Bone marrow transplant engraftment analysis with loss of an informative allele

Identity determination in diagnostic surgical pathology

From a technical perspective, specimen identity determination in surgical pathology over the last several decades has primarily focused on analysis of repetitive DNA sequences, specifically microsatellite repeats. However, a number of techniques have recently been developed that have similar, if not greater, utility in surgical pathology, most notably analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) and gene panels by next generation sequencing (NGS). For cases with an extremely limited sample or a degraded sample, sequence analysis of mitochondrial DNA continues to be the method of choice. From a diagnostic perspective, interest in identity determination in surgical pathology is usually centered on resolving issues of specimen provenance due to specimen labeling/accessioning deficiencies and possible contamination, but is also frequently performed in cases for which the patient's clinical course following definitive therapy is remarkably atypical, in cases of an unexpected diagnosis, and by patient request for "peace of mind". However, the methods used for identity determination have a much broader range of applications in surgical pathology beyond tissue provenance analysis. The methods can be used to provide ancillary information for cases in which the histomorphology is not definitively diagnostic, as for example for tumors that have a virtually identical microscopic appearance but for which the differential diagnosis includes synchronous/metachronous tumors versus a metastasis, and for the diagnosis of hydropic early gestations versus hydatidiform molar pregnancies. The methods also have utility in several other clinical settings, for example to rule out a donor-transmitted malignancy in a transplant recipient, to monitor bone marrow transplant engraftment, and to evaluate natural chimerism.

Practical informativeness of short tandem repeat loci for chimerism analysis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Short tandem repeat (STR) loci are most frequently used for chimerism analysis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the practical informativeness of STR chimerism by integrating theoretical and analytical points.

METHODS

Theoretical and practical informativess of 16 STR loci were evaluated from 1249 pairs of recipients and donors who were prepared for HSCT.

RESULTS

Theoretical informativeness was influenced by genetic diversity including allele frequency and heterozygosity, and was higher in the unrelated HSCT group (90.5±5.3%) compared to the related HSCT group (66.2±4.4%). Practical informativeness was lower than theoretical (6.1±1.7%) because several STR loci were excluded due to stutter peaks and less reliable results, especially in type II-2 donor-recipient match pattern with no recipient-specific allele. We simulated an efficient STR combination for reliable chimerism analysis. Eight informative STR loci were required to analyze chimerism with at least one practically informative locus in the related HSCT group (D18S51, FGA, D2S1338, D13S317, D8S1179, D21S11, D16S539 and D7S820) while only three loci were needed in the unrelated group (D2S1338, FGA and D18S51). A minimum set of 2, 4 or 7 STR loci were required to provide at least 1, 3 or 5 practically informative loci in 95% of the unrelated HSCT group while 3, 8 or 12 loci were required in the related HSCT group.

CONCLUSION

We deducted the practical informativeness of STR chimerism, identified the major influencing factors on the practical informativeness of each STR locus, and successfully simulated the efficient STR combination for reliable chimerism analysis.

Chimerism analysis following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective therapeutic approach for several hematological diseases. Chimerism studies can be helpful to assess donor engraftment, detect early signs of graft rejection, and monitor minimal residual disease. Currently the most common method for monitoring chimerism following HSCT is by PCR amplification of STR loci followed by capillary electrophoresis. Prior to transplantation, multiple STR loci in both the donor and recipient are analyzed in order to identify loci that differentiate the two individuals. Informative loci are selected to calculate the percent donor and recipient present in post-transplant specimens. This is a rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective method for monitoring chimerism in patients following HSCT.

Donor cell leukemia: a review

Relapse of acute leukemia following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) usually represents return of an original disease clone, having evaded eradication by pretransplant chemo-/radiotherapy, conditioning, or posttransplant graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Rarely, acute leukemia can develop de novo in engrafted cells of donor origin. Donor cell leukemia (DCL) was first recognized in 1971, but for many years, the paucity of reported cases suggested it to be a rare phenomenon. However, in recent years, an upsurge in reported cases (in parallel with advances in molecular chimerism monitoring) suggest that it may be significantly more common than previously appreciated; emerging evidence suggests that DCL might represent up to 5% of all posttransplant leukemia "relapses." Recognition of DCL is important for several reasons. Donor-derivation of the leukemic clone has implications when selecting appropriate therapy, because seeking to enhance an allogeneic GVL effect would intuitively not have the same role as in standard recipient-derived relapses. There are also broader implications for donor selection and workup, particularly given the growing popularity of nonmyeloblative HSCT and corresponding rising age of the potential donor pool. Identification of DCL raises potential concerns over future health of the donor, posing ethical dilemmas regarding responsibilities toward donor notification (particularly in the context of cord blood transplantation). The entity of DCL is also of research interest, because it might provide a unique human model for studying the mechanisms of leukemogenesis in vivo. This review presents and collates all reported cases of DCL, and discusses the various strategies, controversies, and pitfalls when investigating origin of posttransplant relapse. Putative etiologic factors and mechanisms are proposed, and attempts made to address the difficult ethical questions posed by discovery of donor-derived malignancy within a HSCT recipient.

Donor cell leukemia in umbilical cord blood transplant patients: a case study and literature review highlighting the importance of molecular engraftment analysis

Donor cell neoplasms are rare complications of treatment regimens that involve stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies, myelodysplastic processes, or certain genetic or metabolic disorders. We report a case of donor cell leukemia in a pediatric patient with a history of acute myeloid leukemia that manifested as recurrent AML FAB type M5 fourteen months after umbilical cord blood transplantation. Although there was some immunophenotypic drift from the patient's original AML and their posttransplant presentation, the initial pathological impression was of recurrent disease. Bone marrow engraftment analysis by multiplex PCR of short tandem repeat markers performed on the patient's diagnostic specimen showed complete engraftment by donor cells, with a loss of heterozygosity in the donor alleles on chromosome 7. This led to the reinterpretation of this patient's disease as donor-derived leukemia. This interpretation was supported by a routine karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis showing loss of chromosome 7 and a male (donor) chromosome complement in this female patient. Also noted was a loss of the patient's presenting chromosomal abnormality, t(11;19)(q23;p13). This case highlights the need for close coordination between all aspects of clinical testing for the transplant patient, including molecular engraftment studies, when distinguishing the very common complication of recurrent disease from the exceedingly rare complication of donor cell leukemia.

Recent advances in quantitative chimerism analysis

Quantitative chimerism analysis is a diagnostic tool used to monitor engraftment kinetics after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. It reflects the proportion of recipient and donor genotypes and is based on the identification of genetic markers characteristic to a given transplant pair. Currently, PCR amplification of short tandem repeats and single-nucleotide polymorphism-specific quantitative real-time PCR are the most widely used techniques for this purpose. In this review, we will address advances as well as technology-specific imperfections, of both techniques that have emerged over the recent years. We will discuss new principles that may simplify assay design, and improve its robustness and reliability. A better chimerism assay could then guide clinical interventions and may, eventually, improve the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Primer site polymorphisms: potential implications for bone marrow engraftment monitoring

Assessment of chimerism after allogeneic bone marrow transplant frequently relies on PCR amplification of donor- and recipient-specific polymorphic short tandem repeats (STR) with subsequent fluorescent detection of amplicons. In vitro amplification of STR loci is often achieved through commercially available, multiplex PCR kits. While originally developed for forensic purposes, these kits are increasingly being used in clinical laboratories for early detection of graft failure and relapse of disease. Despite the obvious benefits of sensitivity, accuracy, reproducibility, and ease-of-use of these commercial kits, laboratories must understand the technological shortcomings of such assays to avoid misinterpretation of patient results. The current case illustrates how primer site polymorphisms associated with specific STR alleles can potentially lead to erroneous interpretation of engraftment analysis using one of these multiplex STR kits.

Donor cell leukemia: a critical review

Approximately 40 cases of DCL have been reported in the literature; cases have been reported after allografts from bone marrow, peripheral blood and cord blood. The study of these cases may provide new insights into the mechanisms of leukemogenesis. Some data suggest that the prevalence of this complication has been under-estimated. Most cases of DCL have occurred following transplantation for leukemia, but there have also been cases reported after transplantation for non-malignant conditions. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain how DCL arise and are briefly discussed. Additional studies are needed to define with more detail both the true prevalence of this complication and its precise pathogenetic mechanism.

Bone marrow engraftment analysis after granulocyte transfusion

We present the case of a 6-year-old male who received an allogeneic bone marrow transplant as part of treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The patient relapsed 5 months after transplantation and received additional chemotherapy. He acquired an angioinvasive fungal infection that required transfusion of granulocytes. Approximately 5 weeks after relapsing (181 days after transplant), a bone marrow specimen was taken for molecular engraftment analysis and flow cytometry to assess graft loss as well as residual disease. The engraftment results generated by the multiple short tandem repeat loci tested were inconsistent, and alleles were present at several loci that were of neither patient nor donor origin. An error in specimen identification was initially considered. Further investigation into the circumstances surrounding procurement of the patient's bone marrow aspirate revealed that the patient had received a granulocyte transfusion approximately 10 hours before the bone marrow specimen was taken. In addition, morphological and flow cytometric analyses of the same bone marrow aspirate demonstrated a significant degree of peripheral blood contamination. We determined that the unknown alleles in the bone marrow engraftment specimen were derived from the donor of the transfused granulocytes. This case illustrates that white cell transfusion can lead to erroneous bone marrow engraftment results, particularly if only one microsatellite locus is used to monitor engraftment.

Diagnostic chimerism analysis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: new methods and markers

Analysis of chimerism after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is important for assessing engraftment and the early detection of graft failure. In addition, the monitoring of minimal residual disease and early detection of imminent relapse has also become an important issue. Novel transplant procedures, for example dose-reduced conditioning protocols, rely on chimerism analysis to guide intervention, i.e. the reduction of immunosuppression or infusion of donor lymphocytes. During the last 30 years, several methods for the analysis of chimerism after hematopoietic cell transplantation have been published. Currently, fluorescent in situ hybridization (XY-FISH) analysis of sex chromosomes after transplantation from a sex-mismatched donor or analysis of polymorphic DNA sequences, i.e. short tandem repeats (STR) or variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR), are the most widely used procedures used in the assessment of chimerism. Two major diagnostic fields can be defined for chimerism analysis: the period of engraftment and the detection of minimal residual disease. Although STR-PCR and FISH analysis are very useful in the diagnosis of engraftment and graft failure, they are only of limited use in the monitoring of minimal residual disease, largely because of its limited level of sensitivity (1-5% for the minor population). Several novel procedures to improve this level of detection have been reported in recent years. One focus has been the use of real-time PCR techniques based on analysis of the Y-chromosome or, more recently, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). These procedures combine quantitative analysis with high sensitivity (10(-4) to 10(-6)), and hold great potential for the future. In addition, the combination of cell sorting based on leukemia-specific immunophenotype and STR-PCR has been successfully used for minimal residual disease detection. First clinical data using these procedures indicate that intervention (e.g. the reduction of immunosuppression or donor lymphocyte infusion) may be effective in the minimal residual disease situation, even in high risk diseases like acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The optimal timing of these diagnostic interventions is a critical issue and has to be further optimized. Whether this will ultimately improve the survival of patients with leukemia after transplantation has to be shown in prospective studies.