Monitoring white blood cell count in adult patients with schizophrenia who are taking clozapine: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Complete blood count-based inflammation indexes and symptom severity in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: An analysis based on structural equation modelling

INTRODUCTION

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) are associated with immune-inflammatory activation. Recently, complete blood count (CBC)-based inflammation indexes such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have emerged as reproducible and cost-effective inflammation markers in mental disorders. In this study, we aimed at investigating the relationship of NLR, MLR, and PLR with symptom severity in people with SSDs, testing interactions with relevant clinical variables.

METHODS

We included inpatients with SSDs aged 18-65 consecutively hospitalized from May 2020 to March 2024. Socio-demographic and clinical data were recorded. CBC-based ratios were estimated from routinely collected blood samples. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was performed to test relationships involving symptom severity constructs and CBC-based ratios, accounting for substance use disorder, antipsychotic treatment, and obesity.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-six participants met inclusion criteria. The SEM analysis uncovered a significant relationship of MLR with positive (coeff.: 0.19, p=0.048) and negative (coeff.: 0.27, p=0.004) symptoms, also showing a significant link of substance use disorder and antipsychotic treatment with symptom severity as well as of antipsychotic treatment with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Notwithstanding the cross-sectional design and the somewhat limited sample representativeness, this study showed a significant relationship between the MLR - but not the NLR or the PLR - and the severity of both positive and negative symptoms, testing at the same time the interactions with other clinical variables. Considering the insufficiency and inconsistency of data in this field, further research is needed to validate our findings and elucidate the underlying mechanisms driving the observed relationships between the MLR and SSD symptoms.

Time for a change to clozapine haematological monitoring

OBJECTIVES

This paper critiques the haematological monitoring guidelines for clozapine. It describes the history of clozapine, as well as the pathophysiology and epidemiology of clozapine-induced neutropenia (CIN) and agranulocytosis (CIA). The paper appraises the extant literature on mandatory clozapine haematological monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Contemporary Australian protocols for clozapine haematological monitoring are not consistent with the current evidence base. CIN and CIA are rare occurrences, and the associated risk of death is low. Potential modifications to existing guidelines include changing neutrophil thresholds for patients with benign ethnic neutropenia and reducing the frequency or removing haematological monitoring after two years of clozapine treatment.

Understanding clozapine-related blood dyscrasias. Developments, genetics, ethnicity and disparity: it's a CIN

Clozapine remains the gold standard intervention for treatment-resistant schizophrenia; however, it remains underused, especially for some minority groups. A significant impediment is concern about propensity to neutropenia. The aim of this article is to provide an update on current knowledge relating to: the pattern and incidence of severe blood dyscrasias; the effectiveness of current monitoring regimes in reducing harm; the mechanisms of and the distinctions between clozapine-induced neutropenia and agranulocytosis; benign ethnic neutropenia; and changes to the monitoring thresholds in the USA and other international variations. These all have implications for the practical use of clozapine; specifically, how barriers to initiating, maintaining and restarting clozapine can be understood and in many cases overcome, especially for patients from minority groups, potentially with simpler approaches than the use of lithium or G-CSF.

Clozapine monitoring at a specialised psychiatric hospital: A retrospective chart review

Background

Clozapine is the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Institute for Care and Excellence (NICE) approved drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Its potentially life-threatening haematological side effects of neutropaenia and agranulocytosis mandate rigorous monitoring of neutrophil counts, presenting unique, Third-World population challenges.

Aim

To describe the Clozapine white blood cell monitoring practice and outcomes in a local psychiatric hospital.

Setting

At a specialist Psychiatry unit in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, which follows a modified algorithm of the South African Standard Treatment Guidelines for Clozapine monitoring.

Methods

A retrospective chart review composed of 120 patients on Clozapine treatment from 01 July 2018-31 December 2020. Demographic and clinical information was captured in a Redcap database. Descriptive statistics using categorical variables were used.

Results

The study population was from a low socioeconomic background, with low levels of education and employment. A baseline neutrophil count was recorded in 58 files (48.3%). Clozapine was stopped in 6 out of the 120 patients due to 'neutropaenia' (absolute neutrophil counts ranging from 1.18 to 1.6); none developed agranulocytosis. Their duration of Clozapine treatment ranged from 2 weeks-15 years.

Conclusion

Haematological monitoring frequency and documentation of patients receiving Clozapine were not in compliance with the hospital's adapted guidelines and may have resulted in the termination of treatment before true neutropaenia developed. Patients developed neutropaenia at low doses of Clozapine and after many years of treatment.

Contribution

These results suggest local Clozapine monitoring guidelines should be more strictly adhered to.

Clinical impact of reducing the frequency of clozapine monitoring: controlled mirror-image cohort study

BACKGROUND

To minimise infection during COVID-19, the clozapine haematological monitoring interval was extended from 4-weekly to 12-weekly intervals in South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust.

AIMS

To investigate the impact of this temporary policy change on clinical and safety outcomes.

METHOD

All patients who received clozapine treatment with extended (12-weekly) monitoring in a large London National Health Service trust were included in a 1-year mirror-image study. A comparison group was selected with standard monitoring. The proportion of participants with mild to severe neutropenia and the proportion of participants attending the emergency department for clozapine-induced severe neutropenia treatment during the follow-up period were compared. Psychiatric hospital admission rates, clozapine dose and concomitant psychotropic medication in the 1 year before and the 1 year after extended monitoring were compared. All-cause clozapine discontinuation at 1-year follow-up was examined.

RESULTS

Of 569 participants, 459 received clozapine with extended monitoring and 110 controls continued as normal. The total person-years were 458 in the intervention group and 109 in the control group, with a median follow-up time of 1 year in both groups. During follow-up, two participants (0.4%) recorded mild to moderate neutropenia in the intervention group and one (0.9%) in the control group. There was no difference in the incidence of haematological events between the two groups (IRR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.02-28.15, P = 0.29). All neutropenia cases in the intervention group were mild, co-occurring during COVID-19 infection. The median number of admissions per patient during the pre-mirror period remained unchanged (0, IQR = 0) during the post-mirror period. There was one death in the control group, secondary to COVID-19 infection.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence that the incidence of severe neutropenia was increased in those receiving extended monitoring.

Outcome of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Patients Treated With Clozapine WHO Previously Went Through SARS-COV-2 Infection

BACKGROUND

The outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic had multiple consequences for the health care system, especially for patients with mental illnesses. Schizophrenia patients particularly appear to have a higher risk of complications due to coronavirus-19 (COVID-19). Clozapine remains the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). However, the COVID-19 pandemic had an important negative impact on clozapine treatment, mainly because of its administration protocol, which was very difficult to follow during the restrictions imposed in the pandemic, and its side effects in patients with COVID-19 infection. Vaccination is an effective method of avoiding SARS-CoV-2 infection or its severe complications, especially in susceptible populations. Data on adverse events after vaccination against COVID-19 are limited, both in the general population and in schizophrenia patients.

STUDY QUESTION

The study aimed to investigate the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients treated with clozapine for hematological parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022. We compared 2 groups of COVID-19 vaccinated patients who had previously experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection: The first group was treated with clozapine, whereas the second group was treated with other antipsychotics.

MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

The primary objective was to identify granulocytopenia, leukocytopenia, and lymphocytopenia. The results were measured after the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

RESULTS

This study included 100 patients. White blood cell count changes were limited to a few cases of mild granulocytopenia (8.16% in the clozapine group and 3.92% in the nonclozapine group, P = 0.37) with no cases of severe granulocytopenia or agranulocytosis.

CONCLUSIONS

As far as leukocyte counts are concerned, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination seems to be safe in patients treated with clozapine who previously had SARS-CoV-2 infection. Leukocyte changes had no clinical implications.

Pharmacogenomic-guided clozapine administration based on HLA-DQB1, HLA-B and SLCO1B3-SLCO1B7 variants: an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis

The identification of pharmacogenetic factors that increase the susceptibility to clozapine-induced agranulocytosis or granulocytopenia (CIAG) has received increasing interest. The SLCO1B3-SCLO1B7 variant (rs149104283) and single amino acid changes in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) HLA-DQB1 (126Q) and HLA-B (158T) were associated with an increased risk of CIAG. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding the SLCO1B3-SCLO1B7 to HLA variants as a new pharmacogenomic (PGx) approach and explored the evolution of a cohort of schizophrenic patients taking long-term clozapine as a third-line antipsychotic medication. The decision model included probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses to assess the expected costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The current monitoring scheme was compared with the PGx-guided strategy, where all patients underwent pre-emptively a genetic test before taking clozapine, over 10 years. By adding the SLCO1B3-SCLO1B7 variant into HLA variants, CIAG sensitivity increased from 36.0% to 43.0%, the specificity decreased from 89.0% to 86.9%, and the probability of cost-effectiveness improved from 74.1% to 87.8%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £16,215 per QALY and remained below the conventional decision threshold (£30,000 or US$50,000 per QALY). Therefore, the SLCO1B3-SCLO1B7 variant, as an additional risk allele to HLA variants, increases preemptive test sensitivity and improves the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PGx-guided clozapine administration.

Pharmacogenomics of Clozapine-induced agranulocytosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Although clozapine is the most effective pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, it is under-utilized, and initiation is often delayed. One reason is the occurrence of a potentially fatal adverse reaction, clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA). Identifying genetic variations contributing to CIA would help predict patient risk of developing CIA and personalize treatment. Here, we (1) review existing pharmacogenomic studies of CIA, and (2) conduct meta-analyses to identify targets for clinical implementation. A systematic literature search identified studies that included individuals receiving clozapine who developed CIA and controls who did not. Results showed that individuals carrying the HLA-DRB1*04:02 allele had nearly sixfold (95% CI 2.20–15.80, p_corrected = 0.03) higher odds of CIA with a negative predictive value of 99.3%. Previously unreplicated alleles, TNFb5, HLA-B*59:01, TNFb4, and TNFd3 showed significant associations with CIA after multiple-testing corrections. Our findings suggest that a predictive HLA-DRB1*04:02-based pharmacogenomic test may be promising for clinical implementation but requires further investigation.

Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenetic-guided clozapine administration based on risk of HLA variants in Japan and the UK

Pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics have enabled the detection of risk of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) variants for clozapine-induced agranulocytosis/granulocytopenia (CIAG). To apply this evidence to the clinical setting, we compared the cost-effectiveness of the proposed "HLA-guided treatment schedule" and the "current schedule" being used in Japan and the United Kingdom (UK) (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) cutoff at 1500/mm³); in the "HLA-guided treatment schedules," we considered a situation wherein the HLA test performed before clozapine initiation could provide "a priori information" by detecting patients harboring risk of HLA variants (HLA-B*59:01 and "HLA-B 158T/HLA-DQB1 126Q" for Japanese and Caucasian populations, respectively), a part of whom can then avoid CIAG onset (assumed 30% "prevention rate"). For the primary analysis, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of "HLA-guided treatment schedule" and "current schedule" used in Japan and the UK, using a Markov model to calculate the cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 10-year time period. Furthermore, as an explorative analysis, we simulated several situations with various ANC cutoffs (1000/mm³ and 500/mm³) and plotted the cost/QALYs for each option to identify the best, or estimate the next best candidate option applicable in actual clinical settings. The primary probabilistic analysis showed that the "HLA-guided treatment schedule" was more cost effective than the "current schedule"; the ICER was £20,995 and £21,373 for the Japanese and the UK populations, respectively. Additional simulation revealed that the treatment option of ANC cutoff at 500/mm³ without HLA screening was the most cost-effective option; however, several options may be candidates to break away from the "current schedule" of ANC cutoff at 1500/mm³. Owing to its cost-effectiveness, we propose such pharmacogenetic-guided/pharmacogenomic-guided clozapine treatment for use in the real-world setting, which provides key information for optimization of clinical guidelines for high-risk patients for gradual change of clozapine treatment schedule under the safety consideration.

A COMMENTARY ON IMPROVING CLOZAPINE ACCESSIBILITY AND REDUCING TREATMENT COST

Clozapine is vastly underutilized in the United States and many other countries. The most commonly cited reason for this is the requirement for frequent blood monitoring, which continues for the duration of treatment. Despite the notoriety clozapine achieved early in its development, accumulated evidence has demonstrated that close blood monitoring beyond the first year of treatment yields minimal safety benefits. Many health care systems have relaxed clozapine blood monitoring requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic for practical reasons, and this presents an opportunity to implement permanent, long overdue changes in mandated monitoring that reflect what has been learned about the real risk for blood dyscrasias with clozapine.

Clozapine-associated secondary antibody deficiency

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clozapine has recently been described as a novel cause of secondary antibody deficiency (SAD), associated with long-term therapy. Here we critically review the evidence linking clozapine use to an increased infection risk, describe immunological alterations, and discuss potential mechanisms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Individuals with schizophrenia are at two to five times more likely to develop pneumonia than the general population, in particular, when receiving clozapine. Delayed-onset distinguishes clozapine-associated hypogammaglobulinaemia from agranulocytosis or neutropenia that occur at lesser frequency. Biomarker searches in treatment-resistant schizophrenia highlight an immune signature associated with long-term clozapine use. This includes reduction in class-switched memory B cells, echoing common variable immunodeficiency. Recent identification of a role for dopamine in T follicular helper-B cell interactions may inform future clinical studies.

SUMMARY

The detrimental impact of the increased infection risk associated with clozapine necessitates a re-evaluation of the current monitoring strategies as well as further studies to better understand the underlying mechanisms of SAD in this setting. On the basis of available evidence, we suggest simple modifications to clozapine monitoring including integration of routine vaccination, smoking cessation, and assessment of humoral immunity. Further studies are required to understand the role of clozapine in neuroinflammation as well as other potentially autoantibody-mediated diseases.

A Systematic Review of Economic Models Across the Entire Schizophrenia Pathway

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is associated with a high economic burden. Economic models can help to inform resource allocation decisions to maximise benefits to patients.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to assess the availability, quality and consistency of conclusions of health economic models evaluating the cost effectiveness of interventions for schizophrenia.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed on multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and Health Technology Assessment database) to identify economic models of interventions for schizophrenia published between 2005 and 2020. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion. Study quality was assessed using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) checklist and the Cooper hierarchy. Model characteristics and conclusions were descriptively summarised.

RESULTS

Seventy-three models met inclusion criteria. Seventy-eight percent of existing models assessed antipsychotics; however, due to inconsistent conclusions reported by different studies, no antipsychotic can be considered clearly cost effective compared with the others. A very limited number of models suggest that the following non-pharmacological interventions might be cost effective: psychosocial interventions, stratified tests, employment intervention and intensive intervention to improve liaison between primary and secondary care. The quality of included models is generally low due to use of a short time horizon, omission of adverse events of interventions, poor data quality and potential conflicts of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights a lack of models for non-pharmacological interventions, and limitations of the existing models, including low quality and inconsistency in conclusions. Recommendations on future modelling approaches for schizophrenia are provided.

New findings in pharmacogenetics of schizophrenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights recent advances in the investigation of genetic factors for antipsychotic response and side effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antipsychotics prescribed to treat psychotic symptoms are variable in efficacy and propensity for causing side effects. The major side effects include tardive dyskinesia, antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG), and clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA). Several promising associations of polymorphisms in genes including HSPG2, CNR1, and DPP6 with tardive dyskinesia have been reported. In particular, a functional genetic polymorphism in SLC18A2, which is a target of recently approved tardive dyskinesia medication valbenazine, was associated with tardive dyskinesia. Similarly, several consistent findings primarily from genes modulating energy homeostasis have also been reported (e.g. MC4R, HTR2C). CIA has been consistently associated with polymorphisms in the HLA genes (HLA-DQB1 and HLA-B). The association findings between glutamate system genes and antipsychotic response require additional replications.

SUMMARY

The findings to date are promising and provide us a better understanding of the development of side effects and response to antipsychotics. However, more comprehensive investigations in large, well characterized samples will bring us closer to clinically actionable findings.

Cost-effectiveness of HLA-DQB1/HLA-B pharmacogenetic-guided treatment and blood monitoring in US patients taking clozapine

Less than 1% of adult patients with schizophrenia taking clozapine develop agranulocytosis, and most of these cases occur within the first weeks of treatment. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region has been associated with genetic susceptibility to clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (single amino acid changes in HLA-DQB1 (126Q) and HLA-B (158T)). The current study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, from a healthcare provider’s perspective, of an HLA genotype-guided approach in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who were taking clozapine and to compare the results with the current absolute neutrophil count monitoring (ANCM) schemes used in the USA. A semi-Markovian model was developed to simulate the progress of a cohort of adult men and women who received clozapine as a third-line antipsychotic medication. We compared current practices using two genotype-guided strategies: (1) HLA genotyping followed by clozapine, with ANCM only for patients who tested positive for one or both alleles (genotype-guided blood sampling); (2) HLA genotyping followed by clozapine for low-risk patients and alternative antipsychotics for patients who tested positive (clozapine substitution scheme). Up to a decision threshold of $3.9 million per quality-adjusted life-year (90-fold the US gross domestic product per capita), the base-case results indicate that compared with current ANCM, genotype-guided blood sampling prior to clozapine initiation appeared cost-effective for targeted blood monitoring only in patients with HLA susceptibility alleles. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that at a cost of genotype testing of up to USD700, HLA genotype-guided blood monitoring remained a cost-effective strategy compared with either current ANCM or clozapine substitution.

Clozapine treatment and discontinuation in Iceland: A national longitudinal study using electronic patient records

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the only drug approved for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. There is evidence that clozapine is underutilized.

AIMS

To evaluate the initiation and discontinuation of clozapine at Landspitali University Hospital in Iceland and the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy in clozapine-treated patients.

METHODS

The study is a part of an ongoing longitudinal study of schizophrenia in Iceland. We identified 201 patients on clozapine or who have been on clozapine by using a keyword search in the electronic health records and by reviewing their medical records.

RESULTS

Mean age at first treatment with clozapine was 37.8 years. Mean follow-up period on clozapine was 11 years. After 20 years of treatment 71.2% of patients were still on clozapine. After one year of treatment 84.4% of patients were still receiving clozapine treatment. We estimate that 11.4% of patients with schizophrenia in Iceland are taking clozapine and that 16% have been treated with clozapine at some point. Polypharmacy is common, since nearly 2/3, 65.6%, of patients taking clozapine use at least one other antipsychotic and 16.9% are also receiving depot injections.

CONCLUSIONS

We need to increase the awareness of psychiatrists in Iceland with regard to treatment with clozapine, since only about half of the estimated population of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia in Iceland have ever been treated with clozapine. Nearly two thirds of patients who are prescribed clozapine in Iceland remain on it long-term.

Efficience du suivi obligatoire sanguin pour dépister les neutropénies sous clozapine et du monitoring de l’ECG en psychiatrie

De nombreux suivis et tests de dépistage sont proposés en psychiatrie sans véritable consensus. Certains examens obligatoires, tels que les contrôles sanguins hebdomadaires des neutrophiles lors de la prescription de clozapine sont peu efficients. Les schémas arbitraires de suivi des globules blancs (neutrophiles) varient considérablement d’un pays à l’autre. Quelles que soient la fréquence et la durée des différents schémas (États-Unis, Grande-Bretagne, France, Suisse, Allemagne), le nombre de patients à traiter est supérieur à 5500 pour escompter une vie sauvée d’une septicémie liée à une neutropénie sévère (< 0,5 G/L) et la survie supplémentaire est inférieure à 1 jour par rapport à l’absence de suivi des neutrophiles.

Les ressources financières utilisées se montent à plusieurs millions d’euros (€ 2,25 à 3,1 millions GB vs États-Unis) par année de vie gagnée ajustée à la qualité de vie (QALY). Ceci entraîne des coûts de renonciation (opportunity costs) qui pourraient être utilisés pour limiter des effets indésirables fréquents des psychotropes, comme la prévention de la prise de poids (et l’insulino-résistance), la gestion des effets indésirables anticholinergiques, ou encore le dépistage ciblé de maladies transmissibles prévalentes en milieu psychiatrique (VIH, hépatites virales B et C).

En particulier, le contrôle électrocardiographique systématique à l’admission, peu employé en psychiatrie, se révèle nettement plus efficient (€ 23 907 par QALY) que le suivi des neutrophiles pour prévenir un décès iatrogène inhérent aux psychotropes. Compte tenu des polymédications (hors indications), des posologies élevées et des stupéfiants co-administrés, le risque de mort subite suivant un épisode de torsade de pointe a sensiblement augmenté. Un consensus pour le suivi électrocardiographique devait être établi afin de prévenir une majorité des arythmies fatales iatrogènes suivant un épisode de torsades de pointe prévisible par une prolongation de l’intervalle QTc.