute settings, particularly with respect to the emerging new technologies (eg, PET/MRI) and radiopharmaceuticals.

Unexplained Distal Obstructive Biliary Dilatation: A Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)-based Model to Discriminate Malignant From Benign Origins

BACKGROUND

The aim was to compare the differences of clinical-radiologic characteristics between malignant and benign causes of patients with unexplained distal obstructive biliary dilatation and to develop a logistic regression model (nomogram) based on those features to predict malignant causes preoperatively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical-radiologic characteristics of 133 patients with unexplained distal obstructive biliary dilatation were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to construct a nomogram to predict malignant causes preoperatively. The developed nomograms were externally validated by assessing their predictive accuracy in an independent set of 90 patients.

RESULTS

Intrahepatic bile duct diameter, enlarged gallbladder, direct bilirubin, and carbohydrate antigen19-9 differed significantly between malignant and benign group. In the training set, the logistic regression model showed the discrimination between benign and malignant causes of distal obstructive biliary dilatation with an area under the curve of 0.965, an accuracy of 0.904, a sensitivity of 0.886, a specificity of 0.913. In the validation set, the model showed an area under the curve of 0.851, an accuracy of 0.837, a sensitivity of 0.897, a specificity of 0.750.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative clinical-radiologic characteristics differed significantly between malignant and benign group. Nomogram based on those features performed well in predicting the malignant causes of patients with unexplained distal obstructive biliary dilatation.

Predicting Malignancy of Biliary Stricture with a Nomogram in Patients with a Non-Malignant Endoscopic Tissue Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

The accurate differentiation between benign and malignant biliary stricture is significant but challenging. Tissue diagnosis of biliary stricture by endoscopy sampling can provide excellent specificity but insufficient sensitivity. For patients with suspected malignant biliary stricture (MBS) but non-malignant was reported in endoscopy tissue samples, we constructed a nomogram to predict malignancy and improve the overall diagnostic performance.

Patients and Methods

232 patients with suspected MBS and underwent endoscopy tissue sampling from January 2017 to December 2019 were included, among which 123 patients’ endoscopy tissue samples were classified as non-malignant (including atypical, negative for malignancy, and nondiagnostic). Demographics, serum markers, radiological and sampling results of these 123 patients were collected to construct a nomogram using multivariate analysis.

Results

The nomogram was developed based on bilirubin, CA19-9, radiological result, and atypical sampling results and provided an AUC of 0.863 (95% CI 0.795–0.930) for predicting MBS. The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of endoscopy tissue diagnosis were 100.00%, 59.90%, and 68.53%, respectively. With the nomogram added, the overall diagnosis specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were 95.24%, 89.20%, and 90.23%, respectively.

Conclusion

The nomogram can predict malignancy in patients whose endoscopy tissue diagnoses were non-malignant. The overall diagnostic performance was improved with the nomogram added.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) for patients with biliary tract cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The role of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET) in the diagnosis and staging of patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs) remains controversial, so we aimed to provide robust information on the utility of ¹⁸FDG-PET in the diagnosis and management of BTC.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis explored the diagnostic test accuracy of ¹⁸FDG-PET as a diagnostic tool for diagnosis of primary tumour, lymph node invasion, distant metastases and relapsed disease. Subgroup analysis by study quality and BTC subtype were performed. Changes in management based on ¹⁸FDG-PET and impact of maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) on prognosis were also assessed. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 2,125 patients were included from 47 eligible studies. The sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of ¹⁸FDG-PET for the diagnosis of primary tumour were 91.7% (95% CI 89.8-93.2) and 51.3% (95% CI 46.4-56.2), respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8668. For lymph node invasion, Se was 88.4% (95% CI82.6-92.8) and Sp was 69.1% (95% CI 63.8-74.1); AUC 0.8519. For distant metastases, Se was 85.4% (95% CI 79.5-90.2) and Sp was 89.7% (95% CI86.0-92.7); AUC 0.9253. For relapse, Se was 90.1% (95% CI 84.4-94.3) and Sp was 83.5% (95% CI 74.4-90.4); AUC 0.9592. No diagnostic threshold effect was identified. Meta-regression did not identify significant sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis revealed no change in results when analyses were limited to studies with low risk of bias/concern. The pooled proportion of change in management was 15% (95% CI 11-20); the majority (78%) due to disease upstaging. Baseline high SUVmax was associated with worse survival (pooled hazard ratio of 1.79; 95% CI 1.37-2.33; p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence to support the incorporation of ¹⁸FDG-PET into the current standard of care for the staging (lymph node and distant metastases) and identification of relapse in patients with BTC to guide treatment selection; especially if the identification of occult sites of disease would change management, or if diagnosis of relapse remains unclear following standard of care imaging. The role for diagnosis of the primary tumour remains controversial due to low sensitivity and ¹⁸FDG-PET should not be considered as a replacement for pathological confirmation in this setting.

LAY SUMMARY

A positron emission tomography (PET scan), using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸FDG), can help doctors identify areas of cancer in the body by highlighting "hot spots". These hotspots may be cancerous (true positive) but may also be non-cancerous, like inflammation (false positive). We show that PET scans are useful to assess how far advanced the cancer is (by assessing spread to lymph glands and to other organs) and also to identify if the cancer has recurred (for example after surgery), thus helping doctors to make treatment decisions. However, a biopsy is still needed for the initial diagnosis of a biliary tract cancer, because of the high chance of a "false positive" with PET scans.

[Radiologic diagnostics of the gall bladder and bile ducts-part 1 : Imaging techniques-normal variants and congenital disorders-cholelithiasis]

Upper abdominal pain, icterus and cholestasis are the main symptoms leading to evaluation of the biliary tract. Since the advent of contrast-enhanced ultrasound techniques the accuracy of bile duct imaging has significantly improved. This is also true for computed tomography using isotropic secondary reconstructions as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including MR cholangiography (MRC), classically and after iv injection of hepatobiliary contrast agent. Diffusion-weighted imaging sequences have a recently proven ability for improving biliary tract imaging. These technical improvements provide the depiction of the non-dilated biliary tract system in diagnostic quality. Therefore, normal variants and congenital disorders of biliary tract anatomy are delineated as well as insights into the postoperative situs and complications related to surgery. Cholelithiasis is the most frequent disease of the gall bladder and biliary tract. Together with related complications, in the majority of cases it is also the reason for bile duct inflammation. Due to the immediate need for treatment special care has to be taken for hydrops of the gall bladder.

Management of Biliary Strictures: State-of-the-Art Review

Biliary strictures can be broadly classified as benign or malignant. Benign biliary strictures are most commonly iatrogenic in nature and are a consequence of hepatobiliary surgery. Cholangiocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the pancreas are the most common causes of malignant biliary obstruction. This article reviews state-of-the-art minimally invasive techniques used to manage these strictures. In addition, the roles of (a) recently introduced biodegradable biliary stents in the management of benign biliary strictures and (b) intraprocedural imaging and navigation tools, such as cone-beam CT, in percutaneous reconstruction of the biliary-enteric anastomosis are discussed.

Enhancing High Value Care in Gastroenterology Practice

BACKGROUNG & AIMS

The objective of this review is to identify common areas in gastroenterology practice where studies performed provide an opportunity for enhancing value or lowering costs.

METHODS

We provide examples of topics in gastroenterology where clinicians could enhance value by either using less invasive testing, choosing a single best test, or by using patient symptoms to guide additional testing.

RESULTS

The topics selected for review are selected in esophageal, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer; functional gastrointestinal diseases (irritable bowel syndrome, bacterial overgrowth, constipation); immune-mediated gastrointestinal diseases; and pancreaticobiliary pathology. We propose guidance to alter practice based on current evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies support the need to review current practice and to continue performing research to further validate the proposed guidance to enhance value of care in gastroenterology and hepatology.