Distinguishing remnant ablation from adjuvant treatment in differentiated thyroid cancer

Radioiodine (131I) treatment decision-making for low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect and influencing factors of postsurgical radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for patients with low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

Subjects and methods

A retrospective analysis of 423 low- and intermediaterisk DTC patients admitted to the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2005 to December 2020 was performed. All patients were treated with surgery, had a postoperative pathological diagnosis, and were treated with RAI, including 89 males and 334 females. Recurrence risk stratification: 143 cases were low-risk, and 280 cases were intermediaterisk.

Results

The excellent response (ER) rate for low- and intermediate-risk were 93.7% and 78.2%, respectively (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in age, cumulative dose of [131I], and pretreatment stimulated-Tg (pre-Tg) levels between the low- and intermediate-risk groups (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in the cumulative dose of 131I and pre-Tg levels between ER and the non-ER group (P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.799 in the low-risk group, and 0.747 in the intermediate-risk group for the ROC curve by ER status of pre-Tg. The ER rate with RAI treatment decreased with an increase in pre-Tg levels.

Conclusion

Pre-Tg was an important factor for RAI treatment decision-making and prognostic evaluation and differed between low-risk and intermediate-risk DTC. Aggressive RAI therapy was recommended for low-risk DTC with pre-Tg ≥ 20.0 ng/mL and in intermediate-risk group with pre-Tg ≥ 10.0 ng/mL.

Change in Practice of Radioactive Iodine Administration in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Single-Centre Experience

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to analyse temporal trends in radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment for thyroid cancer over the past decade; to analyse key factors associated with clinical decisions in RAI dosing; and to confirm lower activities of RAI for low-risk patients were not associated with an increased risk of recurrence.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 1,323 patients who received RAI at a quaternary centre in Australia between 2008 and 2018 was performed. Prospectively collected data included age, gender, histology, and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (7th ed). American Thyroid Association risk was calculated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median activities of RAI administered to low-risk patients decreased from 3.85 GBq (104 mCi) in 2008-2016 to 2.0 GBq (54 mCi) in 2017-2018. The principal driver of this change was an increased use of 1 GBq (27 mCi) from 1.3% of prescriptions in 2008-2011 to 18.5% in 2017-2018. In patients assigned as low risk per ATA stratification, lower activities of 1 GBq or 2 GBq (27 mCi or 54 mCi) were not associated with an increased risk of recurrence. In patients assigned to intermediate- or high-risk categories who received RAI as adjuvant therapy, there was no difference in risk of recurrence between 4 GBq (108 mCi) and 6 GBq (162 mCi).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate an evolution of RAI activities consistent with translation of ATA guidelines into clinical practice. Use of lower RAI activities was not associated with an increase in recurrence in low-risk thyroid cancer patients. Our data also suggest lower RAI activities may be as efficacious for adjuvant therapy in intermediate- and high-risk patients.

Current practice in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer

Considerable changes have occurred in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) during the past four decades, based on improved knowledge of the biology of DTC and on advances in therapy, including surgery, the use of radioactive iodine (radioiodine), thyroid hormone treatment and availability of recombinant human TSH. Improved diagnostic tools are available, including determining serum levels of thyroglobulin, neck ultrasonography, imaging (CT, MRI, SPECT-CT and PET-CT), and prognostic classifications have been improved. Patients with low-risk DTC, in whom the risk of thyroid cancer death is <1% and most recurrences can be cured, currently represent the majority of patients. By contrast, patients with high-risk DTC represent 5-10% of all patients. Most thyroid cancer-related deaths occur in this group of patients and recurrences are frequent. Patients with high-risk DTC require more aggressive treatment and follow-up than patients with low-risk DTC. Finally, the strategy for treating patients with intermediate-risk DTC is frequently defined on a case-by-case basis. Prospective trials are needed in well-selected patients with DTC to demonstrate the extent to which treatment and follow-up can be limited without increasing the risk of recurrence and thyroid cancer-related death.

Contemporary considerations in adjuvant radioiodine treatment of adults with differentiated thyroid cancer

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy with a growing incidence worldwide. The initial conventional management is surgery, followed by consideration of ¹³¹ I treatment that includes three options. These are termed remnant ablation (targeting benign thyroid remnant), adjuvant (targeting presumed microscopic DTC) and known disease (targeting macroscopic DTC) treatments. Some experts mostly rely on clinicopathologic assessment for recurrence risk to select patients for the ¹³¹ I treatment. Others, in addition, apply radioiodine imaging to guide their treatment planning, termed theranostics (aka theragnostics or radiotheragnostics). In patients with low-risk DTC, remnant ablation rather than adjuvant treatment is generally recommended and, in this setting, the ATA recommends a low ¹³¹ I activity. ¹³¹ I adjuvant treatment is universally recommended in patients with high-risk DTC (a primary tumor of any size with gross extrathyroidal extension) and is generally recommended in intermediate-risk DTC (primary tumor >4 cm in diameter, locoregional metastases, microscopic extrathyroidal extension, aggressive histology or vascular invasion). The optimal amount of ¹³¹ I activity for adjuvant treatment is controversial, but experts reached a consensus that the ¹³¹ I activity should be greater than that for remnant ablation. The main obstacles to establishing timely evidence through randomized clinical trials for ¹³¹ I therapy include years-to-decades delay in recurrence and low disease-specific mortality. This mini-review is intended to update oncologists on the most recent clinical, pathologic, laboratory and imaging variables, as well as on the current ¹³¹ I therapy-related definitions and management paradigms, which should optimally equip them for individualized patient guidance and treatment.