Variability in counselling for adrenal insufficiency in COVID-19 and beyond: a survey of rheumatology practice

Diagnosis and management of secondary adrenal crisis

Adrenal crisis (AC) is a life threatening acute adrenal insufficiency (AI) episode which can occur in patients with primary AI but also secondary AI (SAI), tertiary AI (TAI) and iatrogenic AI (IAI). In SAI, TAI and IAI, AC may develop when the HPA axis is unable to mount an adequate glucocorticoid response to severe stress due to pituitary or hypothalamic disruption. It manifests as an acute deterioration in multi-organ homeostasis that, if untreated, leads to shock and death. Despite the availability of effective preventive strategies, its prevalence is increasing in patients with SAI, TAI and IAI due to more frequent exogenous steroid administration, pituitary immune-related effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors and opioid use in pain management. The delayed diagnosis of acute AI which remains infrequently suspected increases the risk of AC. Its main precipitating factors are infections, emotional distress, surgery, cessation or reduction in GC doses, pituitary infarction or surgical cure of endogenous Cushing's syndrome. In patients not known previously to have SAI/TAI/IAI, recognition of its symptoms, signs, and biochemical abnormalities can be challenging and cause delay in proper diagnosis and therapy. Effective therapy of AC is rapid intravenous administration of hydrocortisone (initial bolus of 100 mg followed by 200 mg/24 h as continuous infusion or bolus of 50 mg every 6 h) and 0.9% saline. In diagnosed patients, preventive education in sick-day rules adjustment of glucocorticoid replacement and hydrocortisone parenteral self-administration must be performed repeatedly by trained health care providers. Strategies to improve the adequate preventive education in patients at risk for secondary AI should be promoted in collaboration with various medical specialist societies and patients support associations.

Undiagnosed adrenal insufficiency as a cause of premature death in glucocorticoid users

Objective

It is unknown whether glucocorticoid (GC)-induced adrenal insufficiency may cause premature mortality in GC users. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate if undiagnosed and undertreated GC-induced adrenal insufficiency is a contributor to premature death in GC users.

Methods

Information on dispensed prescriptions in West Sweden from 2007 to 2014 was obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Cause of death was collected from the Swedish Cause of Death Register. Of 223,211 patients who received oral GC prescriptions, 665 died from sepsis within 6 months of their last prescription. Three hundred of these patients who had died in hospital were randomly selected for further investigation. Medical records were initially reviewed by one investigator. Furthermore, two additional investigators reviewed the medical records of patients whose deaths were suspected to be caused by GC-induced adrenal insufficiency.

Results

Of 300 patients (121 females, 40%), 212 (75%) were prescribed GC treatment at admission. The mean age was 76 ± 11 years (range 30-99). Undiagnosed or undertreated GC-induced adrenal insufficiency was considered a probable contributor to death by at least two investigators in 11 (3.7%) patients. In five of these 11 cases, long-term GC therapy was abruptly discontinued during hospitalization. Undiagnosed or undertreated GC-induced adrenal insufficiency was considered a possible contributing factor to death in a further 36 (12%) patients.

Conclusion

GC-induced adrenal insufficiency is an important contributor to premature death in GC users. Awareness of the disorder during intercurrent illness and following cessation of GC treatment is essential.

Measuring the impact of steroid therapy on health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatic diseases: international development of a glucocorticoid treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measure

OBJECTIVES

Glucocorticoids (GCs) ('steroids') are used to treat rheumatic diseases but adverse effects are common. We aimed to explore the impact of GC therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), to inform the development of a treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for use in clinical trials and practice.

METHODS

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients from the UK, USA and Australia, treated for a rheumatic condition with GCs in the last 2 years. Purposive sampling was used to select participants with a range of demographic and disease features. An initial conceptual framework informed interview prompts and cues. Interviews elicited GC-related physical and psychological symptoms and salient aspects of HRQoL in relation to GC therapy. Interview data were analysed inductively to develop initial individual themes and domains. Candidate questionnaire items were developed and refined.

RESULTS

Sixty semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted (UK n = 34, USA n = 10, Australia n = 16). The mean age was 58 years; 39/60 were female; and 18 rheumatic diseases were represented. Some 126 individual themes were identified and organized into six domains: physical symptoms; psychological symptoms; psychological impact of steroids; impact of steroids on participation; impact of steroids on relationships; and benefits of steroids. Candidate questionnaire items were tested and refined by piloting with patient research partners, iterative rounds of cognitive interviews and linguistic translatability assessment, informing a draft questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

We describe an international qualitative study to develop candidate items for a treatment-specific PROM for patients with rheumatic diseases. A future survey will enable the validation of a final version of the PROM.

Quality of Life in Patients with Adrenal Insufficiency

Patients with adrenal insufficiency, despite standard glucocorticoid replacement therapy, continue to experience and report impaired self-perceived health status and quality of life. In this review, we will describe quality of life in this patient population, and summarize the determinants of quality of life, based on previous survey-based studies and clinical trials. In addition, some new emerging data during the still ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic are also reviewed in the present article.

Assessing the Knowledge of Sick-Day Rules Among Patients on Long-Term Glucocorticoids and Healthcare Professionals in a UK District General Hospital

Introduction Adrenal insufficiency can happen because of decreased cortisol production as a result of negative feedback on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, caused by excess exogenous glucocorticoids (GC). The most common cause of adrenal insufficiency is, in fact, abrupt stoppage of exogenous GC. Patients with adrenal insufficiency are at risk of developing life-threatening adrenal crisis if GC is reduced or stopped abruptly, or if GC dose is not increased during periods of increased stress.

The adrenal crises should be preventable with education of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) about “sick-day” rules, the importance of “steroid cards,” and the utility of parenteral steroids.

Methods This study was aimed at assessing the knowledge of sick-day rules in patients on long-term GC as well as HCPs.

Patients aged above 18 years on long-term GC presenting to the endocrinology clinic over 6 weeks were included after audit-committee approval.

Results We assessed 18 consecutive patients in total, 61% (11/18) of whom said that they have received information about sick-day rules from an HCP. Only 38% (7/18) had access to emergency hydrocortisone-kit.

We assessed 36 HCPs. Thirty-six (13/36) percent were aware of steroid emergency card and 50% (18/36) HCPs exhibited awareness regarding steroid dose during acute event and 27% of (10/36) HCPs were aware of accessible hospital intranet resources.

Conclusion This study revealed significant lack of awareness of sick-day rules among patients and HCPs alike. Majority of patients failed to carry steroid emergency card or medic alert bracelet and majority of HCPs and patients lacked knowledge of sick-day rules.

Quality of Life and its Determinants in Patients With Adrenal Insufficiency: A Survey Study at 3 Centers in the United States

CONTEXT

Current evidence on determinants of quality of life (QoL) in patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) is limited.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to identify the determinants of QoL in different subtypes of AI.

METHODS

This multicenter cross-sectional survey study was conducted using a patient-centered questionnaire, the Short Form-36.

RESULTS

Of 529 participants, 223 (42.2%) had primary AI, 190 (35.9%) had secondary AI, and 116 (21.9%) had glucocorticoid-induced AI. Median age was 58 years (interquartile range: 43-68 years) and 342 (64.8%) were women. In multivariable analyses, patients were more likely to report worse physical scores if they were women (odds ratio [OR]: 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8-6.0), had secondary AI or glucocorticoid-induced AI (OR: 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3), had shorter duration of AI (OR: 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.6), were treated with more than 25 mg hydrocortisone equivalent daily (OR: 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.6), had more comorbidities related to glucocorticoid excess (OR: 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.0), reported a higher financial burden from AI (OR: 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.6), and reported difficulties with AI management (OR: 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.2). Women (OR: 2.1; 95% CI, 1.08-4.0), shorter duration of AI (OR: 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3), higher financial burden (OR: 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.0), difficulties with AI management (OR: 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4-4.9), and lack of family support (OR: 9.1; 95% CI, 2.3-33.3) were associated with worse mental component scores.

CONCLUSION

In patients with AI, QoL could be improved by addressing certain determinants, such as avoiding GC overreplacement, providing in-depth education on self-management, offering more comprehensive insurance coverage, and ensuring better family support.

Approach to the Patient With Glucocorticoid-induced Adrenal Insufficiency

Glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency is caused by exogenous glucocorticoid suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and is the most prevalent form of adrenal insufficiency. The condition is important to diagnose given the risk of life-threatening adrenal crisis and impact on patients' quality of life. The diagnosis is made with a stimulation test such as the ACTH test. Until now, testing for glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency has often been based on clinical suspicion rather than routinely but accumulating evidence indicates that a significant number of cases will remain unrecognized. During ongoing oral glucocorticoid treatment or initially after withdrawal, ~50% of patients have adrenal insufficiency, but, outside clinical studies, ≤ 1% of patients have adrenal testing recorded. More than 70% of cases are identified during acute hospital admission, where the diagnosis can easily be missed because symptoms of adrenal insufficiency are nonspecific and overlap those of the underlying and intercurrent conditions. Treatment of severe glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency should follow the principles for treatment of central adrenal insufficiency. The clinical implications and thus indication to treat mild-moderate adrenal deficiency after glucocorticoid withdrawal has not been established. Also, the indication of adding stress dosages of glucocorticoid during ongoing glucocorticoid treatment remains unclear. In patients with established glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency, high rates of poor confidence in self-management and delayed glucocorticoid administration in the acute setting with an imminent adrenal crisis call for improved awareness and education of clinicians and patients. This article reviews different facets of glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency and discusses approaches to the condition in common clinical situations.

EULAR recommendations for the management and vaccination of people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in the context of SARS-CoV-2: the November 2021 update

The first EULAR provisional recommendations on the management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) in the context of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), largely based on expert opinion, were published in June 2020. Since then, an unprecedented number of clinical studies have accrued in the literature. Several SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been approved for population-wide vaccination programmes in EULAR-affiliated countries. Studies regarding vaccination of patients with (inflammatory) RMDs have released their first results or are underway.EULAR found it opportune to carefully review to what extent the initially consensus expert recommendations stood the test of time, by challenging them with the recently accumulated body of scientific evidence, and by incorporating evidence-based advice on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. EULAR started a formal (first) update in January 2021, performed a systematic literature review according to EULAR's standard operating procedures and completed a set of updated overarching principles and recommendations in July 2021. Two points to consider were added in November 2021, because of recent developments pertaining to additional vaccination doses.