Campagnini S, Liuzzi P, Mannini A, Riener R, Carrozza MC. Effects of control strategies on gait in robot-assisted post-stroke lower limb rehabilitation: a systematic review.
J Neuroeng Rehabil 2022;
19:52. [PMID:
35659703 PMCID:
PMC9166346 DOI:
10.1186/s12984-022-01031-5]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Stroke related motor function deficits affect patients' likelihood of returning to professional activities, limit their participation in society and functionality in daily living. Hence, robot-aided gait rehabilitation needs to be fruitful and effective from a motor learning perspective. For this reason, optimal human-robot interaction strategies are necessary to foster neuroplastic shaping during therapy. Therefore, we performed a systematic search on the effects of different control algorithms on quantitative objective gait parameters of post-acute stroke patients.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search on four electronic databases using the Population Intervention Comparison and Outcome format. The heterogeneity of performance assessment, study designs and patients' numerosity prevented the possibility to conduct a rigorous meta-analysis, thus, the results were presented through narrative synthesis.
RESULTS
A total of 31 studies (out of 1036) met the inclusion criteria, without applying any temporal constraints. No controller preference with respect to gait parameters improvements was found. However, preferred solutions were encountered in the implementation of force control strategies mostly on rigid devices in therapeutic scenarios. Conversely, soft devices, which were all position-controlled, were found to be more commonly used in assistive scenarios. The effect of different controllers on gait could not be evaluated since conspicuous heterogeneity was found for both performance metrics and study designs.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, due to the impossibility of performing a meta-analysis, this systematic review calls for an outcome standardisation in the evaluation of robot-aided gait rehabilitation. This could allow for the comparison of adaptive and human-dependent controllers with conventional ones, identifying the most suitable control strategies for specific pathologic gait patterns. This latter aspect could bolster individualized and personalized choices of control strategies during the therapeutic or assistive path.
Collapse