Functional results of osteosynthesis with mini-plate and screws in metacarpal fractures

Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Miniature Plate Osteosynthesis in Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures of Hand: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

 There are several operative modes to address hand fractures to gain better anatomical and functional results including external fixator, percutaneous K-wire fixation, lag screw fixation, tension band wiring, intra-medullary nails or wires, and plate-screw fixation. We evaluated the results of plate osteosynthesis in fractures of metacarpals and phalanges in a prospective manner.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 A total 50 adults (19-60 years) of either sex having 58 fractures managed by miniature plate osteosynthesis and followed for a minimum six months (6-19), including metacarpal and phalangeal fractures (unstable or serial fractures), intra-articular fractures, fracture-dislocation of proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints with joint incongruity or subluxation were enrolled while contaminated compound fractures, pathological fractures and cases of reimplantation were excluded from study. Clinical assessment was done using the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH), total active flexion (TAF), total active range of motion (TAM) score, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (quick DASH) score while sequential radiographs were done at each follow-up.

RESULT

All the fractures had perfect union clinically as well as radiologically with a mean duration of six weeks while functional outcomes in reference to clinical scores were observed excellent and fair in all cases. None of the cases had any loss of reduction, loosening of the implant, or other major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Miniature plate fixation provides enough stability in metacarpal and phalanges fractures, thereby allowing immediate active movements, which leads to excellent functional outcomes and early return to normal activities.

Comprehensive analysis on orthopedic drilling: A state-of-the-art review

Bone drilling is a well-known internal fixation procedure to drill a hole, fixing the bone fragments to reduce the susceptibility of permanent paralysis. The success of bone drilling is evaluated based on the extent of osteonecrosis in terms of heat generation, tissue damage, quality of hole, and drilling forces. The appropriate control of cutting conditions, drill geometric parameters, and bone-specific parameters offer bone drilling a viable solution through conventional and non-conventional drilling techniques. The majority of the published research work considers only limited parameters and tries to optimize the drilling parameters and performance measures. However, bone drilling involves numerous conventional and non-conventional drilling parameters and technologies. In order to develop a better understanding of all the studied parameters and performance measures, there is a dire need to develop a framework. The key objective of this review study is to establish a hierarchy of the framework by collecting almost all the parameters studied until now and addressed the relationship between parameters and performance measures to diminish the controversies in the published literature. Therefore, this framework is novel in nature, organizing all the parameters, performance measures, logical comparisons, and limitations of studies. This holistic review can help medical surgeons and design engineers to understand the complicated relationship among parameters and performance measures associated with this state-of-art technologies. Also, modeling, simulations, and optimization techniques are included to explore the application of such techniques in recent advancements in orthopedic drilling.

The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The overall objective of this study was to determine the patient-level socioeconomic impact resulting from orthopaedic trauma in the available literature. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in December 2019. Studies were eligible for inclusion if more than 75% of the study population sustained an appendicular fracture due to an acute trauma, the mean age was 18 through 65 years, and the study included a socioeconomic outcome, defined as a measure of income, employment status, or educational status. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Pooled estimates of the socioeconomic outcome measures were calculated using random-effects models with inverse variance weighting. Two-hundred-five studies met the eligibility criteria. These studies utilized five different socioeconomic outcomes, including return to work (n = 119), absenteeism days from work (n = 104), productivity loss (n = 11), income loss (n = 11), and new unemployment (n = 10). Pooled estimates for return to work remained relatively consistent across the 6-, 12-, and 24-month timepoint estimates of 58.7%, 67.7%, and 60.9%, respectively. The pooled estimate for mean days absent from work was 102.3 days (95% CI: 94.8-109.8). Thirteen-percent had lost employment at one-year post-injury (95% CI: 4.8-30.7). Tremendous heterogeneity (I2>89%) was observed for all pooled socioeconomic outcomes. These results suggest that orthopaedic injury can have a substantial impact on the patient's socioeconomic well-being, which may negatively affect a person's psychological wellbeing and happiness. However, socioeconomic recovery following injury can be very nuanced, and using only a single socioeconomic outcome yields inherent bias. Informative and accurate socioeconomic outcome assessment requires a multifaceted approach and further standardization.