Effects of subcutaneous and intracerebroventricular injection of physostigmine on the acute corneal nociception in rats

Muscarinic cholinergic system of the dorsal hippocampus involvement in the modulation of formalin-induced orofacial nociception and relevant memory impairment in rats

The hippocampus is well recognized for its significant contributions to learning, memory formation, and emotional regulation. In addition, it was approved by several studies that hippocampus plays a pivotal role in pain modulation; however, the exact mechanism has not yet been identified. In the current research, effects of microinjection of muscarinic M1 cholinergic agents into the CA1 region of the hippocampus in orofacial nociception evoked by formalin and corresponding memory impairment were investigated. Left and right sides of the hippocampus were implanted by guide cannulas. Orofacial nociception was elicited through subcutaneously injection of formalin (1.5 %) solution into the pad of vibrissa region. Evaluating memory was conducted with Morris water maze (MWM). Microinjections of McN-A-343 (a selective agonist of muscarinic M1 receptors) attenuated the both phases of orofacial nociceptive behavior, face rubbing. This effect of McN-A-343 was blocked by prior microinjection of pirenzepine (an antagonist of muscarinic receptors). On the other hand, McN-A-343 and pirenzepine increased and decreased traveled time as well as traveled distance in target zone of MWM, respectively. Additionally, McN-A-343 improved the memory deficits caused by orofacial nociception. Our results indicate that muscarinic acetylcholine receptors contribute significantly in the hippocampal modulation of orofacial nociception and related memory impairment.

SLURP-1 modulates corneal homeostasis by serving as a soluble scavenger of urokinase-type plasminogen activator

PURPOSE

Our previous study revealed the immunomodulatory property of the secreted lymphocyte antigen (Ly6)/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-related protein-1 (SLURP1), abundantly expressed in the cornea and associated with the hyperkeratotic disorder Mal de Meleda. Here, we test the hypothesis that SLURP1 modulates the functions of membrane-tethered uPAR by acting as a soluble scavenger of its ligand urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA).

METHODS

Human corneal limbal epithelial (HCLE) and mouse corneal stromal fibroblast MK/T-1 cells were employed to examine the effect of SLURP1 on cell proliferation and migration. Human corneal limbal epithelial cell clones stably expressing SLURP1 under the control of cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter were generated using lentiviral vectors. Recombinant 6× His-mouse Slurp1 and maltose-binding protein (MBP)-mouse uPA were expressed in Escherichia coli and partially purified using nickel-ion and amylose columns, respectively. Slurp1 interaction with uPA was detected using ligand blots, ELISA, pull-down assays, and immunofluorescent staining.

RESULTS

Stable expression of SLURP1 in HCLE cells was confirmed by immunoblots and immunofluorescent staining. Human corneal limbal epithelial and MK/T-1 cell proliferation and migration rates were suppressed by exogenous SLURP1. Ligand blots, ELISA, and pull-down assays indicated that Slurp1 efficiently interacts with uPA. Immunofluorescent staining demonstrated that exogenous SLURP1 decreased the amount of cell surface-bound uPA in the leading edges of migrating cells. In gap-filling assays, wild-type HCLE cells responded to uPA by increasing their velocity and closing larger area, while the SLURP1-expressing HCLE cells failed to do so.

CONCLUSIONS

SLURP1 modulates corneal homeostasis by serving as a soluble scavenger of uPA and regulating the uPA-dependent functions of uPAR.

The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on neurobiology

This report characterizes the neurobiology of the ocular surface and highlights relevant mechanisms that may underpin contact lens-related discomfort. While there is limited evidence for the mechanisms involved in contact lens-related discomfort, neurobiological mechanisms in dry eye disease, the inflammatory pathway, the effect of hyperosmolarity on ocular surface nociceptors, and subsequent sensory processing of ocular pain and discomfort have been at least partly elucidated and are presented herein to provide insight in this new arena. The stimulus to the ocular surface from a contact lens is likely to be complex and multifactorial, including components of osmolarity, solution effects, desiccation, thermal effects, inflammation, friction, and mechanical stimulation. Sensory input will arise from stimulation of the lid margin, palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, and the cornea.