Validated liquid chromatographic method for the determination of bexarotene in human plasma

A highly sensitive and rapid LC-MS/MS method for quantification of bexarotene in mouse plasma and brain tissue: Application to mice pharmacokinetic study

Emerging evidence has suggested that bexarotene, a nearly 20-year-old skin cancer drug, may be a potential drug candidate to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. As described in this study, a highly sensitive and rapid method, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to determine bexarotene in mouse plasma and brain tissue, was established and validated for the first time. Single-step protein precipitation utilizing methanol solution (containing 0.05 % acetic acid) as precipitation agent was employed to prepare the samples of plasma and brain tissue. Chromatographic separation in gradient elution mode was conducted via an Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 column (50 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) employing methanol-ammonium acetate buffer (5 mM, pH adjusted to 4.6 with acetic acid) as mobile phase which flowed at 0.45 mL/min. The total run time was 6 min for each sample. Detection through mass spectrometric technique was operated by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) in negative electrospray ionization mode. The method was linear within the range of 10.0-15000 ng/mL for plasma and 10.0-600 ng/mL for brain tissue homogenate with the lower limit of quantification of 10.0 ng/ml. The plasma or tissue homogenate was only required 20 μL. The intra- and inter-day precision were less than 13.8 %, and the RE was between -7.4 % and 3.4 %. The method was applied to investigate the plasma pharmacokinetics and brain distribution of bexarotene in mice after being intragastrically administered with bexarotene at the dosage of 100 mg/kg. The results showed that both brain and plasma concentrations of bexarotene peaked at 1.0 h. Bexarotene was rapidly eliminated with a half-life of 2.0 h.

Development and validation of bexarote by bioanalytical methods using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS)

Background

The aim of this study was to develop and validate accurate and precise UPLC method with tandem mass spectrometry (Waters) for the determination of bexarotene in human plasma using bexarotene D4 as internal standard (IS).

Results

The retention time of bexarotene was 2.75 ± 0.30 min. The method was validated with respect to system suitability, linearity, accuracy, precision, matrix effect, auto sampler carryover test, and recovery. Linearity was found to be 1.04 to 351.93 μg/mL. LOQQC, LQC, INTQC, MQC, and HQC were found to be 1.0550, 2.7800, 25.2700, 131.61, and 263.23 respectively. The mean percentage recovery was found to be 95.72%

Conclusion

The bioanalytical method, a selective and sensitive liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method to quantitate bexarotene in K2EDTA human plasma over the concentration range 1.0440 to 351.9320 ng/mL, was successfully validated. This method is suitable for sample analysis to support bioequivalence/bioavailability and/or pharmacokinetic studies involving formulations of bexarotene.

Induced differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia cells by activation of retinoid X and liver X receptors

Use of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) as a differentiation agent has been limited to acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) as non-APL leukemias are insensitive to ATRA. We recently demonstrated that the rexinoid, bexarotene, induces differentiation and therapeutic responses in patients with refractory AML. Rexinoids bind and activate retinoid X receptors (RXR), however rexinoids alone are incapable of activating retinoic acid receptor (RAR)/RXR complexes, suggesting that myeloid differentiation can occur independent of RAR. In this study we demonstrate that rexinoid differentiation of AML cells is RAR independent and requires the expression of PU.1. Because of the promiscuousness of RXR with other nuclear receptors, myeloid differentiation by bexarotene with other nuclear receptor ligands was explored. Bexarotene cooperated with ATRA to enhance differentiation in some AML cell lines, however the combination of bexarotene with the PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone did not. In contrast, bexarotene combined with Liver X Receptor (LXR) agonists T0901317 or GW3965 induced potent differentiation and cytotoxicity in AML cell lines and primary human AML cells, but not in normal progenitor cells. These results suggest that RXR/LXR regulated gene expression in normal cells is deregulated in AML cells and identifies a potential role for these agonists in differentiation therapy of non-APL leukemias.

The effect of bexarotene on atorvastatin pharmacokinetics: results from a phase I trial of bexarotene plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Bexarotene (Targretin(®) capsules) is a retinoid-X-receptor agonist and an inducer of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism. This phase I trial evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) and drug-drug interactions of bexarotene with chemotherapy and a lipid-lowering agent (atorvastatin or fenofibrate). This trial was run in parallel with phase III trials of the combinations to determine whether repeated doses of bexarotene capsules affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the chemotherapeutic or the lipid-lowering agents.

METHODS

Patients (n = 48) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were treated with repetitive cycles of either paclitaxel/carboplatin or cisplatin/vinorelbine chemotherapy, bexarotene (400 mg/m(2)/day) administered continuously starting on day 4 of chemotherapy, and a lipid-lowering drug, either atorvastatin or fenofibrate, starting at least 5 days before chemotherapy due to hypertriglyceridemia induced by bexarotene. Extensive plasma sampling to characterize the PK profiles of the lipid-lowering drugs, relevant chemotherapy agents was performed on day 1 (without bexarotene) and during chemotherapy cycles 2 or 3 (with bexarotene).

RESULTS

Here, we report the drug-drug interactions between the lipid-lowering agents and bexarotene. Mean atorvastatin clearance and dose-corrected AUC values were reduced by nearly 50% with the addition of concomitant bexarotene. As fenofibrate was less effective at controlling hypertriglyceridemia, too few patients received this agent to make any meaningful conclusions about drug-drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

A drug-drug interaction was seen in this trial with bexarotene co-administration leading to a significant reduction in the AUC of atorvastatin. The likely mechanism for this interaction is through induction of CYP3A4 by bexarotene given the role of this enzyme in the metabolism of atorvastatin. Knowledge of this interaction is important for optimizing lipid management with atorvastatin for patients receiving bexarotene.

A Proof-of-Principle Clinical Trial of Bexarotene in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Bexarotene is a rexinoid (selective retinoid X receptor agonist) that affects proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in preclinical studies. The relationship between bexarotene levels and biomarker changes in tumor tissues has not been previously studied.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

BEAS-2B human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells, retinoid-resistant BEAS-2B-R1 cells, A427, H226, and H358 lung cancer cells were treated with bexarotene. Proliferation and biomarker expression were assessed. In a proof-of-principle clinical trial, bexarotene tumor tissue levels and intratumoral pharmacodynamic effects were assessed in patients with stages I to II non-small cell lung cancer. Bexarotene (300 mg/m(2)/day) was administered p.o. for 7 to 9 days before resection.

RESULTS

Bexarotene-induced dosage-dependent repression of growth, cyclin D1, cyclin D3, total epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and phospho-EGFR expression in BEAS-2B, BEAS-2B-R1, A427, and H358, but not H226 cells. Twelve patients were enrolled, and 10 were evaluable. Bexarotene treatment was well tolerated. There was nonlinear correlation between plasma and tumor bexarotene concentrations (r(2) = 0.77). Biomarker changes in tumors were observed: repression of cyclin D1, total EGFR and proliferation in one case; repression of cyclin D3, total and phospho-EGFR in another. The cases with multiple biomarker changes had high tumor bexarotene (107-159 ng/g). A single biomarker change was detected in one case with low tumor bexarotene.

CONCLUSION

Bexarotene represses proliferation and biomarker expression in responsive, but not resistant HBE and lung cancer cells. Similar biomarker changes occur in lung tumors when therapeutic intratumoral bexarotene levels are achieved. This proof-of-principle trial approach is useful to uncover pharmacodynamic mechanisms in vivo and relate these to intratumoral pharmacokinetic effects.

Experiences with monolithic LC phases in quantitative bioanalysis

The applicability of monolithic liquid chromatographic (LC) phases in the field of quantitative bioanalysis has been evaluated. Two existing methods with fluorescence detection (the determination of bexarotene in plasma and the determination of dextromethorphan plus metabolites in urine) were successfully transferred from a conventional reversed-phase column to a 10 cm x 4.6 mm i.d. monolith. By simply increasing the mobile phase flow-rate, run times were about 3-fold reduced, while the chromatographic resolution of the analytes remained unaffected. In both cases, a very good correlation was found between the results of clinical samples obtained with the original method and those obtained with the adapted method. Two methods with tandem mass spectrometric detection were set up. For one of these methods (nifedipine in plasma), the separation of the analyte from interfering matrix components did not need a high plate number; the resolution found on a 10-cm monolith at 6 ml/min and that on a 3-cm conventional column at 2 ml/min were comparable and achieved in the same period of time. As the validation results on both column types were similar and considering the limited compatibility of mass spectrometric detection with high solvent flow rates, the conventional column was concluded to be the best choice for this application. For the determination of estradiol in plasma, however, there was so much interfering material that needed to be separated from the analyte, that the best results were obtained with three 10-cm monolithic columns coupled in series and because of the possibility to apply a relatively high flow-rate, a reasonable run time was still achieved.