The Effects of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Treatment for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Including Non-Randomized Studies

[Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines for clinical practice]

OBJECTIVE

To identify strategies for reducing neonatal and maternal morbidity associated with intrahepatic cholestasis pregnancy (ICP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The quality of evidence of the literature was assessed following the GRADE methodology with questions formulated in the PICO format (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and outcomes defined a priori and classified according to their importance. An extensive bibliographic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the evidence was assessed (high, moderate, low, very low) and a (i) strong or (ii) weak recommendations or (iii) no recommendation were formulated. The recommendations were reviewed in two rounds with external reviewers (Delphi survey) to select the consensus recommendations.

RESULTS

Of the 14 questions (from 12 PICO questions and one definition question outside the PICO format), there was agreement between the working group and the external reviewers on 14 (100%). The level of evidence of the literature was insufficient to provide a recommendation on two questions. ICP is defined by the occurrence of suggestive pruritus (palmoplantar, nocturnal) associated with a total bile acid level>10μmol/L or an alanine transaminase level above 2N after ruling out differential diagnoses. In the absence of suggestive symptoms of a differential diagnosis, it is recommended not to carry out additional biological or ultrasound tests. In women with CIP, ursodeoxycholic acid is recommended to reduce the intensity of maternal pruritus (Strong recommendation. Quality of the evidence moderate) and to decrease the level of total bile acids and alanine transaminases. (Strong recommendation. Quality of the evidence moderate). S-adenosyl-methionine, dexamethasone, guar gum or activated charcoal should not be used to reduce the intensity of maternal pruritus (Strong recommendation. Quality of evidence low), and there is insufficient data to recommend the use of antihistamines (No recommendation. Quality of evidence low). Rifampicin (Weak recommendation. Very low quality of evidence) or plasma exchange (Strong recommendation. Very low quality of evidence) should not be used to reduce maternal pruritus and perinatal morbidity. Serum monitoring of bile acids is recommended to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality (stillbirth, prematurity) (Low recommendation. Quality of the evidence low). The level of evidence is insufficient to determine whether fetal heart rate or fetal ultrasound monitoring are useful to reduce perinatal morbidity (No recommendation). Birth is recommended when bile acid level is above 99μmol/L from 36 weeks gestation to reduce perinatal morbidity, in particular stillbirth. When bile acid level is above 99μmol/L is below 100μmol/L, women should be informed that induction of labor could be considered 37 and 39 weeks gestation to reduce perinatal morbidity. (Strong recommendation. Quality of evidence low). In postpartum, total bile acids and alanine transaminases level should be checked and normalized before prescribing estrogen-progestin contraception, ideally with a low estrogen dose (risk of recurrence of pruritus and cytolysis) (Low recommendation. Quality of evidence very low).

CONCLUSION

Although the quality of evidence regarding ICP gestational cholestasis remains low, there is a strong consensus in France, as shown by our Delphi study, on how to manage women with ICP. The reference first-line treatment is ursodeoxycholic acid.

Effect of polyene phosphatidylcholine/ursodeoxycholic acid/ademetionine on pregnancy outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a liver disorder that occurs in pregnant women and can lead to a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The condition is typically marked by pruritus (itching) and elevated levels of liver enzymes and bile acids. The standard treatment for ICP has generally been ursodeoxycholic acid and ademetionine 1,4-butanedisulfonate, but the efficacy of this approach remains less than optimal. Recently, polyene phosphatidylcholine has emerged as a promising new therapeutic agent for ICP due to its potential hepatoprotective effects.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of polyene phosphatidylcholine/ursodeoxycholic acid/ ademetionine 1,4-butanedisulfonate on bile acid levels, liver enzyme indices, and pregnancy outcomes in patients with ICP.

METHODS

From June 2020 to June 2021, 600 patients with ICP who were diagnosed and treated at our hospital were recruited and assigned at a ratio of 1:1 via random-number table method to receive either ursodeoxycholic acid/ademetionine 1,4-butanedisulfonate (control group, n = 300) or polyene phosphatidylcholine/ursodeoxycholic acid/ademetionine 1,4-butanedisulfonate (combined group, n = 300). Outcome measures included bile acids levels, liver enzyme indices, and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

Prior to treatment, no significant differences were observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). Post-treatment, patients in both groups had significantly lower pruritus scores, but the triple-drug combination group had lower scores than the dual-drug combination group (P < 0.05). The bile acid levels decreased significantly in both groups, but the decrease was more significant in the triple-drug group (P < 0.05). The triple-drug group also exhibited a greater reduction in the levels of certain liver enzymes and a lower incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to the dual-drug group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Polyene phosphatidylcholine/ursodeoxycholic acid/ademetionine 1,4-butanedisulfonate effectively relieves pruritus and reduces bile acid levels and liver enzyme indices in patients with ICP, providing a positive impact on pregnancy outcome and a high safety profile. Further clinical trials are required prior to clinical application.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy

The aims of our study were to evaluate the maternal and fetal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). In this observational, retrospective case-control study, we included all pregnant women who gave birth with a diagnosis of ICP between January 2010 and December 2020 at the Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Messina. The data were compared with those from a control group of pregnant women who did not have ICP. One hundred twenty-nine and eighty-five patients were included, respectively, in the study and in the control group. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hypothyroidism, thrombophilia, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm delivery, which were more frequent in the ICP patients. No neonatal adverse events were recorded, although a significant difference in the meconium-stained amniotic fluid condition was noted. After a 24-month follow-up, 48/129 patients with ICP accepted to be reassessed by liver ultrasound, elastographic examination, and liver function blood tests. No patient showed signs of chronic liver disease. This study confirmed a higher probability of adverse short-term maternal outcomes in ICP pregnant patients, but a lower probability of adverse short-term fetal outcomes and the absence of a long-term maternal risk of chronic liver disease.

Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a rare but potentially serious complication of pregnancy, the main symptom of which is intense pruritus with elevated serum levels of bile acids. The elevated serum bile acid concentration is regarded as a predictor for poor perinatal outcome including intrauterine death. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has become established as the treatment of choice in clinical management to achieve a significant improvement in symptoms and reduce the cholestasis. Pregnant women with severe intrahepatic cholestasis should always be managed in a perinatal centre with close interdisciplinary monitoring and treatment involving perinatologists and hepatologists to minimise the markedly increased perinatal morbidity and mortality as well as maternal symptoms.

Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid is commonly used to treat intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, yet its largest trial detected minimal benefit for a composite outcome (stillbirth, preterm birth, and neonatal unit admission). We aimed to examine whether ursodeoxycholic acid affects specific adverse perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

In this systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Global Health, MIDIRS, and Cochrane without language restrictions for relevant articles published between database inception, and Jan 1, 2020, using search terms referencing intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, ursodeoxycholic acid, and perinatal outcomes. Eligible studies had 30 or more study participants and reported on at least one individual with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and bile acid concentrations of 40 μmol/L or more. We also included two unpublished cohort studies. Individual participant data were collected from the authors of selected studies. The primary outcome was the prevalence of stillbirth, for which we anticipated there would be insufficient data to achieve statistical power. Therefore, we included a composite of stillbirth and preterm birth as a main secondary outcome. A mixed-effects meta-analysis was done using multi-level modelling and adjusting for bile acid concentration, parity, and multifetal pregnancy. Individual participant data analyses were done for all studies and in different subgroups, which were produced by limiting analyses to randomised controlled trials only, singleton pregnancies only, or two-arm studies only. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019131495.

FINDINGS

The authors of the 85 studies fulfilling our inclusion criteria were contacted. Individual participant data from 6974 women in 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis, of whom 4726 (67·8%) took ursodeoxycholic acid. Stillbirth occurred in 35 (0·7%) of 5097 fetuses among women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and in 12 (0·6%) of 2038 fetuses among women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy not treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1·04, 95% CI 0·35-3·07; p=0·95). Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment also had no effect on the prevalence of stillbirth when considering only randomised controlled trials (aOR 0·29, 95% CI 0·04-2·42; p=0·25). Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment had no effect on the prevalence of the composite outcome in all studies (aOR 1·28, 95% CI 0·86-1·91; p=0·22), but was associated with a reduced composite outcome when considering only randomised controlled trials (0·60, 0·39-0·91; p=0·016).

INTERPRETATION

Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment had no significant effect on the prevalence of stillbirth in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, but our analysis was probably limited by the low overall event rate. However, when considering only randomised controlled trials, ursodeoxycholic acid was associated with a reduction in stillbirth in combination with preterm birth, providing evidence for the clinical benefit of antenatal ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.

FUNDING

Tommy's, the Wellcome Trust, ICP Support, and the National Institute for Health Research.

Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is a common disorder of pregnancy manifested by pruritus and elevated bile acids. The etiology of cholestasis is poorly understood and management is difficult due to the paucity of data regarding its diagnosis, treatment, and related adverse outcomes. In this article, we review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, laboratory findings, complications, treatment, management, and current evidence surrounding intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

An insight into the mechanism and molecular basis of dysfunctional immune response involved in cholestasis

Cholestasis is one of the most common clinical symptom of liver diseases. If patients do not receive effective treatment, cholestasis can evolve into liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and ultimately liver failure requiring liver transplantation. Currently, only ursodeoxycholic acid, obeticholic acid and bezafibrate are FDA-approved drugs, thereby requiring a breakthrough in new mechanisms and therapeutic development. Inflammation is one of the common complications of cholestasis. Hepatic accumulation of toxic hydrophobic bile acids is a highly immunogenic process involving both resident and immigrating immune cells. And the resulting inflammation may further aggravate hepatocyte injury. Though, great investigations have been made in the immune responses during cholestasis, the relationship between immune responses and cholestasis remains unclear. Moreover, scarce reviews summarize the immune responses during cholestasis and the efficacy of therapies on immune response. The main purpose of this paper is to review the existing literature on dysfunctional immune response during cholestasis and the effect of treatment on immune response which may provide an insight for researchers and drug development.

Never Too Soon: An Unusual Case of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy at Five Weeks Gestation

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is an incompletely understood liver disease which results in systemic accumulation of bile acids, associated with maternal pruritus and increased risk of intrauterine fetal death. Onset is typically in the third trimester; however, rare cases have been reported early in the first trimester. We present a case of severe, early onset ICP at five weeks gestation in a spontaneous pregnancy. The patient was treated successfully with ursodeoxycholic acid and, after close obstetrical surveillance, delivered a healthy female infant via induced delivery at 34 weeks six days.

Coenzyme Q 10 supplementation: A potential therapeutic option for the treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy specific liver disease characterized by pruritus, elevated serum bile acids and abnormal liver function that may be associated with severe adverse pregnancy outcomes. We previously reported that plasma coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is decreased in women with ICP as it is its analogue coenzyme Q9 (CoQ9) in rats with ethinyl estradiol (EE)-induced cholestasis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible therapeutic role of CoQ10 in experimental hepatocellular cholestasis and to compare it with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) supplementation. Bile acids, CoQ9, CoQ10, transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, retinol, α-tocopherol, ascorbic acid, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, carbonyls, glutathione, superoxide dismutase and catalase were assessed in plasma, liver and/or hepatic mitochondria in control and cholestatic rats supplemented with CoQ10 (250 mg/kg) administered alone or combined with UDCA (25 mg/kg). CoQ10 supplementation prevented bile flow decline (P < 0.05) and the increase in serum alkaline phosphatase and bile acids, particularly lithocholic acid (P < 0.05) in cholestatic rats. Furthermore, it also improved oxidative stress parameters in the liver, increased both CoQ10 and CoQ9 plasma levels and partially prevented the fall in α-tocopherol (P < 0.05). UDCA also prevented cholestasis, but it was less efficient than CoQ10 to improve the liver redox environment. Combined administration of CoQ10 and UDCA resulted in additive effects. In conclusion, present findings show that CoQ10 supplementation attenuated EE-induced cholestasis by promoting a favorable redox environment in the liver, and further suggest that it may represent an alternative therapeutic option for ICP.

Newer Approaches to the Management of Pruritus in Cholestatic Liver Disease

Purpose of Review

Chronic pruritus represents a burdensome symptom in cholestatic liver disease. This review recommends a stepwise therapeutic approach, alongside with providing information on epidemiology, pathophysiology, and novel drug targets.

Recent Findings

Current epidemiological data emphasize chronic itch as a major symptom in immune-mediated liver diseases such as primary biliary cholangitis affecting up to 70% of patients with a significant number suffering from long-lasting and severe pruritus. κ-opioid receptor (KOR) agonists, PPAR agonists, and ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitors are currently investigated for their anti-pruritic efficacy in clinical trials. Future therapies may target the autotaxin-lysophosphatidic acid-axis or the Mas-related GPCR MRGPRX4.

Summary

Cholestatic pruritus still remains a challenging symptom for patients and physicians. Using a stepwise approach including cholestyramine, rifampicin, bezafibrate, naltrexone, and sertraline, pruritus is often adequately manageable. KOR agonists and IBAT inhibitors are currently the most promising anti-pruritic drugs for cholestatic pruritus in development.

The interpretation of liver function tests in pregnancy

Abnormal liver tests occur in 3-5% of pregnancies and show many different causes. Although alterations of liver enzymes could be a physiological phenomenon, it may also reflect potential severe liver injury, necessitating further assessment and accurate management. The work-up has to consider liver diseases specific of pregnancy and non pregnancy-related liver damage (coincidental and pre-existing to pregnancy). Pre-existing liver diseases during pregnancy are relatively uncommon, as pregnant women are generally young and healthy. Liver diseases unique to pregnancy are intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, the HELLP syndrome (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) and acute fatty liver of pregnancy. These disorders may result in foetal distress, severe liver damage and sometime hepatic failure; for these reasons the diagnostic work-up and treatment must be very fast. This review focuses on the management of pregnant women with altered liver function tests. Furthermore, the main liver diseases specific of pregnancy are described.

Treatment of Pruritus Secondary to Liver Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pruritus is a common extrahepatic symptom in various liver disorders, in particularly those with cholestatic features. This review summarizes epidemiology, pathophysiology, evidence-based therapeutic recommendations and currently investigated drugs for pruritus in hepatobiliary disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent epidemiological data suggest pruritus as a common and relevant symptom in immune-mediated liver diseases, i.e., primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with over 70% affected patients, up to 56% suffering from chronic pruritus. The better pathophysiological understanding of hepatic pruritus has led to the identification of novel therapeutic targets, addressed in drug trials using KOR agonists, PPAR agonists, and ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors. Hepatic itch remains among the most agonizing symptoms for affected patients and a clinical challenge for physicians. Therapeutic recommendations include a guideline-based stepwise approach starting with cholestyramine, followed by rifampicin, naltrexone, and sertraline. Bezafibrate and ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors represent promising future anti-pruritic treatment options.

Women successfully treated for severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy do not have increased risks for adverse perinatal outcomes

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) increases adverse perinatal outcome (APO) incidence. Whether successful treatment of severe ICP reduces APO risk is unclear.This retrospective, single-center study in China enrolled consecutive women with ICP who had term delivery (≥37 weeks, singleton) between August 2013 and June 2016. Patients were divided into the mild ICP (serum bile acids (SBA) ≤40 μmol/L throughout pregnancy) and severe ICP (SBA >40 μmol/L during pregnancy but fell after ursodeoxycholate therapy) groups. Baseline characteristics, laboratory investigations, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with meconium staining of amniotic fluid (MSAF) and APOs.Seventy-three patients were included (mild ICP group, n=47; severe ICP group, n=26). Pruritus was more common in the severe ICP group (65.4% vs 40.4%; P <.05), but other baseline characteristics were similar. Compared with the mild ICP group, the severe ICP group had higher SBA at first visit and peak value, higher direct bilirubin before delivery and 4 days postpartum, and lower gamma-glutamyltransferase at peak value, before delivery and 4 days postpartum (P <.05). Other laboratory parameters, type of delivery, hemorrhage, and liver function abnormality were similar between groups, although the severe ICP group had longer duration of hepatic dysfunction (P <.05). Birth weight was lower in the mild ICP group (P <.05), but other fetal outcomes were similar between groups. Logistic regression identified no factors (including SBA group) associated with APOs or MSAF.Women successfully treated for severe ICP do not have increased risks for APOs.

Is It Necessary to Perform the Pharmacological Interventions for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Although many meta-analyses have evaluated the pharmacotherapy of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) and recommended ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) as an effective treatment, the defect of the pair-wise analyses and the mixture of the control group made the outcome uncertain and unclear. We aimed to employ Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the maternal and fetal outcomes after UDCA, S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) mono-therapy or the combination treatment of these two drugs for ICP patients.

METHODS

Multiple electronic database searches were conducted for articles published up to 1 September 2018. The relevant information was extracted from the published reports with a predefined data extraction sheet, and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Poisson Bayesian network meta-analysis was employed to identify the synthesized evidence from the relevant trials, with reporting hazard risks (HRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs).

RESULTS

The pooled outcomes of the 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 625 participants indicated that none of the three regimens can significantly improve maternal and fetal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This NMA of the RCTs clarified that the current intervention has no favorable effect on pruritus and other symptoms in ICP patients.

Specific dermatoses of pregnancy other than pemphigoid gestationis

Specific dermatoses of pregnancy are skin disorders that occur specifically during or immediately after pregnancy and cannot be found in non-pregnant patients. According to the current consensus, they include atopic eruption of pregnancy (AEP), polymorphic eruption of pregnancy (PEP), pemphigoid gestationis (PG), and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). The diagnosis of specific dermatoses of pregnancy can be challenging due to their variation in clinical presentation; moreover, the tests currently available do not always provide the clue for the diagnosis. However, some distinctive features may be helpful to differentiate between such entities. Accordingly, the knowledge of specific dermatoses of pregnancy and of their management is critical, since their early recognition may allow to provide care for the mother and prevent potential increased fetal risk. In fact, while AEP and PEP do not affect maternal and fetal prognosis, PG and, mainly, ICP are associated to maternal complications as well as the risk of fetal loss. In this paper, the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features as well as management of AEP and PEP are reviewed in detail, while PG is described in another article of this issue. Moreover, the main features of ICP, which cannot be considered a primarily skin disease but may be managed first by dermatologists, are reported.

Two cases of first onset intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy associated with moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after IVF treatment and review of the literature

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is an uncommon disorder, which generally occurs in the second and third trimester of pregnancy with symptoms of pruritus. The cause of ICP is unknown but genetic, hormonal and environmental factors contribute to its pathogenesis. The aetiology of ICP is unclear but elevation in oestrogen levels thought to cause ICP is typically seen in the third trimester of pregnancy, and for this reason it is not usually considered in the differential diagnosis of pruritus and liver function disorders in the first trimester of the pregnancy. We present two cases of pregnancy after IVF treatment diagnosed with ICP following the development of OHSS, deteriorating liver function tests and severe pruritus.

Practice Gaps in Pruritus

There are several practice gaps in the evaluation and management of itch. These gaps include a dearth of objective measures of itch, infrequent use of validated patient-reported outcomes for itch, non-evidence-based treatment, and lack of consensus about the ideal workup for generalized itch. The present article reviews these gaps and presents potential solutions.

Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A meta-analysis (a prisma-compliant study)

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a specific pregnancy-related disorder without standard medical therapies. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the most used medicine, but the efficacy and safety of UDCA remain uncertain. Several meta-analyses had been made to assess the effects of UDCA in ICP. However, the samples were not large enough to convince obstetricians to use UDCA. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects and safety of UDCA in patients with ICP, which included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Six databases were searched. The search terms were "ursodeoxycholicacid," "therapy," "management," "treatment," "intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy," "obstetric cholestasis," "recurrent jaundice of pregnancy," "pruritus gravidarum," "idiopathic jaundice of pregnancy," "intrahepatic jaundice of pregnancy," and "icterus gravidarum."Randomized controlled trials of UDCA versus control groups (included using other medicines) among patients with ICP were included. The primary outcomes were improved pruritus scores and liver function. Secondary outcomes were the maternal and fetal outcomes in patients with ICP.Data were extracted from included RCTs. The Mantel-Haenzel random-effects model or fixed-effects model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 12 RCTs involving 662 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In pooled analyses that compared UDCA with all controls, UDCA was associated with resolution of pruritus (risk ratio [RR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.12-2.52; P = 0.01),decrease of serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (standardized mean difference (SMD), -1.36; 95% CI, -2.08 to -0.63; P <0.001), reduced serum levels of bile acid (SMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.20; P <0.001), fewer premature births (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43-0.72; P <0.001),reduced fetal distress (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.94; P = 0.02), high Apgar scores at 5 minutes (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82; P = 0.009), less frequent respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.86; P = 0.02), and fewer neonates in the intensive care unit (NICU) (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.87; P <0.05), increased gestational age (SMD,0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63; P <0.001), and birth weight (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.02-0.40; P = 0.03). There were no differences in meconium staining and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) between the groups (P >0.05). No trials reported adverse effects on mothers and fetuses except nausea and emesis.

CONCLUSION

UDCA is effective and safe to improve pruritus and liver function in ICP. UDCA also reduced adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with ICP.

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Recent advances

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, also known as obstetric cholestasis, is a pruritic condition of pregnancy characterized by an underlying elevation in circulating bile acids and liver derangement, and associated with adverse fetal outcomes, such as preterm labor and stillbirth. Limited understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and mechanisms involved in adverse outcomes has previously restricted treatment options and pregnancy management. Recent advances in these research fields provide tantalizing targets to improve the care of pregnant women affected by this condition.

New Insights on Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is characterized by maternal pruritus, and elevated serum transaminases and bile acids. Genetic defects in at least 6 canalicular transporters have been found. Association studies stress the variability of genotypes, different penetrance, and influence of environmental factors. Serum autotaxin is a sensitive, specific, and robust diagnostic marker. Elevated maternal bile acids correlate with fetal complications. Long-term sequelae for mothers include the gallstone risk and chronic liver disease. There is an association between ICP and hepatitis C. Current treatment is ursodeoxycholic acid, owing to benefits on pruritus, liver function, safety, and decreased rates of adverse effects.

Is ursodeoxycholic acid effective for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy?

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is a condition associated with fetal morbidity and mortality. Ursodeoxycholic acid has been proposed as a treatment alternative, but its use remains controversial. Searching in Epistemonikos database, which is maintained by screening 30 databases, we identified three systematic reviews including eight randomized trials. We combined the evidence using meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table following the GRADE approach. We concluded ursodeoxycholic acid reduces prematurity risk and need for admission in neonatal intensive care units. It might also reduce maternal pruritus.

Immunological basis in the pathogenesis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy poses a great risk to both maternal and fetal health. Despite extensive research, much of the pathogenesis of this disorder is unknown. The increase in bile acids observed in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy has been noted to cause a change in the immune system from the normally mediated TH2 response to one that is more oriented towards TH1. In this literature review, we have critically reviewed the current literature regarding the changes in the immune system and the potential effects of immunological changes in the management of the patient. The current treatment, ursodeoxycholic acid, is also discussed along with potential combination therapies and future directions for research.

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: observational study of the treatment with low-dose ursodeoxycholic acid

BACKGROUND

To exam the biochemical, obstetric management and pregnancy outcome in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) and treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

METHODS

Pregnancy outcome in patients with ICP (N = 307) was studied and patients treated with UDCA (N = 208) vs. no UDCA were compared. The data of the antenatal visits, deliveries and neonatal outcome of 307 pregnancies with ICP was collected from the hospital computerized delivery room log book. UDCA was used in 208 pregnancies. The diagnosis was made by maternal pruritus and elevation of total fasting bile acid (BA) (>6 μmol/l) and elevation of serum alanine aminotransferases (ALT) (>45 U/l). Maternal and neonatal data was analysed and data of the patients who used UDCA during pregnancy was analysed separately and compared with the data from patients without medication.

RESULTS

UDCA was well tolerated. Mothers receiving UDCA had ICP diagnosed five weeks earlier than mothers without medication. At the diagnosis, levels of total BA and ALT were higher in the group using UDCA compared to the group without medication. Most deliveries were induced and perinatal outcome was good. Apgar scores at 5 min were significantly lower in UDCA group (p < 0.05), but fetal umbilical artery pH values were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). There were 30 patients with total BA > 40 μmol/l at diagnosis, 24 with UDCA and 6 without medication and those deliveries were induced soon after diagnosis. The preterm labour was also more common in these patents (p < 0.05). Women with preterm babies had significantly early onset pruritus and ICP was diagnosed earlier. Serum ALT and total BA levels were significantly higher in those pregnancies at diagnosis and also at first control.

CONCLUSIONS

Preterm labour was associated in severe ICP (total BA > 40 μmol/l), ALT levels were also significantly higher and ICP was diagnosed earlier (p < 0.05). Apgar scores were lower in preterm babies (p < 0.05), but umbilical artery pHvalues were not significantly lower. UDCA was well tolerated by pregnant women. With low-dose UDCA treatment the obstetric outcome was good. We still recommend careful obstetrical follow-up.

[Ursodeoxycholic acid: A therapeutic niche in an internist's practice]

The paper shows more than 40 years' experience with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) used as a drug; during this period it has demonstrated its rather high clinical efficacy. Due to the range of its inherent pleiotropic (choleretic, cytoprotective, immunomodulatory, antiapoptotic, hypocholesterolemic, and litholytic) properties, UDCA has a broad spectrum of therapeutic activity. The paper considers the issues associated with the mechanism of action and with the clinical effects of this bile acid. It gives the results of the most important randomized controlled trials determining currently the evidence base for the efficiency and safety of using UDCA in the clinical picture of visceral diseases.