633Diagnostic efficacy of 11C-choline positron emission tomography in patients scheduled for cystectomy

Diagnostic accuracy of C-11 choline and C-11 acetate for lymph node staging in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of C-11 choline and C-11 acetate positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for lymph node (LN) staging in bladder cancer (BC) patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library database, from the earliest available date of indexing through June 30, 2017, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of C-11 choline and C-11 acetate PET/CT for LN staging in BC. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Across 10 studies (282 patients), the pooled sensitivity was 0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.75) without heterogeneity (χ² = 12.4, p = 0.19) and a pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.76-0.95) with heterogeneity (χ² = 29.1, p = 0.00). Likelihood ratio (LR) syntheses gave an overall positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 5.8 (95% CI 2.7-12.7) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.39 (95% CI 0.28-0.53). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 15 (95% CI 6-38). In meta-regression analysis, the study design (prospective vs retrospective) was the source of the study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

C-11 choline and C-11 acetate PET/CT shows a low sensitivity and moderate specificity for the detection of metastatic LNs in patients with BC. Moreover, heterogeneity among the studies should be considered a limitation. Further large multicenter studies would be necessary to substantiate the diagnostic accuracy of C-11 choline and C-11 acetate PET/CT for this purpose.

11C-choline PET/CT for restaging of bladder cancer

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate of C-choline PET/CT in bladder cancer (BC) patients with suspected relapse after primary therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-five BC patients with surgery (21 [84%]) or radiotherapy (4 [16%]) with curative intent had PET/CT for suspicion of relapse. Mean TNM was T2b N0 M0 (range, T1a N0 M0 to T4 N2 M0), whereas mean age was 71.3 years (range, 50-85 years). Nine (36%) of 25 were treated with adjuvant or salvage chemotherapy within 6 months before PET/CT. Positive findings were validated by histology or correlative imaging and/or clinical follow-up lasting at least 12 months. Age, TNM, histology, previous chemotherapy, and type of primary treatment were correlated with PET/CT positivity by univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

C-choline PET/CT was positive in 16 (64%) of 25. Six (37.5%) of 16 were positive in residual bladder/bladder bed, with 2 local false positive (FP) and 1 false negative (FN) on lymph nodes (LNs); 3 of 16 patients had PET-positive LNs with 1 FP; 1 of 16 patients showed distant metastases. Two (12.5%) of 16 had positive residual bladder/bladder bed and locoregional LNs; 1 (6.3%) of 16, residual bladder/bladder bed and bone; metastasis, 1 (6.3%) of 16 residual bladder/bladder bed and lung metastasis; 2 (12.5%) of 16, LN and distant metastasis. Five (56%) of 9 of PET negatives were FN in residual bladder/bladder bed. Eighteen (72%) of 25 were validated by histology, with 7 (18%) of 25 by correlative imaging and/or clinical follow-up. C-choline PET/CT was sensitive, specific, and accurate, with good positive and negative predictive values for local relapse of 66.7%, 84.6%, 76%, 80%, and 73.3% and 90%, 93.3%, 92%, 90%, and 93.3% for LNs and distant relapse, respectively. No FP or FN was detected for distant metastasis. None of the investigated factors were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

C-choline PET/CT is useful for restaging BC suspected of relapse, especially for the evaluation of LN or distant metastases.