Todorovova V, Altschmiedova T, Vrablik M, Ceska R. Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Real-World Data of 1236 Patients Attending a Czech Lipid Clinic. A Retrospective Analysis of Experience in More than 50 years. Part I: Genetics and Biochemical Parameters.
Front Genet 2022;
13:849008. [PMID:
35295947 PMCID:
PMC8918685 DOI:
10.3389/fgene.2022.849008]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The cause of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is defect in LDL receptor or familial defect of apolipoprotein B-100 (FDB) or, rarely, defect in proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. Identification and treatment of patients with FH improves their prognosis. Our data represent retrospective analysis of 50 years of specialised care in our center.
Patients and Methods: A group of 1236 FH patients (841 women, 395 men; 993 study subjects and 243 relatives; mean age 44.8 ± 16.7 years) included 154 FDB patients followed at the Lipid Clinic of the General University Hospital in Prague since the mid-1960s to the present. Clinical diagnosis was based on the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria. Genetic analysis was performed using PCR-RFLP to detect FDB and apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphism. Biochemical data were collected and statistically analysed.
Results: At baseline, mean LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) levels of all FH patients combined were 6.49 ± 1.92 mmol/L and 8.95 ± 1.95 mmol/L, respectively. Their LDL-C levels decreased to 3.26 ± 1.57 mmol/L and TC levels to 5.43 ± 1.69 mmol/L during follow-up. In the subgroup of LDL receptor-mediated FH (non-FDB) patients, baseline LDL-C and TC levels of 6.61 ± 1.95 mmol/L and 9.09 ± 1.97 mmol/L declined to 3.21 ± 1.60 mmol/L and 5.39 ± 1.72 mmol/L, respectively, during follow-up. In the FDB subgroup of patients, baseline levels of LDL-C and TC were 5.57 ± 1.46 mmol/L and 7.88 ± 1.58 mmol/L decreasing to 3.45 ± 0.24 mmol/L and 5.58 ± 1.37 mmol/L, respectively, during follow-up. Differences were also found in the effects of various APOE isoforms on lipid lowering. A significant decrease in lipid parameters was observed with the E2E2 isoform whereas a minimal decrease was seen with the E4E4 and E3E3 isoforms.
Conclusion: Whereas, overall, non-FDB patients had higher baseline lipid levels, these levels declined more appreciably compared with FDB patients during follow-up. Our retrospective analysis also found different effects of APOE isoforms on the decrease in lipid levels.
Collapse