Small supernumerary marker chromosomes 1 with a normal phenotype

Patient with three euchromatic supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosomes 1, 12, and 18: characterization and evaluation of the aberrations

The genetic relevance of small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) depends on their content of euchromatin. In case of mosaicism, the phenotype of the carrier furthermore is influenced by the distribution of the marker in the body. In the majority of reported cases no correlation of the degree of mosaicism in the tissue(s) analyzed and the phenotype could be detected. In particular, non-acrocentric derived sSMCs show a strong tendency to appear in mosaic state irrespective of the clinical picture. We present a patient with cognitive disability and mild craniofacial dysmorphisms with mosaicism of three different autosomal marker chromosomes. The extra chromosomes were analyzed by a combination of SNP array and a variety of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes. All three markers were identified as ring chromosomes containing different amounts of euchromatic material derived from chromosome 1 (1p12 → q21), 12 (12p13.1 → q13.11) and 18 (18p11.21 → q11.2). The size and the frequency of the sSMCs were strikingly different, besides, we observed an unequal combination of the three derivates.

Mosaic small supernumerary marker chromosome 1 at amniocentesis: prenatal diagnosis, molecular genetic analysis and literature review

We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic analysis of mosaic small supernumerary marker chromosome 1 [sSMC(1)]. We review the literature of sSMC(1) at amniocentesis and chromosome 1p21.1-p12 duplication syndrome. We discuss the genotype-phenotype correlation of the involved genes of ALX3, RBM15, NTNG1, SLC25A24, GPSM2, TBX15 and NOTCH2 in this case.

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosomes 6 and 20 in a woman with recurrent spontaneous abortions

In this report, we describe a case of multiple small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) presenting with recurrent abortions. Peripheral blood lymphocytes of a young, healthy and non-consanguineous couple who asked for genetic evaluation after two spontaneous miscarriages were obtained for karyotypes. Lymphocytes of the woman were analyzed by FISH techniques and DNA was extracted and used for array CGH investigation. Karyotyping revealed 48,XX,+2mar[24]/47,XX,+mar[5]/46,XX[3] for the woman and 46,XY for her husband. FISH analysis showed that the two sSMC consisted of chromosomes 6 and 20. Array CGH analysis showed gains of the 6p11.2q12 (9 Mb) and 20 p11.21 (3.3 Mb) chromosomal regions with a total of 42 genes present on both sSMC. Our findings support also the hypothesis that the modification of the expression of some genes involved in embryo implantation, like THBD gene, could be responsible in the recurrent abortions. This report underpins the necessity of array CGH for characterizing precisely sSMC and helping in genotype-phenotype correlations. Furthermore, a literature review on sSMC is included.

Mosaic supernumerary ring chromosome 1 in a three-generational family: 10-year follow-up report

Additional small ring chromosome 1 is described with increasing rate of mosaicism in three generations. Ten years after the first examination, the mosaic rates in the patients were strikingly similar. An increase in the expression of phenotypic anomalies was also observed in the successive generations. FISH examinations following microdissection revealed signals which were positive for 1p13 and 1q21 indicating that the ring contained euchromatic segments on both ends. Additionally, array-CGH whole-genome analysis showed a single copy gain corresponding to band 1p12 to band 1q21-1 of chromosome 1 in the patients. The presence of euchromatic material from chromosome 1 in the ring suggests that the relationship between the cytogenetic findings and the clinical manifestation is likely causative. These unique observations might be explained by mitotic loss of the ring at early embryogenesis, and would indicate different mitotic vulnerability of certain chromosome abnormalities at early postzygotic stages versus later during development.

Cytogenetic contribution to uniparental disomy (UPD)

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is often considered as an event to be characterized exclusively by molecular genetic or epigenetic approaches. This review shows that at least one third of UPD cases emerge in connection with or due to a chromosomal rearrangement. Thus, additional (molecular) cytogenetic characterization of UPD cases is essential. Up to now > 1,100 UPD cases detected in clinical, non-tumor cases are reported in the literature. Recently, these cases were summarized in a regularly updated, freely available online database http://www.med.uni-jena.de/fish/sSMC/00START-UPD.htm. Based of this, here the presently known imprinting syndromes, the chromosomal contribution to UPD phenomenon, and the cytogenetic subgroups of UPD, including cases with normal, abnormal balanced or unbalanced karyotype (like e.g. small supernumerary marker chromosomes and Robertsonian translocations) and segmental UPD are reviewed. Furthermore, chromosome fragmentation as a possible mechanism of trisomic rescue is discussed, which might help to explain the observed 1:9 rate of maternal versus paternal UPD present in cases with original trisomic karyotypes. Overall, as UPD is more but an interesting rarity, the genetic background of each "UPD-patient" needs to be characterized besides by molecular methods, also by molecular cytogenetics in detail.