13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection before treatment: is citric acid necessary?

13C-Urea Breath Test for the Diagnosis of H. pylori Infection in Patients after Partial Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The ¹³C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) is a kind of safe, noninvasive, and reliable measure for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection diagnosis in patients with complete stomach. Nevertheless, the test has not indicated fully precision in people who have had a gastrectomy. So, we made the use of a systematic review of plentiful published resources and research and meta-analysis. There are prominent research achievements regarding of utilizing ¹³C-UBT for H. pylori infection patients diagnosis with the residual stomach.

METHOD

We searched publications available on Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases, and on the web of science. The last search was performed in May 2021. The basis model for this meta-analysis was fixed-effect through Metadisc Beta 1.4 software (Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain). When measuring the precision of ¹³C-urea breath test, we utilized the ratio analysis such as Ratio of diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI).

RESULTS

Ten associated researches were analyzed with a total of 1065 patients. In general, the sensitivity of included studies ranged from 0.40 to 1.00 (I² = 81.2%), whereas the specificity ranged from 0.59 to 1.00 (I² = 90.1%). The pooled sensitivity, specificity were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.86; P < 0.001), 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83; P < 0.001) respectively. The accuracy ranged from 71 to 99. The positive predictive values ranged from 45 to 100. The negative predictive values ranged from 53 to 100. The combined DOR was 36.02 (95%CI 15.65-82.92; I² = 65.8%; P = 0.0018). The corresponding AUC for the SROC curve was 0.92 and the Q value was 0.85.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the outcomes of meta-analysis indicate that during the period of patients' diagnosis in H. pylori infection, who undergoes partial gastrectomy, has high accuracy.

Effect of Citric Acid on Accuracy of 13C-Urea Breath Test after Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy in a Region with a High Prevalence of Atrophic Gastritis

Background/Aims

The validity of ¹³C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) for Helicobacter pylori detection is influenced by atrophic gastritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of citric acid on the accuracy of ¹³C-Urea breath test after H. pylori eradication therapy in a region where atrophic gastritis is common.

Methods

In this prospective study, H. pylori-positive patients received ¹³C-UBT after H. pylori eradication regimen. They were classified into citric acid group and control group. To determine diagnostic accuracy of ¹³C-UBT, patients were offered invasive methods.

Results

A total of 1,207 who successfully took H. pylori-eradication regimen received UBT. They were assigned into the citric acid group (n=562) and the control group (n=645). The mean ¹³C-UBT value of the citric acid group was 10.3±26.4‰, which was significantly (p<0.001) higher than that of that control group (5.1‰±12.6‰). Of these patients 122 patients were evaluated by endoscopic biopsy methods. Based on invasive tests, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ¹³C-UBT for the citric acid group were 83.3%, 91.7%, 81.3%, 55.0%, and 97.5%, respectively. Those of the control group were 87.7%, 90.9%, 88.2%, 62.5%, and 97.8%, respectively. They were not significantly different between the two groups. Although the presence of gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia (IM) decreased the accuracy, the decrease was not significant.

Conclusions

In a country with high prevalence of atrophic gastritis or IM, false positivity remained common despite the use of citric acid in ¹³C-UBT.

Non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of helicobacter pylori: state of the art

Usually, non-invasive tests are the first methods for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. Among these, serological test, stool antigen research and urea breath test are the most used. Antibodies anti-HP are not recommended in low prevalence population, moreover they cannot reveal an ongoing infection, but they only prove a contact with the bacterium. Also, they can persist for a long time after the eradication of the infection, therefore, they should not be used to verify the success of eradication therapy. Stool antigen research and Urea Breath Test (UBT) are useful both in diagnosis and during follow-up after eradication treatment. The stool antigen test is cheaper than Urea breath test with similar sensitivity and specificity. Non-invasive tests are not able to diagnose the associated complications to HP infection. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.

The diagnostic validity of the (13)c-urea breath test in the gastrectomized patients: single tertiary center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the (13)C-urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) in the remnant stomach after partial gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

The (13)C-UBT results after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy was compared with the results of endoscopic biopsy-based methods in the patients who have received partial gastrectomy for the gastric cancer.

RESULTS

Among the gastrectomized patients who showed the positive (13)C-UBT results (≥ 2.5‰, n = 47) and negative (13)C-UBT results (< 2.5‰, n = 114) after H. pylori eradication, 26 patients (16.1%) and 4 patients (2.5%) were found to show false positive and false negative results based on biopsy-based methods, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, and false negative rate for the cut-off value of 2.5‰ were 84.0%, 80.9%, 19.1%, and 16.0%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 44.7% and 96.5%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, two or more H. pylori eradication therapies (odds ratio = 3.248, 95% confidence interval= 1.088-9.695, P = 0.035) was associated with a false positive result of the (13)C-UBT.

CONCLUSIONS

After partial gastrectomy, a discordant result was shown in the positive (13)C-UBT results compared to the endoscopic biopsy methods for confirming the H. pylori status after eradication. Additional endoscopic biopsy-based H. pylori tests would be helpful to avoid unnecessary treatment for H. pylori eradication in these cases.

An optimized 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of H pylori infection

AIM: To validate an optimized 13C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) protocol for the diagnosis of H pylori infection that is cost-efficient and maintains excellent diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS: 70 healthy volunteers were tested with two simplified ¹³C-UBT protocols, with test meal (Protocol 2) and without test meal (Protocol 1). Breath samples were collected at 10, 20 and 30 min after ingestion of 50 mg ¹³C-urea dissolved in 10 mL of water, taken as a single swallow, followed by 200 mL of water (pH 6.0) and a circular motion around the waistline to homogenize the urea solution. Performance of both protocols was analyzed at various cut-off values. Results were validated against the European protocol.

RESULTS: According to the reference protocol, 65.7% individuals were positive for H pylori infection and 34.3% were negative. There were no significant differences in the ability of both protocols to correctly identify positive and negative H pylori individuals. However, only Protocol 1 with no test meal achieved accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 100%. The highest values achieved by Protocol 2 were 98.57%, 97.83%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: A 10 min, 50 mg ¹³C-UBT with no test meal using a cut-off value of 2-2.5 is a highly accurate test for the diagnosis of H pylori infection at a reduced cost.

Evaluation of 3 different tests for the detection of stool antigens to confirm Helicobacter pylori eradication after treatment. A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Recently, several new diagnostic methods aimed to detect Helicobacter pylori stool antigens have been developed. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of 3 different stool tests to confirm H. pylori eradication.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients received H. pylori eradication treatment. Eradication was confirmed with 13C-urea breath test 6-8 weeks later, when stool samples were analyzed by polyclonal (Premier-Platinum-HpSATM), monoclonal (Amplified-IDEIATM-HpStARTM), and rapid test (ImmunoCard-STAT-HpSATM).

RESULTS

H. pylori was eradicated in 85% of the cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with the polyclonal test were: 25%, 91%, 33% and 87%. Corresponding results with the monoclonal test, using the cut-off point recommended by the manufacturer, were 100%, 46%, 25% and 100%. However, the best cut-off point in our study had 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity. The area under ROC curve for the polyclonal and the monoclonal tests was 0.65 and 0.95. Diagnostic accuracy with the rapid test was 75%, 90%, 60% and 95%.

CONCLUSION

Neither the polyclonal stool antigen test nor the rapid stool antigen test can be recommended to confirm H. pylori eradication after treatment. The monoclonal test has better diagnostic accuracy, although more studies are necessary to definitively recommend its use for the confirmation of H. pylori eradication success.

[Breath tests in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases]

Determination of carbon or hydrogen markers in breath has allowed closer investigation of the pathogenic mechanisms of several gastrointestinal diseases. Thus, the 13C-urea breath test is a nonaggressive, simple and safe test with excellent accuracy both in the initial diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and in confirmation of its eradication following treatment. Moreover, because of the simplicity, reproducibility and safety of these types of procedure, they have tended to substitute more uncomfortable and expensive techniques that were traditionally used in gastroenterology. Several breath tests have been developed that allow reliable evaluation of liver or exocrine pancreatic function, gastrointestinal motility, as related to gastric emptying or orocecal transit time, and a diagnostic approach to clinical problems that could be due to bacterial overgrowth or malabsorption of various sugars.

Review article: 13C-urea breath test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection -- a critical review

The urea breath test is a non-invasive, simple and safe test which provides excellent accuracy both for the initial diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and for the confirmation of its eradication after treatment. Some studies have found no differences between urea breath test performed under non-fasting conditions. The simplicity, good tolerance and economy of the citric acid test meal probably make its systematic use advisable. The urea breath test protocol may be performed with relatively low doses (<100 mg) of urea: 75 mg or even 50 mg seem to be sufficient. With the most widely used protocol (with citric acid and 75 mg of urea), excellent accuracy is obtained when breath samples are collected as early as 10-15 min after urea ingestion. A unique and generally proposed cut-off level is not possible because it has to be adapted to different factors, such as the test meal, the dose and type of urea, or the pre-/post-treatment setting. Fortunately, because positive and negative urea breath test results tend to cluster outside of the range between 2 and 5 per thousand, a change in cut-off value within this range would be expected to have little effect on clinical accuracy of the test.

Breath sample collection through the nostril reduces false-positive results of 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

One of the disadvantages of '3C-urea breath test is possible interference by urease activity not related to Helicobacterpylori.

AIMS

We design the simple and non-invasive modification to avoid the contamination of 13CO(2) produced in the mouth.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty-nine patients who underwent diagnostic upper endoscopy were enrolled. Within 1 week of the endoscopic procedure, each patient received the modified 13C-urea breath test. Breath samples were collected at baseline and at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 min after ingestion of 100 mg 13C-urea solution through the mouth and the nostril at each time point.

RESULTS

The breath delta13CO2 value through the nostril at 1 min was already higher in H. pylori-positive patients than in H. pylori-negative patients. Using 2.5% as the cut-off value, the sensitivity and specificity of the modified 13C-urea breath test at 20 min were both 100%, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of the standard 13C-urea breath test were 97.7 and 94%, respectively, using 3% as the cut-off value.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified 13C-urea breath test in which breath samples are collected through the nostril provides an easy way of avoiding false-positive results for the detection of H. pylori infection.

Evaluation of three different tests for the detection of stool antigens to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of several methods aimed to detect Helicobacter pylori stool antigens in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding because of peptic ulcer were included. The first stool sample during hospitalization was collected, and stool antigens were determined with: polyclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Premier-Platinum-HpSA); monoclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Amplified-IDEIA-HpStAR); and rapid monoclonal immunochromatographic test (ImmunoCard-STAT HpSA). A patient was considered infected when H. pylori was diagnosed with invasive tests (rapid urease test or histology) or with (13)C-urea breath test. When all tests were negative, a new breath test was repeated after stopping proton pump inhibitors.

RESULTS

All patients were infected and, therefore, only sensitivity of the tests could be calculated: polyclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (74%), monoclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (94%), and rapid monoclonal immunochromatographic test (60%; concordance between the two observers was high, kappa = 0.9). Neither the presence of maelena nor the delay in obtaining stool samples explained false negatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither the polyclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay stool antigen test nor the rapid immunochromatographic stool antigen test can be recommended to diagnose H. pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the monoclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay stool antigen test is highly sensitive for detecting the infection in patients with this complication, although more studies are necessary to evaluate the specificity of the method.

Endoscopic 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic 13C-urea breath test may avoid contamination of oral urease and rapidly discriminate Helicobacter pylori-positive and Helicobacter pylori-negative patients.

AIMS

To compare the accuracy of endoscopic 13C-urea breath test with conventional invasive methods in diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

PATIENTS

One hundred patients who attended for routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were included.

METHODS

13C-urea was applied to the stomach through the working channel of endoscope at the end of endoscopic examination. Breath samples were collected before endoscopy and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 min after consumption of 100 or 50 mg 13C-urea. Helicobacter pylori infection was defined as those with positive culture or positive results of both histology and CLO test.

RESULTS

The accuracy of 100 mg endoscopic 13C-urea breath test was significantly higher than that of culture and CLO test (100% vs. 88% and 92%, p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). The accuracy of 50 mg endoscopic 13C-urea breath test was higher than that of histology and CLO test (98% vs. 90% and 96%, respectively), although the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic 13C-urea breath test has a higher accuracy compared with biopsy-based modalities. It may be a good choice to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection if endoscopy is indicated for a dyspeptic patient.

The (13)C-urea breath test for non-invasive diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: which procedure and which measuring equipment?

1) The (13)C-urea breath test is one of the most important non-invasive methods for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection in both pre- and post-treatment phases. 2) In order to render the test less expensive and more rapid, a series of modifications have recently been proposed concerning the dose of (13)C-urea and its formulation, as well as the type of measuring equipment used for detecting (13)CO(2) in breath samples. 3) The use of small doses (40--50 mg) of isotope in gelatin capsules or mixed with citric acid in rapid-releasing tablets seems to be promising as it shortens sampling time to 10--20 min. 4) Infrared spectroscopy and laser-assisted ratio analysis equipment are two new valid and less expensive alternatives to conventional isotope mass spectrometry for (13)C analysis in breath. The (13)C-urea breath test is one of the most accurate non-invasive tests for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection. This method has become increasingly popular in the last decade since it employs an innocuous, non-radioactive isotope that can be safely used in both children and adults. The test has been recently simplified by reducing the dose of (13)C-urea used, by adopting shorter sampling times and by using new and cheaper measuring methods for (13)C analysis in the breath samples. These include nondispersive isotope-selective infrared spectroscopy (NDIRS) and laser-assisted ratio analysis (LARA), which greatly differ from each other in their technical characteristics and cost. Both NDIRS and LARA are valid alternatives to conventional isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS), although LARA appears to be more suitable for large laboratories or gastroenterological centres, which need to process many breath samples per day, whereas NDIRS seems to be more suitable for small laboratories or doctors' offices.

Review article:invasive and non-invasive tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

There are two general ways in which a diagnosis of infection by Helicobacter pylori can be made: by using either an invasive or non-invasive procedure. The invasive procedures involve an endoscopy and biopsy. A biopsy is essential because often the mucosa may appear macroscopically normal but nevertheless be inflamed. A biopsy is obtained by histological examination, culture, polymerase chain reaction or detection of the presence of urease activity in biopsy material. The non-invasive tests that can be used to diagnose the infection are serology, detection of labelled metabolic products of urea hydrolysis in the breath (13CO2, 14CO2), the urine or the blood, and detection of H, pylori antigen in a stool specimen. At present no single test can be relied upon to detect definitely colonization by H. pylori, and a combination of two is recommended if this is feasible. The choice of the test to be used is not straightforward and may vary according to the clinical condition and local expertise.