Topotecan and Paclitaxel in Previously Treated Patients with Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer: Phase II Trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group

Oncological Treatment-Related Fatigue in Oncogeriatrics: A Scoping Review

Simple Summary

Fatigue in older patients has multiple etiologies, as this symptom may be cancer-related, treatment-related, age-related, or part of frailty syndrome. Physicians need to identify this symptom and understand its risk factors but also evaluate the risk/benefit ratio of cancer treatments considering the risk of impairing the patient’s quality of life. This scoping review was aimed to present the level of information currently available on any-grade fatigue and grade 3 or more fatigue for each cancer treatment regimen, either in general or in older populations, for the most prevalent tumors.

Abstract

Fatigue is a highly prevalent symptom in both cancer patients and the older population, and it contributes to quality-of-life impairment. Cancer treatment-related fatigue should thus be included in the risk/benefit assessment when introducing any treatment, but tools are lacking to a priori estimate such risk. This scoping review was designed to report the current evidence regarding the frequency of fatigue for the different treatment regimens proposed for the main cancer indications, with a specific focus on age-specific data, for the following tumors: breast, ovary, prostate, urothelium, colon, lung and lymphoma. Fatigue was most frequently reported using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) versions 3 to 5. A total of 324 regimens were analyzed; data on fatigue were available for 217 (67%) of them, and data specific to older patients were available for 35 (11%) of them; recent pivotal trials have generally reported more fatigue grades than older studies, illustrating increasing concern over time. This scoping review presents an easy-to-understand summary that is expected to provide helpful information for shared decisions with patients regarding the anticipation and prevention of fatigue during each cancer treatment.

Combination therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Although small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive cancer, few useful treatment options exist after relapse. Information concerning the efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with SCLC is limited.

METHODS

From April 2007 to October 2016, 318 patients with SCLC received chemotherapy at our institution. The medical records of patients treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel after first-line chemotherapy with platinum plus etoposide or irinotecan were retrospectively analyzed. The objectives were to investigate the frequency at which a carboplatin and paclitaxel regimen was administered to patients with SCLC in clinical practice, and to determine the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and tolerability of such agents.

RESULTS

A total of 24 (7.5%) patients (male, n = 21; female, n = 3; median age, 67 years; performance status, 0-1/≥2, 15/8 patients; limited/extensive disease, 6/15 patients; sensitive/refractory relapse, 3/21 patients) were treated with carboplatin plus paclitaxel. This regimen was chosen due to interstitial lung disease (ILD) (n = 17), radiation pneumonitis (n = 3), combination with palliative radiation therapy (n = 2), and the presence of other cancers (n = 2). The response rate was 33.3%, and the disease control rate was 62.5%. The median PFS and overall survival were 4.1 and 8.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities observed included neutropenia (54.2%), anemia (4.2%), and thrombocytopenia (8.3%). With the exception of grade 3 neuropathies (n = 2), non-hematologic toxicities were mild. No patients experienced an acute exacerbation of ILD.

CONCLUSION

A combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy is effective and feasible in patients with SCLC, especially in those with ILD.

Topotecan in the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents about 15% to 20% of all lung cancers. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of the treatment, cisplatin–etoposide combination being the most used combination as first-line therapy. Despite high initial chemosensitivity, most SCLC patients will experience relapse sooner or later. Unfortunately, second-line chemotherapy does not result in a high response rate like first-line therapy, most patients having developed wide chemoresistance. This chemoresistance is far more important in refractory patients, ie, those who never responded to first-line therapy or who relapsed within 3 months after the end of chemotherapy, than in sensitive patients, ie, those who relapse more than 3 months after the end of chemotherapy. Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is the most studied drug in this second-line setting and has proved its efficacy as a single agent and in combination. A phase III trial comparing oral topotecan to best supportive care (BSC) in relapsed SCLC demonstrated a significant survival benefit as well as a better quality of life. Although the usual schedule is 1.5 mg/m², days 1–5 intravenously, it is not convenient for patients with relapsed SCLC, especially those who are refractory because of their short survival expectation. Oral topotecan is of similar efficacy and much more convenient with limited stay in a treatment unit and has a comparable toxicity profile for these patients with short expected survival. Combination of topotecan with platinum salts or taxanes does not seem to improve further the outcome of the patients and thus single-agent therapy with topotecan is the standard treatment for relapsed SCLC.