First-line integrase inhibitors for HIV-prices versus benefits

In Vitro Susceptibility of HIV Isolates with High Growth Capability to Antiretroviral Drugs

It has been considered that reduced susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs is influenced by drug adherence, drug tolerance and drug-resistance-related mutations in the HIV genome. In the present study, we assessed the intrinsic high viral growth capability as a potential viral factor that may influence their susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs using an in vitro model. Phytohemagglutinin-activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (1.5 × 10⁶ cells) were infected with HIV isolates (10⁶ copies/mL). The culture was carried out at different concentrations (0.001-20 μM) of 13 synthetic antiretroviral compounds (six nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, four integrase inhibitors, and two protease inhibitors), and HIV production was assessed using HIV-RNA copies in culture. The 90% inhibitory concentration (IC₉₀) and pharmacokinetics of an antiretroviral agent were used as parameters to determine the reduced antiretroviral drug susceptibility of HIV isolates with high growth capability to synthetic antiretroviral compounds. The high growth capability of HIV isolates without any known drug resistance-related mutation affected their susceptibility to tenofovir (IC₉₀ = 2.05 ± 0.40 μM), lamivudine (IC₉₀ = 6.83 ± 3.96 μM), emtricitabine (IC₉₀ = 0.68 ± 0.37 μM), and efavirenz (IC₉₀ = 3.65 ± 0.77 μM). These antiretroviral drugs showed IC₉₀ values close to or above the maximum plasma concentration against HIV isolates with high growth capability without any known drug resistance-related mutation. Our results may contribute to the development of effective strategies to tailor and individualize antiretroviral therapy in patients harboring HIV isolates with high growth capability.

First-line HIV treatment outcomes following the introduction of integrase inhibitors in UK guidelines

Objective:

To investigate the characteristics and outcomes of people who initiated different antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens during the era of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs).

Design:

UK-based observational cohort study.

Methods:

UK Collaborative HIV Cohort study participants were included if they had started ART between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2017. Virological failure was defined as the first of two consecutive plasma HIV RNA more than 50 copies/ml, at least 6 months after starting ART. Follow-up was censored at ART discontinuation, class switch or death. The risk of virological failure among those on INSTI, protease inhibitor or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) regimens was compared using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods.

Results:

Of 12 585 participants, 45.6% started a NNRTI, 29.0% a protease inhibitor and 25.4% an INSTI regimen. Over a median follow-up of 20.3 months (interquartile range 7.9–38.9), 7.5% of participants experienced virological failure. Compared with those starting an NNRTI regimen, people receiving INSTIs or protease inhibitors were more likely to experience virological failure: INSTI group adjusted hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.19–1.95, P = 0.0009; protease inhibitor group adjusted hazard ratio 2.70, 95% confidence interval 2.27–3.21, P less than 0.0001, likelihood ratio test P less than 0.0001.

Conclusion:

First-line INSTI regimens were associated with a lower risk of virological failure than protease inhibitor regimens but both groups were more likely to experience virological failure than those initiating treatment with a NNRTI. There is likely to be residual channelling bias resulting from selected use of INSTIs and protease inhibitors in specific clinical contexts, including in those with a perceived risk of poor adherence.