Controversies in the management of hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients with compensated liver cirrhosis

The greatest benefit of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy is seen in cirrhotics attaining sustained virological response (SVR). However, concerns about toxicity and poorer responses often discourage treatment of cirrhotics. This may be particularly relevant in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients, in whom progression of liver fibrosis is faster and treatment responses lower. This is a retrospective analysis of HIV-HCV-coinfected patients who had received peginterferon-ribavirin therapy at our institution. Individuals naïve for interferon in whom liver fibrosis had been assessed using elastometry within the year before being treated were chosen. Response rates and toxicities were compared in cirrhotics (>14.5 KPa) and noncirrhotics. Patients with previous liver decompensation were excluded. Overall, 41 cirrhotics and 190 noncirrhotics entered the study. Groups were similar in age, gender, HCV genotypes and baseline serum HCV-RNA. SVR occurred at similar rates in cirrhotic and noncirrhotics, either considered by intention-to-treat (39%vs 45%; P = 0.4) or as treated (50%vs 52%, P = 0.8). In multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 95% CI, P), SVR was associated with HCV genotypes 2-3 (5, 2.9-11, <0.01) and lower serum HCV-RNA (2, 1.4-3.03 for every log decrease, <0.01) but not with cirrhosis (1.2, 0.4-3.6, 0.6). Treatment discontinuations because of adverse events tended to be more common in cirrhotics than in noncirrhotics (17%vs 12%; P = 0.2), but only severe thrombocytopenia was more frequent in cirrhotics than in non-cirrhotics (20%vs 3% at week 24; P < 0.01). Response to peginterferon-ribavirin therapy is similar in HIV-HCV coinfected patients with and without liver cirrhosis. Therefore, treatment must be encouraged in all compensated cirrhotic patients, although closer monitoring and management of side effects, mainly thrombocytopenia, may be warranted.

Pegylated Interferon-α2b plus Ribavirin: An Efficacious and well-Tolerated Treatment Regimen for Patients with Hepatitis C virus Related Histologically Proven Cirrhosis

Background

Little is known about the efficacy, safety and tolerability of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and histologically proven fully established cirrhosis. We aimed here to evaluate the safety of this regimen in such patients and to identify baseline and on-treatment predictors of a sustained virological response (SVR).

Methods

Patients with histologically proven, HCV-induced cirrhosis were randomized to receive pegylated interferon-α2b (PEG-IFN-α2b; 1.0 μg/kg/week, n=56; group A) or recombinant interferon-α2b (IFN-α2b; 3 million IU three times/week, n=36; group B), each in combination with a weight-based dose of ribavirin (800–1,200 mg/day) for up to 48 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was the assessment of SVR, defined as undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment cessation.

Results

Overall, 40% (37/93) of patients attained SVR: 44% (25/57) in group A and 33% (12/36) in group B ( P=0.31). SVR rates were significantly higher in genotype 2/3 patients than in genotype 1 patients (69% versus 25%; P<0.0001). Platelet count at baseline, rapid virological response, and early virological response were predictors of SVR. Twelve patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event and 20 patients required ribavirin dose reduction for the management of anaemia.

Conclusions

PEG-IFN-α2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment regimen for patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis. Although SVR rates were more satisfactory in genotype 2/3 than in genotype 1 patients, our study identified additional predictors of response that could allow physicians to better manage treatment in this ‘difficult-to-cure’ subset of patients.

Hepatitis C genotype 4: What we know and what we don't yet know

Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-4) is the most common variant of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the Middle East and Africa, particularly Egypt. This region has the highest prevelance of HCV worldwide, with more than 90% of infections due to genotype 4. HCV-4 has recently spread in several Western countries, particularly in Europe, due to variations in population structure, immigration, and routes of transmission. The features of HCV-4 infection and the appropriate therapeutic regimen have not been well characterized. This review discusses the virology, epidemiology, natural history, histology, clinical data, and treatment options for patients with HCV-4 infections. Early reports on the treatment of patients with chronic HCV-4 with conventional interferon (IFN)-alpha monotherapy indicated poor rates of sustained viral response (SVR), which improved slightly when combined with ribavirin. Pegylated IFN and ribavirin combination therapy has dramatically improved the response rates, with recent clinical trials showing rates that exceed 60%. These data can now be used as a platform for further research to define optimal treatment duration and predictors of SVR in patients with HCV-4 infection.

CONCLUSION

HCV-4 infection is spreading beyond its strongholds in Africa and the Middle East. Recent clinical trials show that HCV-4 is not difficult to treat, as the response to treatment may be at an intermediate level compared with genotype 1 and genotypes 2 or 3. Tailored treatment options that are comparable to the treatment approaches for genotype 1, 2, and 3 patients to optimize treatment for each patient are now being developed.

Histological benefits of virological response to peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy in patients with hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus and advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis are at risk for disease progression and hepatic decompensation.

AIM

To determine the effects on hepatic histology of treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a (90 or 180 mug/week) or interferon alfa-2a (3 million units three times weekly) for 48 weeks in patients with paired biopsies.

METHODS

Liver biopsies were obtained at baseline and 6 months after end of treatment. Histological and virological responses were compared.

RESULTS

Patients attaining sustained virological response (n = 40) demonstrated the greatest improvements in fibrosis (-1.0, P < 0.0001) and inflammation (-0.65, P < 0.0001). Patients who cleared hepatitis C virus during treatment, but later relapsed (n = 59), experienced less improvement in fibrosis (-0.04, P < 0.0001) and inflammation (-0.14, P = 0.0768). Nonresponders (n = 85) showed no significant improvement in inflammation or fibrosis. Multiple regression analysis showed that the only factors contributing to improvement in fibrosis were sustained virological response (vs. nonresponder, P = 0.0005; vs. relapse, P = 0.7525) and body mass index < or =30 kg/m2 (P = 0.0995).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that virological response to peginterferon alfa-2a improves inflammation and fibrosis in hepatitis C virus patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Improving virological response and maintaining ideal body weight are critical for achieving optimal histological outcomes in hepatitis C virus patients.

Pegylated interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C: lights and shadows of an innovative treatment

Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) in combination with ribavirin is the standard of treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Several viral and host factors influence the outcome of treatment, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype, baseline viral load, viral kinetics, race, body weight, advanced liver disease, HIV co-infection, and adherence to therapy. Monitoring the response of HCV to treatment during the early time points (4 weeks or 12 weeks) after initiation of therapy has emerged as a critical tool to predict sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable serum HCV RNA 24 weeks after the end of therapy. To counterbalance the influence of host and viral factors, treatment duration can be individualised to achieve an optimal treatment outcome, potentially reduce costs, and minimize side effects.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 with peginterferon, ribavirin, and epoetin alpha

Successful treatment of chronic HCV with peginterferon (PEGIFN) and ribavirin (RVN) is often limited by anemia. We performed the present study to determine if utilizing epoetin alpha (EPO) with or without a higher dose of RVN could enhance sustained virologic response (SVR). We randomized 150 treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 into 3 treatment groups: (1) PEGIFN alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg/week) + weight-based RVN (WBR) 13.3 mg/kg/day (800 to 1400 mg/day); (2) PEGIFN alpha-2b + WBRVN + EPO (40,000 U/week); or (3) PEGIFN alpha-2b + higher dose WBR 15.2 mg/kg/day (1000 to 1600 mg/day) + EPO. We initiated EPO at the onset of therapy to maintain the hemoglobin between 12 and 15 g/dL. When required, we reduced RVN by 200-mg steps. African Americans compose 36% of the population. A significantly smaller percentage of group 2 patients had a decline in hemoglobin to less than 10 g/dL (9% versus 34%; P < 0.05) and required that the RVN dose be reduced (10% versus 40%; P < 0.05) compared to group 1 patients. Despite this, SVR was similar in these groups (19% to 29%). SVR was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in group 3 patients (49%). This resulted from a significant decline (P < 0.05) in relapse rate; only 8% versus 38% for groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that using EPO in all subjects at the initiation of PEGIFN and RVN treatment will not enhance SVR given the same starting dose of RVN. In contrast, a higher starting dose of RVN was associated with a lower relapse rate and higher rate of SVR.

Current and Future Hepatitis C Therapies

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients has evolved significantly in the past 15 years. With a better knowledge of viral kinetics and molecular virology of the hepatitis C virus, we have gone from a low chance of viral eradication to a chance as high as 50%. Despite this, current therapies are not ideal and are associated with side effects, complications, and poor patient tolerability. Therefore, an urgent need to look for better strategies to treat this disease is imperative. Thanks to the current knowledge and ongoing research, we know the way we treat hepatitis C today will change dramatically in the next 5-10 years. This review will focus on current therapies for hepatitis C and the most recent advances in the search for new therapies.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection

Acute and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a serious health problem worldwide, however, there has been advancement in the treatment of HCV infection due to standard treatment using pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The literature indicates that therapy for HCV is becoming more individualized. In addition to considering genotype and viral RNA levels before treatment, achievement of an early virologic response (EVR) and a rapid virologic response (RVR) is now possible during therapy. Moreover, problem patients, such as non-responders, relapsers, HIV or HBV co-infected patients, patients with liver cirrhosis, and pre- or post-liver transplantation patients are an increasing fraction of the patients requiring treatment. This article reviews the literature regarding standard treatments and problem patients with acute and chronic HCV infection. It also includes discussion on contraindications and side effects of treatment with interferon and ribavirin, as well as new drug development.

Treatment of hepatitis C in patients who have decompensated cirrhosis

In 1999, the World Health Organization reported that there were 169.7 million cases of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection worldwide. There are 212,500 Americans with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis, and this number will increase to 375,000 by the year 2015. If one applies the United States rates for proportion of HCV RNA positivity, duration of infection, and time required for development of cirrhosis to the world's population of individuals with HCV, then 7.8 million currently have cirrhosis. By 2015, there will be 13.8 million cases of cirrhosis due to HCV. Management of cirrhosis due to hepatitis C will continue to be a major issue for the foreseeable future for hepatologists, gastroenterologists, and primary care providers throughout the world. This article discusses the current status of antiviral strategies in treating patients who have decompensated chronic hepatitis C before transplantation.